Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on 'alternations'

International Journal of Corpus Linguistics

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 97-129

  Gries, Stefan Th ^a   Stefanowitsch, Anatol ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

(Diathesis) alternation; Collocation; Collostruction; Construction; Distinctive collexemes; Fisher exact test; Syntactic variation; Syntax lexis interface

Indexed keywords

EID: 24344434812     PISSN: 13846655     EISSN: 15699811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Altenberg, B. (1980). Binominal NPs in a thematic perspective: Genitive vs. of-constructions in 17th century English. In S. Jacobson (Ed.), Papers from the Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation (pp. 149-172). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell
2. Berry-Rogghe, G. L. M. (1974). Automatic identification of phrasal verbs. In J. L. Mitchell (Ed.), Computers in the Humanities (pp. 16-26). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
3. Biber, D., Johansson, S. Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman
4. Bolinger, D. (1975). On the passive in English. In A. Makkai & V. Becker Makkai (Eds.), The First Lacus Forum 1974 (pp. 57-80). Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press
5. Browman, C. (1986). The hunting of the quark: The particle in English. Language and Speech, 29(4), 311-334
6. Burt, M.K. (1971). From Deep to Surface Structure. New York: Harper Row
7. Chomsky, N. A. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton
8. Church, K. W., & Hanks, P. (1990). Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1), 22-29
9. Church, K.W., Gale, W., Hanks, P. & Hindle, D. (1991). Using statistics in lexical analysis. In U. Zernik (Ed.), Lexical acquisition: Exploiting On-line Resources to Build up a Lexicon (pp. 115-164). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
10. Deane, P. D. (1987). English possessives, topicality and the Silverstein hierarchy. In J. Aske, N. Beery, L. Michaelis, & H. Filip (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 65-76). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society
11. Dunning, T. (1993). Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19(1), 61-74
12. Erteschik-Shir, N. (1979). Discourse constraints on dative movement. In T. Givón (Ed.), Discourse and Syntax: Syntax and Semantics 12 (pp. 441-487). New York, San Diego & London: Academic Press
13. Fillmore, C. J. (1965). Indirect Object Constructions in English and the Ordering of Transformations. The Hague: Mouton
14. Fillmore, C. J. (1985). Syntactic intrusions and the notion of grammatical construction. In M. Niepokuj, M. VanClay V. Nikiforidou, & D. Feder (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 73-86). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society
15. Fillmore, C. J. (1988). The mechanisms of 'Construction Grammar.' In S. Axmaker, A. Jaisser & H. Signmaster (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 35-55). Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society
16. Fisher, C., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L. R. (1991). On the semantic content of subcategorization frames. Cognitive Psychology, 23(3), 331-392
17. Givón, T. (1993). English Grammar. A Function-based Approach. Vols 1 & 2. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins
18. Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
19. Goldberg, A. E. (1999). The emergence of the semantics of argument structure constructions. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The Emergence of Language (pp. 197-212). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
20. Goldberg, A. E. (2002). Surface generalizations: An alternative to alternations. Cognitive Linguistics, 13(3), 327-356
21. Greenbaum, S. (Ed.) (1996). Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press
22. Gries, St. Th. (2002). Evidence in linguistics: Three approaches to genitives in English. In R. M. Brend, W. J. Sullivan & A. R. Lommel (Eds.), LACUS Forum XXVIII: What constitutes evidence in linguistics? (pp. 17-31). Fullerton, CA: LACUS
23. Gries, St. Th. (2003a). Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A Study of Particle Placement. London, New York: Continuum Press
24. Gries, St. Th. (2003b). Towards a corpus-based identification of prototypical instances of constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 1-28
25. Gries, St. Th. (2003c). Testing the sub-test: A collocational-overlap analysis of English -ic and -ical adjectives. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(1), 31-61
26. Gries, St.Th., & Stefanowitsch, A. (forthcoming). Covarying collexemes in the intocausative. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, Culture, and Mind. Stanford: CSLI Publications
27. Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., Goldberg, R., & Wilson, R. (1989). The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language, 65(2), 203-257
28. Hare, M. L., McRae, K., & Elman, J. L. (2003). Sense and structure: Meaning as a determinant of verb subcategorization preferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(2), 281-303
29. Hawkins, J. A. (1994). A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
30. Hawkins, R. (1981). Towards an account of the possessive constructions: NP's N and the N of NP. Journal of Linguistics 17(2), 247-269
31. Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
32. Jespersen, O. (1949). A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Vol. 7: Syntax. Copenhagen: Munksgaard
33. Kennedy, G. (1991). Between and through: The company they keep and the functions they serve. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English Corpus Linguistics (pp. 95-110). London: Longman
34. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about The Mind. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press
35. Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press
36. Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2. Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press
37. Langacker, R. W. (1995). Possession and possessive constructions. In J. R. Taylor & R. E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World (pp. 51-79). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
38. Lees, R. B. (1960). The Grammar of English Nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton
39. Legum, S. (1968). The verb-particle construction in English: Basic or derived? In B. J. Darden, C.-J. Bailey & A. Davison (Eds.), Papers from the Fourth Regional Meeting Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 50-62). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society
40. Levin, B. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations. A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press
41. Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H. (2000). Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. 4th printing with corrections. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
42. Murphy, R. (1986). English Grammar in Use. 4th revised impression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
43. Nordquist, D. (1998). Try and: a discourse analysis. Proceedings of the First High Desert Linguistics Society Conference, April 3-4. Albuquerque, NM
44. The Oxford English Dictionary. (1989). Second edition, 20 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press
45. Osselton, N. E. (1988). Thematic genitives. In G. Nixon & J. Honey (Eds.), An Historic Tongue: Studies in English Linguistics in Memory of Barbara Strang (pp. 138-144). London: Routledge
46. Pedersen, T. (1996). Fishing for exactness. Proceedings of the SCSUG 96 in Austin, TX, 188-200
47. Pedersen, T., Banerjee, S., & Purandare, A. (2003). Ngram statistics package 0.53. http://www.d.umn.edu/tpederse/code.html (last access: 20 January 2003)
48. Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
49. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman
50. Rice, S. A. (1987). Towards a transitive prototype: Evidence from some atypical English passives. In J. Aske, N. Beery, L. Michaelis & H. Filip (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 422-434). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society
51. Roland, D., & Jurafsky D. (2002). Verb sense and subcategorization probabilities. In P. Merlo & S. Stevenson (Eds.), The Lexical Basis of Sentence Processing: Formal, Computational and Experimental Issues (pp. 303-324). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins
52. Stallings, L. M., MacDonald, M. C., & O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1998). Phrasal ordering constraints in sentence production: Phrase length and verb disposition in Heavy-NP Shift. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(3), 392-417
53. Standwell, G. B. J. (1982). Genitive constructions and functional sentence perspective. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 20(4), 257-261
54. Stefanowitsch, A. (1998). Possession and partition: The two genitives of English. Cognitive Linguistics: Explorations, Applications, Research, 23. Dept. of English, University of Hamburg
55. Stefanowitsch, A. (2003). Constructional semantics as a limit to grammatical variation. In G. Rohdenburg & B. Mondorf (Eds.), Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English (pp. 155-173). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
56. Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, St. Th. (2003). Collostructions: On the interaction between verbs and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209-243
57. Stubbs, M. (1995). Collocations and semantic profiles: On the cause of the trouble with quantitative studies. Functions of Language, 2(1), 23-55
58. Thompson, S. A. (1990). Information flow and dative shift in English discourse. In J. A. Edmondson, C. Feagin & P. Mühlhäusler (Eds.), Development and Diversity: Language Variation across Time and Space (pp. 239-253). Dallas: SIL & University of Arlington, TX
59. Thompson, S. A., & Koide, Y. (1987). Iconicity and 'indirect objects' in English. Journal of Pragmatics, 11(3), 399-406
60. Thompson, A. J., & Martinet, A. V. (1986). A Practical English Grammar.4th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press
61. Weeber, M., Vos, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000). Extracting the lowest-frequency words: Pitfalls and possibilities. Computational Linguistics, 26(3), 301-317