The dynamics of visual word recognition

Ecological Psychology

Volumn 14, Issue 1-2, 2002, Pages 5-19

  Rueckl, Jay G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037839242     PISSN: 10407413     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326969eco1401&2double_2     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151-216). London: Academic.
2. Cortese, M. J., & Simpson, G. B. (2000). Regularity effects in word naming: What are they? Memory & Cognition: 28, 1269-1276.
3. Elman, J. L. (1995). Language as a dynamical system. In R. F. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition (pp. 195-223), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996), Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Feldman, L. B. (Ed.). (1995). Morphological aspects of language processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680-698.
7. Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674-691.
8. Grossberg, S., & Stone, G. (1986). Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: Attentional priming, learning, and resonance, Psychological Review, 93, 46-74.
9. Harm, M. W. (1998). Division of labor in a computational model of visual word recognition. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(02), 0849B.
10. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491-528.
11. Henderson, L. (1985). Towards a psychology of morphemes. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 1, pp. 15-72). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
12. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340.
13. Jared, D., McRae, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 687-715.
14. Kawamoto, A. H. (1993). Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 474-516.
15. Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Kolers, P. A. (1979). A pattern-analyzing basis for recognition memory. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing and human memory (pp. 363-384). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
17. Lukatela, G., Frost, S., & Turvey, M. T. (1999). Identity priming in English is compromised by phonological ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 775-790.
18. Masson, M. E. J. (1995). A distributed memory model of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 3-23.
19. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Pt. 1. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
20. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word identification. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
21. Neely, J. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
22. Plaut, D. C., & Booth, J. R. (2000). Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: Empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. Psychological Review, 107, 786-823.
23. Plaut, D. C., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000), Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 445-485.
24. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading; Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
25. Raveh, M. (1999). The contribution of frequency and semantic similarity to morphological processing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(08), 4280B.
26. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In H. Spinnler & F. Boller (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 63-130). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
27. Rueckl, J. G. (in press). A connectionist perspective on repetition priming. In J. S. Bowers & C. Marsolek (Eds.), Rethinking implicit memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Rueckl, J. G., Mikolinski, M., Raveh, M., Miner, C., & Mars, F. (1997). Morphological priming, fragment completion, and connectionist networks. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 382-405.
29. Rueckl, J. G., & Raveh, M. (1999). The influence of morphological regularities on the dynamics of a connectionist network. Brain and Language, 68, 110-117.
30. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986a). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 2. Psychological and biological models (pp. 216-271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (Eds.). (1986b). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 1. Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., & Scarborough, H. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 1-17.
33. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of visual word recognition. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
34. Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., Hernon, W. P., & Hall, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 399-412.
35. Stone, G. O., & Van Orden, G. C. (1994). Building a resonance framework for recognition using design and system principles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1248-1268.
36. Tenpenny, P. L. (1995). Abstractionist vs. episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 339-363.
37. Tuller, B., Case, P., Ding, M., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1994). The nonlinear dynamics of speech categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1-16.
38. Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Jacobs, A. M., & Braun, M. (2001). Identical words are read differently in different languages. Psychological Science, 12, 379-384.