Causes and consequences of word structure

Causes And Consequences of Word Structure

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-237

  Hay, Jennifer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909127577     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203495131     Document Type: Book

References (170)

1. Alegre, M. and Gordon, P.: 1999a, Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections, Journal of Memory and Language 40, 41-61.
2. Alegre, M. and Gordon, P.: 1999b, Rule-based versus associative processes in derivational morphology, Brain and Language 68, 347-354.
3. Allen, J. and Christiansen, M.: 1996, Integrating multiple cues in word segmentation: A connectionist model using hints, Proceedings of the 18th annual Cognitive Science Society conference, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah, NJ, pp. 370-375.
4. Anshen, F. and Aronoff, M.: 1981, Morphological Productivity and Transparency, Canadian Journal of Linguistics 26(1), 63-72.
5. Anshen, F. and Aronoff, M.: 1988, Producing morphologically complex words, Linguistics pp. 641-655.
6. Anshen, F. and Aronoff, M.: 1999, Using dictionaries to study the mental lexicon, Brain and Language 68, 16-26.
7. Aronoff, M.: 1976, Word Formation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. Aronoff, M.: 1980, The relevance of productivity in a synchronic description of word formation, in J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical Morphology, Mouton, The Hague, pp. 71-82.
9. Aronoff, M. and Sridhar, S.: 1983, Morphological levels in English and Kannada or atarizing Reagan, Papers from the Parassesion on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology and Syntax, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp. 3-16.
10. Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., and Newport, E. L.: 1998, Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants, Psychological Science 9, 321-324.
11. Baayen, R. H.: 1990, Corpusgebaseerd onderzoek naar morfologische produktiviteit, Spektator 19, 213-217.
12. Baayen, R. H.: 1992, Quantitative Aspects of Morphological Productivity, in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1991, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 109-150.
13. Baayen, R. H.: 1993, On frequency, transparency and productivity, in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1992, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 181-208.
14. Baayen, R. H.: 1994, Productivity in Language Production, Language and Cognitive Processes 9(3), 447-469.
15. Baayen, R. H.: 2002, Review of Causes and Consequences of Word Structure, Glot International 6(2), 58-64.
16. Baayen, R. H. and Lieber, R.: 1991, Productivity and English Derivation: A Corpus Based Study, Linguistics 29, 801-843.
17. Baayen, R. H. and Lieber, R.: 1997, Word Frequency Distributions and Lexical Semantics, Computers and the Humanities 30, 281-291.
18. Baayen, R. H. and Renouf, A.: 1996, Chronicling the Times: productive innovations in an English newspaper, Language 72(1), 69-96.
19. Baayen, R. H. and Schreuder, R.: 1999, War and Peace: Morphemes and Full Forms in a Noninteractive Activation Parallel Dual-Route Model, Brain and Language 68, 27-32.
20. Baayen, R. H., Lieber, R. and Schreuder, R.: 1997, The morphological complexity of simplex nouns, Linguistics 35, 861-877.
21. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R. and Gulikers, L.: 1995, The CELEX lexical database (release 2) cd-rom., Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, Univesity of Pennsylvania (Distributor).
22. Bagley, W. A.: 1900, The apperception of the spoken sentence: a study in the psychology of language, American Journal of Psychology 12, 80-130.
23. Balota, D. and Chumbley, J.: 1984, Are lexical decisions good measures of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10, 340-357.
24. Bates, E. and MacWhinney, B.: 1987, Competition, variation and language learning, in B. MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 173-218.
25. Bauer, L.: 1988, Introducing Linguistic Morphology, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
26. Bauer, L.: 1992, Scalar productivity and -lily adverbs, in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1991, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 185-191.
27. Bauer, L.: 1995, Is morphological productivity non-linguistic?, Acta Linguistica Hungarica 43(1-2), 19-34.
28. Beauvillain, C. and Segui, J.: 1992, Representation and Processing of Morphological Information, in R. Frost and L. Katz (eds), Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning, Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V., chapter 19, pp. 377-388.
29. Behaghel, O.: 1916, Geschichte der deutschen Sprache, Trübner, Strassburg.
30. Berkley, D.: 1994, Variability in Obligatory Contour Principle effects, Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Part 1, pp. 1-12.
