Stems and paradigms

Language

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 737-767

  Blevins, James P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21344466474     PISSN: 00978507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lan.2003.0206     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. ACKERMAN, FARRELL, and GREGORY STUMP. 2003. Paradigms and periphrastic expression: A study in realization-based lexicalism. Projecting syntax, ed. by Andrew Spencer and Louisa Sadler. Stanford: CSLI Publications, to appear.
2. ACKERMAN, FARRELL, and GERT WEBELHUTH. 1998. A theory of predicates. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
3. ANDERSON, STEPHEN R. 1985. Phonology in the twentieth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. ANDERSON, STEPHEN R. 1986. Disjunctive ordering in inflectional morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4.1-32.
5. ANDERSON, STEPHEN R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. ANDREWS, AVERY D. 1990. Unification and morphological blocking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8.507-58.
7. ARONOFF, MARK. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. ARONOFF, MARK. 1994. Morphology by itself: stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. BACH, EMMON. 1988. Categorial grammars as theories of language. Categorial grammars and natural language structures, ed. by Richard T. Oehrle, Emmon Bach, and Deirdre Wheeler, 17-34. Dordrecht: Reidel.
10. BAUER, LAURIE. 1988. A descriptive gap in morphology. Yearbook of Morphology 1.17-28.
11. BEARD, ROBERT. 1995. Lexeme-morpheme base morphology: A general theory of inflection and word formation. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
12. BLEVINS, JAMES P. 2000. Markedness and agreement. Transactions of the Philological Society 98.2.233-62.
13. BLEVINS, JAMES P. 2001a. Paradigmatic derivation. Transactions of the Philological Society 99.2.211-22.
14. BLEVINS, JAMES P. 2001b. Realization-based lexicalism. Journal of Linguistics 37.2.355-65.
15. BLEVINS, JAMES P. 2003. Inflection classes and economy. Explorations in nominal inflection, ed. by Lutz Gunkel, Gereon Müller, and Gisela Zinfonun. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, to appear.
16. BOOIJ, GEERT. 1999. Lexical storage and regular processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22.6.1016.
17. BOOIJ, GEERT. 2002. The morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. BROWN, DUNSTAN. 1998. Stem indexing and morphonological selection in the Russian verb: A network morphology account. Models of inflection, ed. by Ray Fabri, Albert Ortmann, and Teresa Parodi, 196-224. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
19. BYBEE, JOAN. 1999. Use impacts morphological representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22.6.1016-17.
20. CARDONA, GEORGE. 1976. Pānini: A survey of research. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
21. CARSTAIRS, ANDREW. 1983. Paradigm economy. Journal of Linguistics 19.115-25.
22. CARSTAIRS-MCCARTHY, ANDREW. 1994. Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast. Language 70.737-88.
23. CHOMSKY, NOAM. 1956. Three models for the description of language. Institute of Radio Engineers Transactions on Information Theory 2-2.113-24.
24. CLAHSEN, HARALD. 1999. Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22.6.991-1013.
25. CLAHSEN, HARALD; SONJA EISENBEISS; and INGRID SONNENSTUHL-HENNING. 1997. Morphological structure and the processing of inflected words. Theoretical Linguistics 23.3.225-55.
26. CORBETT, GREVILLE, and NORMAN M. FRASER. 1993. Network morphology: A DATR account of Russian nominal inflection, determiners and pronouns. Journal of Linguistics 29.113-42.
27. CURME, GEORGE O. 1935. A grammar of the English language, vol. 1: Parts of speech. Boston: Heath.
28. DONALDSON, BRUCE. 1993. A grammar of Afrikaans. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
29. DONALDSON, BRUCE. 1997. Dutch: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.
30. DROSDOWSKI, GÜNTHER (ed.) 1995. Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
31. DURRELL, MARTIN. 1996. Hammer's German grammar and usage. London: Arnold.
32. ERELT, MATI; TIIU ERELT; and KRISTIINA ROSS. 2000. Eesti keele käsiraamat. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.
33. ERNESTUS, MIRJAM, and R. HARALD BAA YEN. 2003. Predicting the unpredictable: Interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch. Language 79.5-38.
34. EVANS, ROGER, and GERALD GAZDAR. 1996. DATR: A language for lexical knowledge representation. Computational Linguistics 22.2.167-216.
35. GILDERSLEEVE, B. L., and G. LODGE. 1895. Gildersleeve's Latin grammar. New York: Macmillan & Co. Reprinted by Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers, 2000.
36. HALLE, MORRIS, and ALEC MARANTZ. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. The view from building 20, ed. by Ken Hale and Samuel J. Keyser, 111-76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. HARRIS, ZELLIG S. 1942. Morpheme alternants in linguistic analysis. Language 18.169-80. Reprinted in Joos 1957, 109-15.
38. HARRIS, ZELLIG S. 1957. Co-occurrence and transformation in linguistic structure. Language 33.283-340.
39. HOCKETT, CHARLES F. 1947. Problems of morphemic analysis. Language 23.321-43.
40. HOCKETT, CHARLES F. 1954. Two models of grammatical description. Word 10.210-31. Reprinted in Joos 1957, 386-99.
41. HOCKETT, CHARLES F. 1967. The Yawelmani basic verb. Language 43.208-22.
42. HOCKETT, CHARLES F. 1987. Refurbishing our foundations. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
43. HUDDLESTON, RODNEY. 1984. Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. HUGHES, MICHAEL, and FARRELL ACKERMAN. 2002. Words and paradigms: Estonian nominal declension. Chicago Linguistics Society 37.425-36.
45. JOOS, MARTIN (ed.) 1957. Readings in linguistics 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46. JOSEPH, BRIAN, and JANE SMIRNIOTOPOULOS. 1993. The morphosyntax of the Modern Greek verbal complex as morphology and not syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 22.4.388-98.
47. KIPARSKY, PAUL. 1966. Über den deutschen Akzent. Studia Grammatica 7: Untersuchungen über Akzent und Intonation im Deutschen, 69-98. New York: Akademie Verlag.
48. KIPARSKY, PAUL. 1982. Lexical phonology and morphology. Linguistics in the morning calm, ed. by the Linguistic Society of Korea, 3-91. Seoul: Hanshin.
49. KURYŁOWICZ, JERZY. 1949. La nature des procès dits 'analogiques'. Acta Linguistica 121-38. Reprinted in Readings in linguistics 2, ed. by Eric P. Hamp, Fred W. House-holder, and Robert Austerlitz, 158-74. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966.
50. LIEB, HANS-HEINRICH. 2003. Notions of paradigm in grammar. Lexikologie/Lexicology (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft), ed. by D. Alan Cruse. Berlin: de Gruyter, to appear.
51. LIEBER, ROCHELLE. 1992. Deconstructing morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52. MATTHEWS, PETER H. 1972. Inflectional morphology: A theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. MATTHEWS, PETER H. 1991. Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. MCCAWLEY, JAMES D. 1968. Concerning the base component of a transformational grammar. Foundations of Language 4.243-67.
55. PAUL, HERMANN. 1881. Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Published 1998 with revisions by I. Schröbler, P. Wiehl, and S. Grosse.
56. PINKER, STEVEN. 1999. Words and rules. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.
57. POLLARD, CARL, and IVAN A. SAG. 1987. Information-based syntax and semantics. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
58. QUIRK, RANDOLF; SYDNEY GREENBAUM; GEOFFREY LEECH; and JAN SVARTVIK. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
59. ROBINS, ROBERT H. 1959. In defense of WP. Transactions of the Philological Society 116-44. Reprinted in Transactions of the Philological Society 99.2.1-36, 2001.
60. RUMELHART, DAVID E., and JAMES L. MCCLELLAND. 1986. Learning the past tense. Parallel distributed processing, vol. 2: Psychological and biological models, ed. by James L. McClelland and David E. Rumelhart, 216-71. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. SAUSSURE, FERDINAND DE. 1916. Cours de linguistique géné rale. Ed. by Wade Bally and Albert Séchehaye. Paris: Payot.
62. SKOUSEN, ROYAL. 1989. Analogical modeling of language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
63. SKOUSEN, ROYAL. 1992. Analogy and structure. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
64. SPENCER, ANDREW. 2001. The paradigm-based model of morphosyntax. Transactions of the Philological Society 99.2.279-313.
65. STUMP, GREGORY T. 1993a. Position classes and morphological theory. Yearbook of Morphology 1992.129-80.
66. STUMP, GREGORY T. 1993b. On rules of referral. Language 69.449-79.
67. STUMP, GREGORY T. 2001. Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. STUMP, GREGORY T. 2002. Morphological and syntactic paradigms: Arguments for a theory of paradigm linkage. Yearbook of Morphology 2001.147-80.
69. TIERSMA, PIETER MEIJRS. 1985. Frisian reference grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
70. WEDEL, ANDREW. 2004. Self-organization and the development of higher-order phonological patterns. Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz dissertation.
71. WHITNEY, WILLIAM DWIGHT. 1889. Sanskrit grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72. WIESE, RICHARD. 1996. The phonology of German. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
73. WUNDERLICH, DIETER, and RAY FABRI. 1995. Minimalist morphology: An approach to inflection. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 14.2.236-94.
74. WURZEL, W. U. 1989. Inflectional morphology and naturalness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
75. ZWICKY, ARNOLD. 1985. How to describe inflection. Berkeley Linguistics Society 11.372-86.
76. ZWICKY, ARNOLD. 1991. Systematic versus accidental phonological identity. Paradigms: The economy of inflection, ed. by Frans Plank, 113-32. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.