Revisiting IS business value research: What we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 139-169

  Schryen, Guido ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

IS business value; IS impact; IS research framework; IS value; literature review; research agenda

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

BUSINESS VALUE; IS IMPACTS; IS RESEARCHES; LITERATURE REVIEWS; RESEARCH AGENDA;

INVESTMENTS;

EID: 84865839127     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: 14769344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2012.45     Document Type: Review

References (284)

1. AGARWAL R and LUCAS HC (2005) The information systems identity crisis: focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research. MIS Quarterly 29(3), 381-398.
2. AKRICH M (1992) The description of technical objects. In Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (BIJKER W and LAW J, Eds), pp 205-224, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. ALI S and GREEN P (2012) Effective information technology (IT) governance mechanisms: an IT outsourcing perspective. Information Systems Frontiers 14(2), 179-193.
4. ALPAR P and KIM M (1990) A microeconomic approach to the measurement of information technology value. Journal of Management Information Systems 7(2), 55-69.
5. ALSHAWI S, IRANI Z and BALDWIN LP (2003) Benchmarking information technology investment and benefits extraction. Benchmarking-An International Journal 10(4), 414-423.
6. AMIHUD Y and LEV B (1981) Risk reduction as managerial motive for conglomerate mergers. Bell Journal of Economics of Innovation & New Technology 12(Autumn), 605-617.
7. ANDRIOLE SJ (2010) Business impact of Web 2.0 technologies. Communications of the ACM 53(12), 67-79.
8. APPLEGATE LM (1994) Managing in an information age: transforming the organization for the 1990s. In Transforming Organizations with Information Technology (BASKERVILLE R, SMITHSON S, NGWENYAMA O and DEGROSS JI, Eds), pp 15-94, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
9. ARAL S, BRYNJOLFSSON E and VAN ALSTYNE M (2007) Information, Technology and Information Worker Productivity Task Level Evidence. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, US.
10. ARAL S and WEILL P (2007) IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: how resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organization Science 18(5), 763-780.
11. ARMSTRONG C and SAMBAMURTHY V (1999) Information technology assimilation in firms: the influence of senior leadership and IT infrastructures. Information Systems Research 10(4), 304-327.
12. ATIS (2007) ATIS Telecom Glossary 2007. Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions [WWW document] http://www.atis.org/glossary/.
13. AU YA and KAUFFMAN RJ (2003) What do you know? Rational expectations in information technology adoption and investment. Journal of Management Information Systems 20(2), 49-76.
14. AVGEROU C (2000) IT and organizational change: an institutionalist perspective. Information Technology & People 13(4), 234-262.
15. AVGEROU C (2001) The significance of context in information systems and organizational change. Information Systems Journal 11(1), 43-63.
16. AVISON D, GREGOR S and WILSON D (2006) Managerial IT unconsciousness. Communications of the ACM 49(7), 89-93.
17. AVISON D and WILSON D (2002) IT failure and the collapse of One.Tel. In Information Systems: The E-Business Challenge (TRAUNMULLER R, Ed.), pp 31-46, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
18. AYAL M and SEIDMANN A (2009) An empirical investigation of the value of integrating enterprise information systems: the case of medical imaging informatics. Journal of Management Information Systems 26(2), 43-68.
19. BAILY MN (1986) What has happened to productivity growth? Science 234(4775), 443-451.
20. BAKER J, SONG J and JONES D (2008) Refining the IT business value model: evidence from a longitudinal investigation of healthcare firms. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems. Paris, France, Association for Information Systems, 14-17 December.
21. BAKOS JY (1987) Dependent variables for the study of firm and industrylevel impacts of information technology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (GALLEGOS L, WELKE R and WETHERBE JC, Eds), pp 10-23, The Society for Information Management, Pittsburgh, PA.
22. BAKOS JY and NAULT BR (1997) Ownership and investment in electronic networks. Information Systems Research 8(4), 321-341.
23. BANKER R, BARDHAN I, CHANG H and LIN S (2006) Plant information systems, manufacturing capabilities, and plant performance. MIS Quarterly 30(2), 315-337.
24. BANKER RD, CHANG H and KAO Y-C (2010) Evaluating cross-organizational impacts of information technology-an empirical analysis. European Journal of Information Systems 19(2), 153-167.
25. BANNISTER F and REMENYI D (2000) Acts of faith: instinct, value and IT investment decisions. Journal of Information Technology 15(3), 231-241.
26. BARNEY JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1), 99-120.
27. BARUA A, KRIEBEL CH and MUKHOPADHYAY T (1995) Information technologies and business value-an analytical and empirical investigation. Information Systems Research 6(1), 3-23.
28. BARUA A, LEE CHS and WHINSTON AB (1996) The calculus of reengineering. Information Systems Research 7(4), 409-428.
29. BECCALLI E (2007) Does IT investment improve bank performance? Evidence from Europe. Journal of Banking & Finance 31(7), 2205-2230.
30. BELLEFLAMME P (2001) Oligopolistic competition, IT use for product differentiation and the productivity paradox. International Journal of Industrial Organization 19(1-2), 227-248.
31. BENAROCH M, JEFFERY M, KAUFFMAN RJ and SHAH S (2007) Option-based risk management: a field study of sequential information technology investment decisions. Journal of Management Information Systems 24(2), 103-140.
32. BENAROCH M and KAUFFMAN RJ (1999) A case for using real options pricing analysis to evaluate information technology project investments. Information Systems Research 10(1), 70-86.
