Are Morphological Effects Distinguishable from the Effects of Shared Meaning and Shared Form?

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 1431-1444

  Feldman, Laurie Beth ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS;

EID: 0034330868     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1431     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Allen, M., & Badecker, W. (2000). Inflectional regularity: Probing the nature of lexical representation in a cross-modal priming task. Manuscript submitted for publication.
2. Balota, D. A., & Paul, S. T. (1996). Summation of activation: Evidence from multiple primes that converge and diverge within semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 827-845.
3. Bentin, S., & Feldman, L. B. (1990). The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to repetition priming at short and long lags: Evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 42A, 693-711.
4. Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177-208.
5. De Groot, A. M. B. (1984). Primed lexical decision: Combined effects of the proportion of related prime-target pairs and the stimulus-onset asynchrony of prime and target. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 36A, 253-280.
6. Den Heyer, K., Briand, K., & Dannenbring, G. L. (1983). Strategic factors in a lexical decision task: Evidence for automatic and attention-driven processes. Memory & Cognition, 11, 374-381.
7. Deutsch, A., Frost, R., & Forster, K. I. (1998). Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1238-1255.
8. Drews, E., & Zwitserlood, P. (1995). Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1098-1116.
9. Emmorey, K. D. (1989). Auditory morphological priming in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(2), 73-92.
10. Feldman, L. B. (1992). Morphological relationships revealed through the repetition priming task. In M. Noonan, P. Downing, & S. Lima (Eds.), Linguistics & literacy (pp. 239-254). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
11. Feldman, L. B. (1994). Beyond orthography and phonology: Differences between inflections and derivations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 442-470.
12. Feldman, L. B. (1999a, May). The time course of morphological processing. Paper presented at the Workshop on Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Morphological Processing, Aix-en-Provence, France.
13. Feldman, L. B. (1999b, November). Morphological similarity and orthographic similarity contrasted: A cross task comparison. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles, CA.
14. Feldman, L. B., & Andjelković, D. (1992). Morphological analysis in word recognition. In L. Katz & R. Frost (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning: An overview (pp. 343-360). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
15. Feldman, L. B., & Bentin, S. (1994). Morphological analysis of disrupted morphemes: Evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 47A, 407-435.
16. Feldman, L. B., & Fowler, C. A. (1987). The inflected noun system in Serbo-Croatian: Lexical representation of morphological structure. Memory & Cognition, 15, 1-12.
17. Feldman, L. B., & Larabee, J. (in press). Morphological facilitation following prefixed but not suffixed words: Lexical architecture or modality-specific processes? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
18. Feldman, L. B., & Moskovljevié, J. (1987). Repetition priming is not purely episodic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 573-581.
19. Feldman, L. B., & Soltano, E. G. (1999). What morphological priming reveals about morphological processing. Brain & Language, 68, 33-39.
20. Feldman, L. B., Soltano, E. G., Pastizzo, M., & Francis, S. (2000). When does semantic transparency influence morphological processing? Manuscript submitted for publication.
21. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked non-word priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 45A, 353-372.
22. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1994). Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 47A, 365-382.
23. Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 39A, 211-251.
24. Fowler, C. A., Napps, S. E., & Feldman, L. B. (1985). Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory & Cognition, 13, 241-255.
25. Frost, R., Forster, K., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 829-856.
26. Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency & neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 228-244.
27. Grainger, J., Colé, P., & Segui, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 370-384.
28. Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 218-233.
29. Grainger, J., O'Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., & Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception and Psychophysics, 45, 189-195.
30. Hanson, V. L., & Feldman, L. B. (1989). Language specificity in lexical organization: Evidence from deaf signers' lexical organization of ASL and English. Memory & Cognition, 17, 292-301.
31. Hanson, V. L., & Wilkenfeld, D. (1985). Morphophonology and lexical organization in deaf readers. Language and Speech, 28, 269-280.
32. Henderson, L., Wallis, J., & Knight, D. (1984). Morphemic structure and lexical access. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Kirsner, K., Milech, D., & Standen, P. (1983). Common and modality-specific coding in the mental lexicon. Memory & Cognition, 11, 621-630.
34. Laudanna, A., Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1989). Priming homographic stems. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 531-546.
35. Lorch, R. (1982). Priming and search processes in semantic memory: A test of three models of spreading activation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Memory, 21, 468-492.
36. Lupker, S. J. (1984). Semantic priming without association: A second look. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 709-733.
37. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
38. Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1994). Visual, orthographic, phonological and lexical influences in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1107-1128.
39. McCrae, K., & Boisvert, S. (1998). Automatic semantic similarity priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1-16.
40. Murrell, G. A., & Morton, J. (1974). Word recognition and morphemic structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 963-968.
41. Napps, S. E. (1989). Morphemic relationships in the lexicon: Are they distinct from semantic and formal relationships? Memory & Cognition, 17, 729-739.
42. Napps, S. E., & Fowler, C. A. (1987). Formal relationships among words and the organization of the mental lexicon. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 257-272.
43. Plaut, D., & Gonnerman, L. (1999, May). Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Paper presented at the Workshop on Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Morphological Processing, Aix-en-Provence, France.
44. Raveh, M. (1999). The contribution of frequency and semantic similarity to morphological processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
45. Raveh, M., & Rueckl, J. G. (2000). Equivalent effects of inflected and derived primes: Long-term morphological priming in fragment completion and lexical decision. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 103-119.
46. Rueckl, J. G., Mikolinski, M., Raveh, M., Miner, C. S., & Mars, F. (1997). Morphological priming, connectionist networks, and masked fragment completion. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 382-405.
47. Schreuder, R., Flores d'Arcais, G. B., & Glazenborg, G. (1984). Effects of perceptual and conceptual similarity in semantic priming. Psychological Research, 45, 339-354.
48. Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 65-76.
49. Seidenberg, M. S. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance, XII (pp. 245-263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., Hernon, W. P., & Hall, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 399-412.
51. Stolz, J. A., & Feldman, L. B. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 109-129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337-359.
53. Thompson-Schill, S. L., Kurtz, K. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). Effects of semantic and associative relatedness on automatic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 440-458.
54. Van Orden, G. C., Jansen op de Haar, M. A., & Bosman, A. M. T. (1997). Complex dynamic systems also predict dissociations, but they do not reduce to autonomous components. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 131-165.