Model of chromosome motility in Drosophila embryos: Adaptation of a general mechanism for rapid mitosis

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 90, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 3966-3982

  Civelekoglu Scholey, G ^a   Sharp, D J ^b   Mogilner, A ^a   Scholey, J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAPHASE; ARTICLE; CELL MOTILITY; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; DROSOPHILA; FORCE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; METAPHASE; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN;

EID: 33744944760     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.078691     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. McIntosh, J. R., E. L. Grishchuk, and R. R. West. 2002. Chromosome-microtubule interactions during mitosis. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 18:193-219.
2. Maiato, H., and C. E. Sunkel. 2004. Kinetochore-microtubule interactions during cell division. Chromosome Res. 12:585-597.
3. Kwon, M., and J. M. Scholey. 2004. Spindle mechanics and dynamics during mitosis in Drosophila. Trends Cell Biol. 14:194-205.
4. Rieder, C. L. 1982. The formation, structure, and composition of the mammalian kinetochore and kinetochore fiber. Int. Rev. Cytol. 79:1-58.
5. Maiato, H., J. DeLuca, E. D. Salmon, and W. C. Earnshaw. 2004. The dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface. J. Cell Sci. 117:5461-5477.
6. McDonald, K. L., E. T. O'Toole, D. N. Mastronarde, and J. R. McIntosh. 1992. Kinetochore microtubules in PTK cells. J. Cell Biol. 118:369-383.
7. Mitchison, T., and M. Kirschner. 1984. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature. 312:237-242.
8. Mitchison, T. J. 1989. Polewards microtubule flux in the mitotic spindle: evidence from photoactivation of fluorescence. J. Cell Biol. 109:637-652.
9. Margolis, R. L., and L. Wilson. 1978. Opposite end assembly and disassembly of microtubules at steady state in vitro. Cell. 13:1-8.
10. Skibbens, R. V., V. P. Skeen, and E. D. Salmon. 1993. Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: a push-pull mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 122:859-875.
11. Mitchison, T. J., and E. D. Salmon. 2001. Mitosis: a history of division. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:E17-E21.
12. LaFountain, J. R., Jr., C. S. Cohan, A. J. Siegel, and D. J. LaFountain. 2004. Direct visualization of microtubule flux during metaphase and anaphase in crane-fly spermatocytes. Mol. Biol. Cell. 15:5724-5732.
13. Maddox, P., A. Straight, P. Coughlin, T. J. Mitchison, and E. D. Salmon. 2003. Direct observation of microtubule dynamics at kinetochores in Xenopus extract spindles: implications for spindle mechanics. J. Cell Biol. 162:377-382.
14. Brust-Mascher, I., and J. M. Scholey. 2002. Microtubule flux and sliding in mitotic spindles of Drosophila embryos. Mol. Biol. Cell. 13:3967-3975.
15. Maddox, P., A. Desai, K. Oegema, T. J. Mitchison, and E. D. Salmon. 2002. Poleward microtubule flux is a major component of spindle dynamics and anaphase a in mitotic Drosophila embryos. Curr. Biol. 12:1670-1674.
16. Pearson, C. G., P. S. Maddox, E. D. Salmon, and K. Bloom. 2001. Budding yeast chromosome structure and dynamics during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 152:1255-1266.
17. He, X., D. R. Rines, C. W. Espelin, and P. K. Sorger. 2001. Molecular analysis of kinetochore-microtubule attachment in budding yeast. Cell. 106:195-206.
18. Rogers, G. C., S. L. Rogers, T. A. Schwimmer, S. C. Ems-McClung, C. E. Walczak, R. D. Vale, J. M. Scholey, and D. J. Sharp. 2004. Two mitotic kinesins cooperate to drive sister chromatid separation during anaphase. Nature. 427:364-370.
19. Mitchison, T. J., and E. D. Salmon. 1992. Poleward kinetochore fiber movement occurs during both metaphase and anaphase-A in newt lung cell mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 119:569-582.