33. BERGHOUT E and RENKEMA T (1997) Evaluating information systems investment proposals: a comparative review of current methodologies. Information and Software Technology 37(1), 1-13.
34. BERNDT ER and MORRISON CJ (1995) High-tech capital formation and economic performance in U.S. manufacturing industries: an exploratory analysis. Journal of Econometrics 65(1), 9-43.
35. BHARADWAJ A, BHARADWAJ SG and KONSYNSKI BR (1999) Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's q. Management Science 45(7), 1008-1024.
36. BHARADWAJ A, KEIL M and MAHRING M (2009) Effects of information technology failures on the market value of firms. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 18(2), 66-79.
37. BHARADWAJ AS (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly 24(1), 169-196.
38. BHATT GD and GROVER V (2005) Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantage: an empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems 22(2), 253-277.
39. BJORN-ANDERSEN N and TURNER JA (1994) Creating the twenty-first century organization: the metamorphosis of Oticon. In Transforming Organizations with Information Technology (BASKERVILLE R, SMITHSON S and NGWENYAMA O, Eds), pp 379-394, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
40. BOURDIEU P (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.
41. BOYNLON AC and ZMUD RW (1984) An assessment of critical success factors. Sloan Management Review 25(4), 17-27.
42. BRESNAHAN TF, BRYNJOLFSSON E and HITT LM (2002) Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: firm-level evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(1), 339-376.
43. BRYNJOLFSSON E (1993) The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM 36(12), 66-77.
44. BRYNJOLFSSON E (1996) The contribution of information technology to consumer welfare. Information Systems Research 7(3), 281-300.
45. BRYNJOLFSSON E and HITT L (1995) Information technology as a factor of production: the role of differences among firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 3(4), 183-200.
46. BRYNJOLFSSON E and HITT L (1996) Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science 42(4), 541-558.
47. BRYNJOLFSSON E and HITT LM (1998) Beyond the productivity paradox. Communications of the ACM 41(8), 49-55.
48. BRYNJOLFSSON E and HITT LM (2000) Beyond computation: information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(4), 23-48.
49. BRYNJOLFSSON E and HITT LM (2003) Computing productivity: firm-level evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics 85(4), 793-808.
50. BRYNJOLFSSON E, HITT LM and YANG S (2000) Intangible Assets: How the Interaction of Computers and Organizational Structure Affects Stock Market Valuations. MIT, Cambridge, MA, US.
51. BRYNJOLFSSON E, HITT LM and YANG SK (2002) Intangible assets: computers and organizational capital. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (1), 137-198.
52. BRYNJOLFSSON E and YANG S (1996) Information technology and productivity: a review of the literature. In Advances in Computers (ZELKOWITZ MV, Ed.), Vol. 43, 179-215, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, US.
53. BRYNJOLFSSON E and YANG S (1999) The intangible costs and benefits of computer investments: evidence from the financial markets. In Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Information Systems (PRABUDDHA D and DEGROSS JI, Eds). Association for Information Systems, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA, ICIS 1999, 13-15 December.
54. BYRD TA and TURNER DE (2000) Measuring the flexibility of information technology infrastructure: exploratory analysis of a construct. Journal of Management Information Systems 17(1), 167-208.
55. CALDEIRA MM and WARD JM (2003) Using resource-based theory to interpret the successful adoption and use of information systems and technology in manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises. European Journal of Information Systems 12(2), 125-139.
56. CALLON M (1991) Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In A Sociology of Monsters? Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Sociological Review Monograph (LAW J, Ed.), pp 132-161, Routledge, London.
57. CARR NG (2003) IT doesn't matter. Harvard Business Review 81(5), 41-49.
58. CASOLARO L and GOBBI G (2007) Information technology and productivity changes in the banking industry. Economic Notes 36(1), 43-76.
59. CHAFFEY D and WOOD S (2005) Business Information Management-Improving Performance Using Information Systems. Prentice Hall, Essex, England.
60. CHAN YE (2000) IT value: the great divide between qualitative and quantitative and individual and organizational measures. Journal of Management Information Systems 16(4), 225-261.
61. CHARI MDR, DEVARAJ S and DAVID P (2008) The impact of information technology investments and diversification strategies on firm performance. Management Science 54(1), 224-234.
62. CHATFIELD AT and YETTON P (2000) Strategic payoff from EDI as a function of EDI embeddedness. Journal of Management Information Systems 16(4), 195-224.
63. CHATTERJEE D, PACINI C and SAMBAMURTHY V (2002) The shareholder-wealth and trading-volume effects of information-technology infrastructure investments. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(2), 7-42.
64. CHATTERJEE D, RICHARDSON VJ and ZMUD RW (2001) Examining the shareholder wealth effects of new CIO position announcements. MIS Quarterly 25(1), 43-70.
65. CHAU PYK, KUAN KKY and LIANG TP (2007) Research on IT value: what we have done in Asia and Europe. European Journal of Information Systems 16(3), 196-201.
66. CHEN SJ and HWANG CL (1991) Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
67. CHEN YH and LIN WT (2009) Analyzing the relationships between information technology, inputs substitution and national characteristics based on CES stochastic frontier production models. International Journal of Production Economics 120(2), 552-569.
68. CHO W and SHAW MJ (2009) Does IT synergy matter in IT portfolio selection?. International Conference on Information Systems, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
69. CHRISTENSEN HA and MONTGOMERY CA (1981) Corporate economic performance: diversification strategy versus market structure. Strategic Management Journal 2(4), 327-343.
70. CIBORRA CU and LANZARA GF (1994) Formative contexts and information technology: understanding the dynamics of innovation in organizations. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 4(2), 61-86.
71. CLEMEN RT (1991) Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis. PWS-KENT, Boston, MA.
72. CLEMONS EK and KLEINDORFER PR (1992) An economic analysis of interorganizational information technology. Decision Support Systems 8(5), 431-446.
73. CLEMONS EK and ROW MC (1991) Sustaining IT advantage-the role of structural differences. MIS Quarterly 15(3), 275-292.
74. CNSS (2006) National Information Assurance Glossary. Committee on National Security Systems [WWW document] http://www.cnss.gov/Assets/pdf/cnssi- 4009.pdf.
75. COHEN WM and LEVINTHAL DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1), 128-152.
76. CULNAN MJ, MCHUGH PJ and ZUBILLAGA JI (2010) How large U.S. companies can use twitter and other social media to gain business value. MIS Quarterly Executive 9(4), 243-260.
77. DAFT RL (1978) Dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal 21(2), 193-210.
78. DAS S, YAYLACICEGI U and MENON NM (2011) The effect of information technology investments in healthcare: a longitudinal study of its lag, duration, and economic value. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 58(1), 124-140.
79. DAVERN MJ and KAUFFMAN RJ (2000) Discovering potential and realizing value from information technology investments. Journal of Management Information Systems 16(4), 121-143.
80. DAVERN MJ and WILKIN CL (2010) Towards an integrated view of IT value measurement. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 11(1), 42-60.
81. DEDRICK J, GURBAXANI V and KRAEMER KL (2003) Information technology and economic performance: a critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Computing Surveys 35(1), 1-28.
82. DEHNING B, PFEIFFER GM and RICHARDSON VJ (2007a) Analysts' forecasts and investments in information technology. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 7(3), 238-250.
83. DEHNING B and RICHARDSON VJ (2002) Returns on investments in information technology: a research synthesis. Journal of Information Systems 16(1), 7-30.
84. DEHNING B, RICHARDSON VJ, SMITH RE and ZMUD RW (2008) Using accounting-based performance measures to assess the business value of information technologies and systems. In Economics, Information Systems and Electronic Commerce Research II: Advanced Empirical Methodologies (KAUFFMAN RJ and TALLON PP, Eds), pp 135-154, ME Sharpe, Armonk, NY.
85. DEHNING B, RICHARDSON VJ, URBACZEWSKI A and WELLS JD (2004) Reexamining the value relevance of ecommerce initiatives. Journal of Management Information Systems 21(1), 57-84.
86. DEHNING B, RICHARDSON VJ and ZMUD RW (2003) The value relevance of announcements of transformational information technology investments. MIS Quarterly 27(4), 637-656.
87. DEHNING B, RICHARDSON VJ and ZMUD RW (2007b) The financial performance effects of IT-based supply chain management systems in manufacturing firms. Journal of Operations Management 25(4), 806-824.
88. DEHNING B and STRATOPOULOS T (2002) DuPont analysis of an IT-enabled competitive advantage. The International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 3(3), 165-176.
89. DEJARNETT L, LASKEY R and TRAINOR HE (2004) From the CIO point of view: the 'IT doesn't matter' debate. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 13(1), 443-455.
90. DELLAROCAS C, GAO G and NARAYAN R (2010) Are consumers more likely to contribute online reviews for hit or niche products? Journal of Management Information Systems 27(2), 127-157.
91. DELONE WH and MCLEAN ER (1992) Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 3(1), 60-95.
92. DELONE WH and MCLEAN ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4), 9-30.
93. DELONE WH and MCLEAN ER (2004) Measuring e-commerce success: applying the DeLone & McLean information systems success model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 9(1), 31-47.
94. DERHAM R, CRAGG P and MORRISH S (2011) Creating value: an SME and social media. In Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2011 (SEDDON PB and GREGOR S, Eds), Queensland University of Technology. Quality Research in Pacific Asia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 7-11 July.
95. DESANCTIS G and POOLE MS (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science 5(2), 121-147.
96. DEVARAJ S and KOHLI R (2000) Information technology payoff in the health-care industry: a longitudinal study. Journal of Management Information Systems 16(4), 41-67.
97. DEWAN S and KRAEMER KL (2000) Information technology and productivity: evidence from country-level data. Management Science 46(4), 548-562.
98. DEWAN S andMIN CK (1997) The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: a firm level analysis. Management Science 43(12), 1660-1675.
99. DEWAN S and REN F (2007) Risk and return of information technology initiatives: evidence from electronic commerce announcements. Information Systems Research 18(4), 370-394.
100. DEWAN S and REN F (2011) Information technology and firm boundaries: impact on firm risk and return performance. Information Systems Research 22(2), 369-388.
101. DEWAN S, SHI C and GURBAXANI V (2007) Investigating the risk-return relationship of information technology investment: firm-level empirical analysis. Management Science 53(12), 1829-1842.
102. DIERICKX I and COOL K (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science 35(12), 1504-1511.
103. DIMAGGIO PJ (1995) Comments on 'What Theory Is Not'. Administrative Science Quarterly 40(3), 391-397.
104. DONG S, XU SX and ZHU KX (2009) Information technology in supply chains: the value of IT-enabled resources under competition. Information Systems Research 20(1), 18-32.
105. DOS SANTOS BL, PEFFERS KG and MAUER DC (1993) The impact of information technology investment announcements on the market value of the firm. Information Systems Research 4(1), 1-23.
106. DOS SANTOS BL, RAJAGOPALAN S, RAO RH and YANG B (1996) Information technology investments and firm performance. In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, (CAREY JM, Ed.), Arizona, USA, Phoenix, 16-18 August.
