Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 79, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 763-775

  Glick, Peter ^c   Fiske, Susan T ^d   Mladinic, Antonio ^d   Saiz, José L ^d   Abrams, Dominic ^a   Masser, Barbara ^a   Adetoun, Bolanle ^d   Osagie, Johnstone E ^d   Akande, Adebowale ^d   Alao, Amos ^d   Brunner, Annetje ^d   Willemsen, Tineke M ^d   Chipeta, Kettie ^d   Dardenne, Benoit ^d   Dijksterhuis, Ap ^d   Wigboldus, Daniel ^d   Eckes, Thomas ^d   Six Materna, Iris ^d   Expósito, Francisca ^d   Moya, Miguel ^d   Foddy, Margaret ^d   Kim, Hyun Jeong ^d   Lameiras, Maria ^d   Sotelo, Maria José ^d   Mucchi Faina, Angelica ^d   Romani, Myrna ^d   Sakalli, Nuray ^d   Udegbe, Bola ^d   Yamamoto, Mariko ^d   Ui, Miyoko ^d   Ferreira, Maria Cristina ^d   López, Wilson López ^b   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

^b FUNDACIÓN UNIVERSITARIA KONRAD LORENZ   (Colombia)

^c LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFRICA; ARTICLE; ASIA; AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; WESTERN HEMISPHERE;

ADULT; AFRICA; AMERICAS; ASIA; AUSTRALIA; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PREJUDICE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SAMPLING STUDIES; STEREOTYPING; WOMEN;

EID: 0034330608     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aiken, L. R. (1987). Formulas for equating ratings on different scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 51-54.
2. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
4. Cronbach, L., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
5. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1994). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes and judgments of competence. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 1-35). New York: Wiley.
7. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-423.
8. Eckes, T., & Six-Materna, I. (1999). Hostilität und Benevolenz: Eine Skala zur Erfassung des Ambivalenten Sexismus [Hostility and benevolence: A measure of ambivalent sexism]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 30, 211-228.
9. Expósito, F., Moya, M., & Glick, P. (1998). Sexismo ambivalente: Medición y correlates [Ambivalent sexism: Measurement and correlates]. Revista de Psicología Social, 13, 159-169.
10. Fiske, S. T. (1998). Prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 357-411). New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (1999). Respect versus liking: Status and interdependence underlie ambivalent stereotypes. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473-489.
12. Glick, P., Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., & Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323-1334.
13. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
14. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (in press). Ambivalent stereotypes as legitimizing ideologies: Differentiating paternalistic and resentful prejudice. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Guttentag, M., & Secord, P. (1983). Too many women? Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16. Harris, M. (1991). Cultural anthropology (3rd ed.). New York: Harper-Collins.
17. Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false-consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
20. Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293-305.
21. Jost, J. T., Burgess, D., & Mosso, C. (in press). Crises of legitimation among self, group, and system: A theoretical integration. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Kilianski, S., & Rudman, L. A. (1998). Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism? Sex Roles, 39, 333-352.
23. Kim, H. J. (1998). Men's motivation toward women and sexual harassment. The Korean Journal of Psychology: Women, 3, 133-147.
24. Masser, B., & Abrams, D. (1999). Contemporary sexism: Relationships among hostile sexism, benevolent sexism, and neosexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 503-517.
25. Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Díaz, M., Ortega, A., & Oyarce, P. (1998). Sexismo ambivalente en estudiantes universitarios chilenos: Teoría, medición y diferencias de género [Ambivalent sexism in Chilean university students: Theory, measurement, and gender differences]. Revista de Psicología Social y Personal'idad. 14(1), 1-14.
26. Pomeroy, S. B. (1975). Goddesses, whores, wives and slaves: Women in classical antiquity. New York: Schocken.
27. Pratto, F. (1996). Sexual politics: The gender gap in the bedroom, the cupboard, and the cabinet. In D. M. Buss & N. M. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, and conflict (pp. 179-230). New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Ridgeway, C. (1992). Gender, interaction, and inequality. New York: Springer-Verlag.
29. Salzman, P. C. (1999). Is inequality universal? Current Anthropology, 40, 31-61.
30. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 998-1011.
31. Smuts, B. (1996). Male aggression against women: An evolutionary perspective. In D. M. Buss & N. M. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, and conflict (pp. 231-268). New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1972). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, Ms. No. 153, 1-52.
33. Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199-214.
34. Tavris, C., & Wade, C. (1984). The longest war (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
35. Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & Joly, S. (1995). Neo-sexism: Plus ça change, plus c'est panel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842-849.
36. Triandis, H. C., & Marín, G. (1983). Etic plus emic versus pseudoetic: A test of the basic assumption of contemporary cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 489-500.
37. United Nations Development Programme. (1998). Human development report 1998. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1982). Measuring sex stereotypes. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39. Woolf, V. (1981). A room of one's own. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. (Original work published 1929)