20. Sharp, D. J., G. C. Rogers, and J. M. Scholey. 2000. Cytoplasmic dynein is required for poleward chromosome movement during mitosis in Drosophila embryos. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:922-930.
21. Brust-Mascher, I., G. Civelekoglu-Scholey, M. Kwon, A. Mogilner, and J. M. Scholey. 2004. Model for anaphase B: role of three mitotic motors in a switch from poleward flux to spindle elongation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:15938-15943.
22. Lawrence, C. J., R. K. Dawe, K. R. Christie, D. W. Cleveland, S. C. Dawson, S. A. Endow, L. S. Goldstein, H. V. Goodson, N. Hirokawa, J. Howard, R. L. Malmberg, J. R. McIntosh, H. Miki, T. J. Mitchison, Y. Okada, A. S. Reddy, W. M. Saxton, M. Schliwa, J. M. Scholey, R. D. Vale, C. E. Walczak, and L. Wordeman. 2004. A standardized kinesin nomenclature. J. Cell Biol. 167:19-22.
23. Yucel, J. K., J. D. Marszalek, J. R. McIntosh, L. S. Goldstein, D. W. Cleveland, and A. V. Philp. 2000. CENP-meta, an essential kinetochore kinesin required for the maintenance of metaphase chromosome alignment in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 150:1-11.
24. Molina, I., S. Baars, J. A. Brill, K. G. Hales, M. T. Fuller, and P. Ripoll. 1997. A chromatin-associated kinesin-related protein required for normal mitotic chromosome segregation in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 139:1361-1371.
25. Rieder, C. L., and E. D. Salmon. 1998. The vertebrate cell kinetochore and its roles during mitosis. Trends Cell Biol. 8:310-318.
26. Mitchison, T. J., P. Maddox, J. Gaetz, A. Groen, M. Shirasu, A. Desai, E. D. Salmon, and T. M. Kapoor. 2005. Roles of polymerization dynamics, opposed motors, and a tensile element in governing the length of Xenopus extract meiotic spindles. Mol. Biol. Cell. 16:3064-3076.
27. Ganem, N. J., K. Upton, and D. A. Compton. 2005. Efficient mitosis in human cells lacking poleward microtubule flux. Curr. Biol. 15:1827-1832.
28. Zhu, C., J. Zhao, M. Bibikova, J. D. Leverson, E. Bossy-Wetzel, J. B. Fan, R. T. Abraham, and W. Jiang. 2005. Functional analysis of human microtubule-based motor proteins, the kinesins and dyneins, in mitosis/cytokinesis using RNA interference. Mol. Biol. Cell. 16:3187-3199.
29. Sproul, L. R., D. J. Anderson, A. T. Mackey, W. S. Saunders, and S. P. Gilbert. 2005. Cik1 targets the minus-end kinesin depolymerase kar3 to microtubule plus ends. Curr. Biol. 15:1420-1427.
30. Encalada, S. E., J. Willis, R. Lyczak, and B. Bowerman. 2005. A spindle checkpoint functions during mitosis in the early Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. Mol. Biol. Cell. 16:1056-1070.
31. Karess, R. 2005. Rod-Zw10-Zwilch: a key player in the spindle checkpoint. Trends Cell Biol. 15:386-392.
32. Howell, B. J., B. F. McEwen, J. C. Canman, D. B. Hoffman, E. M. Farrar, C. L. Rieder, and E. D. Salmon. 2001. Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation. J. Cell Biol. 155:1159-1172.
33. Cimini, D., L. A. Cameron, and E. D. Salmon. 2004. Anaphase spindle mechanics prevent mis-segregation of merotelically oriented chromosomes. Curr. Biol. 14:2149-2155.
34. Joglekar, A. P., and A. J. Hunt. 2002. A simple, mechanistic model for directional instability during mitotic chromosome movements. Biophys. J. 83:42-58.
35. Gardner, M. K., C. G. Pearson, B. L. Sprague, T. R. Zarzar, K. Bloom, E. D. Salmon, and D. J. Odde. 2005. Tension-dependent regulation of microtubule dynamics at kinetochores can explain metaphase congression in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell. 16:3764-3775.
