Stimulus representation in SOP: I. Theoretical rationalization and some implications

Behavioural Processes

Volumn 62, Issue 1-3, 2003, Pages 5-25

  Brandon, Susan E ^a   Vogel, Edgar H ^b   Wagner, Allan R ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DEL MAULE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Animal; Classical; Conditioning; Models; Theoretical

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; RATIONALIZATION;

ARTICLE; CONDITIONED REFLEX; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEARNING; MEMORY; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NONHUMAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0242501523     PISSN: 03766357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-6357(03)00016-0     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Atkinson, R.C., Shiffrin, R.M., 1968. Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes. In: Spence, K.W. (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 2. Academic Press, New York, pp. 89-195.
2. Ayres J.J.B., Haddad C., Albert M. One-trial excitatory backward conditioning as assessed by conditioned suppression of licking in rats: concurrent observations of lick suppression and defensive behaviors. Anim. Learn. Behav. 15:1987;212-217.
3. Babbini M., Davis W.M. Time-dose relationships for locomotor activity effects of morphine after acute or repeated treatment. Br. J. Pharmacol. 46:1972;213-224.
4. Best M.R., Gemberling G.A. The role of short-term processes in the CS preexposure effect and the delay of reinforcement gradient in long-delay taste-aversion learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 3:1977;253-263.
5. Blanchard R.J., Blanchard D.C. Crouching as an index of fear. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 67:1969;370-375.
6. Blough D.S. Steady state data and a quantitative model of operant generalization and discrimination. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 1:1975;3-21.
7. Bolles R.C., Collier A.C. The effect of predictive cues on freezing in rats. Anim. Learn. Behav. 4:1976;6-8.
8. Brandon, S.E., Wagner, A.R., 1998. Occasion setting: influences of conditioned emotional responses and configural cues. In: Schmajuk, N., Holland, P. (Eds.), Occasion Setting: Associative Learning and Cognition in Animals. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 343-382.
9. Brandon S.E., Vogel E.H., Wagner A.R. A componential view of configural cues in generalization and discrimination in Pavlovian conditioning. Behav. Brain Res. 110:2000;67-72.
10. Brandon, S.E., Vogel, E.H., Wagner, A.R., 2002a. Computational models of classical conditioning. In: Moore, J.W. (Ed.), A Neuroscientist's Guide to Classical Conditioning. Springer, New York, pp. 232-310.
11. Brandon, S.E., Myers, K.M., Vogel, E.H., Wagner, A.R., 2002b. Multiple peaked rabbit eyelid conditioned response following training with a single CS-US interval. Meetings of the Eastern Psychological Association, Baltimore, MD.
12. Buchanan S.L., Powell D.A. Cingulate cortex: its role in Pavlovian conditioning. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 95:1982;755-774.
13. Burkhardt P.E. One-trial backward fear conditioning as a function of US intensity. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 15:1980;9-11.
14. Bush, R.R., Mosteller, F., 1955. Stochastic Models for Learning. Wiley, New York.
15. Coleman S.R., Gormezano I. Classical conditioning of the rabbit's (Oryctolagus cuniculus) nictitating membrane response under symmetrical CS-US interval shifts. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 77:1971;447-455.
16. Davis M. Effects of interstimulus interval length and variability on startle-response habituation in the rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 72:1970;177-192.
17. Desmond, J.E., 1990. Temporally adaptive responses in neural models: the stimulus trace. In: Gabriel, M., Moore J. (Eds.), Learning and Computational Neuroscience: Foundations of Adaptive Networks. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 421-456.
18. Donegan N.H. Priming-produced facilitation or diminution of responding to a Pavlovian unconditioned stimulus. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 7:1981;295-312.
19. Gormezano I., Kehoe E.J., Marshall B.S. Twenty years of classical conditioning research with the rabbit. Prog. Psychobiol. Physiol. Psychol. 10:1983;197-277.
20. Grossberg S., Schmajuk N.A. Neural dynamics of adaptive timing and temporal discrimination during associative learning. Neural Netw. 2:1989;79-102.
21. Groves P.M., Thompson R.F. Habituation: a dual-process theory. Psychol. Rev. 77:1970;419-450.
22. Heth C.D. Simultaneous and backward fear conditioning as a function of the number of CS-UCS pairings. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 2:1976;117-129.
23. Heth C.D., Rescorla R.A. Simultaneous and backward fear conditioning in the rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 82:1973;434-443.
