A roommate in cream: Morphological family size effects on interlingual homograph recognition

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 20, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 7-41

  Dijkstra, Ton ^a   Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín ^b,c,d   Schulpen, Béryl ^a   Schrueder, Robert ^b   Baayen, R Harald ^b,c  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b Interfac Res Unit for Lang/Speech   (Netherlands)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^d MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE TEST; LINGUISTICS; MORPHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 14644386860     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960444000124     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alegre, M., & Gordon, P. (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 41-61.
2. Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, A., & Schreuder, R. (1997a). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94-117.
3. Baayen, R. H., Lieber, R., & Schreuder, R. (1997b). The morphological complexity of simplex nouns. Linguistics, 35, 861-877.
4. Baayen, R. H., Tweedie, F. J., & Schreuder, R. (2002). The subjects as a simple random effect fallacy: Subject variability and morphological family effects in the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 81, 55-65.
5. Becker, C. A. (1979). Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 252-259.
6. Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 419-511.
7. Borowsky, R., & Besner, D. (1993). Visual word recognition: A multistage activation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 813-840.
8. Bradley, D. C., & Forster, K. I. (1987). A reader's view of listening. Cognition, 25, 103-134.
9. Brysbaert, M. (2003). Bilingual visual word recognition: Evidence from masked phonological priming. In S. Kinoshita, and S. J. Lupker (Eds), Masked priming: State-of-the-art. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
10. Carreiras, M., Perea, M., & Grainger, J. (1997). Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 857-871.
11. De Groot, A. M. B., Delmaar, P., & Lupker, S. J. (2000). The processing of interlexical homographs in a bilingual and a monolingual task: Support for nonselective access to bilingual memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 397-428.
12. De Jong, N. H. (2002). Morphological families in the mental lexicon. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
13. De Jong, N. H., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 329-365.
14. De Jong, N. H., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (in press). Morphological resonance in the mental lexicon. In R. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 65-88). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
15. Dijkstra, A., Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 496-518.
16. Dijkstra, A. & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 175-197.
17. Dijkstra, A., Van Jaarsveld, H., & Ten Brinke, S. (1998). Interlingual homograph recognition: Effects of task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 51-66.
18. Lalor, E., & Kirsner, K. (2000). Cross-lingual transfer effects between English and Italian cognates and noncognates. International Journal of Bilingualism, 4, 385-398.
19. Lemhöfer, K., & Dijkstra, A. (2004). Recognizing cognates and interlingual homographs: Effects of code similarity in language specific and generalized lexical decision. Memory and Cognition, 32 533-550.
20. Lemhöfer, K., Dijkstra, A., & Michel, M. (2004). Three languages, one ECHO: Cognate effects in trilingual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 585-611.
21. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
22. Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149-157.
23. Morton, J. (1969). The interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
24. Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Bertram, R., Häikiö, T., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (in press). Morphological family size in a morphologically rich language: The case of Finnish compared to Dutch and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
25. Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Schreuder, R., De Jong, N. H., & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Changing places: A cross-language perspective on frequency and family size in Hebrew and Dutch. Manuscript submitted for publication.
26. Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Statistics and Computing. New York: Springer.
27. Plaut, D. C., & Booth, J. R. (2000). Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: Empirical and computational support for a single mechanism account of lexical processing. Psychological Review, 107, 786-823.
28. Royston, P. (1982). An extension of Shapiro and Wilk's W Test for Normality to large samples. Applied Statistics, 31, 115-124.
29. Sánchez-Casas, R., Davis, C. W., & García-Albea, J. E. (1992). Bilingual lexical processing: Exploring the cognate/non-cognate distinction. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 311-322.
30. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 118-139.
32. Schulpen, B., Dijkstra, A., & Schriefers, H. J. (2003). L2 proficiency and task effects on interlingual homograph recognition by Dutch-English bilinguals. Unpublished manuscript, University of Nijmegen.
33. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1981). The effect of sentence context on ongoing word recognition: Test of a two-process theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 658-672.
34. Van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, A. (2002). Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 780-789.
35. Van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, A., & Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 458-483.