107. DRUCKER P (1988) The coming of the new organization. Harvard Business Review 66(1), 45-53.
108. DUBIN R (1978) Theory Development. New York Free Press, New York, NY, US.
109. DYLLICK T and HOCKERTS K (2002) Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment 11(2), 130-141.
110. ENGELBERT H (1991) Scientific information as an economic category. In The Economics of Information Systems and Software (VERYARD R, Ed.), pp 31-43, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
111. FARJOUN M (1998) The independent and joint effects of the skill and physical bases of relatedness. Strategic Management Journal 19(7), 611-630.
112. FEENY DF and IVES B (1990) In search of sustainability: reaping long-term advantage from investments in information technology. Journal of Management Information Systems 7(1), 27-46.
113. FINK L (2011) How do IT capabilities create strategic value? Toward greater integration of insights from reductionistic and holistic approaches. European Journal of Information Systems 20(1), 16-33.
114. FISHBURN PC (1970) Utility Theory for Decision Making. Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co., Huntington, NY.
115. FLOYD SW and WOOLDRIDGE B (1990) Path analysis of the relationship between competitive strategy, information technology, and financial performance. Journal of Management Information Systems 7(1), 47-64.
116. FULK J and DESANCTIS G (1995) Electronic communication and changing organizational forms. Organization Science 6(4), 337-349.
117. GARUD R, KUMARASWAMY A and SAMBAMURTHY V (2006) Emergent by design: performance and transformation at Infosys technologies. Organization Science 17(2), 277-286.
118. GRANT RM (1996) Toward a knowledge based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17(Winter Special Issue), 109-122.
119. GREGOR S, MARTIN M, FERNANDEZ W, STERN S and VITALE M (2006) The transformational dimension in the realization of business value from information technology. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 15(3), 249-270.
120. GURBAXANI V andWHANG S (1991) The impact of information systems on organizations and markets. Communications of the ACM 34(1), 59-73.
121. HAN K, CHANG YB and HAHN J (2011) Information technology spillover and productivity: the role of information technology intensity and competition. Journal of Management Information Systems 28(1), 115-145.
122. HANNU HSS (2008) Analysing business losses caused by information systems risk: a business process analysis approach. Journal of Information Technology 23(3), 185-202.
123. HARRIS EH and KATZ JL (1991) Organizational performance and information technology investment intensity in the insurance industry. Organizational Science 2(3), 263-295.
124. HAYES DC, HUNTON JE and RECK JL (2001) Market reaction to ERP implementation announcements. Journal of Information Systems 15(1), 3-18.
125. HINZ O, SKIERA B, BARROT C and BECKER JU (2012) Seeding strategies for viral marketing: an empirical comparison. Journal of Marketing 75(6), 55-71.
126. HITT L and BRYNJOLFSSON E (1994) The three faces of IT value: theory and evidence. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Information Systems (DEGROSS JI, HUFF SL, MUNRO M, Eds), pp 263-277, Association for Information Systems, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
127. HITT LM and BRYNJOLFSSON E (1996) Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quarterly 20(2), 121-142.
128. HO JLY, WU A and XU SX (2011) Corporate governance and returns on information technology investment: evidence from an emerging market. Strategic Management Journal 32(6), 595-623.
129. HOOGEVEEN D and OPPELLAND HJ (2002) A socio political model of the relationship between IT investments and business performance. 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society Press, p 259b.
130. HSIEH JJP-A, RAI A and XU SX (2011) Extracting business value from IT: a sensemaking perspective of post-adoptive use. Management Science 57(11), 2018-2039.
131. IM KS, DOW KE and GROVER V (2001) A reexamination of IT investment and the market value of the firm-an event study methodology. Information Systems Research 12(1), 103-117.
132. IRANI Z (2002) Information systems evaluation-navigating through the problem domain. Information & Management 40(1), 11-24.
133. IRANI Z and LOVE PED (2001) The propagation of technology management taxonomies for evaluating investments in information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 17(3), 159-175.
134. IRANI Z and LOVE PED (2002) Developing a frame of reference for ex-ante IT/IS investment evaluation. European Journal of Information Systems 11(1), 74-82.
135. ITAA (1996) Help Wanted: The IT Workforce Gap at the Dawn of the New Century. The Information Technology Association of America, Arlington, VA.
136. JAIN A (2005) Performance paradox, information technology investments and administrative performance in the case of the 50 US state governments. International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 389-400.
137. JARVENPAA SL and LEIDNER DE (1998) An information company in Mexico: extending the resource-based view of the firm to a developing country context. Information Systems Research 9(4), 342-361.
138. JELASSI T and FIGON O (1994) Competing through EDI at Brun Passot: achievements in France and ambitions for the single European market. MIS Quarterly 18(4), 337-352.
139. JORGENSEN DW (2001) Information technology and the U.S. economy (Presidential address to the American Economic Association). American Economic Review 91(1), 1-32.
140. JORGENSON DW and STIROH KJ (1995) Computers and growth. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 3(3-4), 295-316.
141. JORGENSON DW and STIROH KJ (1999) Information technology and growth. American Economic Review 89(2), 109-115.
142. JORGENSON DW and STIROH KJ (2000) Raising the speed limit: U.S. economic growth in the information age. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1(1), 125-211.
143. KANE GC and ALAVI M (2007) Information technology and organizational learning: an investigation of exploration and exploitation processes. Organization Science 18(5), 796-812.