31. Bertram, R., Laine, M., Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R. and Hyona, J.: 2000, Affixal Homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language, Cognition 74, B13-B25.
32. Bolinger, D. L.: 1961, Contrastive accent and contrastive stress, Language 37(1), 83-96.
33. Boogaart, P.C. Uit den: 1975, Woordfrequenties in geschreven en gesproken Nederlands, Oosthoek, Utrecht.
34. Bradley, D.: 1979, Lexical representation of derivational relations, in M. Aronoff and M. Kean (eds), Juncture, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA., pp. 37-55.
35. Brent, M. R. and Cartwright, T. A.: 1996, Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation, Cognition 61, 93-125.
36. Burani, C. and Caramazza, A.: 1987, Representation and processing of derived words, Language and Cognitive Processes 2, 217-227.
37. Burani, C. and Laudanna, A.: 1992, Units of Representation for Derived Words in the Lexicon, in R. Frost and L. Katz (eds), Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning, Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V., chapter 18, pp. 361-376.
38. Burzio, L.: 1994, Principles of English Stress, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
39. Butterworth, B.: 1983, Lexical representation, in B. Butterworth (ed.), Language Production, Vol. 2, Academic Press, London, pp. 257-294.
40. Bybee, J.: 1985, Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
41. Bybee, J.: 1988, Morphology as Lexical organization, in M. Hammond and M. Noonan (eds), Theoretical morphology: approaches in modern linguistics, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, pp. 119-142.
42. Bybee, J.: 1995a, Diachronic and Typological Properties of Morphology and their Implications for Representation, in L. B. Feldman (ed.), Morphological Aspects of Language Processing, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 225-246.
43. Bybee, J.: 1995b, Regular Morphology and the Lexicon, Language and Cognitive Processes 10(5), 425-455.
44. Bybee, J. and Newman, J. E.: 1995, Are stem changes as natural as affixes?, Linguistics pp. 633-654.
45. Bybee, J. and Pardo, E.: 1981, On lexical and morphological conditioning of alternations: an nonce-probe experiment with Spanish verbs, Linguistics 19, 931.
46. Cairns, P., Shillcock, R., Chater, N. and Levy, J.: 1997, Bootstrapping word boundaries: A bottom-up corpus-based approach to speech segmentation, Cognitive Psychology 33, 111-153.
47. Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., and Romani, C.: 1988, Lexical access and inflectional morphology, Cognition 28, 297-332.
48. Chialant, D. and Caramazza, A.: 1995, Where is Morphology and How is it Processed?, in L. B. Feldman (ed.), Morphological Aspects of Language Processing, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 55-78.
49. Christiansen, M. H., Allen, J. and Seidenberg, M. S.: 1998, Learning to segment speech using multiple cues: A connectionist model, Language and Cognitive Processes 13, 221-268.
50. Cleveland, W. S.: 1979, Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots, Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, 829-36.
51. Cole, P., Beauvillan, C., and Segui, J.: 1989, On the Representation and Processing of Prefixed and Suffixed Derived Words: A Differential Frequency Effect, Journal of Memory and Language 28, 1-13.
52. Coleman, J.: 1996, The psychological reality of language-specific constraints, Paper presented at the Fourth Phonology Meeting, University of Manchester, May 1996.
53. Coleman, J. and Pierrehumbert, J.: 1997, Stochastic Phonological Grammars and Acceptability, Computational Phonology: Proceedings of the Workshop, 12 July 1997, Association for Computational Linguistics, Somerset, NJ, pp. 49-56.
54. Connine, C.M., Titone, D., and Wang, J.: 1993, Auditory word recognition: extrinsic and intrinsic effects of word frequency, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 19(1), 81-94.
55. Cooper, W. and Paccia-Cooper, J.: 1980, Syntax and Speech, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
56. Cutler, A.: 1980, Productivity in word formation, in J. Kreiman and A. E. Ojeda (eds), Papers from the 16th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 45-51.
57. Cutler, A.: 1981, Degrees of Transparency in Word Formation, Canadian Journal of Linguistics 26(1), 73-77.
58. Cutler, A.: 1990, Exploiting prosodic probabilities in speech segmentation, in G. Altmann (ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 105-121.
59. Cutler, A.: 1994, Segmentation problems, rhythmic solutions, Lingua 92, 81-104.
60. Cutler, A. and Butterfield, S.: 1992, Rhythmic Cues to Speech Segmentation: Evidence from Juncture Misperception, Journal of Memory and Language 31, 218-236.
61. Cutler, A. and Carter, D.: 1987, The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary, Computer Speech and Language 2, 133-142.
62. Cutler, A. and Norris, D.: 1988, The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14, 113-121.
63. Cutler, A., Hawkins, J. A., and Gilligan, G.: 1985, The suffixing preference: a processing explanation, Linguistics 23, 723-758.
64. Dahan, D. and Brent, M. R.: 1999, On the discovery of novel word-like units from utterances: An artificial-language study with implications for native-language acquisition, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 128, 165-185.
65. Dell, G.: 1990, Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors, Language and Cognitive Processes 5(4), 313-349.
66. Dressler, W. U.: 1997, On productivity and potentiality in inflectional morphology, CLAS-NET Working Papers 7, 2-22.
67. Elman, J. and McClelland, J.: 1988, Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes, Journal of Memory and Language 27, 143-165.
68. Elman, J. L.: 1990, Finding structure in time, Cognitive Science 14, 179-211.
69. Fabb, N.: 1988, English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 527-539.
70. Feldman, L. B.: 1994, Beyond Orthography and Phonology: Differences between Inflections and Derivations, Journal of Memory and Language 33, 442-470.
71. Feldman, L. B. and Soltano, E. G.: 1999, Morphological Priming: The Role of Prime Duration, Semantic Transparency, and Affix Position, Brain and Language 68, 33-39.
72. Fowler, C.A., Napps, S.E., and Feldman, L.B.: 1985, Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming, Memory and Cognition 13, 241-255.
73. Francis, W. N. and Kucera, H.: 1982, Frequency Analysis of English Usage, Lexicon and Grammar, Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston.
74. Frauenfelder, U. H. and Schreuder, R.: 1992, Constraining Psycholinguistic Models of Morphological Processing and Representation: The Role of Productivity, in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1991, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 165-185.
75. Frisch, S.: 1996, Similarity and Frequency in Phonology, PhD thesis, Northwestern University.
76. Frisch, S.: 2000, Temporally organized lexical representations as phonological units, in M. Broe and J. Pierrehumbert (eds), Papers in Laboratory Phonology V: Acquisition and the lexicon, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 283-298.
77. Frisch, S., Large, N. and Pisoni, D.B.: 2000, Perception of wordlikeness: Effects of segment probability and length on the processing of non-words, Journal of Memory and Language 42, 481-496.
78. Giegerich, H. J.: 1999, Lexical Strata in English: morphological causes, phonological effects, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
79. Gleitman, L.R., Gleitman, H., Landau, B. and Wanner, E.: 1988, Where learning begins: Initial representations for language learning, in F. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, Vol. 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 150-193.
80. Goldsmith, J.: 1990, Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology, Basil Blackwell Ltd., Oxford, U.K.
81. Gordon, P. and Alegre, M.: 1999, Is There a Dual System for Regular Inflections?, Brain and Language 68, 212-217.
82. Greenberg, J.: 1963, Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements, in J. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
83. Greenberg, J. H.: 1978, Some generalizations regarding initial and final consonant clusters, in Greenberg, J.H., C.A. Ferguson and E.A. Moravcsik (ed.), Universals of Human Language Volume II: Phonology, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 243-280.
84. Grosjean, F.: 1980, Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm, Perception and Psychophysics 45, 189-195.
85. Grossberg, S.: 1986, The adaptive self-organization of serial order in behavior: Speech, language, and motor control, in E. Schwab and H.C. Nusbaum (eds), Pattern recognition by humans and machines: Vol 1. Speech perception, Academic Press, New York, pp. 187-294.
86. Harwood, F. and Wright, A. M.: 1956, Statistical study of English word formation, Language 32(2), 260-273.
87. Hay, J.: 2001, Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative?, Linguistics 39(6), 1041-1070.
88. Hay, J.: 2002, From speech perception to morphology: Affix-ordering revisited, Language 78(3), 527-555.
89. Hay, J. and Baayen, R.: 2002, Parsing and productivity, in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology, 2001, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 203-235.
