Towards an integrated view of IT value measurement

International Journal of Accounting Information Systems

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 42-60

  Davern, Michael J ^a   Wilkin, Carla L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

IT value; Measurement; Objective; Perceptual; Representation; Subjective

Indexed keywords

EID: 77149125557     PISSN: 14670895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2009.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Aral S., Brynjolfsson E., and Van Alstyne M. Information, technology and information work productivity: task-level evidence. Proceedings of the twenty-seventh international conference on information systems, Milwaukee, WI (2006) 285-306
2. Archer S. On the methodology of constructing a conceptual framework for financial accounting. In: Mumford M.J., and Peasnell K.V. (Eds). Philosophical perspectives on accounting: essays in honour of Edward Stamp (1993), Routledge, London 62-136
3. Armstrong C.P., and Sambamurthy V. Information technology assimilation in firms: the influence of senior leadership and IT infrastructures. Inf Syst Res 10 4 (1999) 304-327
4. Arnold V., and Sutton S.G. The theory of technology dominance: understanding the impact of intelligent decision aids on decision makers' judgments. Adv Account Behav Res 1 (1998) 175-194
5. Arnold V., Clark N., Collier P.A., Leech S.A., and Sutton S.G. The differential use and effect of knowledge-based system explanations in novice and expert judgment decisions. MIS Q 30 1 (2006) 79-97
6. Banker R.D., Potter G., and Srinivasan D. An empirical investigation of an incentive plan that includes nonfinancial performance measures. Account Rev 75 1 (2000) 65-92
7. Barton A. Reflections of an Australian contemporary: the complementarity of entry and exit price current value accounting systems. Abacus 36 3 (2000)
8. Barua A., and Mukhopadhyay T. Information technology and business performance: past, present, and future. In: Zmud R.W. (Ed). Framing the domains of IT management: projecting the future through the past (2000), Pinnaflex Education Resources, Cincinnati, Ohio 65-84
9. Bell D.E., Raiffa H., and Tversky A. Decision making: descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions (1988), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England
10. Benaroch M., and Kauffman R.J. A case for using real options pricing analysis to evaluate information technology project investments. Inf Syst Res 10 1 (1999) 70-86
11. Brickley J., Smith C.W., and Zimmerman I. Managerial economics and organizational architecture (2004), McGraw-Hill/Irwin
12. Broadbent M., McDonald M., and Hunter R. Letter to the Editor. In does IT matter?. An HBR debate. Harvard Business Review Onpoint, Harvard Business School Press Product #3566 (2003)
13. Brooke G. Information Technology and productivity: an economic analysis of the effects of product differentiation. PhD Thesis, University of Minnesota, 1991.
14. Brown T.J., Churchill Jr. G.A., and Peter J.P. Improving the measurement of service quality. J Retail 69 1 (1993) 127-131
15. Brynjolfsson E. The productivity paradox of information technology. Commun ACM 36 12 (1993) 67-77
16. Brynjolfsson E., and Hitt L.M. Beyond the productivity paradox. Commun ACM 41 8 (1998) 49-55
17. Brynjolfsson E., and Hitt L. Beyond computation: information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J Econ Perspect 14 4 (2000) 23-48
18. Brynjolfsson E., and Hitt L. Computing productivity: firm level evidence. Rev Econ Stat 85 4 (2003) 793-808
19. Carr C.L. IT doesn't matter. In does IT matter?. An HBR debate. Harvard Business Review Onpoint, Harvard Business School Press Product #3566 (2003)
20. Carman J.M. Consumer perceptions of service quality: an assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions. J Retail 66 1 (1990) 33-55
21. Chambers R.J. Accounting, evaluation and economic behavior (1966), Prentice-Hall
22. Chan Y.W. IT value: the great divide between qualitative and quantitative and individual and organizational measures. J Manage Inf Syst 16 4 (2000) 225-261
23. Cronin Jr. J.J., and Taylor S.A. Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension. J Mark 56 (1992) 55-68 July
24. Cronin Jr. J.J., and Taylor S.A. SERVPREF versus SERVQUAL: reconciling performance-based and perceptions-minus-expectations measurement of service quality. J Mark 58 (1994) 125-131 January
25. Cross R. Revenue management: hardcore tactics for market domination (1997) Broadway Books, New York
26. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13 3 (1989) 318-339
27. Davern M.J. Information Systems Planning: The Search for Potential Value. In: King W.R. (Ed). Planning for Information Systems. Advances in Management Information Systems. Volume 14 (Armonk, New York, M.E. Sharpe) (2009) 259-273
28. Davern M.J., and Kauffman R.J. The limits to value of decision support systems. Paper presented at the 10th workshop on information systems and economics, New York, NY (1998)
29. Davern M.J., and Kauffman R.J. Discovering value and realizing potential from IT investments. J Manage Inf Syst 16 4 (2000) 121-144
30. Davern M.J., Ferguson C., and Pinnuck M. The pervasiveness of information and communication technology: its effects on business models and implications for the accounting profession. Aust Account Rev 15 3 (2005) 44-55 Supplement
31. Davern M.J., Mantena R., and Stohr E. Diagnosing decision quality. Decis Support Syst 45 (2008) 123-139
32. DeGeus A. Planning as learning. Harvard Bus Rev 66 2 (1988) 75-81 March-April
33. DeLone W.H., and McLean E.R. Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf Syst Res 3 1 (1992) 60-95
34. Doll W.J., and Torkzadeh G. The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction: theoretical and methodological issues. MIS Q 15 1 (1991) 5-10
35. Dos Santos B.L., and Peffers K. Rewards to investors in innovative information technology applications: first movers and early followers in ATMs. Organ Sci 6 3 (1995) 241-259
36. Elbashir M., Collier P., and Davern M.J. Measuring the effects of business intelligence systems: the relationship between business process and organizational performance. Int J Account Inf Syst (2008)
37. Ferguson C., Finn F., and Hall J. Electronic commerce investments: the resource-based view of the firm, and firm market value. Int J Account Inf Syst 6 1 (2005) 5-29
38. Galletta D.F., and Lederer A.L. Some cautions on the measurement of user information satisfaction. Decis Sci 20 (1989) 419-438
39. Godfrey J., Hodgson A., and Holmes S. Accounting theory. 5th edition (2003), John Wiley Press
40. Goodhue D.L., Wybo M.D., and Kirsch L.J. The impact of data integration on the costs and benefits of information systems. MIS Q 16 3 (1992) 293-311
41. Gupta A.K., and Govindarajan V. Business unit strategy, managerial characteristics, and business unit effectiveness at strategy implementation. Acad Manage J 27 (1984) 25-41
42. Hampton C. Determinants of reliance: an empirical test of the theory of technology dominance. Int J Account Inf Syst 6 (2005) 214-240
43. Hayes D.C., Hunton J.E., and Reck J.L. Market reaction to ERP implementation announcements. J Inf Syst 15 1 (2001) 3-18
44. Hevner A.R., March S.T., and Park J. Design science in information systems research. MIS Q 26 1 (2004) 75-105
45. Ittner C.D., and Larcker D.F. Coming up short on non-financial performance measurement. Harvard Bus Rev 81 11 (2003) 88-95
46. Ives B., Olson M.H., and Baroudi J.J. The measurement of user information satisfaction. Commun ACM 26 10 (1983) 785-793
47. Jick T.D. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Adm Sci Q 24 4 (1979) 602-611
48. Johnson H., and Kaplan R. Relevance lost: the rise and fall of management accounting (1987), Harvard Business School Press
49. Kaplan R.S., and Norton D.P. The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus Rev (1992) 71-79 Jan-Feb
50. Kaplan R.S., and Norton D.P. The balanced scorecard (1996), Harvard Business School Press
51. Kaplan R.S., and Norton D.P. Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: part I. Account Horiz 15 1 (2001) 87-106
52. Kaplan S.E., Reneau J.H., and Whitecotton S.M. The effects of predictive ability information, locus of control, and decision maker involvement on decision aid reliance. J Behav Decis Mak 14 (2001) 35-50