144. KARIMI J, SOMERS TM and BHATTACHERJEE A (2007) The role of information systems resources in ERP capability building and business process outcomes. Journal of Management Information Systems 24(2), 221-260.
145. KAUFFMAN RJ and WEILL P (1989) An evaluative framework for research on the performance effects of information technology investment. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information Systems, pp 377-388, Association for Information Systems, ACM, Boston, MA.
146. KELLEY MR (1994) Productivity and information technology-the elusive connection. Management Science 40(11), 1406-1425.
147. KIM D, CAVUSGIL ST and CALANTONE RJ (2006) Information system innovations and supply chain management: channel relationships and firm performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34(1), 40-54.
148. KIM G, SHIN B, KIM KK and LEE HG (2011) IT capabilities, process-oriented dynamic capabilities, and firm financial performance. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 12(7), 487-517.
149. KIM JK, XIANG JY and LEE S (2009) The impact of IT investment on firm performance in China: an empirical investigation of the Chinese electronics industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, to appear 76(5), 678-687.
150. KIM K and MITHAS S (2011) How does bond market view IT investments of firms? An empirical evidence of bond ratings and yield spreads. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2011 (GALLETTA DF and LIANG T-P, Eds), Shanghai, China, Association for Information Systems, 4-7 December.
151. KO M and BRYSON K-M (2002) A regression tree based exploration of the impact of information technology investments on firm level productivity. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2002 (WRYCZA S, Ed.), pp 506-517, Gdansk, Poland, Information Systems and the Future of the Digital Economy, 6-8 June.
152. KO M and OSEI-BRYSON KM (2004) Using regression splines to assess the impact of information technology investments on productivity in the health care industry. Information Systems Journal 14(1), 43-63.
153. KOHLI R and GROVER V (2008) Business value of IT: an essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9(1), 23-39.
154. KRAEMER KL, DEDRICK J and YAMASHIRO S (2000) Refining and extending the business model with information technology: Dell Computer Corporation. The Information Society 16(1), 5-21.
155. LATOUR B (1991) Technology is society made durable. In A Sociology of Monsters? Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Sociological Review Monograph (LAW J, Ed.), pp 103-131, Routledge, London.
156. LAUDON KC and LAUDON JP (2005) Essentials of Management Information Systems-Managing the Digital Firm. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
157. LEE AHI, CHEN WC and CHANG CJ (2008) A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications 34(1), 96-107.
158. LEE H, YU J and KIM H (2004) An empirical study on the integrated performance model for the effect of information technology investments. In Proceedings of the Eight Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. China Association for Information Systems, Shanghai.
159. LEE O-K, LIM KH, SAMBAMURTHY V and WEI KK (2007) IT-enabled organizational agility and firms' sustainable competitive advantage. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Association for Information Systems, ICIS 2007, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 9-12 December.
160. LEE S, XIANG JY and KIM JK (2011) Information technology and productivity: empirical evidence from the Chinese electronics industry. Information & Management 48(2/3), 79-87.
161. LEONARDI PM (2007) Activating the informational capabilities of information technology for organizational change. Organization Science 18(5), 813-831.
162. LI MF and YE LR (1999) Information technology and firm performance: linking with environmental, strategic and managerial contexts. Information & Management 35(1), 43-51.
163. LICHTENBERG FR (1995) The output contributions of computer equipment and personnel: a firm-level analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 3(4), 201-217.
164. LIM JH, RICHARDSON VJ and ROBERTS TL (2004) Information technology investment and firm performance-a meta-analysis. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society, Big Island, HI, USA, 5-8 January 2004.
165. LIN WT (2009) The business value of information technology as measured by technical efficiency: evidence from country-level data. Decision Support Systems 46(4), 865-874.
166. LIN WT and CHIANG C-Y (2011) The impacts of country characteristics upon the value of information technology as measured by productive efficiency. International Journal of Production Economics 132(1), 13-33.
167. LIN WT and SHAO BBM (2006a) Assessing the input effect on productive efficiency in production systems the value of information technology capital. International Journal of Production Research 44(9), 1799-1819.
168. LIN WT and SHAO BBM (2006b) The business value of information technology and inputs substitution: the productivity paradox revisited. Decision Support Systems 42(2), 493-507.
169. LOOS P, NEBEL W, GóMEZ JM, HASAN H, WATSON RT, VOM BROCKE J and SEIDEL S and 3(4) JR (2011) Green IT: a matter of business and information systems engineering? Business & Information Systems Engineering 3(4), 245-252.
170. LOVEMAN GW (1994) An assessment of the productivity impact of information technologies. In Information Technology and the Corporation of the 1990s: Research Studies (ALLEN TJ and SCOTT-MORTON MS, Eds), pp 84-110, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
171. MAHMOOD MA and MANN GJ (1993) Measuring the organizational impact of information technology investment: an exploratory study. Journal of Management Information Systems 10(1), 97-122.
172. MAHMOOD MA and MANN GJ (2005) Information technology investments and organizational productivity and performance: an empirical investigation. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 15(3), 185-202.
173. MARKUS ML and ROBEY D (1988) Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research. Management Science 34(5), 583-598.
174. MARKUS ML and ROBEY D (2004) Why stuff happens: explaining the unintended consequences of using information technology. In The Past and Future of Information Systems (MORTEN THANNING VENDELO KVA, Ed.), pp 61-93, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
175. MARTHANDAN G and TANG CM (2010) Information systems evaluation: an ongoing measure. International Journal of Business Information Systems 6(3), 336-353.
