Do orthotactics and phonology constrain the transposed-letter effect?

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 69-92

  Perea, Manuel ^a   Carreiras, Manuel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MASKING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 38049120005     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960701578146     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Acha, J. and Perea, M. The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: Evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers. British Journal of Psychology
2. Álvarez, C., Carreiras, M. and Perea, M. (2004) Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition?. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, pp. 427-452.
3. Berent, I. and Perfetti, C. A. (1995) A rose is a REEZ: The two cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English. Psychological Review, 102, pp. 146-184.
4. Binder, J. R., Medler, D. A., Westbury, C. F., Liebenthal, E. and Buchanan, L. (2006) Tuning of the human left fusiform gyrus to sublexical orthographic structure. NeuroImage, 33, pp. 739-748.
5. Brunsdon, R., Coltheart, M. and Nickels, L. (2005) Treatment of irregular word spelling in developmental surface dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, pp. 213-251.
6. Bruner, J. S. and O'Dowd, D. (1958) A note on the informativeness of parts of words. Language and Speech, 1, pp. 98-101.
7. Buchwald, A. and Rapp, B. (2006) Consonants and vowels in orthographic representations. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, pp. 308-337.
8. Carreiras, M. and Perea, M. (2002) Masked priming effects with syllabic neighbors in the lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, pp. 1228-1242.
9. Carreiras, M., Ferrand, L., Grainger, J. and Perea, M. (2005) Sequential effects of phonological priming in visual word recognition. Psychological Science, 16, pp. 585-589.
10. Carreiras, M., Vergara, M. and Perea, M. (2007) ERP correlates of transposed-letter similarity effects: Are consonants processed differently from vowels?. Neuroscience Letters, 419, pp. 219-224.
11. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T. and Besner, D. (1977) Access to the internal lexicon. Attention and performance XI, pp. 534-555. Academic Press, New York
12. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Ziegler, J. and Langdon, R. (2001) DRC: A Dual-Route Cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, pp. 204-256.
13. Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L. and Rayner, K. (2005) Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, pp. 1327-1339.
14. Davis, C. J. (1999) The Self-Organising Lexical Acquisition and Recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition
15. Davis, C. J. and Perea, M. (2005) BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 37, pp. 665-671.
16. Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M. and Carreiras, M. (2007) Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for ortho-morphological decomposition. Cognition
17. Ferrand, L. and Grainger, J. (1994) Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, pp. 365-382.
18. Forster, K. I. and Davis, C. (1991) The density constraint on form-priming in the naming task: Interference effects from a masked prime. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, pp. 1-25.
19. Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C. and Carter, R. (1987) Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, pp. 211-251.
20. Forster, K. I. and Forster, J. C. (2003) DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, pp. 116-124.
21. Frankish, C. and Turner, E. (2007) SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, pp. 189-211.
22. Frost, R. (1998) Towards a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, pp. 71-99.
23. Gómez, P., Ratcliff, R. and Perea, M. (2007) A model of letter position coding: The overlap model
24. Goswami, U. and Ziegler, J. C. (2006) A developmental perspective on the neural code for written words. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, pp. 142-143.
25. Grainger, J., Granier, J. P., Farioli, F., Van Assche, E. and van Heuven, W. (2006) Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, pp. 865-884.
26. Grainger, J., Kiyonaga, K. and Holcomb, P. J. (2006) The time-course of orthographic and phonological code activation. Psychological Science, 17, pp. 1021-1026.
27. Grainger, J. and Ferrand, L. (1994) Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, pp. 218-233.
28. Grainger, J. and Jacobs, A. M. (1996) Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, pp. 518-565.
29. Grainger, J. and van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003) Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. The mental lexicon, pp. 1-23. Nova Science, New York
30. Johnson, R. L. (2007) The flexibility of letter coding: Nonadjacent letter transposition effects in the parafovea. Eye movements: A window on mind and brain, pp. 425-442. Elsevier, Amsterdam
31. Johnson, R. L., Perea, M. and Rayner, K. (2007) Transposed-letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, pp. 209-229.
32. Lee, H-W., Rayner, K. and Pollatsek, A. (2001) The relative contribution of consonants and vowels to word identification during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, pp. 189-205.
33. Lupker, S. J., Perea, M. and Davis, C. J. (2005) An investigation of the nature of input coding and lexical selection: Evidence from the masked priming paradigm
34. Lupker, S. J., Perea, M. and Davis, C. J. (2008) Transposed letter priming effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, pp. 93-116.
35. O'Connor, R. E. and Forster, K. I. (1981) Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 9, pp. 78-92.
36. Perea, M. and Carreiras, M. (2006) Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, pp. 1600-1613.
37. Perea, M. and Carreiras, M. (2006) Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries?. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, pp. 418-422.
38. Perea, M. and Estévez, A. (2008) Transposed-letter similarity effects in naming pseudowords: Evidence with children and adults. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, pp. 33-46.
39. Perea, M. and Fraga, I. (2006) Transposed-letter and laterality effects in lexical decision. Brain and Language, 97, pp. 102-109.
40. Perea, M. and Lupker, S. J. (2003) Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory and Cognition, 31, pp. 829-841.
41. Perea, M. and Lupker, S. J. (2003) Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. Masked priming: State of the art, pp. 97-120. Psychology Press, Hove, UK
42. Perea, M. and Lupker, S. J. (2004) Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, pp. 231-246.
43. Perea, M. and Lupker, S. J. (2007) La posición de las letras externas en el reconocimiento visual de palabras [The role of external letter positions in visual word recognition]. Psicothema, 19, pp. 559-564.
44. Perea, M. and Rosa, E. (2000) Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a short stimulus-onset asynchrony. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, pp. 668-677.
45. Perea, M., Rosa, E. and Gómez, C. (2001) Dimensiones de similitud ortogrófica: Procesos de codificación en las palabras [Dimensions of orthographic similarity: Coding processes on words].
46. Perea, M., Rosa, E. and Gómez, C. (2005) The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task. Perception and Psychophysics, 67, pp. 301-314.
47. Pollatsek, A. and Well, A. D. (1995) On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, Cognition, 21, pp. 785-794.
48. Pollatsek, A., Perea, M. and Carreiras, M. (2005) Does conal prime CANAL more than cinal? Masked phonological priming effects in Spanish with the lexical decision task. Memory and Cognition, 33, pp. 557-565.
49. Rastle, K. and Brysbaert, M. (2006) Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter?. Cognitive Psychology, 53, pp. 1-49.
50. Rayner, K., White, S., Johnson, R. L. and Liversedge, S. (2006) Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres: There's a cost. Psychological Science, 17, pp. 192-193.
51. Rumelhart, D. E. (1977) Toward an interactive model of reading. Attention and performance VI, pp. 573-603. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, Hillsdale, NJ
52. Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L. (1982) An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, pp. 60-94.
53. Schoonbaert, S. and Grainger, J. (2004) Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, pp. 333-367.
54. Treisman, A. and Souther, J. (1986) Illusory words: The roles of attention and of top-down constraints in conjoining letters to form words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, pp. 3-17.
55. Whitney, C. (2001) How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, pp. 221-243.
56. Whitney, C. and Cornelissen, P. (2005) Letter-position encoding and dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, pp. 274-301.
57. Ziegler, J. C. and Jacobs, A. M. (1995) Phonological information provides early sources of constraint in the processing of letter strings. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, pp. 567-593.