An extended platform logic perspective of IT governance: Managing perceptions and activities of IT

Journal of Strategic Information Systems

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 129-166

  Schwarz, A ^a   Hirschheim, R ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Governance Platform Logic Model Relation Based Management; Information Technology Management; Oil and gas industry

Indexed keywords

GAS INDUSTRY; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

RELATION-BASED MANAGEMENT;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0043124488     PISSN: 09638687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0963-8687(03)00021-0     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Agarwal R., Sambamurthy Z. Principles and models for organizing the IT function. MIS Quarterly Executive. 1:(1):2002;1-16.
2. Applegate L., King J. Rigor and relevance: careers on the line. MIS Quarterly. 23:(1):1999;17-18.
3. Barua A., Mukhopadhyay T. Information technology and firm performance: past, present, and future. Zmud R.W. Framing the Domains of IT Management Research: Projecting the Future Through the Past. 2000;Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Cinncinati, OH.
4. Bashein B., Markus L. A Credibility equation for IT specialists. Sloan Management Review. 38:(4):1997;35-45.
5. Bate P., Khan R., Pye A. Towards a culturally sensitive approach to organization structuring: where organization design meets organization development. Organization Science. 11:(2):2000;197-211.
6. Beath C.M. Supporting the information technology champion. MIS Quarterly. 15:(3):1991;355-373.
7. Benbasat I., Goldstein D.K., Mead M. The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly. 11:(3):1987;368-386.
8. Benbasat I., Zmud R. Empirical research in information systems: the practice of relevance. MIS Quarterly. 23:(1):1999;3-16.
9. Bharadwaj A.S. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly. 24:(1):2000;169-196.
10. Bharadwaj, A., Sambamurthy, V., Zmud, R., 1999. IT capabilities: theoretical perspectives and empirical operationalization. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of Information Systems, Charlotte, NC.
11. Brown C.V. Examining the aybrid IS governance solutions: evidence from a single case study. Information Systems Research. 8:(1):1997;69-94.
12. Brown C.V., Magill S.L. Alignment of the IS function with the enterprise: towards a model of antecedents. MIS Quarterly. 18:(4):1994;371-403.
13. Brown C.V., Sambamurthy V. Repositioning the IT Organization to Enable Business Transformation. 1999;Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Cincinnati, OH.
14. Brynjolffson E. The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM. 35:1993;66-67.
15. Brynjolffson E., Hitt L. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science. 42:(4):1996;541-558.
16. Camillus J., Lederer A.L. Corporate strategy and the design of computerized information systems. Sloan Management Review. 26:(3):1985;35-42.
17. Chan Y. Why haven't we mastered alignment? The importance of the informal organization structure. MIS Quarterly Executive. 1:(2):2002;97-112.
18. Choudhury V., Xia W. Henderson J.C., Venkatraman N. A Resource-Based Theory of Network Structures in Research in Strategic Management and Information Technology. vol. 2:1999;55-85 JAI Press, Stamford, CT.
19. DiRomualdo A., Gurbaxani V. Strategic intent for IT outsourcing. Sloan Management Review. 39:(4):1998;67-80.
20. Earl M. Management Strategies for Information Technology. 1989;Prentice Hall, London.
21. Ein-Dor P., Segev E. Organizational Context and MIS Structure: Some Empirical Evidence. MIS Quarterly. 6:(3):1982;55-68.
22. Eisenhardt K.M. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review. 14:1989;532-550.
23. Enns H., Huff S. Chief information officer influence: an exploratory study. Hansen R., Bichler M., Mahrer H. Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference on Information Systems, Vienna, Austria. Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference on Information Systems, Vienna, Austria. 2000;660-666.
24. Feeny D., Willcocks L. Core Is capabilities for exploiting information technology. Sloan Management Review. 1998;9-21.
25. Fiedler K., Grover V., Teng J. An empirically derived taxonomy of information technology structure and is relationship to organizational structure. Journal of Management Information Systems. 13:(1):1996;9-34.
26. Garvin D.A. The processes of management and organization. Sloan Management Review. 39:(4):1998;33-50.
27. Glaser B.G., Strauss A.L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. 1967;Aldine Publishing Company, New York.
