Recent developments in focused library design: Targeting gene-families

Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 19-29

  Miller, Jennifer L ^a  

^a Amphora Discovery Corp   (United States)

Author keywords

Drug discovery; Focused library design; Gene family; GPCR; High throughput screening; Kinase

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL COMPOUND; CHYMOTRYPSIN; CYCLOOXYGENASE 2 INHIBITOR; DRUG; ELASTASE; G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR; GLYCINE DERIVATIVE; ION CHANNEL; LIGAND; MU OPIATE RECEPTOR; PEPTOID; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE INHIBITOR; PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITOR; PROTEINASE; TRYPSIN;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BIOTECHNOLOGY; COMPARATIVE MOLECULAR FIELD ANALYSIS; DRUG ABSORPTION; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG DISTRIBUTION; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG ELIMINATION; DRUG INDUSTRY; DRUG METABOLISM; DRUG RESEARCH; DRUG SAFETY; DRUG SCREENING; DRUG SYNTHESIS; GENE TARGETING; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; MOLECULAR LIBRARY; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHARMACOPHORE; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE PROPERTY RELATION; REVIEW; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; GENE; METHODOLOGY;

CHEMISTRY, PHARMACEUTICAL; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DRUG DESIGN; GENES;

EID: 33644855557     PISSN: 15680266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/156802606775193347     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Lipinski, C., Hopkins, A. Navigating chemical space and biology for medicine. Nature 2004, 432, 855-861.
2. Miller, J.L., Bradley, E.K., Teig, S.L. Luddite: An information-theoretic library design tool. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 47-54.
3. Rusinko III, A., Young, S.S., Drewry, D.H., Gerritz, S.W. Optimzation of focused chemical libraries using recursive partitioning. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening 2002, 5, 125-133.
4. Lowrie, J.F., Delisle, R.K., Hobbs, D.W., Diller, D.J. The Different Strategies for Designing GPCR and Kinase Targeted Libraries. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening 2004, 7, 495-510.
5. Tropsha, A., Reynolds, C.H. Designing focused libraries for drug discovery: Hit to lead to drug. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2002, 20, 427-428.
6. Agrafiotis, D.K., Martin, E.J. Introduction and foreward to the special issue on combinatorial library design. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2000, 18, 317-319.
7. Dooley, C.T., Ny, P., Bidlack, J.M., Houghten, R.A. Selective ligands for the μ, δ, and κ opioid receptors identified from a single tetrapeptide positional scanning combinatorial library. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 18848-18856.
8. Zuckermann, R.N., Martin, E.J., Spellmeyer, D.C., Stauber, G.B., Shoemaker, K.R., Kerr, J.M., Figliozzi, G.M., Goff, D.A., Siani, M.A., Simon, R.J., Banville, S.C., Brown, E.G., Wang, L., Richter, L.S., Moos, W.H. Discovery of nanomolar ligands for 7-transmembrane G-protein-coupled receptors from a diverse N-(substituted)glycine peptoid library. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 2678-2685.
9. Martin, E.J., Blaney, J.M., Siani, M.A., Spellmeyer, D.C., Wong, A.K., Moos, W.H. Measuring diversity: Experimental design of combinatorial libraries for drug discovery. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 1431-1436.
10. Lipinski, C.A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B.W., Feeney, P.J. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1997, 23, 3-25.
11. Ajay, A., Bemis, G.W., Murcko, M.A. Designing libraries with CNS activity. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 4942-4951.
12. Oprea, T.I., Davis, A.M., Teague, S.J., Leeson, P.D. Is there a difference between leads and drugs? A historical perspective. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1308-1315.
13. Baurin, N., Baker, R., Richardson, C., Chen, I., Foloppe, N., Potter, A., Jordan, A., Roughley, S., Parratt, M., Greaney, P., Morley, D., Hubbard, R.E. Drug-like annotation and duplicate analysis of a 23-supplier chemical database totalling 2.7 million compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 643-651.
14. Matter, H., Baringhaus, K.H., Naumann, T., Klabunde, T., Pirard, B. Computational approaches towards the rational design of drug-like compound libraries. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening 2001, 4, 453-475.
