Non-catalytic function for ATR in the checkpoint response

Cell Cycle

Volumn 6, Issue 16, 2007, Pages 2019-2030

  McSherry, Troy D ^b,d   Kitazono, Ana A ^c   Javaheri, Ali ^b   Kron, Stephen J ^b   Mueller, Paul R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^d ABBOTT LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

ATR; Cell cycle; Checkpoint; mec1; PIKK; S. cerevisiae; Spindle assembly; Xenopus; Yeast

Indexed keywords

ATR PROTEIN; CHECKPOINT KINASE RAD3; MUTANT PROTEIN; PROTEIN RAD9; XENOPUS PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE ARREST; CELL DEATH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EUKARYOTA; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 34548208813     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.6.16.4553     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Hoeijmakers JH. Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 2001; 411:366-74.
2. Khanna KK, Jackson SP. DNA double-strand breaks: Signaling, repair and the cancer connection. Nat Genet 2001; 27:247-54.
3. Abraham RT. Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases. Genes Dev 2001; 15:2177-96.
4. Carr AM. Control of cell cycle arrest by the Mec1sc/Rad3sp DNA structure checkpoint pathway. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1997; 7:93-8.
5. Yang J, Yu Y, Hamrick HE, Duerksen-Hughes PJ. ATM, ATR and DNA-PK: Initiators of the cellular genotoxic stress responses. Carcinogenesis 2003; 24:1571-80.
6. McSherry TD, Mueller PR. Xenopus Cds1 is regulated by DNA-dependent protein kinase and ATR during the cell cycle checkpoint response to double-stranded DNA ends. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:9968-85.
7. Li J, Stern DF. Regulation of Chk2 by DNA-dependent protein kinase. J Biol Chem 2005.
8. Clerici M, Baldo V, Mantiero D, Lottersberger F, Lucchini G, Longhese MP. A Tel1/MRX-dependent checkpoint inhibits the metaphase-to-anaphase transition after UV irradiation in the absence of Mec1. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:10126-44.
9. Krishnan V, Nirantar S, Crasta K, Cheng AY, Surana U. DNA replication checkpoint prevents precocious chromosome segregation by regulating spindle behavior. Mol Cell 2004; 16:687-700.
10. Tsvetkov L, Xu X, Li J, Stern DF. Polo-like kinase 1 and Chk2 interact and colocalize to centrosomes and the midbody. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:8468-75.
11. You Z, Chahwan C, Bailis J, Hunter T, Russell P. ATM activation and its recruitment to damaged DNA require binding to the C terminus of Nbs1. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:5363-79.
12. Rouse J, Jackson SP. Lcd1p recruits Mec1p to DNA lesions in vitro and in vivo. Mol Cell 2002; 9:857-69.
13. Wolkow TD, Enoch T. Fission yeast Rad26 is a regulatory subunit of the Rad3 checkpoint kinase. Mol Biol Cell 2002; 13:480-92.
14. Zou L, Elledge SJ. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 2003; 300:1542-8.
15. Melo JA, Cohen J, Toczyski DP. Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo. Genes Dev 2001; 15:2809-21.
16. Kondo T, Wakayama T, Naiki T, Matsumoto K, Sugimoto K. Recruitment of Mec1 and Ddc1 checkpoint proteins to double-strand breaks through distinct mechanisms. Science 2001; 294:867-70.
17. Rhind N, Russell P. Chk1 and Cds1: Linchpins of the DNA damage and replication checkpoint pathways. J Cell Sci 2000; 113:3889-96.
18. Toh GW, Lowndes NF. Role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 protein in sensing and responding to DNA damage. Biochem Soc Trans 2003; 31:242-6.
19. Lee JS, Collins KM, Brown AL, Lee CH, Chung JH. hCds1-mediated phosphorylation of BRCA1 regulates the DNA damage response. Nature 2000; 404:201-4.
20. Lou Z, Minter-Dykhouse K, Wu X, Chen J. MDC1 is coupled to activated CHK2 in mammalian DNA damage response pathways. Nature 2003; 421:957-61.
21. Wang B, Matsuoka S, Carpenter PB, Elledge SJ. 53BP1, a mediator of the DNA damage checkpoint. Science 2002; 298:1435-8.
22. Cortez D, Wang Y, Qin J, Elledge SJ. Requirement of ATM-dependent phosphorylation of brca1 in the DNA damage response to double-strand breaks. Science 1999; 286:1162-6.
23. Tibbetts RS, Cortez D, Brumbaugh KM, Scully R, Livingston D, Elledge SJ, Abraham RT. Functional interactions between BRCA1 and the checkpoint kinase ATR during genotoxic stress. Genes Dev 2000; 14:2989-3002.
24. Sanchez Y, Bachant J, Wang H, Hu F, Liu D, Tetzlaff M, Elledge SJ. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 1999; 286:1166-71.
25. Blankley RT, Lydall D. A domain of Rad9 specifically required for activation of Chk1 in budding yeast. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:601-8.
26. Lew DJ, Burke DJ. The spindle assembly and spindle position checkpoints. Annu Rev Genet 2003; 37:251-82.
27. Clemenson C, Marsolier-Kergoat MC. The spindle assembly checkpoint regulates the phosphorylation state of a subset of DNA checkpoint proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:9149-61.
28. Collura A, Blaisonneau J, Baldacci G, Francesconi S. The fission yeast Crb2/Chk1 pathway coordinates the DNA damage and spindle checkpoint in response to replication stress induced by topoisomerase I inhibitor. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:7889-99.
29. Garber PM, Rine J. Overlapping roles of the spindle assembly and DNA damage checkpoints in the cell-cycle response to altered chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2002; 161:521-34.
30. Maringele L, Lydall D. EXO1-dependent single-stranded DNA at telomeres activates subsets of DNA damage and spindle checkpoint pathways in budding yeast yku70Delta mutants. Genes Dev 2002; 16:1919-33.
31. Sugimoto I, Murakami H, Tonami Y, Moriyama A, Nakanishi M. DNA replication checkpoint control mediated by the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2p in fission yeast. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:47372-8.
32. Zachos G, Black EJ, Walker M, Scott MT, Vagnarelli P, Earnshaw WC, Gillespie DA. Chk1 is required for spindle checkpoint function. Dev Cell 2007; 12:247-60.
33. Morgan SE, Lovly C, Pandita TK, Shiloh Y, Kastan MB. Fragments of ATM which have dominant-negative or complementing activity. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17:2020-9.
34. Chapman CR, Evans ST, Carr AM, Enoch T. Requirement of sequences outside the conserved kinase domain of fission yeast Rad3p for checkpoint control. Mol Biol Cell 1999; 10:3223-38.
35. Fernandes N, Sun Y, Chen S, Paul P, Shaw RJ, Cantley LC, Price BD. DNA damage-induced association of ATM with its target proteins requires a protein interaction domain in the N terminus of ATM. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:15158-64.
36. Perry J, Kleckner N. The ATRs, ATMs, and TORs are giant HEAT repeat proteins. Cell 2003; 112:151-5.
37. Cortez D, Guntuku S, Qin J, Elledge SJ. ATR and ATRIP: Partners in checkpoint signaling. Science 2001; 294:1713-6.
38. Schmidt DR, Schreiber SL. Molecular association between ATR and two components of the nucleosome remodeling and deacetylating complex, HDAC2 and CHD4. Biochemistry 1999; 38:14711-7.
39. Shafman T, Khanna KK, Kedar P, Spring K, Kozlov S, Yen T, Hobson K, Gatei M, Zhang N, Watters D, Egerton M, Shiloh Y, Kharbanda S, Kufe D, Lavin MF. Interaction between ATM protein and c-Abl in response to DNA damage. Nature 1997; 387:520-3.
40. Guo Z, Kumagai A, Wang SX, Dunphy WG. Requirement for Atr in phosphorylation of Chk1 and cell cycle regulation in response to DNA replication blocks and UV-damaged DNA in Xenopus egg extracts. Genes Dev 2000; 14:2745-56.