24. Holland, P.C., 1983. Occasion-setting in Pavlovian feature positive discriminations. In: Commons, M.L., Herrnstein, R.J., Wagner, A.R. (Eds.), Quantitative Analyses of Behavior: Discrimination Processes, vol. 4. Ballinger, New York, NY, pp. 182-206.
25. Holland P.C. Overshadowing and blocking as acquisition deficits: no recovery after extinction of overshadowing or blocking cues. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B. 52B(4):1999;307-333.
26. Kalat J.W., Rozin P. "Learned safety" as a mechanism in long delay taste-aversion learning in rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 83:1973;198-207.
27. Kamin, L.J., 1965. Temporal and intensity characteristics of the conditioned stimulus. In: Prokasy, W.F. (Ed.), Classical Conditioning. Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 118-147.
28. Kamin, L.J., 1968. Attention-like processes in classical conditioning. In: Jones, M.R. (Ed.), Miami Symposium on the Prediction of Behavior: Aversive Stimulation. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables, FL, pp. 9-32.
29. Kehoe, E.J., 1990. Classical conditioning: fundamental issues for adaptive network models. In: Gabriel, M., Moore, J. (Eds.), Learning and Computational Neuroscience: Foundations of Adaptive Networks. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 389-420.
30. Kehoe E.J., Graham-Clarke P., Schreurs B.G. Temporal patterns of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response to compound and component stimuli under mixed CS-US intervals. Behav. Neurosci. 103:1989;283-295.
31. Kimmel, H.D., 1965. Instrumental inhibitory factors in classical conditioning. In: Prokasy, W.F. (Ed.), Classical Conditioning. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, NY, pp. 148-171.
32. Konorski, J., 1948. Conditioned Reflexes and Neuron Organization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
33. Konorski, J., 1967. Integrative Activity of the Brain: An Interdisciplinary Approach. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
34. Marchant H.G., Mis F.W., Moore J.W. Conditioned inhibition of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response. J. Exp. Psychol. 95:1972;408-411.
35. Martin I., Levy A.B. Efficiency of the conditioned eyelid response. Science. 150:1965;781-783.
36. Mauk M.D., Ruiz B.P. The timing of conditioned eyelid responses: differential conditioning using multiple inter-stimulus intervals. Behav. Neurosci. 106:1991;666-681.
37. Marks, L.E., 1974. Sensory Processes. Academic Press, New York, NY.
38. Mazur, J.E., Wagner, A.R., 1982. An episodic model of associative learning. In: Commons, M., Herrnstein, R., Wagner, A.R. (Eds.), Quantitative Analyses of Behavior: Acquisition, vol. 3. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp. 3-39.
39. McNish K.A., Betts S.L., Brandon S.E., Wagner A.R. Divergence of conditioned eyeblink and conditioned fear in backward Pavlovian training. Anim. Learn. Behav. 25:1996;43-52.
40. Millenson J.R., Kehoe E.J., Gormezano I. Classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response under fixed and mixed CS-US intervals. Learn. Motiv. 8:1977;351-366.
41. Miller, R.R., Matzel, L.D., 1988. The comparative hypothesis: a response rule for the expression of association. In: Bower, G.H. (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 22. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 51-92.
42. Palleta M.S., Wagner A.R. Development of context-specific tolerance to morphine: support for a dual-process interpretation. Behav. Neurosci. 100:1986;611-623.
43. Pavlov, I.P., 1927. Conditioned Reflexes. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
44. Peterson L.R., Peterson M.J. Short-term retention of individual verbal items. J. Exp. Psychol. 58:1959;193-198.
45. Plotkin H.C., Oakley D.A. Backward conditioning in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 88:1975;586-590.
46. Rescorla R.A. Simultaneous and successive associations in sensory preconditioning. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 6:1980;207-216.
47. Rescorla, R.A., 1985. Inhibition and facilitation. In: Miller, R.R., Spear, N.E. (Ed.), Information Processing in Animals: Conditioned Inhibition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 299-326.
48. Rescorla R.A. Associative changes in exciters and inhibitors differ when they are conditioned in compound. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 26:2000;428-438.
49. Rescorla R.A. Unequal associative changes when exciters and neutral stimuli are conditioned in compound. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 54B:2001;53-68.
50. Rescorla R.A. Effect of following an excitatory-inhibitory compound with an intermediate reinforcer. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 28:2002;163-174.
51. Rescorla, R.A., Wagner, A.R., 1972. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In: Black, A.H., Prokasy, W.F. (Eds.), Classical Conditioning II. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, NY, pp. 64-99.
