Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance

Cell Research

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 99-113

  Li, Xuan ^a   Heyer, Wolf Dietrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

DNA repair; Double strand breaks; Genome stability; Homologous recombination; Interstrand crosslinks; Stalled replication forks

Indexed keywords

DNA; RAD51 PROTEIN;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CROSSING OVER; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MUTAGENESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN BINDING; REVIEW; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CROSSING OVER, GENETIC; DNA; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUTAGENESIS; PROTEIN BINDING; RAD51 RECOMBINASE; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

EID: 38049173021     PISSN: 10010602     EISSN: 17487838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2008.1     Document Type: Review

References (159)

1. Friedberg EC, Walker GC, Siede W, et al. DNA Repair and Mutagenesis. 2nd Edition. Washington, DC: ASM Press, 2006.
2. Hunter N. Meiotic recombination. In: Aguilera A, Rothstein R. eds. Homologous recombination. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2007:381-441.
3. Heyer WD. Biochemistry of eukaryotic homologous recombination. In: Aguilera A, Rothstein R, eds. Molecular genetics of recombination. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2007:95-133.
4. Paques F, Haber JE. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 1999; 63:349-404.
5. Sung P, Klein H. Mechanism of homologous recombination: mediators and helicases take on regulatory functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7:739-750.
6. West SC. Molecular views of recombination proteins and their control. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003; 4:435-445.
7. Wyman C, Kanaar R. DNA double-strand break repair: All's well that ends well. Annu Rev Genet 2006; 40:363-383.
8. Kuzminov A. Recombinational repair of DNA damage in Escherichia coli and bacteriophage lambda. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 1999; 63:751-813.
9. Krogh BO, Symington LS. Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 2004; 38:233-271.
10. Christ N, Moynahan ME, Jasin M. BRCA2: safeguarding the genome through homologous recombination. In: Aguilera A, Rothstein R. eds. Molecular genetics of recombination. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2007:363-380.
11. Pellegrini L, Venkitaraman A. Emerging functions of BRCA2 in DNA recombination. Trends Biochem Sci 2004; 29:310-316.
12. Kennedy RD, D'Andrea AD. The Fanconi Anemia/BRCApathway: new faces in the crowd. Genes Dev 2005; 19:2925-2940.
13. Patel KJ, Joenje H. Fanconi anemia and DNA replication repair. DNA Repair (Amst) 2007; 6:885-890.
14. Wold MS. Replication protein A: heterotrimeric, single-stranded DN A-binding protein required for eukaryotic DNA metabolism. Annu Rev Biochem 1997; 66:61-92.
15. Sung P. Catalysis of ATP-dependent homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange by yeast RAD51 protein. Science 1994; 265:1241-1243.
16. Conway AB, Lynch TW, Zhang Y, et al. Crystal structure of a Rad51 filament. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2004; 11:791-796.
17. Ogawa T, Yu X, Shinohara A, Egelman EH. Similarity of the yeast RAD51 filament to the bacterial RecA filament. Science 1993; 259:1896-1899.
18. Bianco PR, Tracy RB, Kowalczykowski SC. DNA strand exchange proteins: a biochemical and physical comparison. Front Biosci 1998; 3:570-603.
19. Zaitseva EM, Zaitsev EN, Kowalczykowski SC. The DNA binding properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 protein. J Biol Chem 1999; 274:2907-2915.
20. Eggler AL, Inman RB, Cox MM. The Rad51 -dependent pairing of long DNA substrates is stabilized by replication protein A. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:39280-39288.
21. Sugiyama T, Zaitseva EM, Kowalczykowski SC. A single-stranded DNA-binding protein is needed for efficient presynaptic complex formation by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 protein. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:7940-7945.
22. Beernink HTH, Morrical SW. RMPs: recombination/replication mediator proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 1999; 24:385-389.
23. Lisby M, Barlow JH, Burgess RC, Rothstein R. Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 2004; 118:699-713.
24. Gasior SL, Wong AK, Kora Y, Shinohara A, Bishop DK. Rad52 associates with RPA and functions with Rad55 and Rad57 to assemble meiotic recombination complexes. Genes Dev 1998; 12:2208-2221.
