Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions

International Journal of Corpus Linguistics

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 209-243

  Stefanowitsch, Anatol ^a   Gries, Stefan Th ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Collocation; Construction; Construction Grammar; Fisher exact test; Syntax lexis interface

Indexed keywords

EID: 24344449747     PISSN: 13846655     EISSN: 15699811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Barlow, M., & S. Kemmer (1994). A schema-based approach to grammatical description. In S. D. Lima, R. L. Corrigan, & G. K. Iverson (Eds.), The reality of linguistic rules (pp. 19-42). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins
2. Berry-Rogghe, G. L. M. (1974). Automatic identification of phrasal verbs. In J. L. Mitchell (Ed.), Computers in the humanities (pp. 16-26). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
3. Biber, D. (1993). Co-occurrence patterns among collocations: A tool for corpus-based lexical knowledge acquisition. Computational Linguistics, 19(3), 531-538
4. Bybee, J. (1998). The emergent lexicon. In M. C. Gruber, D. Higgins, K. S. Olson, & T. Wysocki (Eds.), Papers from the Thirty-Fourth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 421-135). Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society
5. Church, K. W., & P. Hanks (1990). Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1), 22-29
6. Church, K. W., W. Gale, P. Hanks, & D. Hindle (1991). Using statistics in lexical analysis. In U. Zernik (Ed.), Lexical acquisition: Exploiting on-line resources to build up a lexicon (pp. 115-164). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
7. Church, K. W., W. Gale, P. Hanks, D. Hindle, & R. Moon (1994). Lexical substitutability. In B. T. S. Atkins & A. Zampolli (Eds.), Computational approaches to the lexicon (pp. 153-177). Oxford: Oxford University Press
8. Collins Cobuild E-Dict (1998). Glasgow: Harper Collins Publ
9. Dowty, D. R. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar. The Semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague's PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel
10. Dunning, T. (1993). Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19(1), 61-74
11. Fillmore, C. J. (1985). Syntactic intrusions and the notion of grammatical construction. In M. Niepokuj, M. VanClay, V. Nikiforidou, & D. Feder (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 73-86). University of California, Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society
12. Fillmore, C. J. (1988). The mechanisms of 'Construction Grammar'. In S. Axmaker, A. Jaisser, & H. Singmaster (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 35-55). University of California, Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society
13. Givón, T. (1989). Mind, code, and context: Essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
14. Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
15. Goldberg, A. E. (1996). Construction grammar. In K. Brown & J. Miller (Eds.), Concise encyclopedia of syntactic theories (pp. 68-71). Oxford: Pergamon
16. Goldberg, A. E. (1999). The emergence of the semantics of argument structure constructions. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 197-212). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
17. Goldberg, A. E., D. M. Casenhiser, & N. Sethuraman (Forthcoming). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics
18. Gries, St. Th. (2003). Testing the sub-test: A collocational-overlap analysis of English -ic and -ical adjectives. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(1), 31-61
19. Gries, St. Th., & A. Stefanowitsch (Forthcoming). Co-varying collexemes in the into-causative. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture, and mind. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications
20. Gries, St. Th., & A. Stefanowitsch (In preparation). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on 'alternations'
21. Hanks, P. (1996). Contextual dependency and lexical sets. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 1(1), 75-98
22. Hopper, P. (1987). Emergent grammar. In J. Aske, N. Beery, L. Michaelis, & H. Filip (Eds.), Papers of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 139-157). University of California, Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society
23. Hunston, S., & G. Francis. (2000). Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
24. Jackendoff, R. S. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
25. Jespersen, O. (1931). A modern English grammar on historical principles. Part IV: Syntax. London: Allen & Unwin
26. Kay, P., & C. J. Fillmore (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X Doing Y construction. Language, 75(1), 1-33
27. Kennedy, G. (1991). Between and through: The company they keep and the functions they serve. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English corpus linguistics (pp. 95-110). London: Longman
28. Lakoff, G. (1970). Irregularity in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
29. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
30. Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1: Theoretical foundations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
31. Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
32. Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
33. Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: The state of ELT and a way forward. Hove, UK: Language Teaching Publications
34. Manning, C. D., & H. Schütze (2000). Foundations of statistical natural language processing. 4th printing with corrections. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
35. Oakes, M. P. (1998). Statistics for corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
36. Oh, S.-Y. (2000). Actually and in fact in American English: A data-based analysis. English Language and Linguistics, 4(2), 243-268
37. Oxford English Dictionary on CD-ROM. (1994). Version 1.15, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press
38. Pawley, A., & F. H. Syder (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. Richard & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191-226). London: Longman
39. Pedersen, T. (1996). Fishing for exactness. Proceedings of the SCSUG 96 in Austin, TX, 188-200
40. Pedersen, T., S. Banerjee, & A. Purandare (2003). Ngram statistics package 0.53. http://www.d.umn.edu/tpederse/code.html (downloaded 20 January 2003)
41. Piao, S. S. (2002). Word alignment in English-Chinese parallel corpora. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17(2), 207-230
42. Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition. The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
43. Pollard, C., & I. A. Sag (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press
44. Reddy, M. (1979). The conduit metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284-324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
45. Rietveld, T., & R. van Hout (1993). Statistical techniques for the study of language and language behaviour. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter
46. Sadock, J. (1994). Toward a grammatically realistic typology of speech acts. In S. L. Tsohatzidis (Ed.), Foundations of speech act theory. Philosophical and linguistic perspectives (pp. 393-406). London: Routledge
47. Sag, I., & Th. Wasow (1999). Syntactic theory. A formal introduction. Stanford: CSLI Publications
48. Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
49. Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press
50. Stefanowitsch, A. (2001). Constructing causation: A construction grammar approach to analytic causatives. Doctoral dissertation, Rice University, Houston, TX
51. Stubbs, M. (1995). Collocations and semantic profiles: On the cause of the trouble with quantitative studies. Functions of Language, 2(1), 23-55
52. Weeber, M., R. Vos, & H. Baayen (2000). Extracting the lowest-frequency words: Pitfalls and possibilities. Computational Linguistics, 26(3), 301-317
53. Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Cross-cultural pragmatics. The semantics of human interaction. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter
54. Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley