A history of social psychological research on gender

Handbook of the History of Social Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 475-497

  Biernat, Monica ^a   Deaux, Kay ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873947333     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203808498-31     Document Type: Chapter

References (230)

1. Abramson, P. R., Goldberg, P. A., Greenberg, J. H., & Abramson, L. M. (1977). The talking platypus phenomenon: Competency ratings as a function of sex and professional status. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2, 114-124.
2. Adams, G., Garcia, D. M., Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Steele, C. M. (2006). The detrimental effects of a suggestion of sexism in an instruction situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 602-615.
3. Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Oxford, UK: Addison-Wesley.
4. Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
5. Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291-322.
6. Aristotle (c. 350 BCE). The history of animals (10 Vols.), Book IX. London, UK: Henry G. Bohn, 1862.
7. Ashmore, R. D., & Del Boca, F. K. (1979). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory: Toward a cognitive-social psychological conceptualization. Sex Roles, 5, 219-248.
8. Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
9. Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1995). Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 181-198.
10. Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power → sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768-781.
11. Bartol, K. M., & Manhardt, P. J. (1979). Sex differences in job outcome preferences: Trends among newly hired college graduates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 477-482.
12. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing. New York, NY: Basic Books.
13. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.
14. Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354-364.
15. Berger, J. J., Fizek, H., Norman, R. Z., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction. New York, NY: Elsevier.
16. Bettencourt, B. A., & Miller, N. (1996). Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 422-447.
17. Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191-228.
18. Biernat, M. (2003). Toward a broader view of social stereotyping. American Psychologist, 58, 1019-1027.
19. Biernat, M., & Fuegen, K., & Kobrynowicz, D. (2010). Shifting standards and the inference of incompetence: Effects of formal and informal evaluation tools. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 855-868.
20. Biernat, M., Manis, M., & Nelson, T. E. (1991). Stereotypes and standards of judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 485-499.
21. Biernat, M., & Vescio, T. K. (2002). She swings, she hits, she’s great, she’s benched: Implications of gender-based shifting standards for judgment and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 66-77.
22. Bosak, J., Sczesny, S., & Eagly, A. H. (2008). Communion and agency judgments of women and men as a function of role information and response format. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1148-1155.
23. Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L. C., & Lai, L. (2007). Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103 (1), 84-103.
24. Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2006). Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91 (5), 998-1012.
25. Brown, R. P., & Josephs, R. A. (1999). A burden of proof: Stereotype relevance and gender differences in math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 246-257.
26. Callahan-Levy, C. M., & Messé, L. A. (1979). Sex differences in the allocation of pay. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 433-446.
27. Carli, L. (2001). Gender and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 725-741.
28. Carpenter, S., & Trentham, S. (1998). Subtypes of women and men: A new taxonomy and an exploratory categorical analysis. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 679-696.
29. Carpenter, S., & Trentham, S. (2001). Should we take “gender” out of gender subtypes? The effects of gender, evaluative valence, and context on the organization of person subtypes. Sex Roles, 45, 455-480.
30. Ceci, V., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2009). Women’s underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 218-261.
31. Cherry, F., & Deaux, K. (1978). Fear of success versus fear of gender inappropriate behavior. Sex Roles, 4, 97-101.
32. Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 97, 1045-1060.
33. Chesler, P., & Goodman, E. J. (1976). Women, money and power. New York, NY: Morrow.
34. Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity-femininity: An exception to a famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 80, 389-407.
35. Correll, S. J. (2004). Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. American Sociological Review, 69, 93-113.
36. Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1297-1338.
37. Crandall, V. C. (1967). Achievement behavior in young children. In W. W. Hartup & N. L. Smothergill (Eds.), The young child: Reviews of research (pp. 165-185). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
38. Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
39. Crosby, F. J. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
40. Crosby, F. J. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371-386.
41. Crosby, F. J. (1993). Why complain? Journal of Social Issues, 49, 169-184.
42. Crosby, F. J., Biernat, M., & Williams, J. (2004). The maternal wall: Introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 675-682.
43. Crosby, F., Clayton, S., Alksnis, O., & Hemker, K. (1986). Cognitive biases in the perception of discrimination: The importance of format. Sex Roles, 14, 637-646.
44. Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5-37.
45. Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 701-718.
46. Deaux, K. (1976). The behavior of women and men. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
47. Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade’s research on gender. American Psychologist, 39, 105-116.
48. Deaux, K. (1985). Sex and gender. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 49-81.
49. Deaux, K., & Emswiller, T. (1974). Explanations for successful performance on sex-linked tasks: What is skill for the male is luck for the female. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 80-85.