25. Sugawara N, Wang X, Haber JE. In vivo roles of Rad52, Rad54, and Rad55 proteins in Rad51-mediated recombination. Mol Cell 2003; 12:209-219.
26. Sung P. Yeast Rad55 and Rad57 proteins form a heterodimer that functions with replication protein A to promote DNA strand exchange by Rad51 recombinase. Genes Dev 1997; 11:1111-1121.
27. Thacker J. A surfeit of RAD51-like genes? Trends Genet 1999; 15:166-168.
28. Masson JY, Tarsounas MC, Stasiak AZ, et al. Identification and purification of two distinct complexes containing the five RAD51 paralogs. Genes Dev 2001; 15:3296-3307.
29. Schild D, Lio YC, Collins DW, Tsomondo T, Chen DJ. Evidence for simultaneous protein interactions between human Rad51 paralogs. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:16443-16449.
30. Sigurdsson S, Van Komen S, Bussen W, et al. Mediator function of the human Rad51 B-Rad51C complex in Rad51/RPA-catalyzed DNA strand exchange. Genes Dev 2001; 15:3308-3318.
31. Yonetani Y, Hochegger H, Sonoda E, et al. Differential and collaborative actions of Rad51 paralog proteins in cellular response to DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:4544-4552.
32. Shinohara A, Shinohara M, Ohta T, Matsuda S, Ogawa T. Rad52 forms ring structures and co-operates with RPA in single-strand annealing. Genes Cells 1998; 3:145-156.
33. Singleton MR, Wentzell LM, Liu YL, West SC, Wigley DB. Structure of the single-strand annealing domain of human RAD52 protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:13492-13497.
34. Shinohara A, Ogawa H, Ogawa T. Rad51 protein involved in repair and recombination in S. cerevisiae is a RecA-like protein. Cell 1992; 69:457-470.
35. Hays SL, Firmenich AA, Massey P, Banerjee R, Berg P. Studies of the interaction between Rad52 protein and the yeast single-stranded DNA binding protein RPA. Mol Cell Biol 1998; 18:4400-4406.
36. Sugiyama T, Kowalczykowski SC. Rad52 protein associates with replication protein A (RPA)-single-stranded DNA to accelerate Rad51-mediated displacement of RPA and presynaptic complex formation. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:31663-31672.
37. New JH, Sugiyama T, Zaitseva E, Kowalczykowski SC. Rad52 protein stimulates DNA strand exchange by Rad51 and replication protein A. Nature 1998; 391:407-410.
38. Shinohara A, Ogawa T. Stimulation by Rad52 of yeast Rad51-mediated recombination. Nature 1998; 391:404-407.
39. Sung P. Function of yeast Rad52 protein as a mediator between replication protein A and the Rad51 recombinase. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:28194-28197.
40. Sugiyama T, New JH, Kowalczykowski SC. DNA annealing by Rad52 Protein is stimulated by specific interaction with the complex of replication protein A and single-stranded DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:6049-6054.
41. Sugiyama T, Kantake N, Wu Y, Kowalczykowski SC. Rad52-mediated DNA annealing after Rad51-mediated DNA strand exchange promotes second ssDNA capture. EMBO J 2006; 25:5539-5548.
42. Rijkers T, VandenOuweland J, Morolli B, et al. Targeted inactivation of mouse RAD52 reduces homologous recombination but not resistance to ionizing radiation. Mol Cell Biol 1998; 18:6423-6429.
43. Fujimori A, Tachiiri S, Sonoda E, et al. Rad52 partially substitutes for the Rad51 paralog XRCC3 in maintaining chromosomal integrity invertebrate cells. EMBO J 2001; 20:5513-5520.
44. Tarsounas M, Davies D, West SC. BRCA2-dependent and independent formation of RAD51 nuclear foci. Oncogene 2003; 22:1115-1123.