15. Balakin, K.V., Lang, S.A., Skorenko, A.V., Tkachenko, S.E., Ivashchenko, A.A., Savchuk, N.P. Structure-based versus property-based approaches in the design of G-Protein-Coupled receptor-targeted libraries. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 1553-1562.
16. Balakin, K.V., Tkachenko, S.E., Lang, S.A., Okun, I., Ivashchenko, A.A., Savchuk, N.P. Property-based design of GPCR-targeted library. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 42, 1332-1342.
17. Jacoby, E. A novel chemogenomics knowledge-based ligand design strategy - Application to G Protein-coupled receptors. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 2001, 20, 115-123.
18. Jacoby, E., Fauchère, J.-L., Raimbaud, E., Ollivier, S., Michel, A., Spedding, M. A three binding site hypothesis for interactions of ligands with monoamine G Protein-coupled receptors: Implications for combinatorial ligand design. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1999, 18, 561-572.
19. Lavrador, K., Murphy, B., Saunder, J., Struthers, S., Wang, X., Williams, J. A screening library for peptide activated G-protein coupled receptors. 1. The test set. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 6864-6874.
20. Lamb, M.L., Bradley, E.K., Beaton, G., Bondy, S.S., Castellino, A.J., Gibbons, P.A., Suto, M.J., Grootenhuis, P.D.J. Design of a gene family screening library targeting G-protein coupled receptors. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2004, 23, 15-21.
21. Manallack, D.T., Pitt, W.R., Gancia, E., Montana, J.G., Livingstone, D.J., Ford, M.G., Whitley, D.C. Selecting screening candidates for kinase and G protein-coupled receptor targets using neural networks. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 1256-1262.
22. Ford, M.G., Pitt, W.R., Whitley, D.C. Selecting compounds for focused screening using linear discriminant analysis and artificial neural networks. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2004, 22, 467-472.
23. Gray, N.S., Wodicka, L., Thunnissen, A.-M., Norman, T.C., Kown, S., Espinoza, F.H., Mogan, D.O., Barnes, G., LeClerc, S., Meijer, L., Kim, S.H., Lockhart, D.J., Schultz, P.G. Exploiting chemical libraries, structure, and genomics in the search for kinase inhibitors. Science 1998, 281, 533-538.
24. Szardenings, A.K., Harris, D., Lam, S., Shi, L., Tien, D., Wang, Y., Patel, D.V., Nacre, M., Campbell, D.A. Rational design and combinatorial evaluation of enzyme inhibitor scaffolds: identificaiton of novel inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 2194-2200.
25. Carroll, C.D., Patel, H., Johnson, T.O., Guo, T., Orlowshi, M., He, Z.-M., Cavallaro, C.L., Guo, J. Oksman, A., Gluzman, I.Y., Connelly, J., Chelsky, D., Goldberg, D.E., Dolle, R.E., Identification of potent inhibitors of plasmodium falciparum plasmepsin II from an encoded statine combinatorial library. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 2315-2320.
26. Ajay, A., Walters, W.P. Murcko, M.A. Can we learn to distinguish between "drug-like" and "nondrug-like" molecules? J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3314-3324.
27. Feher, M., Schmidt, J. Property distributions: Differences between drugs, natural products, and molecules from combinatorial chemistry. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 218-227.
28. Ghose, A.K., Viswanadhan, V.N., Wendoloski, J.J. A knowledge-based approach in designing combinatorial or medicinal chemistry libraries for drug discovery. 1. A qualititative and quantitative characterization of known drug databases. J. Comb. Chem. 1999, 1, 55-68.
29. Gillet, V.J., Willett; P., Bradshaw, J. Identification of biological activity profiles using substructural analysis and genetic algorithms. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 165-179.
30. Lee, M.-L., Schneider, G. Scaffold architecture and pharmacophoric properties of natural products and trade drugs: Application in the design of natural product-based combinatorial libraries. J. Comb. Chem. 2001, 3, 284-289.
31. Sadowski, J., Kubinyi, H. A scoring scheme for discriminating between drugs and nondrugs. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3325-3329.
32. Vieth, M., Siegel, M.G., Higgs, R.E., Watson, I.A., Robertson, D.H., Savin, K.A., Durst, G.L., Hipskind, P.A. Characteristic physical properties and structural fragments of marketed oral drugs. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 224-232.