53. Kauffman R., and Weill P. An evaluative framework for research on the performance effects of information technology investment. Proceedings of the tenth international conference on information systems (1989) 377-388 Boston, MA
54. Kettinger W.J., and Lee C.C. Pragmatic perspectives on the measurement of information systems service quality. MIS Q 21 2 (1997) 223-240
55. Lucas H.C.J. Information technology and the productivity paradox: assessing the value of investing in IT (1999), Oxford University Press, New York
56. Mangindaan J.V., Navissi F., and Wilkin C. Stock market reaction to the announcements of investments in enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. European Accounting Association Conference (EAA), Rotterdam, Netherlands (2008)
57. Mattessich R.V. Critique of accounting: examination of the foundations and normative structure of an applied science (1995), Quorum Books, London
58. Melone N.P. A theoretical assessment of the user satisfaction construct in information systems research. Manag Sci 36 1 (1990) 76-91
59. Melville N., Kraemer K., and Gurbaxani V. Review: information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of IT business value. MIS Q 28 2 (2004) 283-322
60. Milton S. Ontological foundations of representational information systems: an Australian perspective. Scand J Inf Syst 19 1 (2007) 109-134
61. Monk E., and Wagner B. Concepts in enterprise resource planning. 2nd edn. (2006), Thomson Course Technology, Boston, Massachusetts
62. Most K. Accounting theory. 2nd edition (1982), Columbus Ohio, Grid Publishing
63. Nicolaou A., and Bhattacharya S. Organizational performance effects of ERP systems usage: the impact of post-implementation changes. Int J Account Inf Syst 7 1 (2006) 18-35
64. Oliver R.L. Processing of the satisfaction response in consumption: a suggested framework and research propositions. J Consum Satisfact Dissatisfact Complain 2 (1989) 1-16
65. Otley D. Performance management: a framework for management control systems research. Manage Account Res 10 (1999) 363-382
66. Panko R. Spreadsheets and Sarbanes-Oxley: regulations, risks, and control frameworks. Commun AIS 17 29 (2006) 647-676
67. Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V.A., and Berry L.L. SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring customer perceptions of service quality. Mark Sci Inst 86-108 (1986) 1-39
68. Parasuraman A., Berry L.L., and Zeithaml V.A. Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. J Retail 67 4 (1991) 420-450
69. Peter J.P., Churchill Jr. G.A., and Brown T.J. Caution in the use of difference scores in consumer research. J Consum Res 19 4 (1993) 655-662
70. Pitt L.F., Watson R.T., and Kavan C.B. Service quality: a measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Q 19 2 (1995) 173-187
71. Ray G., Barney J.B., and Muhanna W.A. Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource-based view. Strateg Manage J 25 1 (2004) 23-37
72. Ray G., Muhanna W.A., and Barney J.B. Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: a resource-based analysis. MIS Q 29 4 (2005) 625-652
73. Rikhardsson P., and Kræmmergaard P. Identifying the impacts of enterprise system implementation and use: examples from Denmark. Int J Account Inf Syst 7 1 (2006) 36-49
74. Sadler D.R. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instr Sci 18 2 (1989) 119-141
75. Seddon P.B. A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inf Syst Res 8 3 (1997) 240-253
76. Seddon P.B., and Kiew M.-Y. A partial test and development of DeLone and McLean's model of IS success. Aust J Inf Syst 4 1 (1996) 90-109
77. Shang S., and Seddon P.B. Assessing and managing the benefits of enterprise systems: the business manager's perspective. Inf Syst J 12 (2002) 271-299
78. Sircar S., Turnbow J.L., and Bordoloi B. A framework for assessing the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance. J Manage Inf Syst 16 4 (2000) 69-97
79. Smith B.C., Leimkuhler J.F., and Darrow R.M. Yield management at American Airlines. Interfaces 22 1 (1992) 8-31
80. Spreng R.A., MacKenzie S.B., and Olshavsky R.W. A reexamination of the determinants of consumer satisfaction. J Mark 60 3 (1996) 15-32
81. Srinivasan A. Alternative measures of system effectiveness: associations and implications. MIS Q 9 1 (1985) 243-253
82. Staubus G. Two views of accounting measurement. Abacus 40 3 (2004) 265-279
83. Stewart T.A. Introduction. In does IT matter?. An HBR debate. Harvard Business Review Onpoint, Harvard Business School Press Product #3566 (2003)
84. Subramani M. How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships?. MIS Q 28 1 (2004) 45-73
85. Subramani M.R., and Walden E. The Dotcom effect: the impact of E-commerce announcements on the market value of firms. Proceedings of the twentieth international conference on information systems, Charlotte, North Carolina (1999) 193-207
86. Subramani M.R., and Walden E. The impact of E-commerce announcements on the market value of firms. Inf Syst Res 12 2 (2001) 135-154
87. Tallon P.P., Kraemer K.L., and Gurbaxani V. Executives' perceptions of the business value of information technology: a process-oriented approach. J Manage Inf Syst 16 4 (2000) 145-173
88. Teas R.K. Expectations, performance evaluation, and consumers' perceptions of quality. J Mark 57 (1993) 18-34 October
89. Teas R.K. Expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: an assessment of a reassessment. J Mark 58 (1994) 132-139 January
90. Trochim W.K., and Donnelly J.P. The research methods knowledge base. Atomic dog. 3rd edition (2006)
91. Van der Stede W.A., Chow C.W., and Lin T.W. Strategy, choice of performance measures, and performance. Behav Res Account 18 (2006) 185-205
92. Van Dyke T.P., Kappelman L.A., and Prybutok V.R. Measuring information systems service quality: concerns on the use of the SERVQUAL questionnaire. MIS Q 21 2 (1997) 195-208
93. Venkatesh V., and Morris M.G. Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Q 24 1 (2000) 115-139
94. Venkatraman N., and Ramanujam V. Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches. Acad Manag Rev 11 4 (1986) 801-814
95. Venkatraman N., and Ramanujam V. Measurement of business economic performance: an exanimation of method convergence. J Manage 13 1 (1987) 109-122
96. Wand Y., and Weber R. Towards a deep structure theory of information systems. In: DeGross J.I., Alavi M., and Oppelland H. (Eds). International conference on information systems (1990) 61-71 Copenhagen, Denmark
97. Wand Y., and Weber R. On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars. Eur J Inf Syst 3 (1993) 217-237
98. Wand Y., and Weber R. On the deep structure of information systems. Eur J Inf Syst 5 (1995) 203-223
99. Wilkin C. Quality as the criterion for delivered IS effectiveness. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Business and Law, Deakin University, Australia, 2001.
100. Wilkin C. Evaluating the quality of delivered systems: a framework and instrument. Int J Bus Inf Syst 2 2 (2007) 127-148
101. Wilkin C., and Castleman T. Development of an instrument to evaluate the quality of delivered information systems. Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-36) (2003), The Hilton Waikoloa Village Resort, Big Island, Hawaii
102. Wilkin C., and Hewett W. Measuring the quality of information technology applications as a function of use. Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Information Systems 1997 (ACIS'97) (1997), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
103. Wilkin C., Hewett W., and Carr R. Exploring the role of expectations in defining stakeholder's evaluations of IS quality. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Information Resources Management Association (IRMA'00) (2000), Anchorage, Alaska, USA
104. Wilkin C., Carr R., and Hewett W. Evaluating IS quality: exploration of the role of expectations on stakeholders' evaluation. In: Van Grembergen W. (Ed). Information technology evaluation methods and management (2001), Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
105. Wybo M.D., and Goodhue D.L. Using interdependence as a predictor of data standards: theoretical and measurement issues. Inf Manage 29 6 (1995) 317-329
106. Yorke M. Formative assessment in higher education: moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. High Educ 45 (2003) 477-501