Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 913-918

  Velan, Hadas ^a   Frost, Ram ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37349095766     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194121     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. CHRISTIANSON, K., JOHNSON, R. L., & RAYNER, K. I. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1327-1339.
2. COLTHEART, M., RASTLE, K., PERRY, C., LANGDON, R., & ZEIGLER, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
3. DAVIS, M. (2003). "Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch." Personal web page via the Cognition & Brain Sciences Institute, University of Cambridge. Retrieved April 24, 2006, from www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/~mattd/ Cambrigde.
4. DEUTSCH, A., FROST, R., & FORSTER, K. I. (1998). Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1238-1255.
5. FRIEDMANN, N., & GVION, A. (2001). Letter position dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 673-696.
6. FRIEDMANN, N., & GVION, A. (2005). Letter form as a constraint for errors in neglect dyslexia and letter position dyslexia. Behavioral Neurology, 16, 145-158.
7. FROST, R. (1995). Phonological computation and missing vowels: Mapping lexical involvement in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 398-408.
8. FROST, R., FORSTER, K. I., & DEUTSCH, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew?: A masked priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 829-856.
9. FROST, R., KUGLER, T., DEUTSCH, A., & FORSTER, K. I. (2005) Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1293-1326.
10. GRAINGER, J., & VAN HEUVEN, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed), The mental lexicon: "Some words to talk about words" (pp. 1-23). New York: Nova Science.
11. GRAINGER, J., & WHITNEY, C. (2004). Does the huamn mnid raed words as a whole? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 58-59.
12. GREEN, D. M., & SWETS, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
13. KANWISHER, N. G., & POTTER, M. C. (1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 1-30.
14. LUPKER, S., & PEREA, M. (2003). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 97-120). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
15. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & RUMELHART, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
16. ORNAN, U. (2003). The final word: Mechanism for Hebrew word generation. Haifa: Haifa University Press.
17. PEREA, M., & LUPKER, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory & Language, 51, 231-246.
18. POTTER, M. C. (1984). Rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP): A method for studying language processing. In D. E. Kieras & M. A. Just (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research (pp. 91-118). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. RAWLINSON, G. E. (1976). The significance of letter position in word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England.
20. RAWLINSON, G. E. (1999). Reibadailty. New Scientist, 162, 55.
21. RAYNER, K., WHITE, S. J., JOHNSON, R. L., & LIVERSEDGE, S. P. (2006). Raeding wrods with jubmled lettrs: There's a cost. Psychological Science, 17, 192-193.
22. SCHOONBAERT, S., & GRAINGER, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language & Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367.
23. WHITNEY, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221-243.