33. Voigt, J.H., Beinfait, B., Wang, S., Nicklaus, M.C. Comparison of the NCI open database with seven large chemical structural databases. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 702-712.
34. Wagener, M., van Geerestein, V.J. Potential drugs and nondrugs: Prediction and identification of important structural features. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 280-292.
35. Xu, Y.-J., Johnson, M. Using molecular equivalence numbers to visually explore structural features that distinguish chemical libraries. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 912-926.
36. Dobson, C.M. Chemical space and biology. Nature 2004, 432, 824-828.
37. Bajorath, J. Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2002, 1, 882-894.
38. Mestres, J., Veeneman, G.H. Identification of "latent hits" in compound screening collections. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 3441-3444.
39. Beavers, M.P., Chen, X. Structure-based combinatorial library design: methodologies and applications. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2002, 20, 463-468.
40. Clark, D.E. Rapid calculation of polar molecular surface area and its application to the prediction of transport phenomena. Part 1. Prediction of intestinal absorption. J. Pharm. Sci. 1999, 88, 807-814.
41. Stahura, F.L., Xue, L. Godden, J.W. Bajorath, J. Methods for compound selection focused on hits and application in drug discovery. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2002, 20, 439-446.
42. FILTER, OpenEye Scientific Software: Santa Fe, NM.
43. Dunbar, Jr. J.B. Compound acquisition strategies. Pac. Sym. Biocomput. 2000, 555-565.
44. Popa-Burke, I.G., Issakova, O., Arroway, J.D., Bernasconi, P., Chen, M., Coudurier, L., Galasinski, S., Jadhav, A.P., Janzen, W.P., Lagasca, D., Liu, D., Lewis, R.S., Mohney, R.P., Sepetov, N., Sparkman, D.A., Hodge, C.N. Streamlined system for purifying and quantifying a diverse library of compounds and the effect of compound concentration measurements on the accurate interpretation of biological assay results. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 7278-7287.
45. Wu, G., Irvine, J., Luft, C., Pressley, D., Hodge, C.N., Janzen, W.P. Assay development and high-throughput screening of caspases in microfluidic format. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening 2003, 6, 303-312.
46. Janzen, W.P., Bernasconi, P., Cheatham, L., Mansky, P., Popa-Burke, I.G., Williams, K., Worley, J., Hodge, C.N. Optimizing thechemical genomics process, Chapter 3., in Chemical Genomics, F. Darvas, G. Dorman, and A. Guttman, Editors. 2004, Marcel Dekker: New York.
47. Gobbi, A., Lee, M.-L. DISE: Directed sphere exclusion. J. Chem. Inf. Comput Sci. 2003, 43, 317-323.
48. Hamprecht, F.A., Thiel, W., van Gunsteren, W.F. Chemical library subset selection algorithms: A unified derivation using spatial statistics. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 414-428.
49. Reynolds, C.H., Tropsha, A., Pfahler, L.B., Druker, R., Chakravorty, S., Ethiraj, G., Zheng, W. Diversity and coverage of structural sublibraries selected using the SAGE and SCA algorithms. J. Chem. Inf. Comput.Sci. 2001, 41, 1470-1477.
50. Agrafiotis, D.K. A constant time algorithm for estimating the diversity of large combinatorial libraries. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 159-167.
51. Agrafiotis, D.K., Rassokhin, D.N. A fractal approach for selecting an appropriate bin size for cell-based diversity estimation. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 117-122.
52. Godden, J.W., Bajorath, J. Chemical descriptors with disctinct levels of information content and varying sensitivity to differences between selected compound databases identified by SE-DSE analysis. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 87-93.
53. Tounge, B A., Pfahler, L.B., Reynolds, C.H. Chemical information based scaling of molecular descriptors: A universal chemical scale for library design and analysis. 2002, 42, 879-884.
54. Trepalin, S.V., Gerasimenko, V.A., Kozyukov, A.V., Savchuk, N.P., Ivaschenko, A.A. New diversity calculations algorithms used for compound selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 249-268.
55. Godden, J.W., Xue, L., Kitchen, D.B., Stahura, F.L., Schermerhorn, E.J., Bajorath, J. Median partitioning: A novel method for the selection of representatitve subsets from large compounds pools. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 885-893.
