Promoting academic motivation and self-regulation: Practical guidelines for online instructors

TechTrends

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 37-45

  Artino Jr , Anthony R ^a  

^a US Navy ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 48249134032     PISSN: 87563894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11528-008-0153-x     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Abrami, P. C., & Bernard, R. M. (2006). Research on distance education: In defense of field experiments. Distance Education, 24, 5-26.
2. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. Retrieved December 24, 2007, from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/online_nation.pdf
3. American Psychological Association (APA). (1997). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school redesign and reform. Washington, D.C.: APA Presidential Task Force on Psychology in Education. Retrieved July 11, 2006, from http://www.apa.org/ed/lcp2/ lcp14.html
4. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2), 1-17.
5. Artino, A. R. (2004). A model for designing online collaborative learning. Distance Learning, 1(4), 23-28.
6. Artino, A. R. (2007a). Online military training: Using a social cognitive view of motivation and self-regulation to understand students' satisfaction, perceived learning, and choice. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8, 191-202.
7. Artino, A. R. (2007b). Self-regulated learning in online education: A review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 4(6), 3-18.
8. Artino, A. R. (in press). Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: Predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
9. Artino, A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2006). Learning online: Motivated to self-regulate? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 10(4), 176-182.
10. Artino, A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2007, October). Motivation and self-regulation in online courses: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Anaheim, CA.
11. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261-278.
12. Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 199-209.
13. Azevedo, R. Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students' ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 344-370.
14. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
16. Bangert, A. W. (2004). The seven principles of good practice: A framework for evaluating online teaching. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 217-232.
17. Bell, P. D., & Akroyd, D. (2006). Can factors related to self-regulated learning predict learning achievement in undergraduate asynchronous Web-based courses? International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 3(10), 5-16.
18. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74, 379-439.
19. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds). (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego: Academic.
20. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21. Cennamo, K. S., Ross, J. D., & Rogers, C. S. (2002). Evolution of a Web-enhanced course incorporating strategies for selfregulation. Educause Quarterly, 25(1), 28-33.
22. Christopher, M. M., Thomas, J. A., & Tallent-Runnels, M. K. (2004). Raising the bar: Encouraging high level thinking in online discussion forums. Roeper Review, 26(3), 166-171.
23. Corno, L., & Randi, J. (1999). A design theory for classroom instruction in selfregulated learning? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, Vol. II (pp. 293-318). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Curda, S. K., & Curda, L. K. (2003). Advanced distributed learning: A paradigm shift for military education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4, 1-14.
25. Dabbagh, N., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
26. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2004). Supporting self-regulation in student-centered Webbased learning environments. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 40-47.
27. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Using Web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33, 513-540.
28. Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: Prompt for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 819-837.
29. Dillon, C., & Greene, B. (2003). Learner differences in distance learning: Finding differences that matter. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 235-244). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Eccles, J., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents' achievement task values and expectancyrelated beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215-225.
31. Fletcher, J. D., Tobias, S., & Wisher, R. A. (2007). Learning anytime, anywhere: Advanced distributed learning and the changing face of education. Educational Researcher, 36, 96-102.
32. Garrison, D. R. (2003). Self-directed learning and distance education. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 161-168). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking and computer conferencing: A model and tool to access cognitive presence. American Journal of Distance Education, 15, 7-23.
34. Gibson, C. C. (2003) Learners and learning: The need for theory. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 147-160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin's model of self-regulated learning: New perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77, 334-372.
36. Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28, 115-152.
37. Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2001). Educational research in the Internet age: Examining the role of individual characteristics. Educational Researcher, 30(9), 22-26.
38. Hiltz, S. R. (1997). Impacts of college-level courses via asynchronous learning networks: Some preliminary results. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 1(2), 1-19.
39. Hodges, C. B. (2005). Self-regulation in Webbased courses: A review and the need for research. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6, 375-383.
40. Hsu, J. T. (1997). Value, expectancy, metacognition, resourced management, and academic achievement: A structural model of self-regulated learning in a distance education context. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(5), 1458. (UMI No. 9835152)
41. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
42. Joo, Y., Bong, M., & Choi, H. (2000). Selfefficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in Web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 5-17.