41. Hekmat-Nejad M, You Z, Yee MC, Newport JW, Cimprich KA. Xenopus ATR is a replication-dependent chromatin-binding protein required for the DNA replication checkpoint. Curr Biol 2000; 10:1565-73.
42. Carpenter PB, Mueller PR, Dunphy WG. Role for a Xenopus Orc2-related protein in controlling DNA replication. Nature 1996; 379:357-60.
43. Leise IIIrd W, Mueller PR. Multiple Cdk1 inhibitory kinases regulate the cell cycle during development. Dev Biol 2002; 249:156-73.
44. Mueller PR, Coleman TR, Dunphy WG. Cell cycle regulation of a Xenopus Wee1-like kinase. Mol Biol Cell 1995; 6:119-34.
45. Sikorski RS, Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1989; 122:19-27.
46. Turner DL, Weintraub H. Expression of achaete-scute homolog 3 in Xenopus embryos converts ectodermal cells to a neural fate. Genes Dev 1994; 8:1434-47.
47. Keegan KS, Holtzman DA, Plug AW, Christenson ER, Brainerd EE, Flaggs G, Bentley NJ, Taylor EM, Meyn MS, Moss SB, Carr AM, Ashley T, Hoekstra MF. The Atr and Atm protein kinases associate with different sites along meiotically pairing chromosomes. Genes Dev 1996; 10:2423-37.
48. Higuchi R, Krummel B, Saiki RK. A general method of in vitro preparation and specific mutagenesis of DNA fragments: Study of protein and DNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 1988; 16:7351-67.
49. In: Guthrie C, Fink GR, eds. Guide to yeast genetics and molecular biology, 1991.
50. Usui T, Ogawa H, Petrini JH. A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Mol Cell 2001; 7:1255-66.
51. Wu M, Gerhart J. Raising Xenopus in the laboratory. Methods Cell Biol 1991; 36:3-18.
52. Weinert TA, Kiser GL, Hartwell LH. Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. Genes Dev 1994; 8:652-65.
53. Tibbetts RS, Brumbaugh KM, Williams JM, Sarkaria JN, Cliby WA, Shieh SY, Taya Y, Prives C, Abraham RT. A role for ATR in the DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of p53. Genes Dev 1999; 13:152-7.
54. Zhao X, Muller EG, Rothstein R. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol Cell 1998; 2:329-40.
55. Kiser GL, Weinert TA. Distinct roles of yeast MEC and RAD checkpoint genes in transcriptional induction after DNA damage and implications for function. Mol Biol Cell 1996; 7:703-18.
56. Bentley NJ, Holtzman DA, Flaggs G, Keegan KS, DeMaggio A, Ford JC, Hoekstra M, Carr AM. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad3 checkpoint gene. EMBO J 1996; 15:6641-51.
57. Matsuoka S, Huang M, Elledge SJ. Linkage of ATM to cell cycle regulation by the Chk2 protein kinase. Science 1998; 282:1893-7.
58. Paulovich AG, Hartwell LH. A checkpoint regulates the rate of progression through S phase in S. cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Cell 1995; 82:841-7.
59. Paciotti V, Clerici M, Lucchini G, Longhese MP. The checkpoint protein Ddc2, functionally related to S. pombe Rad26, interacts with Mec1 and is regulated by Mec1-dependent phosphorylation in budding yeast. Genes Dev 2000; 14:2046-59.
60. Wakayama T, Kondo T, Ando S, Matsumoto K, Sugimoto K. Pie1, a protein interacting with Mec1, controls cell growth and checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21:755-64.
61. Sanchez Y, Desany BA, Jones WJ, Liu Q, Wang B, Elledge SJ. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 1996; 271:357-60.
62. Emili A. MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell 1998; 2:183-9.
63. Vialard JE, Gilbert CS, Green CM, Lowndes NF. The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage. EMBO J 1998; 17:5679-88.
64. Mallory JC, Petes TD. Protein kinase activity of Tel1p and Mec1p, two Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins related to the human ATM protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97:13749-54.