176. MARTIN-OLIVER A and SALAS-FUMAS V (2008) The output and profit contribution of information technology and advertising investments in banks. Journal of Financial Intermediation 17(2), 229-255.
177. MATA FJ, FUERST WL and BARNEY JB (1995) Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly 19(4), 487-505.
178. MCAFEE A (2002) The impact of enterprise information technology adoption on operational performance-an empirical investigation. Production and Operations Management 11(1), 33-53.
179. MCFARLAN FW (1981) Portfolio approach to information systems. Harvard Business Review 59(5), 142-150.
180. MELVILLE N, GURBAXANI V and KRAEMER K (2007) The productivity impact of information technology across competitive regimes: the role of industry concentration and dynamism. Decision Support Systems 43(1), 229-242.
181. MELVILLE N, KRAEMER K and GURBAXANI V (2004) Review: information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly 28(2), 283-322.
182. MENON NM, LEE B and ELDENBURG L (2000) Productivity of information systems in the healthcare industry. Information Systems Research 11(1), 83-92.
183. MEYER JW and ROWAN B (1991) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (POWELL WW and DIMAGGIO PJ, Eds), Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL.
184. MILGROM P and ROBERTS J (1995) Complementarities and fit strategy, structure and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics 19(2-3), 179-208.
185. MILLER DJ (2004) Firms' technological resources and the performance effects of diversification: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal 25(11), 1097-1119.
186. MITHAS S, RAMASUBBU N and SAMBAMURTHY V (2011) How information management capability influences firm performance. MIS Quarterly 35(1), 237-256.
187. MOONEY J, GURBAXANI V and KRAEMER K (1995) A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Information Systems (ARIAV G, BEATH CM, DEGROSS JI, HOYER R and KEMERER CF, Eds), pp 17-27, Association for Information Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 10-13 December.
188. MUKHOPADHYAY T, KEKRE S and KALATHUR S (1995) Business value of information technology: a study of electronic data interchange. MIS Quarterly 19(2), 137-156.
189. MUTCH A (2010) Technology, organization, and structure-a morphogenetic approach. Organization Science 21(2), 507-520.
190. NAIR M (2011) Understanding and measuring the value of social media. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance 22(3), 45-51.
191. NEIROTTI P and PAOLUCCI E (2007) Assessing the strategic value of information technology: an analysis on the insurance sector. Information & Management 44(6), 568-582.
192. NELSON R and WINTER S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
193. NELSON RR (2007) IT project management: infamous failures, classic mistakes, and best practices. MIS Quarterly Executive 6(2), 67-78.
194. NEWMAN M and SABHERWAL R (1991) Information systems development: four process scenarios with case studies. Journal of Information Systems 5(1), 84-101.
195. OLINER SD and SICHEL DE (2000) The resurgence of growth in the late 1990s: is information technology the story? Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(4), 3-22.
196. ORDANINI A and RUBERA G (2010) How does the application of an IT service innovation affect firm performance? A theoretical framework and empirical analysis on e-commerce. Information & Management 47(1), 60-67.
197. ORLIKOWSKI WJ (1992) The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 3(3), 398-427.
198. ORLIKOWSKI WJ (1996) Improvising organizational transformation over time: a situated change perspective. Information Systems Research 7(1), 63-92.
199. ORLIKOWSKI WJ and IACONO CS (2001) Desperately seeking the 'IT' in IT research. A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research 12(2), 121-134.
200. ORLIKOWSKI WJ and WALSHAM G (Eds) (1996) Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work. Chapman & Hall, London. OZ E (2005) Information technology productivity: in search of a definite observation. Information & Management 42(6), 789-798.
201. PALEPU K (1985) Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management Journal 6(3), 239-255.
202. PARÉ G, BOURDEAU S, MARSAN J, NACH H and SHURAIDA S (2008) Re-examining the causal structure of information technology impact research. European Journal of Information Systems 17(4), 403-416.
203. PESLAK AR (2003) A firm level study of information technology productivity using financial and market based measures. Journal of Computer Information Systems 43(4), 72-80.
204. PFEFFER J and SALANCIK GR (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper and Row, New York.
205. PICCOLI G and IVES B (2005) Review: IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: a review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Quarterly 29(4), 747-776.
206. PINSONNEAULT A and KRAEMER KL (2002) Exploring the role of information technology in organizational downsizing: a tale of two American cities. Organization Science 13(2), 191-208.
207. POON SK and DAVIS JG (2003) Estimating the impact of information technology investments on Australian productivity. In Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ANG J, KNIGHT S-A, Eds), Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, 26-28 November.
208. POON SK, DAVIS JG and CHOI B (2009) Augmenting productivity analysis with data mining: an application on IT business value. Expert Systems with Applications 36(2), 2213-2224.
209. POSTON R and GRABSKI S (2000) The impact of enterprise resource planning systems on firm performance. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2000 (ANG S, KRCMAR H, ORLIKOWSKI WJ, WEILL P and DEGROSS JI, Eds), pp 479-493, Brisbane, Australia, 10-13 December.
210. POWELL TC and DENT-MICALLEF A (1997) Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal 18(5), 375-405.
211. POWELL W (1990) Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Research on Organizational Behavior 12, 295-336.
212. RAGHUPATHI W (2007) Corporate governance of IT: a framework for development. Communications of the ACM 50(8), 94-99.
213. RAI A, PATNAYAKUNI R and PATNAYAKUNI N (1997) Technology investment and business performance. Communications of the ACM 40(7), 89-97.
214. RAI A and TANG X (2010) Leveraging IT capabilities and competitive process capabilities for the management of interorganizational relationship portfolios. Information Systems Research 21(3), 516-542.