36. Sprague, B. L., C. G. Pearson, P. S. Maddox, K. S. Bloom, E. D. Salmon, and D. J. Odde. 2003. Mechanisms of microtubule-based kinetochore positioning in the yeast metaphase spindle. Biophys. J. 84:3529-3546.
37. Hill, T. L. 1985. Theoretical problems related to the attachment of microtubules to kinetochores. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 82:4404-4408.
38. Inoue, S., and E. D. Salmon. 1995. Force generation by microtubule assembly/disassembly in mitosis and related movements. Mol. Biol. Cell. 6:1619-1640.
39. Svoboda, K., and S. M. Block. 1994. Force and velocity measured for single kinesin molecules. Cell. 77:773-784.
40. Mallik, R., B. C. Carter, S. A. Lex, S. J. King, and S. P. Gross. 2004. Cytoplasmic dynein functions as a gear in response to load. Nature. 427:649-652.
41. Singh, M. P., R. Mallik, S. P. Gross, and C. C. Yu. 2005. Monte Carlo modeling of single-molecule cytoplasmic dynein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:12059-12064.
42. Marshall, W. F., J. F. Marko, D. A. Agard, and J. W. Sedat. 2001. Chromosome elasticity and mitotic polar ejection force measured in living Drosophila embryos by four-dimensional microscopy-based motion analysis. Curr. Biol. 11:569-578.
43. Howard, J. 2001. Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
44. Mennella, V., G. C. Rogers, S. L. Rogers, D. W. Buster, R. D. Vale, and D. J. Sharp. 2005. Functionally distinct kinesin-13 family members cooperate to regulate microtubule dynamics during interphase. Nat. Cell Biol. 7:235-245.
45. Janson, M. E., M. E. de Dood, and M. Dogterom. 2003. Dynamic instability of microtubules is regulated by force. J. Cell Biol. 161:1029-1034.
46. King, J. M., and R. B. Nicklas. 2000. Tension on chromosomes increases the number of kinetochore microtubules but only within limits. J. Cell Sci. 113:3815-3823.
47. Salmon, E. D. 2005. Microtubules: a ring for the depolymerization motor. Curr. Biol. 15:R299-R302.
48. Winey, M., C. L. Mamay, E. T. O'Toole, D. N. Mastronarde, T. H. Giddings Jr., K. L. McDonald, and J. R. McIntosh. 1995. Three-dimensional ultrastructural analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 129:1601-1615.
49. Zhai, Y., P. J. Kronebusch, and G. G. Borisy. 1995. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and the metaphase-anaphase transition. J. Cell Biol. 131:721-734.
50. Waters, J. C., R. V. Skibbens, and E. D. Salmon. 1996. Oscillating mitotic newt lung cell kinetochores are, on average, under tension and rarely push. J. Cell Sci. 109:2823-2831.
51. Scholey, J. M., G. C. Rogers, and D. J. Sharp. 2001. Mitosis, microtubules, and the matrix. J. Cell Biol. 154:261-266.
52. Palmer, R. E., M. Koval, and D. Koshland. 1989. The dynamics of chromosome movement in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 109:3355-3366.
53. Chen, W., and D. Zhang. 2004. Kinetochore fibre dynamics outside the context of the spindle during anaphase. Nat. Cell Biol. 6:227-231.
54. Desai, A., P. S. Maddox, T. J. Mitchison, and E. D. Salmon. 1998. Anaphase A chromosome movement and poleward spindle microtubule flux occur at similar rates in Xenopus extract spindles. J. Cell Biol. 141:703-713.
55. Maddox, P. S., K. S. Bloom, and E. D. Salmon. 2000. The polarity and dynamics of microtubule assembly in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:36-41.
56. Maddox, P. S., J. K. Stemple, L. Satterwhite, E. D. Salmon, and K. Bloom. 2003. The minus end-directed motor Kar3 is required for coupling dynamic microtubule plus ends to the cortical shmoo tip in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 13:1423-1428.
