Evaluating cross-organizational impacts of information technology- an empirical analysis

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 153-167

  Banker, Rajiv D ^a   Chang, Hsihui ^b   Kao, Yi Ching ^c  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross organizational impacts; Externalities; Information technology value; Public accounting; Seemingly unrelated regression; Translog cost function

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952034858     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: 14769344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2010.9     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. AICPA (1984) SAS No. 48, the Effects of Computer Processing on the Examination of Financial Statements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, New York.
2. AICPA (2001) SAS No. 94, the Effect of Information Technology on the Auditor's Consideration of Internal Control in a Financial Statement Audit. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, New York.
3. ALPAR P and KIM M (1990) A microeconomic approach to the measurement of information technology value. Journal of Management Information Systems 7(2), 55-69.
4. ANDERSON JC and GERBING DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103, 411-423.
5. BAGOZZI RP and PHILLIPS LW (1982) Representing and testing organizational theories: a holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly 27, 459-489.
6. BANKER RD, KAUFFMAN RJ and MOREY RC (1990) Measuring gains in operational efficiency from information technology: a study of the positran deployment at Hardee's inc. Journal of Management Information Systems 7(2), 29-54.
7. BELL TB, KNECHEL WR, PAYNE JL and WILLINGHAM JJ (1998) An empirical investigation of the relationship between the computerization of accounting systems and the incidence and size of audit differences. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 17(1), 13-38.
8. BENBASAT I, GOLDSTEIN DK and MEAD M (1987) The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly 11(3), 369-387.
9. BHARADWAJ AS, BHARADWAJ SG and KONSYNSKI BR (1999) Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's q. Management Science 45(6), 1008-1024.
10. BOLLEN KA (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
11. BONNER S (1994) A model of the effects of audit task complexity. Accounting, Organizations and Society 19, 213-234.
12. BRYNJOLFSSON E (1993) The information technology and the productivity paradox. Communications of the ACM 36(12), 66-77.
13. BRYNJOLFSSON E and YANG S (1996) Information technology and productivity: a review of the literature. In Advances in Computers (ZELKOWITZ M, Ed.), pp 179-214, Academic Press, New York.
14. CHEN F, ROMANO Jr. NC and NUNAMAKER Jr. JF (2006) A collaborative project management approach and a framework for its supporting systems. Journal of International Technology and Information Management 15(2), 1-16.
15. CHOE JM (1996) The relationships among performance of accounting information systems, influences factors, and evolution level of information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 12, 215-239.
16. CLARK TC and STODDARD DB (1996) Interorganizational business process redesign: merging technological and process innovation. Journal of Management Information Systems 13(2), 9-28.
17. COHEN J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
18. DELONE WH (1988) Determinants of success for computer usage in small business. MIS Quarterly 12, 51-61.
19. DEWAN S and MIN C (1997) The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: a firm level analysis. Management Science 43(12), 1660-1675.
20. ELLIOTT RK (2002) Twenty-first century assurance. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 21(1), 139-146.
21. FERGUSON A and STOKES DJ (2002) Brand name audit pricing, industry specialization, and leadership premiums post-big 8 and big 6 merger. Contemporary Accounting Research 19(1), 77-110.
22. FOSTER G (1980) Externalities and financial reporting. Journal of Finance 35(2), 521-533.
23. FOSTER G (1981) Intra-industry information transfers associated with earnings release. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3, 201-232.
24. HAN JCY and WILD JJ (1990) Unexpected earnings and intraindustry information transfers: further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 28(1), 211-219.
25. HELLER WP and STARRETT D (1976) The nature of externalities. In Theory and Measurement of Economic Externalities (LIN SA, Ed.), pp 9-22, Academic Preess, New York.
26. HELMS G and MANCINO J (1998) The electronic auditor. Journal of Accountancy 185(4), 45-48.
27. HITT L and BRYNJOLFSSON E (1996) Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quarterly 20(2), 121-142.
28. IRANI Z and LOVE P (2001) Information systems evaluation: past, present and future. European Journal of Information Systems 10, 183-188.