215. RAINER K and MILLER M (2005) Examining differences across journal rankings. Communications of the ACM 48(2), 91-94.
216. RAMIREZ R, MELVILLE N and LAWLER E (2010) Information technology infrastructure, organizational process redesign, and business value: an empirical analysis. Decision Support Systems 49(4), 417-429.
217. RAVICHANDRAN T and LERTWONGSATIEN C (2005) Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: a resourcebased perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 21(4), 237-276.
218. REICHELD F and SCHEFTER P (2000) E-loyalty: your secret weapon on the web. Harvard Business Review 78(4), 105-113.
219. RICHARDSON VJ and ZMUD RW (2002) The value relevance of information technology investment announcements: incorporating industry strategic IT role. 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 8, 1-10.
220. ROACH SS (1987) America's Technology Dilemma: A Profile of the Information Economy. Morgan Stanley, New York, NY, USA.
221. ROACH SS (1991) Services under siege: the restructuring imperative. Harvard Business Review 39(2), 82-92.
222. ROBINS JA and WIERSEMA M (1995) A resource-based approach to the multibusiness firm. Strategic Management Journal 16(4), 277-299.
223. ROCKART JF (1979) Chief executives define their own data needs. Harvard Business Review 57(2), 81-93.
224. ROSS JW, BEATH CM and GOODHUE DL (1996) Develop long term competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan Management Review 38(1), 31-45.
225. ROWE F (1994) Data network productivity and competitive behavior: the case of the French commercial banks. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 46(1), 29-44.
226. ROZTOCKI N and WEISTROFFER HR (2008) Event studies in information systems research: a review. In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, 14th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2008, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (BENBASAT I andMONTAZEMI AR, Eds), Association for Information Systems, Toronto, Canada, 14-17 August.
227. RUMELT RP (1982) Diversification strategy and profitability. Strategic Management Journal 3(4), 359-369.
228. SAMBAMURTHY V and ZMUD RW (2000) Research commentary: the organizing logic for an enterprise's IT activities in the digital era-a prognosis of practice and a call for research. Information Systems Research 11(2), 105-114.
229. SANTHANAM R and HARTONO E (2003) Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance. MIS Quarterly 27(1), 125-153.
230. SCHNEBERGER S and WADE M (2010) Theories used in IS research Wiki http://www.fsc.yorku.ca/york/istheory/wiki/index.php/Main-Page.
231. SCHRAGE M (2003) How IT Can Differentiate Your Business from the Competition. CIO, Framingham, MA, USA.
232. SCHWARZ A and HIRSCHHEIM R (2003) An extended platform logic perspective of IT governance: managing perceptions and activities of IT. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 12(2), 129-166.
233. SEDDON PB (1997) A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research 8(3), 240-253.
234. SCHRYEN G (2010a) An analysis of literature reviews on IS business value: how deficiencies in methodology and theory use resulted in limited effectiveness. In Proceedings of the First Scandinavian Conference on Information Systems (SCIS) (KAUTZ K and NIELSEN PA, Eds), Rebild, Denmark, 20-22 August, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing 60, Springer.
235. SCHRYEN G and BODENSTEINC (2010b) A decision-theoretic foundation of IS business value research. In Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2010) (ALEXANDER PM, TURPIN M and VAN DEVENTER JP, Eds), Pretoria, South Africa, 7-9 June.
236. SCHRYEN G (2011) Seeking the value in IS business value Research-an agenda for investigating synergies between socio-organizational change, IS capabilities change, and IS innovation. In Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2011) (TUUNAINEN VK, ROSSI M and NANDHAKUMAR J, Eds), Helsinki, Finland, 9-11 June.
237. SEDDON PB, PATNAYAKUNI R and BOWTELL M (1999) Dimensions of information systems success. Communications of the AIS 2(3), 1-61.
238. SENADHEERA V, WARREN M and LEITCH S (2011) A study into how Australian banks use social media. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2011 (SEDDON PB and GREGOR S, Eds). Queensland University of Technology. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Quality Research in Pacific Asia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 7-11 July.
239. SETHI V and KING WR (1994) Development of measures to assess the extent to which an information technology application provides competitive advantage. Management Science 40(12), 1601-1627.
240. SHIN N (1997) The impact of information technology on coordination costs: implications for firm productivity. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Information Systems (DEGROSS JI and KUMAR K, Eds), pp 133-146, Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 15-17 December.
241. SHIN N (2006) The impact of information technology on the financial performance of diversified firms. Decision Support Systems 41(4), 698-707.
242. SIRCAR S, TURNBOW JL and BORDOLOI B (1998) The impact of information technology investments on firm performance: a review of the literature. The Journal of Engineering Valuation and Cost Analysis 1(3), 171-181.
243. SIRCAR S, TURNBOW JL and BORDOLOI B (2000) A framework for assessing the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance. Journal of Management Information Systems 16(4), 69-97.
244. SOH C and MARKUS ML (1995) How IT creates business value: a process theory synthesis. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Information Systems (ARIAV G, BEATH CM, DEGROSS JI, HOYER R and KEMERER CF, Eds), pp 29-41, Association for Information Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 10-13 December.
245. STAEHR L (2010) Understanding the role of managerial agency in achieving business benefits from ERP systems. Information Systems Journal 20(3), 213-238.
246. STIROH KJ (2002) Information technology and the US productivity revival: what do the industry data say? American Economic Review 92(5), 1559-1576.
247. STRATOPOULOS T and DEHNING B (2000) Does successful investment in information technology solve the productivity paradox? Information & Management 38(2), 103-117.