56. Venter, J.C., Adams, M.D., Myers, E.W., Li, P.W., Mural, R.J., Sutton, G.G., Smith, H.O., Yandell, M., Evans, C.A., Holt, R.A., Gocayne, J.D., Amanatides, P., Ballew, R.M., Huson, D.H., Wortman, J.R., Zhang, Q., Kodira, C.D., Zheng, X.H., Chen, L., Skupski, M., Subramanian, G., Thomas, P.D., Zhang, J., Gabor Miklos, G.L., Nelson, C., Broder, S., Clark, A.G., Nadeau, J., McKusick, V.A., Zinder, N., Levine, A.J., Roberts, R.J., Simon, M., Slayman, C., Hunkapiller, M., Bolanos, R., Delcher, A., Dew, I., Fasulo, D., Flanigan, M., Florea, L., Halpern, A., Hannenhalli, S., Kravitz, S., Levy, S., Mobarry, C., Reinert, K., Remington, K., Abu-Threideh, J., Beasley, E., Biddick, K., Bonazzi, V., Brandon, R., Cargill, M., Chandramouliswaran, I., Charlab, R., Chaturvedi, K., Deng, Z., Francesco, V.D., Dunn, P., Eilbeck, K., Evangelista, C., Gabrielian, A.E., Gan, W., Ge, W., Gong, F., Gu, Z., Guan, P., Heiman, T.J., Higgins, M.E., Ji, R.-R., Ke, Z., Ketchum, K.A., Lai, Z., Lei, Y., Li, Z., Li, J., Liang, Y., Lin, X., Lu, F., Merkulov, G.V., Milshina, N., Moore, H.M., Naik, A.K., Narayan, V.A., Neelam, B., Nusskern, D., Rusch, D.B., Salzberg, S., Shao, W., Shue, B., Sun, J., Wang, Z.Y., Wang, A., Wang, X., Wang, J., Wei, M.-H., Wides, R., Xiao, C., Yan, C., Yao, A., Ye, J., Zhan, M., Zhang, W., Zhang, H., Zhao, Q., Zheng, L., Zhong, F., Zhong, W., Zhu, S.C., Zhato, S., Gilbert, D., Baumhueter, S., Spier, G., Carter, C., Cravchik, A., Woodage, T., Ali, F., An, H., Awe, A., Baldwin, D., Baden, H., Barnstead, M., Barrow, I., Beeson, K., Busam, D., Carver, A., Center, A., Cheng, M.L., Curry, L., Danaher, S., Davenport, L., Desilets, R., Dietz, S., Dodson, K., Doup, L., Ferriera, S., Garg, N., Gluecksmann, A., Hart, B., Haynes, J., Haynes, C., Heiner, C., Hladun, S., Hostin, D., Houck, J., Howland, T., Ibegwam, C., Johnson, J., Kalush, F., Kline, L., Koduru, S., Love, A., Mann, F., May, D., McCawley, S., McIntosh, T., McMullen, I., Moy, M., Moy, L., Murphy, B., Nelson, K., Pfannkoch, C., Pratts, E., Puri, V., Qureshi, H., Reardon, M., Rodriguez, R., Rogers, Y.-H., Romblad, D., Ruhfel, B., Scott, R., Sitter, C., Smallwood, M., Stewart, E., Strong, R., Suh, E., Thomas, R., Tint, N.N., Tse, S., Vech, C., Wang, G., Wetter, J., Williams, S., Williams, M., Windsor, S., Winn-Deen, E., Wolfe, K., Zaveri, J., Zaveri, K., Abril, J.F., Guigo, R., Campbell, M.J., Sjolander, K.V., Karlak, B., Kejariwal, A., Mi, H., Lazareva, B., Hatton, T., Narechania, A., Diemer, K., Muruganujan, A., Guo, N., Sato, S., Bafna, V., Istrail, S., Lippert, R., Schwartz, R., Walenz, B., Yooseph, S., Allen, D., Basu, A.., Baxendale, J., Blick, L., Caminha, M., Carnes-Stine, J., Caulk, P., Chiang, Y.-H., Coyne, M., Dahlke, C., Mays, A.D., Dombroski, M., Donnelly, M., Ely, D., Esparham, S., Fosler, C., Gire, H., Glanowski, S., Glasser, K., Glodek, A., Gorokhov, M., Graham, K., Gropman, B., Harris, M., Heil, J., Henderson, S., Hoover, J., Jennings, D., Jordan, C., Jordan, J., Kasha, J., Kagan, L., Kraft, C., Levitsky, A., Lewis, M., Liu, X., Lopez, J., Ma, D., Majoros, W., McDaniel, J., Murphy, S., Newman, M., Nguyen, T., Nguyen, N., Nodell, M., Pan, S., Peck, J., Peterson, M., Rowe, W., Sanders, R., Scott, J., Simpson, M., Smith, T., Sprague, A., Stockwell, T., Turner, R., Venter, E., Wang, M., Wen, M., Wu, D., Wu, M., Xia, A., Zandieh A., Zhu, X. The Sequence of the Human Genome. Science 2001, 291, 1304-1351.