50. Deaux, K., & LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 788-827). New York, NY: Random House.
51. Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369-389.
52. Deaux, K., & Taynor, J. (1973). Evaluation of male and female ability: Bias works two ways. Psychological Reports, 32, 261-262.
53. Deaux, K., & Ullman, J. C. (1983). Women of steel. New York, NY: Praeger.
54. Diamond, S. (1955). Sex stereotypes and acceptance of sex role. Journal of Psychology, 39, 385-388.
55. Dipboye, R. L., Arvey, R. D., & Terpstra, D. E. (1977). Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resume evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 288-294.
56. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
57. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.
58. Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 283-308.
59. Eagly, A. H., & Diekman, A. B. (2005). What is the problem? Prejudice as an attitude-in-context. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Click, & L. A. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 19-35). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
60. Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569-591.
61. Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.
62. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.
63. Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125-145.
64. Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.
65. Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543-558.
66. Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735-754.
67. Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 309-330.
68. Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievementrelated choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585-609.
69. Eccles (Parsons), J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., et al. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75-146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
70. Eckes, T. (1994). Explorations in gender cognition: Content and structure of female and male subtypes. Social Cognition, 12, 37-60.
71. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161-186.
72. Ellis, L. J., & Bentler, P. M. (1973). Traditional sex-determined role standards and sex stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 28-34.
73. Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 103-127.
74. Epstein, C. F. (1988). Deceptive distinctions: Sex, gender, and the social order. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press and New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
75. Exline, J. J., & Lobell, M. (1999). The perils of outperformance: Sensitivity about being the target of a threatening upward comparison. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 307-337.
76. Fausto-Sterling, A. (1985). Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men. New York, NY: Basic Books. Revised edition 1992.
77. Federal Glass Ceiling Commission. (1995). Good for business: Making full use of the nation’s human capital: The environmental scan: A fact-finding report of the Federal Glass Ceiling Commission. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
78. Fiske, S. T., Bersoff, D. N., Borgida, E., Deaux, K., & Heilman, M. E. (1991). Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins. American Psychologist, 46, 1049-1060.
79. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
80. Fitzgerald, L. F., Gelfand, M. J., & Drasgow, F. (1995). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 17, 425-445.
81. Foschi, M. (2000). Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 21-42.
82. Frable, D. E. S. (1997). Gender, racial, ethnic, sexual, and class identities. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 139-161.
83. Fuegen, K., Biernat, M., Haines, E., & Deaux, K. (2004). Mothers and fathers in the workplace: How gender and parental status influence judgments of job-related competence. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 737-754.
84. Garcia, D. M., Reser, A., Amo, R. B., Redersdorff, S., & Branscombe, N. R. (2005). Perceivers’ responses to in-group and out-group members who blame a negative outcome on discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 769-780.
85. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
86. Ginther, D. K. (2006). The economics of gender differences in employment outcomes in academia. Biological, social, and organizational components of success for women in science and engineering: Workshop Report. (Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering) (pp. 99-112). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
87. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
88. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118.
89. Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763-775.
90. Goldberg, P. (1968). Are women prejudiced against women? Transaction, 5, 28-30.
91. Goodenough, F. L. (1927). The consistency of sex differences in mental traits at various ages. Psychological Review, 34, 440-462.
92. Gray, J. (1992). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus: A practical guide for improving communication and getting what you want in your relationships. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
93. Green, R. J., Ashmore, R. D., & Manzi, R., Jr. (2005). The structure of gender type perception: Testing the elaboration, encapsulation, and evaluation framework. Social Cognition, 23, 429-464.
94. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
95. Greenwald, A., Poehlman, T., Uhlmann, E., & Banaji, M. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17-41.
96. Gutek, B. A. (1985). Sex and the workplace: Impact of sexual behavior and harassment on women, men, and organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
97. Gutek, B. A., & Done, R. S. (2001). Sexual harassment. In R. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 367-387). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
98. Haig, D. (2004). The inexorable rise of gender and the decline of sex: Social change in academic titles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 87-96.
99. Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. G., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 1-51.
100. Harlan, S. L., & O’Farrell, B. (1982). After the pioneers: Prospects for women in nontraditional blue-collar jobs. Work & Occupations, 9, 363-386.
101. Haslam, S. A., & Ryan, M. K. (2008). The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 530-546.
102. Hegarty, P., & Buechel, C. (2006). Androcentric reporting of gender differences in APA articles, 1965-2004. Review of General Psychology, 10, 377-389.
