Selecting screening candidates for kinase and G protein-coupled receptor targets using neural networks

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 1256-1262

  Manallack, David T ^a,e   Pitt, Will R ^a   Gancia, Emanuela ^a   Montana, John G ^b   Livingstone, David J ^c,d   Ford, Martyn G ^c   Whitley, David C ^c  

^a UCB PHARMA   (Belgium)

^b Amedis Pharmaceuticals Unit 209   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^d ChemQuest   (United Kingdom)

^e De Novo Pharmaceuticals Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGANDS;

GENETIC ENGINEERING; MODAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; MOLECULES; NEURAL NETWORKS; TOXICITY;

ENZYMES;

CELL SURFACE RECEPTOR; GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG SCREENING; FACTUAL DATABASE; IN VITRO STUDY; METABOLISM; STATISTICS;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; GTP-BINDING PROTEINS; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PHOSPHOTRANSFERASES; RECEPTORS, CELL SURFACE;

EID: 0036708537     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci020267c     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Wölcke, J.; Ullmann, D. Miniaturized HTS Technologies - uHTS. Drug Discov. Today 2001, 6, 637-646.
2. Furka, A. Combinatorial Chemistry: 20 Years On. Drug Discov. Today 2002, 7, 1-4.
3. Kassel, D.B. Combinatorial Chemistry and Mass Spectrometry in the 21st Century Drug Discovery Laboratory. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 255-267.
4. Drews, J. Jürgen Drews Discusses the Future of the Industry. Drug Discov. Today 2001, 6, 338-341.
5. Lipper, R.A. How Can We Optimize Selection of Drag Development Candidates From Many Compounds at the Discovery Stage? Modern Drug Discovery 1999, 2, 55-60.
6. Venkatesh, S.; Lipper, R.A. Role of the Development Scientist in Compound Lead Selection and Optimization. J. Pharm. Sci. 2000, 89, 145-154.
7. Li, A.P. Screening For Human ADME/Tox Drug Properties in Drug Discovery. Drug Discov. Today 2001, 6, 357-366.
8. Thompson, T.N. Early ADME in Support of Drug Discovery: The Role of Metabolic Stability Studies. Curr. Drug Metab. 2000, 1, 215-241.
9. Clark, D.E. Prediction of Intestinal Absorption and Blood-Brain Barrier Penetration by Computational Methods. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2001, 4, 477-496.
10. Johnson, D.E.; Wolfgang, G.H.I. Predicting Human Safety: Screening and Computational Approaches. Drug Discov. Today 2000, 5, 445-454.
11. Stewart, B.H.; Wang, Y.; Surendran N. In Annual Reports in Medicinal Chemistry Volume 35; Doherty A.M., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, 2000; Vol. 35, Chapter 27, pp 299-307.
12. Hann, M.; Hudson, B.; Lewell, X.; Lifely, R.; Miller, L.; Ramsden N. Strategic Pooling of Compounds For High-Throughput Screening. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 897-902.
13. Rishton, G.M. Reactive Compounds and in vitro False Positives in HTS. Drug Discov. Today 1997, 2, 382-384.
14. Waiters, W.P.; Stahl, M.T.; Murcko, M.A. Virtual Screening - An Overview. Drug Discov. Today 1998, 3, 160-178.
15. Lipinski, C.A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B.W.; Feeney, P.J. Experimental and Computational Approaches to Estimate Solubility and Permeability in Drug Discovery and Development Settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1997, 23, 3-25.
16. Wagener, M.; van Geerestein, V.J. Potential Drugs and Nondrugs: Prediction and Identification of Important Structural Features. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 280-292.
17. Ajay, Walters, W.P.; Murcko, M.A. Can We Learn to Distinguish Between "Drug-Like" and "Nondrug-Like" Molecules? J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3314-3324.
18. Sadowski, J.; Kubinyi, H. A Scoring Scheme for Discriminating Between Drags and Nondrugs. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3325-3329.
19. Frimurer, T.M.; Bywater, R.; Nærum, L.; Nørskov Lauritsen, L.; Brunak, S. Improving the Odds in Discriminating "Drug-Like" From "Non Drug-Like" Compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 1315-1324.
20. Pearlman, R.S.; Smith, K.M. Metric Validation and the Receptor-Relevant Subspace Concept. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 28-35.
21. Pearlman, R.S.; Smith, K.M. Novel Software Tools for Chemical Diversity. Persp. Drug Discov. Design 1998, 9, 339-353.
22. Bemis, G.W.; Murcko, M.A. The Properties of Known Drugs. 1. Molecular Frameworks. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 2887-2893.
