DuPont analysis of an IT-enabled competitive advantage

International Journal of Accounting Information Systems

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 165-176

  Dehning, Bruce ^a   Stratopoulos, Theophanis ^b  

^a CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

Competitive advantage; DuPont analysis; Information technology; Return on assets

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036791028     PISSN: 14670895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1467-0895(02)00032-5     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Barber BM, Lyon JD. Detecting abnormal operating performance: the empirical power and specification of test statistics. J Financ Econ 1996;41(3):359-99 (July).
2. Barnes P. Methodological implications of non-normally distributed financial ratios. J Bus Finance Account 1982;9/1:51-62.
3. Barnes P. Methodological implications of non-normally distributed financial ratios: a reply. J Bus Finance Account 1983;10/4:691-3.
4. Barney J. Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1997.
5. Barua A, Kriebel C, Mukhopadhyay T. Information technology and business value: an analytic and empirical investigation. Inf Syst Res 1995;6(1):3-23.
6. Bharadwaj A. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Q 2000;24(1):169-96 (March).
7. Computerworld, 1993. Section 2 of 2, September 13, 45.
8. Deakin EB. Distributions of financial accounting ratios: some empirical evidence. Account Rev 1976;51:90-6 (January).
9. Dos Santos BL, Peffers KG, Mauer DC. The impact of information technology investment announcements on the market value of the firm. Inf Syst Res 1993;4(1):1-23.
10. Eisemann PC. Return on equity and systematic ratio analysis. Commer Lend Rev 1997;12(3):51-7 (Summer).
11. Frecka TJ, Hopwood WS. The effects of outliers on the cross-sectional distributional properties of financial ratios. Account Rev 1983;58/1:115-28 (January).
12. Gibson C. Financial statement analysis: using financial accounting information. 4th ed. Boston, MA: PWS-Kent Publishing, 1989.
13. Grinyer P, Norburn D. Planning for existing markets: perceptions of executives and financial performance. J R Stat Soc, Ser A 1975;138:70-97.
14. Hitt L, Brynjolfsson E. Productivity, profit and consumer welfare: three different measures of information technology. MIS Q 1996;20(2):121-42.
15. Horrigan JO. Methodological implications of non-normally distributed financial ratios: a comment. J Bus Finance Account 1983;10/4:683-9.
16. Keats B, Hitt M. A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Acad Manage J 1988;31:570-98.
17. Landauer T. The trouble with computers. Boston, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
18. Larsen RJ, Marx ML. An introduction to mathematical statistics and its applications. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986.
19. Laudon K, Laudon J. Management information systems: organization and technology in the networked enterprise. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2000.
20. Lenz R. Determinants of organizational performance: an interdisciplinary review. Strategic Manage J 1981;2: 131-54.
21. Mata F, Fuerst W, Barney J. Information Technology and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Resource-based Analysis. MIS Quarterly 1995;19(4):487-505.
22. Morton M. Introduction. In: Morton M, editor. The corporation of the 1990s. New York, NY: Oxford Univ. Press, 1991, p. 3-23.
23. Neo B. Factors facilitating the use of information technology for competitive advantage: an exploratory study. Inf Manage 1988;15(4):191-201.
24. Pastore, R. Competing Interests, c10. com, October 1, 1995, www.cio.com/c10/porter0195.html.
25. Strassmann P. The business value of computers: an executive's guide. New Canaan, CT: Information Economic Press, 1990.
26. Strassmann P. The squandered computer. New Canaan, CT: Information Economic Press, 1997.
27. Stratopoulos T, Dehning B. Does successful investment in information technology solve the productivity paradox? Inf Manage 2000;38(2):103-17 (December).
28. Weill P. The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: a study of the valve manufacturing sector. Inf Syst Res 1992;3(4):307-33 (December).
29. Weston J, Brigham E. Essentials of managerial finance. 10th ed. Fort worth, TX: Dryden Press, 1993.
30. Zamuto RA. Comparison of multiple constituency models of organizational effectiveness. Acad Manage Rev 1984;9:1-16 (Spring).