103. Hegarty, P., & Pratto, F. (2010). Interpreting and communicating the results of gender-related research. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary, Handbook of gender research in psychology. New York, NY: Springer.
104. Heilman, M. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 269-298.
105. Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Averting penalties for women’s success: Rectifying the perceived communality deficiency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 81-92.
106. Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416-427.
107. Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. AAUW. Available online at www.aauw.org
108. Hitlan, R. T., Pryor, J. B., Hesson-McInnis, M. S., & Olson, M. (2009). Antecedents of gender harassment: An analysis of person and situation factors. Sex Roles, 61, 794-807.
109. Hoffman, L. W. (1972). Early childhood experiences and women’s achievement motives. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 129-155.
110. Hollingworth, L. S. (1918). Comparison of the sexes in mental traits. Psychological Bulletin, 15, 427-432.
111. Hopkins v. Price Waterhouse, 618 F. Supp. 1109 (D. D.C. 1985).
112. Hopkins v. Price Waterhouse, No. 84-3040, slip op. (D. D.C. May 14, 1990).
113. Horner, M. S. (1972). Toward an understanding of achievement-related conflicts in women. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 157-175.
114. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581-592.
115. Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A., & Williams, C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494-495.
116. Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53-69.
117. Hymowitz, C., & Schellhardt, T. D. (1986, March 24). The glass ceiling: Why women can’t seem to break the invisible barrier that blocks them from top jobs. The Wall Street Journal, Section 4, 10-40.
118. Inzlicht, M., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11, 365-371.
119. Johns, M., Schmader, T., & Martens, A. (2005). Knowing is half the battle: Teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women’s math performance. Psychological Science, 16, 175-179.
120. Josephs, R. A., Markus, H. R., & Tafarodi, R. W. (1992). Gender and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 391-402.
121. Jung, C. G. (1933/1962). Modern man in search of a soul (W. S. Dell & C. F. Baynes, trans.). New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and World. (Original work published 1933.)
122. Jussim, L., Cain, T. R., Crawford, J. C., Harber, K., Cohen, F., & Nelson, T. (2009). The unbearable accuracy of stereotypes. H andbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 199-227). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
123. Jussim, L., Coleman, L. M., & Lerch, L. (1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 536-546.
124. Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T. (2001). Stop complaining: The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 254-263.
125. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
126. Kite, M. E., & Deaux, K. (1987). Gender belief systems: Homosexuality and the implicit inversion theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 83-96.
127. Kite, M. E., Deaux, K., & Haines, E. L. (2008). Gender stereotypes. In F. Denmark & M. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories (2nd ed., pp. 205-236). Westport, CT: Praeger.
128. Kling, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristairki, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes Masculine? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 470-500.
129. Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristarki, T. (2011). Are leader streotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 616-642.
130. Kunda, Z., & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284-308.
131. Lerner, M. J. (1981). Justice motive in human relations: Some thoughts on what we know and need to know about justice. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), Justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change (pp. 11-35). New York, NY: Plenum.
132. Levine, A., & Crumrine, J. (1973). Women and the fear of success: A problem in replication. American Journal of Sociology, 4, 964-974.
133. Linn, M. C., & Hyde, J. S. (1989). Gender, mathematics and science. Educational Researcher, 18, 17-19.
134. Lipman-Blumen, J., Handley-Isaksen, A., & Leavitt, H. J. (1983). Achieving styles in men and women: A model, an instrument, and some findings. In J. T. Spence & R. L. Helmreich (Eds.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 147-204). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
135. Locksley, A., Borgida, E., Brekke, N., & Hepburn, C. (1980). Sex stereotypes and social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 821-831.
136. Lyness, K. S., & Heilman, M. E. (2006). When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 777-785.
137. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
138. Major, B., Barr, L., Zubek, J., & Babey, S. H. (1999). Gender and selfesteem: A meta-analysis. In W. B. Swann, J. H. Langlois, & L. A. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 223-253). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
139. Major, B., Kaiser, C. R., & McCoy, S. K. (2003). It’s not my fault: When and why attributions to prejudice protect well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 772-781.
140. Major, B., McFarlin, D., & Gagnon, D. (1984). Overworked and underpaid: On the nature of gender differences in personal entitlement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 (6), 1399-1412.
141. Major, B., & Sawyer, P. J. (2009). Attributions to discrimination: Antecedents and consequences. In T. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 89-110). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
142. Marano, H. E. (2002). The fear of success. Psychology Today. Available online at www.psychologytoday.com
143. Mason, M. A., & Goulden, M. (2004). Marriage and baby blues: Redefining gender equity in the academy. Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 596, 86-103.
144. McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York, NY: Appleton.
145. McKenzie-Mohr, D., & Zanna, M. (1990). Treating women as sexual objects: Look to the (gender schematic) male who has viewed pornography. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 296-308.
146. Mead, M. (1949). Male and female: A study of the sexes in a changing world. Oxford, UK: William Morrow.
147. Mednick, M. T. S., & Weissman, H. J. (1975). The psychology of women-Selected topics. Annual Review of Psychology, 26, 1-18.
148. Mendoza-Denton, R., Park, S. H., & O’Connor, A. (2008). Gender stereotypes as situation-behavior profiles. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 971-982.
149. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986).
150. Miles, C. (1935). Sex in social psychology. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 683-797). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
151. Money, J. (1955). Hermaphroditism, gender and precocity in hyperadrenocorticism: Psychologic findings. Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital, 96, 253-264.
152. Murphy, M. C., Steele, C., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18 (10), 879-885.
153. Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
154. Nadler, E. B., & Morrow, W. R. (1959). Authoritarian attitudes toward women and their correlates. Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 113-123.
155. National Science Foundation (2004). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in sciences and engineering: 2004. NSF 00-327. Arlington, VA: NSF.
156. Nguyen, H. H., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1314-1334.
157. Nisbett, R. E. (2009). Intelligence and how to get it: Why schools and cultures count. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
158. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002a). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 101-115.
159. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002b). Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 44-59.
160. O’Leary, V. E. (1974). Some attitudinal barriers to occupational aspirations in women. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 809-826.
161. Olson, J. M., Roese, N. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1996). Expectancies. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 211-238). New York, NY: Guilford.
162. Parsons, T. (1940). An analytical approach to the theory of social stratification. American Journal of Sociology, 45, 841-862.
163. Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family, socialization and interaction processes. New York, NY: The Free Press.
164. Post, D. L. (1980). Floyd H. Allport and the launching of modern social psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16, 369-376.
165. Pryor, J. B., Giedd, J. L., & Williams, K. B. (1995). A social psychological model for predicting sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 69-84.
166. Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377-391.
167. Quinn, D. M., & Spencer, S. J. (2001). The interference of stereotype threat with women’s generation of mathematical problem-solving strategies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 55-71.
168. Ridgeway, C. L., & Bourg, C. (2004). Gender as status: An expectation states theory approach. In A. H. Eagly, A. Beall, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (2nd ed., pp. 217-241). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
169. Ridgeway, C., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Motherhood as a status characteristic. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 683-700.
170. Rosenberg, R. (1982). Beyond separate spheres: Intellectual roots of modern feminism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
171. Rosenkrantz, P., Vogel, S., Bee, H., Broverman, I., & Broverman, D. M. (1968). Sex-role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32, 287-295.
172. Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629-645.
173. Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157-176.
174. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57 (4), 743-762.
175. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
176. Rudman, L. A., & Goodwin, S. A. (2004). Gender differences in automatic ingroup bias: Why do women like women more than men like men? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 494-509.
177. Rudman, L. A., Greenwald, A. G., & McGhee, D. E. (2001). Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and ingroup share desirable traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1164-1178.
178. Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). The glass cliff: evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management, 16, 81-90.
179. Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2007). The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding women’s appointment to precarious leadership positions. Academy of Management Review, 32, 549-572.
180. Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., & Kulich, C. (2010). Politics and the glass cliff: Evidence that women are preferentially selected to contest hard-to-win seats. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 56-64.
181. Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675-688.
182. Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2002). The meaning and consequences of perceived discrimination in disadvantaged and privileged social groups. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 167-199.
183. Schneider, D. J. (2004). The psychology of stereotyping. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
184. Schuler, R. S. (1975). Sex, organizational level, and outcome importance: Where the differences are. Personnel Psychology, 28, 365-375.
185. Sczesny, S. (2003). A closer look beneath the surface: Various facets of the think-manager-think-male stereotype. Sex Roles, 49, 353-363.
186. Sesko, A. K., & Biernat, M. (2010). Prototypes of race and gender: The invisibility of Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 356-360.
187. Sheilds, S. A. (1975). Functionalism, Darwinism, and the psychology of women: A study in social myth. American Psychologist, 30, 739-754.
188. Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80-83.
