Data mining at the intersection of psychology and linguistics

Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 69-83

  Baayen, R Harald ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85082911205     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315084503-6     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood size effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 802–814.
2. Baayen, R., Feldman, L., & Schreuder, R. (2004). Collinearity and non-linearity in regression analyses of simple word recognition, word naming, and subjective frequency estimation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
3. Baayen, R. H., Moscoso del Prado, F., Schreuder, R., & Wurm, L. (2003). When word frequencies do NOT regress towards the mean. In R. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 463–484). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
4. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340–357.
5. Balota, D., Cortese, M., & Pilotti, M. (1999). Visual lexical decision latencies for 2906 words, [http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~dbalota/lexical_decision.html]
6. Fellbaum, C. E. (1998). Word Net: An electronic database. Cambridge: MIT Press.
7. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 256–281.
8. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565.
9. Harrell, F. E. (2001). Regression modeling strategies (Statistics and Computing Series). New York: Springer.
10. Kohler, R. (1986). Zur linguistischen Synergetik: Struktur und Dynamik der Lexik. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
11. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of Present–Day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
12. Miller, G. A. (1990). Wordnet: An on-line lexical database. International Journal of Lexicography, 3, 235–312.
13. Moscoso del Prado, F. (2003). Paradigmatic effects in morphological processing: Computational and cross-linguistic experimental studies. MPI Series in Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
14. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
15. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 118–139.
16. Spieler, D. H., & Balota, D. A. (1998). Naming latencies for 2820 words. [http:// www.artsci.wustl.edu/~dbalota/naming.html]
17. Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I. (1944). A teacher's word book of 30.000 words. New York: Columbia University Press.