29. IRANI Z and LOVE P (2002) Developing a frame of reference for ex-ante it/is investment evaluation. European Journal of Information Systems 11, 74-82.
30. JORESKOG KG and SORBOM D (1989) Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the Simplis Command Language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ.
31. KIM Y, LACINA M and PARK MS (2008) Positive and negative information transfers from management forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research 46(4), 885-908.
32. KO I, OLFMAN L and CHOI S (2009) The impacts of electronic collaboration and information exploitation capability on firm performance: focusing on suppliers using buyer-dominated interorganizational information systems. International Journal of e-Collaboration 5(2), 1-17.
33. KUDYBA S and DIWAN R (2002) Research report: increasing returns to information technology. Information Systems Research 13(1), 104-111.
34. LEE B and MENON NM (2000) Information technology value through different normative lenses. Journal of Management Information Systems 16(4), 99-119.
35. LUCAS H, BERNDT D and TRUMAN G (1996) A reengineering framework for evaluating a financial imaging system. Communications of the ACM 39(5), 86-96.
36. MARCH HW and HOCEVAR D (1985) Application of confirmatory factor analysis tot he study of self-concept: first- and higher-order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin 97(3), 562-582.
37. MESSIER WF (1997) Auditing - A Systematic Approach. The McGraw-Hill Companies, New York.
38. MONTAZEMI A (1988) Factors affecting information satisfaction in the context of the small business environment. MIS Quarterly 12, 239-256.
39. MOSCOVE SA, SIMKIN MG and BAGRANOFF NA (1997) Core Concept of Accounting Information Systems. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Toronto, Canada.
40. MUKHOPADHYAY T, KEKRE S and KALATHUR S (1995) Business value of information technology: a study of electronic data interexchange. MIS Quarterly 19(2), 137-156.
41. NUNNALLY J (1978) Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.
42. O'KEEFE TB, SIMUNIC DA and STEIN MT (1994) The production of audit services: evidence from a major public accounting firm. Journal of Accounting Research 32(2), 241-261.
43. PALMROSE Z (1986) Audit fees and auditor size: further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 24(1), 97-110.
44. PENNINGS J (1995) Information technology and organizational effectiveness. In Productivity and Quality Challenge (HARKER PT, Ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherland.
45. PORTER ME and MILLAR VE (1985) How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review 63(4), 149-160.
46. RAYPORT JF and SVIOKLA JJ (1995) Exploiting the virtual value chain. Harvard Business Review 73(6), 75-85.
47. ROBEY D, IM G and WAREHAM JD (2008) Theoretical foundations of empirical research on interorganizational systems: assessing past contributions and guiding future directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9(9), 497-518.
48. SHEPHARD RW (1970) Theory of Cost and Production Functions. Princeton University, Princeton. N.J.
49. SIMON DT and FRANCIS JR (1988) The effects of auditor change on audit fees: tests of price cutting and price recovery. The Accounting Review 63(2), 255-269.
50. SIMUNIC DA (1980) The pricing of audit services: theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 18(1), 161-190.
51. SIRCAR S, TURNBOW JL and BORDOLOI B (2000) A framework for assessing the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance. Journal of Management Information Systems 16(4), 69-97.
52. SUBRAMANI M (2004) How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships? MIS Quarterly 28(1), 45-73.
53. THOMAS J and ZHANG F (2008) Overreaction to intra-industry information transfers? Journal of Accounting Research 46(4), 909-940.
54. TUCKER GH (2001) IT and the audit. Journal of Accountancy 192(3), 41-43.
55. VARIAN HR (1992) Microeconomic Analysis. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc, New York.
56. WALLACE WA (1980) The Economic Role of the Audit in Free and Regulated Markets. Touche & Ross & Co., New York.
57. WALTERS AA (1963) Production and cost functions: an econometric survey. Econometrica 31(1/2), 1-66.
58. WARNER RM (2007) Applied Statistics: From Bivariate through Multivariate Techniques. Sage Publications, Inc, Newbury Park, CA.
59. WILKINSON JW, CERULLO MJ, RAVAL V and WONG-ON-WING B (2000) Accounting Information Systems. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York.
60. YIN RK (1984) Case Study Research. SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
61. ZELLNER A (1962) An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests of aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association 57, 500-509