57. Morgan, M.J., Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 2001, 409, 860.
58. MDL Drug Data Report, MDL Information Systems Inc.: San Leandro, CA.
59. Patchett, A.A., Nargund, R.P. Chapter 26. Privileged structures - An update, in Annual reports in Medicinal Chemistry Vol. 35, G.L. Trainor, Editor. 2000, Academic Press: San Diego. p. 289-298.
60. Willett, P. Similarity and Clustering in Chemical Information Systems. 1987, New York, NY: John Wiley.
61. Hansch, C., Leo, A. Exploring QSAR: Volume 1. Fundamentals and Applications in Chemistry and Biology. 1995: Oxford University Press.
62. Cramer, R.D., DePriest, S.A., Patterson, D.E., Hecht, P. The Developing Practice of Comparative Molecular Field Analysis, in 3D QSAR in Drug Design: Theory, Methods and Applications. 1993, ESCOM: Leiden.
63. Deng, W., Breneman, C., Embrechts, M.J. Predicting protein-ligand binding affinities using novel geometrical descriptors and machine-learning methods. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 699-703.
64. Hitchings, H., Bidault, Y. Local modeling of ADME-Tox properties using support vector machines, in CHI Predictive ADME. 2005: San Diego, CA.
65. Mallela, R., Hitchings, H., Asar, A., Guyon, I., Miller, J.L. A comparison of machine learning methods on HTS and ADME-Tox data, in Drug Discovery and Technology. 2004: Boston, MA.
66. Pickett, S.D., McLay, I.M., Clark, D.E. Enhancing the hit-to-lead properties of lead optimization libraries. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 263-272.
67. Bradley, E.K., Beroza, P., Penzotti, J.E., Grootenhuis, P.D.J., Spellmeyer, D.C., Miller, J.L. A rapid computational method for lead evolution: description and application to the alpha 1-adrenergic antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 2770-2774.
68. Mason, J.S. Cheney, D.L. Library design and virtual screening using multiple 4-point pharmacophore fingerprints. Pac. Sym. Biocomput. 2000, 576-587.
69. Mason, J.S., Morize, I., Menard, P.R., Cheney, D.L., Hulme, C., Labaudiniere, R.F. New 4-point pharmacophore method for molecular similarity and diversity applications: Overview of the method and applications, including a novel approach to the design of combinatorial libraries containing privileged substructures. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 3251-3264.
70. Güner, O.F. ed. Pharmacophore perception, development, and use in drug design. 2000, International University Line: La Jolla, CA.
71. McGregor, M.J., Muskal, S.M. Pharmacophore fingerprinting. 2. Application to primary library design. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 40, 117-125.
72. Keserü, G.M., Molnár, L. METAPRINT: A metabolic fingerprint. Application to cassette design for high-throughput ADME screening. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 437-444.
73. Balaz, S., Lukacova, V. Subcellular pharmacokinetics and its potential for library focusing. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2002, 20, 479-490.
74. Ensemble database of biologically active compounds. 2002, Prous Science.
75. Pearlman, R.S., Smith, K.M. Novel software tools for chemical diversity. Perspect. Drug Discov. Des. 1998, 9, 339-353.
76. Pearlman, R.S., Smith, K.M. Metric validation and the receptor-relevant subspace concept. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 28-35.
77. Bishop, C.M. Neural netowrks for pattern recognition. 1995: Oxford University Press.
78. Lavrador, K., Murphy, B., Saunders, J., Struthers, S., Wang, X., Williams, J. A screening library for peptide activated G-Protein Coupled Receptors. 1. The test set. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 6864-6874.