90. Hay, J. and Baayen, R. H.: to appear, Phonotactics, parsing and productivity, Italian Journal of Linguistics.
91. Hay, J. and Plag, I.: to appear, What constrains possible suffix combinations? On the interaction of grammatical and processing restrictions in derivational morphology, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.
92. Hay, J., Jannedy, S., and Mendoza-Denton, M.: 1999, Oprah and /ay/: Lexical frequency, referee design and style, Proceedings of the 14 International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco, pp. 1389-1392.
93. Hay, J., Pierrehumbert, J. and Beckman, M.: in press, Speech perception, wellformedness, and the statistics of the lexicon, in Local, J., Ogden, R. and Temple, R. (ed.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI: Phonetic Interpretation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
94. Hay, J., Pierrehumbert, J., Beckman, M. and Faust West, J.: 1999, Lexical frequency effects in speech errors, Manuscript of paper presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, LA, January 1999.
95. Johnson, K.: 1997a, The auditory/perceptual basis for speech segmentation, in K. Ainsworth-Darnell and M. D'Imperio (eds), Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics: Papers from the Linguistics Laboratory, Vol. 50, Ohio State University, pp. 101-113.
96. Johnson, K.: 1997b, Speech perception without speaker normalization, in K. Johnson and J. Mullenix (eds), Talker variability in speech processing, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 145-165.
97. Jusczyk, P.W., Cutler, A. and Redanz, N.: 1993, Preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words, Child Development 64, 675-687.
98. Jusczyk, P.W., Houston, D.M., and Newsome, M.: 1999, The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants, Cognitive Psychology 39, 159-207.
99. Jusczyk, P.W., Luce, P.A. and Charles-Luce, J.: 1994, Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language, Journal of Memory and Language 33, 630-645.
100. Kempley, S. and Morton, J.: 1982, The effects of priming with regularly and irregularly related words in auditory word recognition, British Journal of Psychology 73, 441-454.
101. Kenstowicz, M.: 1994, Phonology in Generative Grammar, Oxford: Blackwell Publications.
102. Kiparsky, P.: 1982, Lexical Morphology and Phonology, in I.S. Yang (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Hanshin, Seoul, pp. 1-92.
103. Kiparsky, P.: 1983, Word formation and the lexicon, in F. Ingemann (ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference, University of Kansas, pp. 3-22.
104. Laudanna, A. and Burani, C.: 1985, Address mechanisms to decomposed lexical entries, Linguistics 23, 775-792.
105. Laudanna, A., Burani, C. and Cermele, A.: 1994, Prefixes as processing units, Language and Cognitive Processes 9(3), 295-316.
106. Lehiste, I.: 1972, The timing of utterances and linguistic boundaries, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51, 2018-2024.
107. Levelt, W.: 1983, Monitoring and self-repair in speech, Cognition 14, 41-104.
108. Losiewicz, B. L.: 1992, The effect of frequency on linguistic morphology, PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
109. Luce, P. A. and Pisoni, D.: 1998, Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model, Ear and Hearing 19, 1-36.
110. Marslen-Wilson, W. and Welsh, A.: 1978, Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech, Cognitive Psychology 10, 29-63.
111. Marslen-Wilson, W. and Zhou, X.: 1999, Abstractness, Allomorphy, and Lexical Architecture, Language and Cognitive Processes 14(4), 321-352.
112. Marslen-Wilson, W., Ford, M., and Zhou, X.: 1997, The combinatorial lexicon: Priming derivational affixes, Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
113. Marslen-Wilson, W., Hare, M., and Older, L.: 1993, Inflectional morphology and phonological regularity in the English mental lexicon., Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Erlbaum, Princeton, NJ.
114. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., and Older, L.: 1994, Morphology and Meaning in the English Mental Lexicon, Psychological Review 101(1), 3-33.
115. Marslen-Wilson, W., Zhou, X. and Ford, M.: 1997, Morphology, modality, and lexical architechure, in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1996, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 117-134.