28. Gordon J., Gordon S. Structuring the interaction between IT and business units. Information Systems Management. 17:(1):2000;7-17.
29. Greenwood R., Hinnings C.R. Understanding strategic change: the contribution of archetypes. Academy of Management Journal. 36:(5):1993;1052-1081.
30. Hirschheim R., Porra J., Parks M. The evolution of the corporate IT function and the role of the CIO at Texaco: How do perceptions of IT's performance get formed? Database. 2003;. in press.
31. Hitt L., Brynjolffson E. Productivity business profitability, and consumer surplus: three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quarterly. 20:(2):1996;121-142.
32. Kern, T., 1997. The gestalt of an information technology outsourcing relationship: an exploratory analysis. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Information Systems, Atlanta, pp. 37-58.
33. Kern T., Willcocks L. The Relationship Advantage: Information Technology, Sourcing and Management. 2001;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
34. Klepper R. The management of partnering development in I/S outsourcing. Journal of Information Technology. 10:1995;249-258.
35. Kogut B., Zander U. What firms do? Coordination, identify, and learning. Organization Science. 7:(5):1996;502-518.
36. Lawler E.E. From the Ground Up: Six Principles for Building the New Logic Corporation. 1996;Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
37. Lorenzoni G., Baden-Fuller C. Creating a strategic center to manage a web of partners. California Management Review. 37:(3):1995;146-163.
38. Main T.J., Short J.E. Managing the merger: building partnership through IT planning at the New Baxter. MIS Quarterly. 13:(4):1989;469-484.
39. Martinsons M., Davison R., Tse D. The balanced scorecard: a foundation for the strategic management of information systems. Decision Support Systems. 25:(1):1999;71-88.
40. McFarlan W.F., Nolan R.L. How to manage an IT outsourcing alliance. Sloan Management Review. 36:(2):1995;9-25.
41. Measuring Performance in the Organization of the Future: A Research Study. 1991;Executive Summary, Lexington, MA.
42. Olson M.H., Chervany N.L. The Relationship Between Organizational characteristics and the Structure of the Information Services Function. MIS Quarterly. 4:(2):1980;57-68.
43. Orlikowski W.J. CASE tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly. 3:1993;309-340.
44. Paper D. IS Relevance: are we asking the right questions? Communications of the AIS. 6:2001;. (article 20).
45. Peppard J., Ward J. Mind the gap: diagnosing the relationship between the IT organization and the rest of the business. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 8:(1):1999;29-60.
46. Quinn J., Hilmer F. Strategic outsourcing. Sloan Management Review. 1994;43-55.
47. Ranson S., Hinnings C.R., Greenwood R. The structuring of organizational structures. Administrative Science Quarterly. 28:1980;414-437.
48. Ross J., Beath C., Goodhue D. Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan Management Review. 1996;31-42.
49. Ross J., Vitale M., Beath C. The untapped potential of IT chargeback. MIS Quarterly. 23:(2):1999;215-237.
50. Sabherwal R., Hirschheim R., Goles T. The dynamics of alignment: a punctuated equilibrium model. Organization Science. 12:(2):2001;179-197.
51. Sambamurthy V., Zmud R. Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies. MIS Quarterly. 23:(2):1999;261-290.
52. Sambamurthy V., Zmud R.W. Research commentary: the organizing logic for an enterprise's IT activities in the digital era-a prognosis of practice and a call for research. Information Systems Research. 11:(2):2000;105-114.
53. Serafeimidis V., Smithson S. Information system evaluation in practice: a case study of organizational change. Journal of Information Technology. 15:(2):2000;93-105.
54. Tavakolian H. Linking the information technology structure with organizational competitive strategy: a survey. MIS Quarterly. 12:(3):1989;309-317.
55. Tesch R. Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools. 1990;Falmer Press, New York.
56. Van der Zee J.T.M., Jong B.D. Alignment is not enough: integrating business and information technology management with the balanced business scorecard. Journal of Management Information Systems. 16:(2):1999;137-156.
57. Ward J., Peppard J. Reconciling the IT/business relationship: a troubled marriage in need of guidance. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 5:(1):1996;37-65.
58. Weill P., Broadbent M. Managing IT infrastructure: a strategic choice. Zmud R. Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future Through the Past. 2000;Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Cincinnati, OH.
59. Yin R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Method. 1984;Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.