Relationships between language structure and language learning: The suffixing preference and grammatical categorization

Cognitive Science

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1317-1329

  St Clair, Michelle C ^a   Monaghan, Padraic ^b   Ramscar, Michael ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Corpus analysis; Grammatical categorization; Human experimentation; Language evolution; Language learning; Suffixing preference

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950757150     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01065.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baayen, R. H., Pipenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
2. Black, A. W., Clark, R., Richmond, K., King, S., & Zen, H. (2004). Festival speech synthesizer (Version 1.95). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
3. Braine, M. D. S., Brody, R. E., Brooks, P. J., Sudhalter, V., Ross, J. A., Catalano, L., & Fisch, S. M. (1990). Exploring Language acquisition in children with a miniature artificial language: Effects of item and pattern frequency, arbitrary subclasses and correction. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 591-610.
4. Brooks, P. J., Braine, M. D., Catalano, L., Brody, R. E., & Sudhalter, V. (1993). Acquisition of gender-like noun subclasses in an artificial language: The contribution of phonological markers to learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 76-95.
5. Bybee, J. L., Pagliuca, W., & Perkins, R. D. (1990). On the asymmetries of the affixation of grammatical material. In W. Croft, K. Denning, & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Studies in typology and diachrony (pp. 1-42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
6. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. New York: Mouton.
7. Christiansen, M., & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 31, 489-509.
8. Clark, E. V. (2007). Morphology in language acquisition. In A. Spencer & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), The handbook of morphology (pp. 374-389). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing.
9. Cutler, A., & Carter, D. M. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language, 2, 133-142.
10. Cutler, A., Hawkins, J. A., & Gilligan, G. (1985). The suffixing preference: A processing explanation. Linguistics, 23, 723-758.
11. Enrique-Arias, A. (2002). Accounting for the position of verbal agreement morphology with psycholinguistic and diachronic explanatory factors. Studies in Language, 26, 1-31.
12. Evans, N., & Levinson, S. (In press). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Brain and Behavioural Sciences.
13. Fudge, E. (1984). English word-stress. London: George Allen & Unwin.
14. Givon, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.
15. Greenberg, J. H. (1957). Order of affixing: A study in general linguistics. In Essays in linguistics (pp. 89-94). New York: Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research.
16. Hawkins, J. A., & Cutler, A. (1988). Psycholinguistic factors in morphological asymmtery. In J. A. Hawkins (Ed.), Explaining language universals (pp. 280-317). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
17. Hawkins, J. A., & Gilligan, G. (1988). Prefixing and suffixing univerals in relation to basic word order. Lingua, 74, 219-259.
18. Hoeksema, J. (1985). Categorical morphology. New York: Garland Publishing Inc.
19. Hupp, J. M., Sloutsky, V. M., & Culicover, P. W. (2009). Evidence for a domain-general mechanism underlying the suffixation preference in language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 876-909.
20. Kelly, M. (1996). The role of phonology in grammatical category assignments. In J. L. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 249-261). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Kuczaj, S. A. (1979). Evidence for a language learning strategy: On the relative ease of acquisition of prefixes and suffixes. Child Development, 50, 1-13.
22. Marslen-Wilson, W. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102.
23. Mithum, M. (1989). The acquisition of polysynthesis. Journal of Child Language, 16, 285-312.
24. Monaghan, P., Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). The differential role of phonological and distributional cues in grammatical categorisation. Cognition, 96, 143-182.
25. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A., Butterfield, S., & Kearns, R. (2001). Language-universal constraints on speech segmentation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 637-660.
26. Osgood, C. E. (1949). The similarity paradox in human learning: A resolution. Psychological Review, 56, 132-143.
27. Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Pollatsek, A., & Well, A. D. (1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 785-794.
29. Ramscar, M., & Yarlett, D. (2007). Linguistic self-correction in the absence of feedback: A new approach to the logical problem of language acquisition. Cognitive Science, 31, 927-960.
30. Ramscar, M., Yarlett, D., Dye, M., & Kalchbrenner, N. (2009). The feature-label-order effect in symbolic learning. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
31. Reali, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). Uncovering the richness of the stimulus: Structure dependence and indirect statistical evidence. Cognition, 96, 143-182.
32. Redington, M., Chater, N., & Finch, S. (1998). Distributional information: A powerful cue for acquiring syntactic categories. Cognitive Science, 22, 425-469.
33. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
34. Sague, K., MacWhinney, B., & Lavie, A. (2004). Adding syntactic annotations to transcripts of parent-child dialogs. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on language resources and evaluation (pp. 1815-1818). Lisbon: LREC.
35. Sapir, E. (1921). Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
36. Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the acquisition of grammar. In C. A. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 175-208). New York: Holt, Rinehard & Winston.
37. St. Clair, M. C. (2007). Language structure and language acquisition: Grammatical categorization using phonological and distributional information. Unpublished thesis. York, England: University of York.
38. Valian, V., & Coulson, S. (1988). Anchor points in language learning: The role of marker frequency. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 71-86.