79. Grootenhuis, P.D.J., Lamb, M.L., Bradley, E.K., Myers, P.L., Shirley, W.A., Rogers, D., Castellino, A.J., Miller, J.L. Process for the informative and iterative design of a gene-family screening library. 2002, L.L.C.Deltagen Research Laboratories. WO. 2003019183. 2002 - US26842.
80. Teig, S.L. Informative libraries are more useful than diverse ones. J. Biomol. Scr. 1998, 3, 85-88.
81. Poulain, R., Horvath, D., Bonnet, B., Exkhoff, C., Chapelain, B., Bodinier, M.-C., Deprez, B. From hit to lead. Combining two complementary methods for coused. library design. Applicaiton to μ opiate ligands. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 3378-3390.
82. Aronov, A.M., Murcko, M.A. Toward a pharmacophore for kinase frequent hitters. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 5616-5619.
83. Godden, J.W., Furr, J.R., Xue, L., Stahura, F.L., Bajorath, J. Molecular similarity analysis and virtual screening by mapping of consensus positions in binary-transformed chemical descriptor spaces with variable dimensionality. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 21-29.
84. Godden, J.W., Furr, J.R., Bajorath, J. Recursive median partitioning for virutal screening of large databases. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 182-188.
85. MOE (Molecular Operating Environment), Chemical Computing Group Inc.: Montreal, Canada.
86. Sun, Y., Ewing, T.J.A., Skillman, A.G., Kuntz, I.D. CombiDOCK: structure-based combinatorial docking and library design. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 1998, 12, 597-604.
87. Shoichet, B.K., McGovern, S.L. Wei, B. Irwin, J.J. Lead discovery using molecular docking. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2002, 6, 439-446.
88. Stahl, M., Todarov, N.P., James, T., Mauser, H., Boehm, H.-J., Dean, P.M. A validation study on the practical use of automated de novo design. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16, 459-478.
89. Mason, J.S., Beno, B.R. Library design using BCUT chemistry-space descriptors and multiple four-point pharmacophore fingerprints: Simultaneous optimization and structure-based diversity. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2000, 18, 438-451.
90. Oshiro, C., Bradley, E.K., Eksterowicz, J.E., Evensen, E., Lamb, M.L., Lanctot, J.K., Putta, S., Stanton, R., Grootenhuis, P.D.J. Performance of 3D-database molecular docking studies into homology models. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 764-767.
91. Eksterowicz, J.E., Evensen, E., Lemmen, C., Brady, G.P., Lanctot, J.K., Bradley, E.K., Saiah, E., Robinson, L.A., Grootenhuis, P.D.J., Blaney, J.M. Coupling structure-based design with combinatorial chemistry: application of active site derived pharmacophores with informative library design. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2002, 20, 469-477.
92. Evensen, E., Joseph-McCarthy, D., Karplus, M. MCSS version 2.1. 1997, Harvard University: Cambridge, MA.
93. Murray, C.M., Cato, S.J. Design of libraries to explore receptor sites. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 46-50.
94. Lamb, M.L., Burdick, K.W., Toba, S., Young, M.M., Skillman, A.G., Zou, X., Arnold, J.R., Kuntz, I.D. Design, docking, and evaluation of multiple libraries against multiple targets. PROT. Stuct. Funct. Gen. 2001, 42, 296-318.
95. Manning, G., Whyte, D.B., Martinez, R., Hunter, T., Sudarsanam, S. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science 2002, 298, 1912-1934.
96. GRID, Molecular Discovery Limited: London, UK.
97. Goodford, P.J. A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules. J. Med. Chem. 1985, 28, 849-857.
98. Mills, J.E., Dean, P.M. Three-dimensional hydrogen-bond geometry and probability information from a crystal survey. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 1996, 10, 607-622.
99. Palczewski, K., Kumasaka, T., Hori, T., Behnke, C.A., Motoshima, H., Fox, B.A., Le Trong, I., Teller, D.C., Okada, T., Stemkamp, R.E., Yamamoto, M., Miyano, M. Crystal structure of Rhopdopsin: A G Proein-coupled receptor. Science 2000, 289, 393-421.
100. Crossley, R. The design of screening libraries targeted at G-protein coupled receptors. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2004, 4, 581-589.