45. Yang HJ, Li QB, Fan J, Holloman WK, Pavletich NP. The BRCA2 homologue Brh2 nucleates RAD51 filament formation at a dsDNA-ssDNA junction. Nature 2005; 433:653-657.
46. San Filippo J, Chi P, Sehorn MG, et al. Recombination mediator and Rad51 targeting activities of a human BRCA2 polypeptide. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:11649-11657.
47. Yang HJ, Jeffrey PD, Miller J, et al. BRCA2 function in DNA binding and recombination from a BRCA2-DSS1 -ssDNA structure. Science 2002; 297:1837-1848.
48. Pellegrini L, Yu DS, LoT, et al. Insights into DNA recombination from the structure of a RAD51-BRCA2 complex. Nature 2002; 420:287-293.
49. Davies OR, Pellegrini L. Interaction with the BRCA2 C terminus protects RAD51-DNA filaments from disassembly by BRC repeats. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2007; 14:475-483.
50. Esashi F, Galkin VE, Yu X, Egelman EH, West SC. Stabilization of RAD51 nucleoprotein filaments by the C-terminal region of BRCA2. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2007; 14:468-474.
51. Esashi F, Christ N, Gannon J, et al. CDK-dependent phosphorylation of BRCA2 as a regulatory mechanism for recombinational repair. Nature 2005; 434:598-604.
52. Gudmundsdottir K, Lord CJ, Witt E, Tutt ANJ, Ashworth A. DSS1 is required for RAD51 focus formation and genomic stability in mammalian cells. EMBO Rep 2004; 5:989-993.
53. Kojic M, Yang HJ, Kostrub CF, Pavletich NP, Holloman WK. The BRCA2-interacting protein DSS1 is vital for DNA repair, recombination, and genome stability in Ustilago maydis. Mol Cell 2003; 12:1043-1049.
54. Xia B, Sheng Q, Nakanishi K, et al. Control of BRCA2 cellular and clinical functions by a nuclear partner, PALB2. Mol Cell 2006; 22:719-729.
55. Lu HM, Guo X, Meng XB, et al. The BRCA2-interacting protein BCCIP functions in RAD51 and BRCA2 focus formation and homologous recombinational repair. Mol Biol Cell 2005; 25:1949-1957.
56. Heyer WD, Li X, Rolfsmeier M, Zhang XP. Rad54: the Swiss Army knife of homologous recombination? Nucl Acids Res 2006; 34:4115-4125.
57. Tan TLR, Kanaar R, Wyman C. Rad54, a Jack of all trades in homologous recombination. DNA Repair 2003; 2:787-794.
58. Sharan SK, Morimatsu M, Albrecht U, et al. Embryonic lethality and radiation hypersensitivity mediated by Rad51 in mice lacking Brca2. Nature 1997; 386:804-810.
59. Essers J, Hendriks RW, Swagemakers SMA, et al. Disruption of mouse RAD54 reduces ionizing radiation resistance. Cell 1997; 89:195-204.
60. Wesoly J, Agarwal S, Sigurdsson S, et al. Differential contributions of mammalian Rad54 paralogs to recombination, DNA damage repair, and meiosis. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:976-989.
61. Amitani I, Baskin RJ, Kowalczykowski SC. Visualization of Rad54, a chromatin remodeling protein, translocating on single DNAmolecules. Mol Cell 2006; 23:143-148.
62. Mazin AV, Alexeev AA, Kowalczykowski SC. A novel function of Rad54 protein - Stabilization of the Rad51 nucleoprotein filament. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:14029-14036.
63. Wolner B, Peterson CL. ATP-dependent and ATP-independent roles for the Rad54 chromatin remodeling enzyme during recombinational repair of a DNA double strand break. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:10855-10860.
64. Mazin AV, Bornarth CJ, Solinger JA, Heyer W-D, Kowalczykowski SC. Rad54 protein is targeted to pairing loci by the Rad51 nucleoprotein filament. Mol Cell 2000; 6:583-592.
65. Van Komen S, Petukhova G, Sigurdsson S, Stratton S, Sung P. Superhelicity-driven homologous DNA pairing by yeast recombination factors Rad51 and Rad54. Mol Cell 2000; 6:563-572.