116. Mast-Finn, J.: 1999, Triggering the speech mode of perception: Does word frequency matter?, Proceedings of the 1999 National Conference on Undergraduate Research.
117. Mattys, S.L., Jusczyk, P.W., Luce, P.A. and Morgan, J.L.: 1999, Word segmentation in infants: How phonotactics and prosody combine, Cognitive Psychology 38, 465-494.
118. McClelland, J. and Elman, J.: 1986, The TRACE model of speech perception, Cognitive Psychology 18, 1-86.
119. McQueen, J. and Cutler, A.: 1998, Morphology in word recognition, in A. Spencer and A. Zwicky (eds), The Handbook of morphology, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 406-427.
120. McQueen, J. M.: 1998, Segmentation of Continuous Speech using Phonotactics, Journal of Memory and Language 39, 21-46.
121. McQueen, J. M. and Cox, E.: 1995, The use of phonotactic constraints in the segmentation of Dutch, EUROSPEECH'95, ESCAT, Madrid, pp. 1707-1709.
122. McQueen, J.M., Norris, D. and Cutler, A.: 1994, Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 20, 621-638.
123. Meunier, F. and Segui, J.: 1999a, Frequency Effects in Auditory Word Recognition: The Case of Suffixed Words, Journal of Memory and Language 41, 327-344.
124. Meunier, F. and Segui, J.: 1999b, Morphological Priming Effect: The Role of Surface Frequency, Brain and Language 68, 54-60.
125. Modor, C.: 1992, Productivity and categorization in morphological classes, PhD thesis, SUNY at Buffalo, NY.
126. Mohanan, K.: 1986, The Theory of Lexical Phonology, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland.
127. Napps, S. E.: 1989, Morphemic relationships in the lexicon: Are they distinct from semantic and formal relationships?, Memory and Cognition 17(6), 729-739.
128. Norris, D.: 1990, Aa dynamic-net model of human speech recognition, in G. Altmann (ed.), Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 87-105.
129. Norris, D.: 1992, Connectionism: A new class of bottom up model, in R. G. Reilly and N. E. Sharkey (eds), Connectionist Approaches to Language Processing, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hove, Sussex, pp. 351-371.
130. Norris, D.: 1993, Bottom-up connectionist models of interaction, in G. Altmann and R. Schillcock (eds), Connectionist Models of Speech Processing: The Sperlonga Meeting II, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdate, N.J., pp. 211-234.
131. Norris, D.: 1994, Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition, Cognition 52, 189-234.
132. Norris, D., McQueen, J. and Cutler, A.: 1995, Competition and segmentation in spoken-word recognition, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 21, 1209-1228.
133. Norris, D., McQueen, J.M., and Cutler, A.: 2000, Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23(3), 299-325.
134. Norris, D., McQueen, J.M., Cutler, A. and Butterfield, S.: 1997, The Possible-Word Constraint in the Segmentation of Continuous Speech, Cognitive Psychology 34, 191-243.
135. Otake, T., Yoneyama, K., Cutler, A. and van der Lugt, A.: 1996, The representation of Japanese moraic nasals, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100, 3831-3842.
136. Pagliuca, W.: 1976, Pre-fixing, Unpublished Manuscript, SUNY/Buffalo.
137. Paivio, A., Yuille, J.C. and Madigan, S.: 1968, Concreteness, imagery, and meaningness values for 925 nouns, Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph 76.
138. Pesetsky, D.: 1985, Morphology and logical form, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 193-246.
139. Pierrehumbert, J.: 1994, Syllable structure and word structure: a study of triconsonantal clusters in English, in P. A. Keating (ed.), Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form. Papers in Laboratory Phonology 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 168-190.
140. Pierrehumbert, J.: 1995, Prosodic effects on glottal allophones, in O. Fujimura (ed.), Vocal Fold Physiology 8: Voice Quality Control (Proceedings of the VIIIth Vocal Fold Physiology Conference), Singular Press, San Diego, pp. 39-60.
141. Pierrehumbert, J.: 2001, Why phonological constraints are so coarse-grained, in J. McQueen and A. Cutler (eds), SWAP special issue, Language and Cognitive Processes 16, 5/6, pp. 691-698.
