IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation

Organization Science

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 763-780

  Aral, Sinan ^a   Weill, Peter ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Business value of information technology; Complementarities; Firm performance; Information technology assets; IT capabilities; IT infrastructure; IT practices; Resource based theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 41449112482     PISSN: 10477039     EISSN: 15265455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0306     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Anderson, E. W., C. Fornell, R. T. Rust. 1997. Customer satisfaction, productivity, and profitability: Differences between goods and services. Marketing Sci. 16(2) 129-145.
2. Athey, S., S. Stern. 1998. An empirical framework for testing theories about complementarity in organizational design. NBER Working Paper 6600, Cambridge, MA.
3. Autor, D., F. Levy, R. Murnane. 1998. Computing inequality: Have computers changed the labor market? Quart. J. Econom. 113(4) 1169-1214.
4. Bakos, Y. 1991. A strategic analysis of electronic marketplaces. MIS Quart. 15(3) 295-310.
5. Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1) 99-120.
6. Bartel, A., C. Ichniowski, K. Shaw. 2004. Using insider econometrics to study productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 2(1) 217-223.
7. Barua, A., C. H. Kriebel, T. Mukhopadhyay. 1995. Information technology and business value: An analytical and empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 6(1) 2-23.
8. Bharadwaj, A. S. 2000. A resource-based perspective on IT capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 24(1) 169-196.
9. Bharadwaj, A. S., S. G. Bharadwaj, B. Konsynski. 1999. Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's q. Management Sci. 45(7) 1008-1024.
10. Boudreau, D., D. Gefen, D. W. Straub. 2001. Validation in MIS research: A state-of-the-art assessment. MIS Quart. 25(1) 1-24.
11. Bresnahan, T. F., E. Brynjolfsson, L. M. Hitt. 2002. Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1) 339-376.
12. Breusch, T., A. Pagan. 1979. A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica 47 1287-1294.
13. Broadbent, M., P. Weill, B. S. Neo. 1999. Strategic context and patterns of IT infrastructure capability. J. Strat. Inform. Sys. 8(2) 157-187.
14. Brynjolfsson, E. 1996. The contribution of information technology to consumer welfare. Inform. Systems Res. 7(3) 281-300.
15. Brynjolfsson, E., L. M. Hitt. 1995. Information technology as a factor of production: The role of differences among firms. Econom. Innov. New Tech. 3(4) 183-199.
16. Brynjolfsson, E., L. M. Hitt. 1996. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. 42(4) 541-558.
17. Brynjolfsson, E., L. M. Hitt. 2000. Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J. Econom. Perspectives 14(4) 23-48.
18. Brynjolfsson, E., S. Yang. 1997. The intangible benefits and costs of investments: Evidence from financial markets. J. I. DeGross, K. Kuldeep, eds. Proc. 18th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, GA.
19. Brynjolfsson, E., T. Malone, V. Gurbaxani, A. Kambil. 1994. Does information technology lead to smaller firms? Management Sci. 40(12) 1645-1662.
20. Campbell, D. T., D. W. Fiske. 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-rnultimethod matrix. Psych. Bull. 56(2) 81-105.
21. Capon, N., J. U. Farley, S. Hoenig. 1990. Determinants of financial performance: A meta analysis. Management Sci. 36(10) 1143-1159.
22. Clemons, E. K., M. C. Row. 1991. Sustaining IT advantage: The role of structural differences. MIS Quart. 15(3) 275-292.
23. Cohen, W. M., D. A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1) 128-152.
24. Devaraj, S., R. Kohli. 2003. Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual use the missing link? Management Sci. 49(3) 273-289.
25. Dewan, S., C. Min. 1997. The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: A firm level analysis. Management Sci. 43(12) 1660-1675.
26. Dierickx, I., K. Cool. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. 35(12) 1504-1511.
27. Doll, W. J., G. Torkzadeh. 1998. Developing a multidimensional measure of system use in an organizational context. Inform. Management 33(4) 171-185.
28. Dos Santos, B. L., K. Peffers. 1995. Rewards to investors in innovative information technology applications: First movers and early followers in ATMs. Organ. Sci. 6(3) 241-259.
29. Dos Santos, B. L., K. Peffers, D. C. Mauer. 1993. The impact of information technology investment announcements on the market value of the firm. Inform. Systems Res. 4(1) 1-23.
30. Dosi, G., R. Nelson, S. G. Winter. 2000. The Nature and Dynamic of Organizational Capabilities. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
31. Duncan, N. B. 1995. Capturing flexibility of information technology infrastructure: A study of resource characteristics and their measure. J. Management Inform. Sys. 12(2) 37-57.
