Inflectional morphology and word meaning: Orthogonal or co-implicative cognitive domains?

Morphological Structure in Language Processing

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1-43

  Kostić, Aleksandar ^a   Marković, Tanja ^a   Baucal, Aleksandar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85065695258     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1515/9783110910186.1     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Baayen, R. Harald, Ton Dijkstra, and Robert Schreuder 1997 Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language 37: 94-117.
2. Benveniste, Emile 1962 Pour l'analyse des functions causelles: Le genitif latin. Lingua 11: 10-10.
3. Blake, Barry J. 1994 Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Burani, Cristina, and Alfonso Cramazza 1987 Representation and processing of inflected words. Language and Cognitive Processes 2: 217-227.
5. Butterworth, Brian 1983 Lexical representation. In Language production, Vol. II: Development, writing and other language processes, B. Butterworth (ed.), London: Academic Press.
6. Caramazza, Alfonso, Alessandro Laudana, and Cristina Romani 1988 Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition 28: 297-332.
7. Cole, Pascal, Juan Segui, and Marcus Taft 1997 Words and morphemes as units for lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language 37: 312-330.
8. Diver, William 1964 The system of agency of the Latin noun. Word 2: 178-196.
9. Feldman, Laurie, and Carol A. Fowler 1987 The inflected noun system in Serbo-Croatian: Lexical representation of morphological structure. Memory and Cognition 15 (1): 197-209.
10. Gibson, James J. 1977 The theory of affordances. In Perceiving, acting and knowing, R. Shaw and J. Bransford (eds.), New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Inc. Publishers.
11. Gibson, Eleanor J. 2000 Where is the information for affordances? Ecological Psychology 12 (1): 53-56.
12. de Groot, Anette W. 1956 Classification of uses of a case illustrated on the genitive in Latin. Lingua 6: 8-66.
13. Hjelmslev, Louis 1935, 1937 La categorie des cas. Acta Jutlandica VII, I, IX, 2.
14. Kostić, Aleksandar 1991 Informational approach to processing inflected morphology: Standard data reconsidered. Psychological Research 53 (1): 62-70.
15. Kostić, Aleksandar 1995 Informational load constraints on processing inflected morphology. In Morphological aspects of language processing, L. B. Feldman (ed.), New Jersey:. Lawrence Erlbaum Inc. Publishers.
16. Kostić, Aleksandar 2003 The effects of the amount of information on processing of inflected morphology (submitted).
17. Kostic, Á. 1965a Struktur a upotrebne vrednosti gramatikih oblika u srpskohrvatskom jeziku [Probability structure of grammatical forms in Serbo-Croatian], Beograd: Institut za eksperimentalnu fonetiku i patologiju govora.
18. Kostić, Á. 1965b Sintakticke funkcije padeznih oblika u srpskohrvatskom jeziku [5y«-tactic functions and meanings of Serbo-Croatian cases], Beograd: Institut za eksperimentalnu fonetiku i patologiju govora.
19. Kostić, Á 1999 Frekvencijski recnik savremenog srpskog jezika. Tom I - VII. [Frequency y of contemporary Serbian language. Vol. I- VII], Beograd: Institut za eksperimentalnu fonetiku i patologiju govora, Beograd i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu.
20. Kostić, Á. 2001 Kvantitativni opis strukture srpskog jezika - Korpus srpskog jezika. [Quantitative description of Serbian language structure - Corpus of Serbian language], Beograd: Institut za eksperimentalnu fonetiku i patologiju govora, Beograd i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu.
21. Kurilowicz, Jerzy 1960 Le probleme du classement des cas. Esquisses linguistiques: 131-150, Wroclaw-Krakov.
22. Manelis, L., and Tharp, D. 1977 The processing of affixed words. Memory and Cognition 5 (6): 690-695.
23. Pickering, John 2000 On the proper treatment of afFordance: Formality or mutuality? Ecological Psychology 12(1): 71-77.
24. Sandra Dominiek, Stephen Frisson, and Frans Daems 1999 Why simple verb forms can be so difficult to spell: the influence of homophone frequency and distance in Dutch. Brain and Language 68: 277-283
25. Schreuder, Robert, and R. Harald Baayen 1997 How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language 37: 118-139.
26. Sereno, Joan A., and Allard Jongman 1997 Processing of English inflectional morphology. Memory and Cognition 25: 425-437.
27. Shaw, Robert E., Michael T. Turvey, and William Mace 1982 Ecological psychology: The consequences of commitment to realism. In Cognition and the symbolic processes, W. Weimer and D. Palermo (eds.), 159-226. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
28. Taft, Marcus, and Ken I. Förster 1975 Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14: 638-647.
29. Taft, Marcus, and Ken I. Forster 1976 Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15: 607-620.
30. Taft, Marcus 1979 Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition 7(4): 263-272.
31. Taft, Marcus 1981 Prefix stripping revisited. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20: 289-297.
32. Taft, Marcus 1994 Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 9: 271-294.
33. Taft, Marcus, and Xiaopius Zhu 1995 The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: A Chinese study. In Morphological aspects of language processing, L. Feldman (ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
34. Turvey, Michael T., and Robert E. Shaw 1978 The primacy of perceiving: An ecological reformulation of perception as a point of departure for understanding memory. In Perspectives on memory research: Essays in honor of Uppssala University's 500th anniversary, L. G. Nilsson (ed.), 167-222. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
35. Turvey, Michael T. 1992 Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology 4 (3): 173-187.