248. SUBRAMANI M and WALDEN E (2001) The impact of e-commerce announcements on the market value of firms. Information Systems Research 12(2), 135-154.
249. SUTTON RI and STAW BM (1995) What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly 40(3), 371-384.
250. SWIERCZEK FW and SHRESTHA PK (2003) Information technology and productivity: a comparison of Japanese and Asia-Pacific banks. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 14(2), 269-288.
251. SYLLA C and WEN HJ (2002) A conceptual framework for evaluation of information technology investments. International Journal of Technology Management 24(2-3), 236-261.
252. TALLON PP, KRAEMER KL and GURBAXANI V (2000) Executives' perceptions of the business value of information technology: a processoriented approach. Journal of Management Information Systems 16(4), 145-173.
253. TAM KY (1998) The impact of information technology investments on firm performance and evaluation: evidence from newly industrialized economies. Information Systems Research 9(1), 85-98.
254. TAMBE P, HITT L and BRYNJOLFSSON E (2012) The extroverted firm: how external information practices affect innovation and productivity. Management Science 58(5), 843-859.
255. TAN BCC, PAN SL and HACKNEY R (2010) The strategic implications of web technologies: a process model of how web technologies enhance organizational performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 57(2), 181-197.
256. TANRIVERDI H and VENKATRAMAN N (2005) Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms. Strategic Management Journal 26(2), 97-119.
257. THATCHER ME and OLIVER JR (2001) The impact of technology investments on a firm's production efficiency, product quality, and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems 18(2), 17-45.
258. THATCHER ME and PINGRY DE (2004a) An economic model of product quality and IT value. Information Systems Research 15(3), 268-286.
259. THATCHER ME and PINGRY DE (2004b) Understanding the business value of information technology investments: theoretical evidence from alternative market and cost structures. Journal of Management Information Systems 21(2), 61-85.
260. THATCHER ME and PINGRY DE (2007) Modeling the IT value paradox. Communications of the ACM 50(8), 41-45.
261. THOUIN M, HOFFMAN JJ and FORD EW (2008) The effect of information technology investment on firm-level performance in the health care industry. Health Care Management Review 33(1), 60-68.
262. VENKATRAMAN N (1994) IT-enabled business transformation-from automation to business scope redefinition. Sloan Management Review 35(2), 73-87.
263. VICKERY SK, DROGE C, SETIA P and SAMBAMURTHY V (2010) Supply chain information technologies and organisational initiatives: complementary versus independent effects on agility and firm performance. International Journal of Production Research 48(23), 7025-7042.
264. WADE M and HULLAND J (2004) Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 107-142.
265. WAN Z, FANG Y and WADE M (2007) The ten-year odyssey of the IS productivity paradox-a citation analysis (1996-2006). In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems. (HOXMEIER JA, HAYNE S, Eds), Keystone, Colorado.
266. WARD JM (1990) A portfolio approach to evaluating information systems investments and setting priorities. Journal of Information Technology 5(4), 222-231.
267. WATSON RT, BOUDREAU M-C and CHEN AJW (2010) Information systems and environmentally sustainable development: energy informatics and new directions for the IS community. MIS Quarterly 34(1), 23-38.
268. WEBSTER J and WATSON RT (2002) Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly 26(2), XIII-XXIII.
269. WEILL P (1992) The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: a study of the valve manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research 3(4), 307-333.
270. WEILL P and BROADBENT M (1998) Levering the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
271. WEILL P and OLSON M (1989) Managing investment in information technology: mini case examples and implications. MIS Quarterly 13(1), 3-18.
272. WEITZEL T, ECKHARDT A and LAUMER S (2009) A framework for recruiting IT talent: lessons from Siemens. MIS Quarterly Executive 8(4), 123-137.
273. WERNERFELT B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5(2), 171-180.
274. WEST LA and COURTNEY JF (1993) The information problems in organizations-a research model for the value of information and information systems. Decision Sciences 24(2), 229-251.
275. WHETTEN DA (1989) What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review 14(4), 490-495.
276. WHITTINGTON R, PETTIGREW A, PECK S, FENTON E and CONYON M (1999) Change and complementarities in the new competitive landscape: a European panel study, 1992-1996. Organization Science 10(5), 583-600.
277. WHYTE J (2010) Taking time to understand: articulating relationships between technologies and organizations. In Technology and Organization: Essays in Honour of Joan Woodward (PHILLIPS N, SEWELL G and GRIFFITHS D, Eds), pp 217-236, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
278. WILLIAMS ML and FROLICK MN (2001) The evolution of EDI for competitive advantage: the FedEx case. Information Systems Management 18(2), 47-53.
279. WISEMAN D (1992) Information economics: a practical approach to valuing information systems. Journal of Information Technology 7(3), 169.
280. ZAMMUTO RF, GRIFFITH TL, MAJCHRZAK A, DOUGHERTY DJ and FARAJ S (2007) Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science 18(5), 749-762.
281. ZHANG MJ (2005) Information systems, strategic flexibility and firm performance: an empirical investigation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 22(3), 163-184.
282. ZHANG MJ and LADO AA (2001) Information systems and competitive advantage: a competency-based view. Technovation 21(3), 147-156.
283. ZHU K and KRAEMER K (2005) Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Information Systems Research 16(1), 61-84.
284. ZHU K, KRAEMER KL, XU S and DEDRICK J (2004) Information technology payoff in e-business environments: an international perspective on value creation of e-business in the financial services industry. Journal of Management Information Systems 21(1), 17-54.