66. Petukhova G, Stratton S, Sung P. Catalysis of homologous DNA pairing by yeast Rad51 and Rad54 proteins. Nature 1998; 393:91-94.
67. Solinger JA, Kiianitsa K, Heyer W-D. Rad54, a Swi2/Snf2-like recombinational repair protein, disassembles Rad51:dsDNA filaments. Mol Cell 2002; 10:1175-1188.
68. Li X, Heyer WD. Rad54 controls access to the invading 3′ end in Rad51 -mediated strand invasion during homologous recombination in S. cerevisiae. 2007; in submission.
69. Alexeev A, Mazin A, Kowalczykowski SC. Rad54 protein possesses chromatin-remodeling activity stimulated by a Rad51-ssDNA nucleoprotein filament. Nat Struct Biol 2003; 10:182-186.
70. Jaskelioff M, Van Komen S, Krebs JE, Sung P, Peterson CL. Rad54p is a chromatin remodeling enzyme required for heteroduplex joint formation with chromatin. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:9212-9218.
71. Zhang Z, Fan HY, Goldman JA, Kingston RE. Homology-driven chromatin remodeling by human RAD54. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2007; 14:397-405.
72. Bugreev DV, Hanaoka F, Mazin AV. Rad54 dissociates homologous recombination intermediates by branch migration. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2007; 14:746-753.
73. Bugreev DV, Mazina OM, Mazin AV. Rad54 protein promotes branch migration of Holliday junctions. Nature 2006; 442:590-593.
74. Miyazaki T, Bressan DA, Shinohara M, Haber JE, Shinohara A. In vivo assembly and disassembly of Rad51 and Rad52 complexes during double-strand break repair. EMBO J 2004; 23:939-949.
75. Takata M, Sasaki MS, Sonoda E, et al. The Rad51 paralog Rad5 IB promotes homologous recombinational repair. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:6476-6482.
76. Hoeijmakers JHJ. Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 2001; 411:366-374.
77. McClintock B. The stability of broken ends of chromosomes in Zea Mays. Genetics 1941; 26:234-282.
78. Engels WR, Johnson-Schlitz DM, Eggleston WB, Sved J. Highfrequency P element loss in Drosophila is homolog dependent. Cell 1990; 62:515-525.
79. Dudley DD, Chaudhuri J, Bassing CH, Alt FW. Mechanism and control of V(D)J recombination versus class switch recombination: similarities and differences. Adv Immunolo 2005; 86:43-112.
80. Ward JF. DNA damage produced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells: identities, mechanisms of formation, and reparability. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 1988; 35:95-125.
81. Povirk LF. DNA damage and mutagenesis by radiomimetic DNA-cleaving agents: bleomycin, neocarzinostatin and other enediynes. Mutat Res 1996; 355:71-89.
82. Li TK, Liu LF. Tumor cell death induced by topoisomerasetargeting drugs. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2001; 41:53-77.
83. Wang JC. Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular perspective. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002; 3:430-440.
84. Koster DA, Palle K, Bot ES, Bjomsti MA, Dekker NH. Antitumour drugs impede DNA uncoiling by topoisomerase I. Nature 2007; 448:213-217.
85. Pouliot JJ, Yao KC, Robertson CA, Nash HA. Yeast gene for a Tyr-DNA phosphodiesterase that repairs topoisomerase I complexes. Science 1999; 286:552-555.
86. Interthal H, Pouliot JJ, Champoux JJ. The tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase Tdp 1 is a member of the phospholipase D superfamily. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98:12009-12014.
87. Pierce AJ, Hu P, Han M, Ellis N, Jasin M. Ku DNA end-binding protein modulates homologous repair of double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Genes Dev 2001; 15:3237-3242.
88. Szostak JW, Orr-Weaver TL, Rothstein RJ, Stahl FW. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell 1983; 33:25-35.