43. Justice, E. M., & Dornan, T. M. (2001). Metacognitive differences between traditional-age and nontraditionalage college students. Adult Education Quarterly, 51, 236-249.
44. Kauffman, D. F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in Web-based environments: Instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategies use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computer Research, 31, 139-161.
45. Keller, J. M. (1999). Using the ARCS motivational process in computer-based instruction and distance education. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, 78, 39-47.
46. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75-86.
47. Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2006). Supporting selfregulated learners for a while and what computers can contribute. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 425-435.
48. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335-353.
49. Larreamendy-Joerns, J., & Leinhardt, G. (2006). Going the distance with online education. Review of Educational Research, 76, 567-605.
50. Lee, C. (2002). The impact of self-efficacy and task value on satisfaction and performance in a Web-based course. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63(05), 1798. (UMI No. 3054599)
51. Ley, K., & Young, D. B. (2001). Instructional principles for self-regulation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 93-103.
52. Lim, C. K. (2001). Computer self-efficacy, academic self-concept, and other predictors of satisfaction and future participation of adult distance learners. American Journal of Distance Education, 15, 41-51.
53. Liu, X., Bonk, C. J., Magjuka, R. J., Lee, S., Su, B. (2005). Exploring four dimensions of online instructor roles: A program level case study. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 9(4), 29-48.
54. Locke E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
55. Locke E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705-717.
56. Lynch, R., & Dembo, M. (2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context. [Electronic version]. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2).
57. Martin, J. (2004). Self-regulated learning, social cognitive theory, and agency. Educational Psychologist, 39, 135-145.
58. Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a threestrikes rule again pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14-19.
59. McLoughlin, C. (2002). Learner support in distance and networked learning environments: Ten dimensions for successful design. Distance Education, 23, 149-162.
60. Miltiadou, M., & Savenye, W. C. (2003). Applying social cognitive constructs of motivation to enhance student success in online distance education. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education Journal, 11(1), 78-95.
61. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
62. Niemi, H., Nevgi, A., & Virtanen, P. (2003). Towards self-regulation in web-based learning. Journal of Educational Media, 28, 49-72.
63. Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What's the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy.
64. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470.
65. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego: Academic.
66. Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667-686.
67. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.
68. Puustinen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 269-286
69. Richardson, J. C., & Newby, T. (2006). The role of students' cognitive engagement in online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 20, 23-37.
70. Rivera, R. J., & Paradise, A. (2006). State of the industry in leading enterprises: ASTD's annual review of trends in workplace learning and performance. Retrieved October 26, 2007, from http://www.astd.org/NR/rdonlyres/ 0A1BE935-3905-4B09-B517-6CC5B41E2AC5/12314/ stateofindustry_Execsum.pdf
71. Rovai, A. P. (2003). Strategies for grading online discussions: Effects on discussions and classroom community in Internetbased university course. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(1), 89-107.
72. Russell, T. L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomena. Chapel Hill, NC: Office of Instructional Telecommunications, North Carolina State University.
73. Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231.
74. Schunk, D. H. (2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40, 85-94.
75. Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
76. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
77. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York: The Guilford Press.
78. Shea, P., Li, C. S., Swan, K., & Pickett, A. (2005). Developing learning community in online asynchronous college courses: The role of teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 9(4), 59-82.
79. Spatariu, A., Hartley, K., Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., & Quinn, L. F. (2007). The influence of the discussion leader procedure on the quality of arguments in online discussions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37, 83-103.
80. Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76, 93-135.
81. Wang, S., & Lin, S. S. J. (2007). The application of social cognitive theory to webbased learning through NetPorts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 600-612.
82. Wang, A. Y., & Newlin, M. H. (2002). Predictors of web-student performance: The role of self-efficacy and reasons for taking an online class. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 151-163.
83. Weinstein, C. E., Schulte, A., & Palmer, D. (1987). LASSI: Learning and study strategies inventory. Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing.
84. Whipp, J. L., & Chiarelli, S. (2004). Self-regulation in a web-based course: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 5-22.
85. Williams, P. E., & Hellman, C. M. (2004). Differences in self-regulation for online learning between first- and second-generation college students. Research in Higher Education, 45, 71-82.
86. Winters, F. I., & Azevedo, R. (2005). High school students' regulation of learning during computer-based science inquiry. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33, 189-217.
87. Woo, Y, & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 15-25.
88. Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Lai, C., & Tan, H. S. (2005). What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107, 1836-1884.
89. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic.
90. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of selfregulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628.