142. Pinker, S. and Prince, A.: 1988, On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition, Cognition 28, 73-193.
143. Pitt, M. A. and McQueen, J. M.: 1998, Is compensation for coarticulation mediated by the lexicon?, Journal of Memory and Language 39, 347-370.
144. Plag, I.: 1996, Selectional restrictions in English suffixation revisted: a reply to Fabb (1988), Linguistics pp. 769-798.
145. Plag, I.: 1999, Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York.
146. Plag, I.: 2002, The role of selectional restrictions, phonotactics and parsing in constraining suffix ordering in English, in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology, 2001, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 285-314.
147. Plag, I., Dalton-Puffer, C. and Baayen, R. H.: 1999, Morphological productivity across speech and writing, English Language and Linguistics 3(2), 209-228.
148. Plunkett, K. and Elman, J. L.: 1997, Exercises in Rethinking Innateness: A Handbook for Connectionist Simulations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
149. Prasada, S. and Pinker, S.: 1993, Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological patterns, Language and Cognitive Processes 8, 1-56.
150. Raffelsiefen, R.: 1999, Phonological constraints on English word formation, in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1998, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 225-287.
151. Raveh, M. and Rueckl, J. G.: 2000, Equivalent Effects of Inflected and Derived Primes: Long-Term Morphological Priming in Fragment Completion and Lexical Decision, Journal of Memory and Language 42, 103-119.
152. Rumelhart D.E., G.E. Hinton, and R.J. Williams: 1986, Learning internal representations by error backpropagation, in R. D. and M. J. (eds), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, volume 1, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 318-362.
153. Saffran, J. R., Newport, E.L. and Aslin, R. N.: 1996, Word Segmentation: The Role of Distributional Cues, Journal of Memory and Language 35, 606-621.
154. Saffran, J.R., Aslin, R.N., and Newport, E.L.: 1996, Statistical learning by 8-month old infants, Science 274, 1926-1928.
155. Schreuder, R. and Baayen, R. H.: 1994, Prefix stripping re-revisited, Journal of Memory and Language 33, 357-375.
156. Schreuder, R. and Baayen, R. H.: 1995, Modeling Morphological Processing, in L. B. Feldman (ed.), Morphological Aspects of Language Processing, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 131-156.
157. Schultink, H.: 1961, Produktiviteit als morfologisch fenomeen, Forum der Letteren 2, 110-125.
158. Segui, J. and Zubizarreta, M.-L.: 1985, Mental representation of morphologically complex words and lexical access, Linguistics 23, 759-774.
159. Selkirk, E. O.: 1982, The syntax of words, number 7 in Linguistic Inquiry Monograph Series, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
160. Sereno, J. and Jongman, A.: 1997, Processing of English inflectional morphology, Memory and Cognition 25, 425-437.
161. Siegel, D.: 1979, Topics in English Morphology, Garland, New York.
162. Sonnenstuhl, I., S. Eisenbeiss, and H. Clahsen: 1999, Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon, Cognition 72, 203-236.
163. Spencer, A.: 1991, Morphological theory: An introduction to word structure in generative grammar, Oxford edn, Basil Blackwell.
164. Sproat, R.: 1985, On deriving the lexicon, PhD thesis, MIT.
165. Stanners, R.F., Neiser, J.J., Hernon, W.P. and Hall, R.: 1979, Memory representations for morphologically related words, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18, 399-412.
166. Stemberger, J. and MacWhinney, B.: 1986, Frequency and the storage of regularly inflected forms, Memory and Cognition 14, 17-26.
167. Stemberger, J. P. and MacWhinney, B.: 1988, Are inflected forms stored in the lexicon?, in M. Hammond and M. Noonan (eds), Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics, Academic Press, San Diego, California, pp. 101-116.
168. Strauss, S.: 1982, On 'relatedness paradoxes' and related paradoxes, Linguistic Inquiry 13, 695-700.
169. Suomi, K., McQueen, J.M. and Cutler, A.: 1997, Vowel harmony and speech segmentation in Finnish, Journal of Memory and Language 36, 422-444.
170. Szpyra, J.: 1989, The Phonology-Morphology Interface: Cycles, levels and words, Routledge, London.