Morphological family size in a morphologically rich language: The case of finnish compared with Dutch and Hebrew

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1271-1278

  Moscoso Del Prado Martín, Fermín ^a,c,d   Bertram, Raymond ^b   Häikiö, Tuomo ^b   Schreuder, Robert ^a   Harald Baayen, R ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^c MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 7544231802     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1271     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Baayen, R. H., Tweedie, F. J., & Schreuder, R. (2002). The subjects as a simple random effect fallacy: Subject variability and morphological family effects in the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 81, 55-65.
2. Bates, E., D'Amico, S., Jacobsen, T., Szekely, A., Andonova, E., Devescovi, A., et al. (2003). Timed picture naming in seven languages. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 344-380.
3. Belsley, D. A. (1991). Conditioning diagnostics: Collinearity and weak data in regression. New York: Wiley.
4. Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York: Wiley.
5. Bertram, R., Baayen, R. H., & Schreuder, R. (2000). Effects of family size for complex words. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 390-405.
6. Bertram, R., Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R., Laine, M., & Hyönä, J. (2000). Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language. Cognition, 74, B13-B25.
7. Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1-22.
8. Cleveland, W. S. (1979). Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 829-836.
9. De Jong, N. H. (2002). Morphological families in the mental lexicon. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
10. De Jong, N. H., Feldman, L. B., Schreuder, R., Pastizzo, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2002). The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: Peripheral morphological, and central orthographic effects. Brain and Language, 81, 555-567.
11. De Jong, N. H., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 329-365.
12. De Jong, N. H., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2003). Morphological resonance in the mental lexicon. In R. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 65-88). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
13. Dijkstra, T., Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Schulpen, B., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. (in press). A roommate in cream: Morphological family size effects in bilinguals. Language and Cognitive Processes.
14. Järvikivi, J., Bertram, R., & Niemi, J. (2003). Affixal salience and the processing of derivational morphology: The role of suffix allomorphy. Manuscript submitted for publication. University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
15. Laine, M., & Virtanen, P. (1999). WordMill lexical search program [Database]. Turku, Finland: Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Turku.
16. Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149-157.
17. Lüdeling, A., & De Jong, N. H. (2002). German particle verbs and word-formation. In N. Dehé, R. Jackendoff, A. McIntyre, & S. Urban (Eds.), Verb-particle explorations (pp. 315-333). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
18. McRae, K., DeSa, V., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 99-130.
19. Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2003). Paradigmatic effects in morpholog ical processing: Computational and cross-linguistic experimental studies. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
20. Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Schreuder, R., De Jong, N. H., & Baayen, R. H. (2003). Changing places: A cross-language perspective on frequency and family size in Hebrew and Dutch. Manuscript submitted for publication, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
21. Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Kostić, A., & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Putting the bits together: An information theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition, 94, 1-18.
22. Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS: Statistics and computing. New York: Springer.
23. Sadeniemi, M. (Ed.). (1978). Nykysuomen sanakirja [Nowadays Finnish dictionary]. Porvoo, Finland: WSOY.
24. Schouwvlieger, H., & Mäkinen-Schouwvlieger, A. (1992). Suomi-hollanti-suomi-taskusanakirja [Finnish-Dutch-Finnish pocket dictionary]. Porvoo, Finland: WSOY.
25. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 118-139.
26. Vannest, J., Bertram, R., Järvikivi, J., & Niemi, J. (2002). Counterintuitive cross-linguistic differences: More morphological computation in English than in Finnish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 3, 38-106.
27. Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. New York: Hafner.