Research on IT value: What we have done in Asia and Europe

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 196-201

  Chau, Patrick Y K ^a   Kuan, Kevin K Y ^a   Liang, Ting Peng ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547600395     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: 14769344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000666     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. BRYNJOLFSSON E (1993) The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM 36(12), 66-77.
2. BRYNJOLFSSON E and HITT L (1996) Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science 42(4), 541-558.
3. CAMERON KS and WHETTEN DA (1983) Some conclusions about organizational effectiveness. In Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison of Multiple Models (CAMERON KS and WHETTEN DA, Eds), pp 261-277, Academic Press, New York.
4. CHAU PYK, HUANG LH and LIANG TP (2005) Information systems research in the Asia Pacific region. European Journal of Information Systems 14(4), 317-323.
5. CLAVER E, GONZALEZ R and LLOPIS J (2000) An analysis of research in information systems (1981-1997). Information & Management 37(4), 181-195.
6. CLEMONS EK, REDDI SP and ROW MC (1993) The impact of information technology on the organization of economic activity: the 'move to the middle' hypothesis, Journal of Management Information Systems 10(2), 9-35.
7. CLEMONS EK and ROW MC (1993) Limits to interfirm coordination through information technology: results of a field study in consumer packaged goods distribution. Journal of Management Information Systems 10(1), 73-95.
8. CRONK MC and FITZGERALD EP (1997) A conceptual framework for furthering understanding of 'IT business value' and its dimensions. In Proceedings of the 3rd Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems Brisbane, Australia.
9. DELONE WH and MCLEAN ER (1992) Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 3(1), 60-95.
10. DELONE WH and MCLEAN ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4), 9-30.
11. DOS SANTOS BL, PEFFERS K and MAUER DC (1993) The impact of information technology investment announcements on the market value of the firm. Information Systems Research 4(1), 1-23.
12. GROVER V, JEONG SR and SEGARS AH (1996) Information systems effectiveness: the construct space and patterns of application. Information & Management 31(4), 177-191.
13. HITT LM and BRYNJOLFSSON E (1996) Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quarterly 20(2), 121-142.
14. HSIEH JJPA and WANG W (2007) Explaining employees, extended use of complex information systems. European Journal of Information Systems 16(3), 228-236.
15. LOEBBECKE C (2007) Adopting IT for content integration in the supermarket: the METRO Group case. European Journal of Information Systems 16(3), 228-236.
16. MASON RO (1978) Measuring information output: a communication systems approach, Information & Management 1(5), 219-234.
17. QUADDUS M and HOFMEYER G (2007) An investigation into the factors influencing the adoption of B2B trading exchanges in small businesses in Western Australia. European Journal of Information Systems 16(3), 202-215.
18. SEDDON PB (1997) A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research 8(3), 240-253.
19. SEDDON PB, STAPLES S, PATNAYAKUNI R and BOWTELL M (1999) Dimensions of information systems success. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2(3), 1-61.
20. SHANNON CE and WEAVER W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
21. ZHANG S, HUANG L-H and YU D-H (2006) An analysis of information systems research in Chinese Mainland. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 17, 785-800.