189. Spearman, C. (1923). The nature of intelligence. Oxford, UK: Macmillan.
190. Spence, J. T. (1985). Gender identification and its implications for the concepts of masculinity and femininity. In T. Sondregger (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on Motivation and Achievement. Vol. 32: Psychology and gender (pp. 59-95). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
191. Spence, J. T. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 624-635.
192. Spence, J. T., & Buckner, C. E. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 44-62.
193. Spence, J. T., Deaux, K., & Helmreich, R. (1985). Sex roles in contemporary American society. In E. Aronson & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 149-178). New York, NY: Random House.
194. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1972). The Attitudes toward Women Scale: An objective instrument to measure attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary society. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 66.
195. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity & femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
196. Spence, J. T., & Helmrich, R. L. (1980). Masculine instrumentality and feminine expressiveness: Their relationships with sex role attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 147-163.
197. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1983). Achievement-related motives and behavior. In J. T. Spence & R. L. Helmreich (Eds.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 10-74). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
198. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-feminity. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43 (Ms. No. 617).
199. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1973). A short version of the Attitudes Toward Women Scale (AWS). Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 219-220.
200. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4-28.
201. Stangor, C., Swim, J. K., Sechrist, G. B., DeCoster, J., Van Allen, K. L., & Ottenbeit, A. (2003). Ask, answer and announce: Three stages in perceiving and responding to discrimination. In W. Stroebe, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (pp. 277-311). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
202. Steele, C. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.
203. Steele, C. M. (2010). Whistling Vivaldi and other clues to how stereotypes affect us. New York, NY: Norton.
204. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811.
205. Stein, A. H., & Bailey, M. M. (1973). The socialization of achievement orientation in females. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 345-366.
206. Steinpreis, R. E., Anders, K. A., & Ritzke, D. (1999). The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex Roles, 41, 509-528.
207. Stewart, A. J., & McDermott, C. (2004). Gender in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 519-544.
208. Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199-214.
209. Swim, J. K., & Cohen, L. L. (1997). Overt, covert, and subtle sexism: A comparison between the Attitudes Toward Women and modern sexism scales. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21 (1), 103-118.
210. Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. L. (1999). Excuse me - what did you just say?! Women’s public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68-88.
211. Taylor, D. M., Wright, S. C., Moghaddam, D. M., & Lalonde, R. N. (1990). The personal/group discrimination discrepancy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 254-262.
212. Terman, L. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
213. Terman, L. M., & Miles, C. C. (1936). Sex and personality: Studies in masculinity and femininity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
214. Thorndike, E. L. (1914). The influence of sex. Mental work and fatigue and individual differences and their causes. Educational psychology (pp. 169-205). New York, NY: Teachers College.
215. Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & Joly, S. (1995). Neo-sexism: Plus ça change, plus c’est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842-849.
216. Tresemer, D. (1976). Do women fear success? Signs, 1, 863-874.
217. Unger, R. K. (1979). Toward a redefinition of sex and gender. American Psychologist, 34, 1085-1094.
218. Unger, R. K. (1998). Resisting gender: Twenty-five years of feminist psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
219. US Department of Labor. (2008a). Quick facts on non-traditional occupations for women. Available online at www.dol.gov
220. US Department of Labor, (2008b). Quick stats on women workers, 2008. Available online at www.dol.gov
221. US Department of Labor (2009). Labor force statistics from the current population survey: Women in the labor force: A databook (2009 ed.). Available online at www.bls.gov
222. Veroff, J., Wilcox, S., & Atkinson, J. W. (1953). The achievement motive in high school and college age women. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 108-119.
223. Vescio, T. K., Gervais, S. J., Snyder, M., & Hoover, A. (2005). Power and the creation of patronizing environments: The stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 658-672.
224. Wiener, R. L., Reiter-Palmon, R., Winter, R. J., Richter, E., Humke, A., & Maeder, E. (2010). Complainant behavioral tone, ambivalent sexism, and perceptions of sexual harassment. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 56-84.
225. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
226. Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2010). Gender. In S. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 629-667). New York, NY: Wiley.
227. Woodzicka, J. A., & LaFrance, M. (2005). The effects of subtle sexual harassment on women’s performance in a job interview. Sex Roles, 53, 67-77.
228. Woolley, H. T. (1910). A review of the recent literature on the psychology of sex. Psychological Bulletin, 7, 335-342.
229. Yoder, J. D., & Schleicher, T. L. (1996). Undergraduates regard deviation from occupational gender stereotypes as costly for women. Sex Roles, 34, 171-188.
230. Zuckerman, M., & Wheeler, L. (1975). To dispel fantasies about the fantasy-based measure of fear of success. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 932-946.