89. Nassif N, Penney J, Pal S, Engels WR, Gloor GB. Efficient copying of nonhomolgous sequences from ectopic sites via P-element-induced gap repair. Mol Cell Biol 1994; 14:1613-1625.
90. Malkova A, Ivanov EL, Haber JE. Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93:7131-7136.
91. Mosig G. Recombination and recombination-dependent DNA replication in bacteriophage T4. Annu Rev Genet 1998; 32:379-413, C371.
92. Ivanov EL, Sugawara N, White CI, Fabre F, Haber JE. Mutations in Xrs2 and Rad50 delay but do not prevent mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1994; 14:3414-3425.
93. Krishna S, Wagener BM, Liu HP, et al. Mre11 and Ku regulation of double-strand break repair by gene conversion and break-induced replication. DNA Repair (Amst) 2007; 6:797-808.
94. Fiorentini P, Huang KN, Tishkoff DX, Kolodner RD, Symington LS. Exonuclease I of Saccharomyces cerevisiae functions in mitotic recombination in vivo and in vitro. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17:2764-2773.
95. Clerici M, Mantiero D, Lucchini G, Longhese MP. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein promotes resection and bridging of double strand break ends. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:38631-38638.
96. Liu YL, Masson JY, Shah R, O'Regan P, West SC. RAD51C is required for Holliday junction processing in mammalian cells. Science 2004; 303:243-246.
97. Wu LJ, Hickson ID. The Bloom's syndrome helicase suppresses crossing-over during homologous recombination. Nature 2003; 426:870-874.
98. Plank JL, Wu JH, Hsieh TS. Topoisomerase III alpha and Bloom's helicase can resolve a mobile double Holliday junction substrate through convergent branch migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:11118-11123.
99. Wu L, Bachrati CZ, Ou JW, et al. BLAP75/RMI1 promotes the BLM-dependent dissolution of homologous recombination intermediates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:4068-4073.
100. Lo YC, Paffett KS, Amit O, et al. Sgsl regulates gene conversion tract lengths and crossovers independently of its helicase activity. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:4086-4094.
101. Oh SD, Lao JP, HwangPYH, et al. BLM ortholog, Sgs1, prevents aberrant crossing-over by suppressing formation of multichromatid joint molecules. Cell 2001; 130:259-272.
102. Petalcorin MIR, Sandall J, Wigiley DB, Boulton SJ. CeBRC-2 stimulates D-loop formation by RAD-51 and promotes DNA single-strand annealing. J Mol Biol 2006; 361:231-242.
103. Ira G, Malkova A, Liberi G, Foiani M, Haber JE. Srs2 and Sgs1-Top3 suppress crossovers during double-strand break repair in yeast. Cell 2003; 115:401-411.
104. Veaute X, Jeusset J, Soustelle C, et al. The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments. Nature 2003; 423:309-312.
105. Adams MD, McVey M, Sekelsky JJ. Drosophila BLM in double-strand break repair by synthesis-dependent strand annealing. Science 2003; 299:265-267.
106. Bachrati CZ, Borts RH, Hickson ID. Mobile D-loops are a preferred substrate for the Bloom's syndrome helicase. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:2269-2279.
107. Elliott B, Jasin M. Double-strand breaks and translocations in cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci 2002; 59:373-385.
108. Richardson C, Jasin M. Frequent chromosomal translocations induced by DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 2000; 405:697-700.
109. Moynahan ME, Jasin M. Loss of heterozygosity induced by a chromosomal double-strand break. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94:8988-8993.
110. Lydeard JR, Jain S, Yamaguchi M, Haber JE. Break-induced replication and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance require Pol32. Nature 2007; 448:820-823.
111. Nickoloff JA, Sweetser DB, Clikeman JA, Khalsa GJ, Wheeler SL. Multiple heterologies increase mitotic double-strand break-induced allelic gene conversion tract lengths in yeast. Genetics 1999; 153:665-679.
112. Dunham MA, Neumann AA, Fasching CL, Reddel RR. Telomere maintenance by recombination in human cells. Nat Genet 2000; 26:447-450.