52. Schmajuk, N.A., 1997. Animal Learning and Cognition: A Neural Network Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
53. Schmajuk N.A., Moore J.W. Real-time attentional models for classical conditioning and the hippocampus. Physiol Psychol. 13:1985;278-290.
54. Schmajuk N.A., Moore J.W. Effects of hippocampal manipulations on the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response: simulations by an attentional-associative model. Behav. Brain Res. 32:1989;173-189.
55. Schneiderman N., Gormezano I. Conditioning of the nictitating membrane of the rabbit as a function of CS-US interval. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 57:1964;188-195.
56. Siegel S., Domjan M. Backward conditioning as an inhibitory procedure. Learn. Motiv. 2:1971;1-11.
57. Singh S.D. Conditioned emotional response in the rat: I. Constitutional and situational determinants. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 52:1959;574-578.
58. Smith M.C. CS-US interval and US intensity in classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 66:1968;679-687.
59. Smith M.C., Coleman S.R., Gormezano I. Classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response at backward, simultaneous, and forward CS-US intervals. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 69:1969;226-231.
60. Sutton R.W., Barto A.G. Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: expectation and prediction. Psychol. Rev. 88:1981;135-170.
61. Sutton, R.W., Barto, A.G., 1990. Time-derivative models of Pavlovian reinforcement. In: Gabriel, M., Moore, J. (Eds.), Learning and Computational Neuroscience: Foundations of Adaptive Networks. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 497-537.
62. Tait R.W., Saladin M.E. Concurrent development of excitatory and inhibitory associations during backward conditioning. Anim. Learn. Behav. 14:1986;133-137.
63. Thompson R.F. The neurobiology of learning. Science. 233:1986;941-947.
64. Thompson, R.F., Donegan, N.H., Clark, G.A., Lavond, D.G., Lincoln, J.S., Madden, J., Mamounas, L.A., Mauk, M.D., McCormick, D.S., 1986. Neuronal substrates of discrete, defensive conditioned reflexes, conditioned fear states, and their interactions in the rabbit. In: Gormezano, I., Prokasy, W.K., Thompson, R.F. (Eds.), Classical Conditioning III. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 371-399.
65. Vogel, E.H., 2001. A theoretical and empirical analysis of inhibition of delay in Pavlovian conditioning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University.
66. Vogel, E.H., Brandon, S.E., Wagner, A.R., 2003. Stimulus Representation in SOP: II. An Application to Inhibition of Delay. Behav. Process. 62 (1-3), 27-48.
67. Wagner, A.R., 1971. Elementary associations. In: Kendler, H.H., Spence, J.T. (Eds.), Essays in Neobehaviorism: A Memorial Volume to Kenneth W. Spence. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, NY, pp. 187-213.
68. Wagner, A.R., 1976. Priming in STM: an information-processing mechanism for self-generated or retrieval-generated depression in performance. In: Tighe, T.J., Leaton, R.N. (Eds.), Habituation: Perspectives From Child Development, Animal Behavior, and Neurophysiology. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 95-128.
69. Wagner, A.R., 1981. SOP: a model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In: Spear, N.E., Miller, R.R. (Eds.), Information Processing in Animals: Memory Mechanisms. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 5-47.
70. Wagner, A.R., Brandon, S.E., 1989. Evolution of a structured connectionist model of Pavlovian conditioning (ÆSOP). In: Klein, S.B., Mowrer, R.R. (Eds.), Contemporary Learning Theories: Pavlovian Conditioning and the Status of Traditional Learning Theory. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 149-189.
71. Wagner, A.R., Brandon, S.E., 2001. A componential theory of Pavlovian conditioning. In: Mowrer, R.R., Klein, S.B. (Eds.), Contemporary Learning: Theory and Application. Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, pp. 23-64.
72. Wagner, A.R., Donegan, N.H., 1989. Some relationships between a computational model (SOP) and a neural circuit for Pavlovian (rabbit eyeblink) conditioning. In: Hawkins, R.D., Bower, G.H. (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation; Computational Models of Learning in Simple Neural Systems, vol. 22. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 157-203.
73. Wagner, A.R., Rescorla, R.A., 1972. Inhibition in Pavlovian conditioning: application of a theory. In: Boakes, R.A., Haliday, M.S. (Eds.), Inhibition and Learning. Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 302-336.
74. Wagner A.R., Terry W.S. Backward conditioning to a CS following an expected vs. a surprising UCS. Anim. Learn. Behav. 3:1975;370-374.
75. Wilson R.S. Cardiac response: determinants of conditioning. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. Monogr. 68(1, Pt.2):1969;1-23.