Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organization in a given language

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1293-1326

  Frost, Ram ^a   Kugler, Tamar ^a   Deutsch, Avital ^a   Forster, Kenneth I ^b,c  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^c University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

Form priming; Lexical organization; Morphology; Orthography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VISION; WRITING;

HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY; WRITING;

EID: 30544453924     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1293     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Bentin, S., & Frost, R. (2001). Linguistic theory and psychological reality: A reply to Boudelaa and Marslen-Wilson. Cognition, 81, 113-118.
2. Bentin, S., & Ibrahim, R. (1996). Reading in a language without orthography. On the involvement of phonology in visual word recognition: The case of Arabic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 309-323.
3. Boudelaa, S., & Gaskell, G. M. (2002). A re-examination of the default system for Arabic plurals. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 321-343.
4. Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2001a). Morphological units in the Arabic mental lexicon, Cognition, 81, 65-92.
5. Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2001b). The time-course of morphological, phonological and semantic processes in reading Modern Standard Arabic. In Proceedings of the Twenty Third Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 138-143). Edinburgh, Scotland.
6. Brysbaert, M. (2001). Prelexical phonological coding of visual words in Dutch: Automatic after all. Memory & Cognition, 29, 765-773.
7. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the mental lexicon. In S. Domic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). London: Academic Press.
8. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Zeigler, J. (2001). A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
9. De Moor, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2000). Neighbourhood-frequency effects when primes and targets have different lengths. Psychological Research, 63, 159-162.
10. Deutsch, A., Frost, R., & Forster, K. I. (1998). Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1238-1255.
11. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 353-372.
12. Ferrand, L., & Grainger. J. (1994). Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 365-382.
13. Forster, K. I. (1987). Form-priming with masked primes: The best-match hypothesis. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII (pp. 127-146). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Forster, K. I. (1998). The pros and cons of masked priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 203-233.
15. Forster, K. I. (1999). The microgenesis of priming effect in lexical access. Brain & Language, 68, 5-15.
16. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680-698.
17. Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, A. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms. Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 1-25.
18. Forster, K. I., & Taft, M. (1994). Bodies, antibodies, and neighborhood-density effects in masked form priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 844-863.
19. Forster, K. I., & Veres, C. (1998). The prime lexicality effect: Form-priming as a function of prime awareness, lexical status, and discrimination difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 298-314.
20. Frost, R. (1995). Phonological computation and missing vowels: Mapping lexical involvement in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 398-408.
21. Frost, R., Ahissar, M., Gottesman, R., & Tayeb, S. (2003). Are phonological effects fragile? The effect of luminance and exposure duration on form priming and phonological priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 346-358.
22. Frost, R., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I. (2000). Decomposing complex words in a nonlinear morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 751-765.
23. Frost, R., Deutsch, A., Gilboa, O., Tannenbaum, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2000). Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1277-1288.
24. Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew: A masked priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 829-856.
25. Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104-115.
26. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 256-281.
27. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
28. Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), Mental lexicon: Some words to talk about words (pp. 2-23). New York: Nova Science.
29. Grainger, J., & Whitney, C. (2004). Does the human mind read words as a whole? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 58-59.
30. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491-528.
31. Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 517-560.
32. Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., & Quinlan, P. T., & Besner, D. (1987). Orthographic priming: Qualitative differences between priming from identified and unidentified primes. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII (pp. 105-126). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Longtin, C. M., Segui, J., & Halle, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 313-334.
34. Lupker, S. J., & Colombo, L. (1994). Inhibitory effects in form-priming. Evaluating a phonological competition explanation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 437-451.
35. Martin, R. C., & Jensen, C. R. (1988). Phonological priming in the lexical decision task: A failure to replicate. Memory & Cognition, 16, 505-521.
36. Masson, M. E. J. (1995). A distributed-memory model of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 3-23.
37. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
38. Meyer, D. E. Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Ruddy, M. (1975). Loci of contextual effects in visual word recognition. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and performance V (pp. 94-118). New York: Academic Press.
39. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. (2003). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 97-120). Hove, United Kingdom: Psychology Press.
40. Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2000). Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a short stimulus-onset asynchrony. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 668-677.
41. Peressotti, F., & Grainger, J. (1999). The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 691-706.
42. Plaut, D. C., & Booth, J. R. (2000). Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: Empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. Psychological Review, 107, 786-823.
43. Plaut, D., & Gonnerman, L. (2000). Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 445-485.
44. Flaut, D., Seidenberg, M. S., McClelland, J. L., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Component principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-116.
45. Rajaram, S., & Neely, J. H. (1992). Dissociative masked repetition priming and word frequency effects in lexical decision and episodic recognition tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 152-182.
46. Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2003). Reading morphologically complex words: Some thoughts from masked priming. In A. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 279-308). New York and Hove, United Kingdom: Psychology Press.
47. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 1090-1098.
48. Rueckl, J. (2002). The dynamics of visual word recognition. Ecological Psychology, 14, 5-19.
49. Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367.
50. Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors - Effects of relative prime target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 65-76.
51. Taft, M. (1994). Interactive activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271-294.
52. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638-647.
53. Velan, H., Frost, R., Deutsch, A., & Plaut, D. (2005). The processing of root morphemes in Hebrew: Contrasting localist and distributed accounts. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 169-206.
54. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 221-243.
55. Zeigler, J. C., & Perry, C. (1998). No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: Resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task. Cognition, 68, 53-62.