113. Ira G, Pellicioli A, Balijja A, et al. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDKl. Nature 2004; 431:1011-1017.
114. Freudenreich CH. Chromosome fragility: molecular mechanisms and cellular consequences. Front Biosci 2007; 12:4911-4924.
115. Azvolinsky A, Dunaway S, Torres JZ, Bessler JB, Zakian VA. The S-cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA helicase moves with the replication fork and affects replication of all yeast chromosomes. Genes Dev 2006; 20:3104-3116.
116. Kolodner RD, Putnam CD, Myung K. Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 2002; 297:552-557.
117. Prakash S, Prakash L. Translesion DNA synthesis in eukaryotes: a one- or two-polymerase affair. Genes Dev 2002; 16:1872-1883.
118. Heller RC, Marians KJ. Replisome assembly and the direct restart of stalled replication forks. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7:932-943.
119. Heller RC, Marians KJ. Replication fork reactivation downstream of a blocked nascent leading strand. Nature 2006; 439:557-562.
120. Lopes M, Foiani M, Sogo JM. Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. Mol Cell 2006; 21:15-27.
121. Bianchi M, DasGupta C, Radding CM. Synapsis and the formation of paranemic joints by E. coli RecA protein. Cell 1983; 34:931-939.
122. Hickson ID. RecQ helicases: caretakers of the genome. Nat Rev Cancer 2003; 3:169-178.
123. Shor E, Weinstein J, Rothstein R. Genetic screen for top3 suppressors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies SHU1, SHU2, PSY3 and CSM2: four genes involved in error-free DNA repair. Genetics 2005; 169:1275-1289.
124. Mankouri HW, Ngo HP, Hickson ID. Shu proteins promote the formation of homologous recombination intermediates that are processed by sgsl-rmil-top3. Mol Biol Cell 2007; 18:4062-4073.
125. Martin V, Chahwan C, Gao H, et al. Sws1 is a conserved regulator of homologous recombination in eukaryotic cells. EMBO J 2006; 25:2564-2574.
126. Hollingsworth NM, Brill SJ. The Mus81 solution to resolution: generating meiotic crossovers without Holliday junctions. Genes Dev 2004; 18:117-125.
127. Heyer WD, Ehmsen KT, Solinger JA. Holliday junctions in the eukaryotic nucleus: resolution in sight? Trends in Biochem Sci 2003; 10:548-557.
128. Boddy MN, Lopez-Girona A, Shanahan P, et al. Damage tolerance protein Mus81 associates with the FHA1 domain of checkpoint kinase Cds1. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:8758-8766.
129. Interthal H, Heyer WD. MUS81 encodes a novel helix-hairpinhelix protein involved in the response to UV- and methylationinduced DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet 2000; 263:812-827.
130. Wood A, Garg P, Burgers PMJ. A ubiquitin-binding motif in the translesion DNA polymerase Rev1 mediates its essential functional interaction with ubiquitinated proliferating cell nuclear antigen in response to DNA damage. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:20256-20263.
131. Stelter P, Ulrich HD. Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation. Nature 2003; 425:188-191.
132. Hoege C, Pfander B, Moldovan GL, Pyrowolakis G, Jentsch S. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 2002; 419:135-141.
133. Sogo JM, Lopes M, Foiani M. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 2002; 297:599-602.
134. Papouli E, Chen SH, Davies AA, et al. Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. Mol Cell 2005; 19:123-133.
135. Pfander B, Moldovan GL, Sacher M, Hoege C, Jentsch S. SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature 2005; 436:428-433.
136. Rrejci L, Van Komen S, Li Y, et al. DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament. Nature 2003; 423:305-309.
137. Herzberg K, Bashkirov VI, Rolfsmeier M, et al. Phosphorylation of Rad55 on serines 2, 8, and 14 is required for efficient homologous recombination in the recovery of stalled replication forks. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:8396-8409.
138. Dronkert ML, Kanaar R. Repair of DNA interstrand cross-links. Mutat Res 2001; 486:217-247.
139. Lehoczky P, McHugh PJ, Chovanec M. DNA interstrand crosslink repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2007; 31:109-133.