57. Kline-Smith, S. L., A. Khodjakov, P. Hergert, and C. E. Walczak. 2004. Depletion of centromeric MCAK leads to chromosome congression and segregation defects due to improper kinetochore attachments. Mol. Biol. Cell. 15:1146-1159.
58. Rogers, S. L., G. C. Rogers, D. J. Sharp, and R. D. Vale. 2002. Drosophila EB1 is important for proper assembly, dynamics, and positioning of the mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 158:873-884.
59. Kaplan, K. B., A. A. Burds, J. R. Swedlow, S. S. Bekir, P. K. Sorger, and I. S. Nathke. 2001. A role for the Adenomatous polyposis coli protein in chromosome segregation. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:429-432.
60. Rieder, C. L. 2005. Kinetochore fiber formation in animal somatic cells: dueling mechanisms come to a draw. Chromosoma. 114:310-318.
61. Wollman, R., E. N. Cytrynbaum, J. T. Jones, T. Meyer, J. M. Scholey, and A. Mogilner. 2005. Efficient chromosome capture requires a bias in the 'search-and-capture' process during mitotic-spindle assembly. Curr. Biol. 15:828-832.
62. Howard, J., and A. A. Hyman. 2003. Dynamics and mechanics of the microtubule plus end. Nature. 422:753-758.
63. Koshland, D. E., T. J. Mitchison, and M. W. Kirschner. 1988. Polewards chromosome movement driven by microtubule depolymerization in vitro. Nature. 331:499-504.
64. Andrews, P. D., Y. Ovechkina, N. Morrice, M. Wagenbach, K. Duncan, L. Wordeman, and J. R. Swedlow. 2004. Aurora B regulates MCAK at the mitotic centromere. Dev. Cell. 6:253-268.
65. Westermann, S., A. Avila-Sakar, H. W. Wang, H. Niederstrasser, J. Wong, D. G. Drubin, E. Nogales, and G. Barnes. 2005. Formation of a dynamic kinetochore- microtubule interface through assembly of the Dam1 ring complex. Mol. Cell. 17:277-290.
66. Molodtsov, M. I., E. L. Grishchuk, A. K. Efremov, J. R. McIntosh, and F. I. Ataullakhanov. 2005. Force production by depolymerizing microtubules: a theoretical study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:4353-4358.
67. McIntosh, J. R. 2005. Rings around kinetochore microtubules in yeast. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12:210-212.
68. Fall, C. P., E. Marland, J. Tyson, and J. Wagner, editors. 2002. Computational Cell Biology. Springer, New York.
69. Schnitzer, M. J., K. Visscher, and S. M. Block. 2000. Force production by single kinesin motors. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:718-723.
70. Wood, K. W., R. Sakowicz, L. S. Goldstein, and D. W. Cleveland. 1997. CENP-E is a plus end-directed kinetochore motor required for metaphase chromosome alignment. Cell. 91:357-366.
71. Rusan, N. M., U. S. Tulu, C. Fagerstrom, and P. Wadsworth. 2002. Reorganization of the microtubule array in prophase/prometaphase requires cytoplasmic dynein-dependent microtubule transport. J. Cell Biol. 158:997-1003.
72. Nicklas, R. B., and D. F. Kubai. 1985. Microtubules, chromosome movement, and reorientation after chromosomes are detached from the spindle by micromanipulation. Chromosoma. 92:313-324.
73. Wadsworth, P., and E. D. Salmon. 1986. Microtubule dynamics in mitotic spindles of living cells. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 466:580-592.
74. Rieder, C. L., and R. Hard. 1990. Newt lung epithelial cells: cultivation, use, and advantages for biomedical research. Int. Rev. Cytol. 122:153-220.
75. Cassimeris, L., S. Inoue, and E. D. Salmon. 1988. Microtubule dynamics in the chromosomal spindle fiber: analysis by fluorescence and high-resolution polarization microscopy. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 10:185-196.