32. Dunne, T., J. Haltiwanger, K. Troske. 1997. Technology and jobs: Secular changes and cyclincal dynamics. Carnegie-Rochester Conf. Series Public Policy XLVI 107-178.
33. Floyd, S. W., B. Wooldridge. 1990. Path analysis of the relationship between competitive strategy, information technology and financial performance. J. Management Inform. Sys. 7(1) 47-64.
34. Gefen, D., D. W. Straub, M. C. Boudreau. 2000. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Comm. AIS 4(7) 1-78.
35. Goldin, C., L. Katz. 1998. The origins of technology-skill complementarity. Quart. J. Econom. 113(3) 693-732.
36. Goodhue, D. L., R. L. Thompson. 1995. Task technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. 19(2) 213-236.
37. Grant, R. M. 1996. Toward a knowledge based theory of the firm. Strat. Management J. 17 109-122.
38. Hitt, L. M. 1999. Information technology and firm boundaries: Evidence from panel data. Inform. Systems Res. 10(2) 134-149.
39. Hitt, L. M., E. Brynjolfsson. 1996. Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quart. 20(2) 121-142.
40. Jensen, M. C., W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3 295-316.
41. Keen, P. G. W. 1991. Shaping the Future: Business Design Through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
42. Kelley, M. R. 1994. Productivity and information technology: The elusive connection. Management Sci. 40(11) 1406-1425.
43. Kohli, R., S. Devaraj. 2003. Measuring information technology payoff: A meta-analysis of structural variables in firm-level empirical research. Inform. Systems Res. 14(2) 127-145.
44. Kreuger, A. 1993. How computers have changed the wage structure: Evidence from micro data. Quart. J. Econom. 108(1) 33-60.
45. Loveman, G. W. 1994. An assessment of the productivity impact of information technologies. T. J. Allen, M. S. Scott Morton, eds. Information Technology and the Corporation of the 1990s: Research Studies. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
46. Malone, T. W., J. Yates, R. I. Benjamin. 1987. Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Comm. ACM 30(6) 484-497.
47. Mata, F. J., W. L. Fuerst, J. Barney. 1995. Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quart. 19(4) 487-505.
48. Milgrom, P., J. Roberts. 1990. The economics of modem manufacturing: Technology, strategy and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(3) 511-528.
49. Mithas, S., M. S. Krishnan, C. Fornell. 2005. Why do customer relationship management applications affect customer satisfaction? J. Marketing. 69(4) 201-209.
50. Montgomery, C., B. Wernerfelt. 1988. Diversification, Ricardian rents, and Tobin's q. RAND J. Econom. 19 623-632.
51. Nagayama, K., P. Weill. 2004. 7-Eleven Japan Co., Ltd.: Reinventing the retail business model. Center for Information Systems Research Working Paper 338, Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
52. Nelson, R., S. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
53. Prahalad, C. K., G. Hamel. 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 63 79-91.
54. Richardson, G. B. 1972. The organization of industry. Econom. J. 82 883-896.
55. Rockart, J. F., M. J. Earl, J. Ross. 1996. Eight imperatives for the new IT organization. Sloan Management Rev. 38(1) 43-55.
56. Ross, J. W., C. M. Beath, D. L. Goodhue, 1996. Develop long term competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan Management Rev. 38(1) 31-45.
57. Sambamurthy, V., A. Bharadwaj, V. Grover. 2003. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of IT in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. 27(2) 237-263.
58. Strassman, P. 1990. The Business Value of Computers. Information Economics Press, New Haven, CT.
59. Straub, D. W. 1989. Validating instruments in MLS research. MIS Quart. 13(2) 147-169.
60. Teece, D. J., G. Pisano, A. Shuen. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strat. Management J. 18(7) 509-533.
61. Tushman, M. L., P. Anderson. 1986. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3) 439-465.
62. Wade, M., J. Hulland. 2004. Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quart. 28(1) 107-142.
63. Weill, P. 1992. The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: A study of the valve manufacturing sector. Inform. Systems Res. 3(4) 307-333.
64. Weill, P., S. Aral. 2005. IT savvy: Achieving industry leading returns from your IT portfolio. CISR Res. Briefing 5(2A) 1-4.
65. Weill, P., M. Broadbent. 1998. Levering the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
66. Weill, P., J. Ross. 2004. IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
67. Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource based view of the firm. Strat. Management J. 5 171-180.
68. White, H. 1980. A heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroscedasticity. Econometrica 48(4) 817-838.
69. Williamson, O. 1975. Markets and Hierarchy: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. Free Press, New York.
70. Zhu, K., K. L. Kraemer. 2002. e-Commerce metrics for net-enhanced organizations: Assessing the value of e-commerce to firm performance in the manufacturing sector. Inform. Systems Res. 13(3) 275-295.