140. Niedernhofer LJ, Daniels JS, Rouzer CA, Greene RE, Marnett LJ. Malondialdehyde, a product of lipid peroxidation, is mutagenic in human cells. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:31426-31433.
141. McHugh PJ, Spanswick VJ, Hartley JA. Repair of DNA interstrand crosslinks: molecular mechanisms and clinical relevance. Lancet One 2001; 2:483-490.
142. De Silva IU, McHugh PJ, Clingen PH, Hartley JA. Defining the roles of nucleotide excision repair and recombination in the repair of DNA interstrand cross-links in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:7980-7990.
143. Akkari YM, Bateman RL, Reifsteck CA, Olson SB, Grompe M. DNA replication is required to elicit cellular responses to psoralen-induced DNA interstrand cross-links. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:8283-8289.
144. Hanada K, Budzowska M, Modesti M, et al. The structure-specific endonuclease Mus81-Eme1 promotes conversion of interstrand DNA crosslinks into double-strands breaks. EMBO J 2006; 25:4921-4932.
145. Niedernhofer LJ, Odijk H, Budzowska M, et al. The structure-specific endonuclease Erccl-Xpf is required to resolve DNA interstrand cross-link-induced double-strand breaks. Mol Biol Cell 2004; 24:5776-5787.
146. Li XR, Hejna J, Moses RE. The yeast Snm1 protein is a DNA 5′-exonuclease. DNA Repair (Amst) 2005; 4:163-170.
147. Li X, Moses RE. The beta-lactamase motif in Snm1 is required for repair of DNA double-strand breaks caused by interstrand crosslinks in S. cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 2003; 2:121-129.
148. Hejna J, Philip S, Ott J, FaulknerC, Moses R. The hSNM1 protein is a DNA 5′-exonuclease. Nucl Acids Res 2007; 35:6115-6123.
149. Dronkert MLG, de Wit J, Boeve M, et al. Disruption of mouse SNMl causes increased sensitivity to the DNA interstrand cross-linking agent mitomycin C. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:4553-4561.
150. Smogorzewska A, Matsuoka S, VinciguerraP, et al. Identification of the FANCI protein, a monoubiquitinated FANCD2 paralog required for DNA repair. Cell 2007; 129:289-301.
151. Reid S, Schindler D, Hanenberg H, et al. Biallelic mutations in PALB2 cause Fanconi anemia subtype FA-N and predispose to childhood cancer. Nat Gen 2007; 39:162-164.
152. Xia B, Dorsman JC, Ameziane N, et al. Fanconi anemia is associated with a defect in the BRCA2 partner PALB2. Nat Gen 2007; 39:159-161.
153. Meetei AR, Medhurst AL, Ling C, et al. A human ortholog of archaeal DNA repair protein Hef is defective in Fanconi anemia complementation group M. Nat Gen 2005; 37:958-963.
154. Mosedale G, Niedzwiedz W, Alpi A, et al. The vertebrate Hef ortholog is a component of the Fanconi anemia tumor-suppressor pathway. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2005; 12:763-771.
155. Ciccia A, Ling C, Coulthard R, et al. Identification of FAAP24, a Fanconi anemia core complex protein that interacts with FANCM. Mol Cell 2001; 25:331-343.
156. Pazin MJ, Kadonaga JT. SWI2/SNF2 and related proteins: ATP-driven motors that disrupt protein-DNA interactions? Cell 1997; 88:737-740.
157. Gupta R, Sharma S, Sommers JA, et al. Analysis of the DNA substrate specificity of the human BACH1 helicase associated with breast cancer. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:25450-25460.
158. Gupta R, Sharma S, Sommers JA, et al. FANCJ (BACH1) helicase forms DNA damage inducible foci with replication protein A and interacts physically and functionally with the single-stranded DNA-binding protein. Blood 2001; 110:2390-2398.
159. Osman F, Dixon J, Barr AR, Whitby MC. The F-box DNA helicase Fbh1 prevents Rhp51-dependent recombination without mediator proteins. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:8084-8096.