Decomposing Morphologically Complex Words in a Nonlinear Morphology

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 751-765

  Frost, Ram ^a   Deutsch, Avital ^a   Forster, Kenneth I ^b,c  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^c University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; ISRAEL; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SEMANTICS;

ADULT; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; ISRAEL; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS;

EID: 0034182028     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.751     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Baayen, H. (1991). Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In G. Booij & J. Van Marie (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology (pp. 109-149). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
2. Ben-Asher, M. (1971). Do verbal-patterns concern the grammar or the dictionary? The University, 16, 31-34.
3. Besner, D. (2000). Basic processes in reading: Multiple routines in localist and connectionist models. In P. A. McMullen & R. M. Klein (Eds.), Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia (pp. 413-458). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Blau, Y. (1971). Phonology and morphology. Tel Aviv, Israel: Hakibbutz Hameuchad Press.
5. Burani, C., & Laudanna, A. (1992). Units of representation of derived words in the lexicon. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Advances in psychology: Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 27-44). Amsterdam: Elsevier and North-Holland.
6. Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (Vol. 2, pp. 257-294). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7. Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 207-332.
8. Deutsch, A., Frost, R., & Forster, K. I. (1998). Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1238-1255.
9. Feldman, L. B. (1991). The contribution of morphology to word recognition. Psychological Research, 53, 33-41.
10. Feldman, L. B. (1994). Beyond orthography and phonology: Differences between inflections and derivations. Journal of Memory and language, 33, 442-470.
11. Feldman, L. B., Frost, R., & Pnini, T. (1995). Decomposing words into their constituent morphemes: Evidence from English and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 947-960.
12. Forster, K. I. (1987). Form-priming with masked primes: The best-match hypothesis. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 127-146). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Forster, K. I. (1994). Computational modeling and elementary process analysis in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1292-1310.
14. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680-698.
15. Forster, K. I., Davis, C., & Shoknecht, C., & Carter, A. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 1-25.
16. Forster, K. I., & Taft, M. (1994). Bodies, antibodies, and neighborhood-density effects in masked form priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 844-863.
17. Fowler, C. A., Napps, S. E., & Feldman, L. B. (1985). Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory & Cognition, 13, 241-255.
18. Frauenfelder, U. H., & Schreuder, R. (1991). Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. In G. Booij & J. Van Marie (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology (pp. 165-183). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
19. Frost, R., & Bentin, S. (1992). Reading consonants and guessing vowels. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Advances in psychology: Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 27-44). Amsterdam: Elsevier and North-Holland.
20. Frost, R., Deutsch, A., Gilboa, O., Tannenbaum, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (in press). Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory & Cognition.
21. Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew: A masked priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 829-856.
22. Grainger, J., Cole, P., & Segui, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 370-384.
23. Henderson, L., Wallis, J., & Knight, K. (1984). Morphemic structure and lexical access. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 211-226). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Laudanna, A., Burani, C., & Cermele, A. (1994). Prefixes as processing units. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 295-316.
25. Marcus, G. F., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Weise, R., & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 189-256.
26. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
27. Perea, M., Gotor, A., Rosa, E., & Algarebel, S. (1995, November). Time course of semantic activation for different prime-target relationships in the lexical decision task. Poster presented at the 36th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.
28. Plaut, D. C., & Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 377-500.
29. Rueckl, J. G., Mikolonski, M., Raveh, M., Miner, C., & Mars, F. (1997). Morphological priming, fragment completion, and connectionist networks. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 382-405.
30. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Seidenberg, M. S. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XIl: The psychology of reading (pp. 244-263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Seidenberg, M. S. (1997, November). Where do sublexical structures come from? Paper presented at the 38th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia.
33. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
34. Sereno, J. A. (1991). Graphemic, associative, and syntactic priming effects at brief stimulus onset asynchrony in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 459-477.
35. Stolz, J. A., & Feldman, L. B. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 109-129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Taft, M. (1981). Prefixed stripping revisited. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 289-297.
37. Taft, M. (1994). Interactive activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271-294.
38. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638-647.
39. Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymboloic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.