23. Bemis, G.W.; Murcko, M.A. The Properties of Known Drugs. 2. Side Chains. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 5095-5099.
24. Wang, J.; Ramnarayan, K. Toward Designing Drug-Like Libraries: A Novel Computational Approach for Prediction of Drag Feasibility of Compounds. J. Comb. Chem. 1999, 1,524-533.
25. Xu, J.; Stevenson, J. Drug-Like Index: A New Approach to Measure Drug-Like Compounds and Their Diversity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 1177-1187.
26. Anzali, S.; Barnickel, G.; Cezanne, B.; Krug, M.; Filimonov, D.; Poroikov, V. Discriminating Between Drugs and Nondrugs by Prediction of Activity Spectra for Substances (PASS). J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 2432-2437.
27. Muegge, I.; Heald, S.L.; Brittelli, D. Simple Selection Criteria for Drug-Like Chemical Matter. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 1841-1846.
28. Gálvez, J.; de Julián-Ortiz, J.V.; García-Domenech, R. General Topological Patterns of Known Drugs. J. Mol. Graph. Mod. 2001, 20, 84-94.
29. Willett, P. Chemical Similarity Searching. J. Chem. Inf Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 983-996.
30. Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity; Johnson, M., Maggiora, G.M., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1990.
31. Xue, L.; Godden, J.W.; Bajorath, J. Database Searching for Compounds With Similar Biological Activity Using Short Binary Bit String Representations of Molecules. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 881-886.
32. Briem, H.; Lessel, U.F. In vitro and in silico Affinity Fingerprints: Finding Similarities Beyond Structural Classes. Persp. Drug Discov. Design 2000, 20, 231-244.
33. Pickett, S.D.; Mason, J.S.; McLay, I.M. Diversity Profiling and Design Using 3D Pharmacophores: Pharmacophore-Derived Queries (PDQ). J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 1214-1223.
34. Ashton, M.J.; Jaye, M.C.; Mason, J.S. New Perspectives in Lead Generation II: Evaluating Molecular Diversity. Drug Discov. Today 1996, 1, 71-78.
35. Mason, J.S.; Morize, I.; Menard, P.R.; Cheney, D.L.; Hulme C.; Labaudiniere, R.F. New 4-point Pharmacophore Method for Molecular Similarity and Diversity Applications: Overview of the Method and Applications, Including a Novel Approach to the Design of Combinatorial Libraries Containing Privileged Substructures. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 3251-3264.
36. Ajay; Bemis, G.W.; Murcko, M.A. Designing Libraries With CNS Activity. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 4942-4951.
37. Keserû, G.M.; Molnár, L.; Greiner, I. A Neural Network Based Virtual High Throughput Screening Test for the Prediction of CNS Activity. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2000, 3, 535-540.
38. Bucinski, A.; Nasal, A.; Kaliszan, R. Pharmacological Classification of Drugs Based on Neural Network Processing of Molecular Modelling Data. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2000, 3, 525-533.
39. Burden, F.R.; Winkler, D.A. New QSAR Methods Applied to Structure-Activity Mapping and Combinatorial Chemistry. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 236-242.
40. Gillet, V.J.; Willett, P.; Bradshaw, J. Identification of Biological Activity Profiles Using Substructural Analysis and Genetic Algorithms. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 165-179.
41. Xue, L.; Bajorath, J. Molecular Descriptors for Effective Classification of Biologically Active Compounds Based on Principal Components Analysis Identified by a Genetic Algorithm. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 801-809.
42. Harper, G.; Bradshaw, J.; Gittins, J.C.; Green, D.V.S.; Leach, A.R. Prediction of Biological Activity for High-Throughput Screening Using Binary Kernal Discrimination. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1295-1300.
43. Burden, F.R. Molecular Identification Number for Substructure Searches. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1989, 29, 225-227.
44. DiverseSolutions, v4.0.6; University of Texas, Austin, U.S.A.; distributed through Tripos, Inc.: 1669 S. Hanley Rd., Suite 303, St. Louis, MO 63144, U.S.A.
45. Beno, B.R.; Mason, J.S. The Design of Combinatorial Libraries Using Properties and 3D Pharmacophore Fingerprints. Drug Discov. Today 2001, 6, 251-258.
46. Gao, H. Application of BCUT Metrics and Genetic Algorithm in Binary QSAR Analysis. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 402-407.
47. Mason, J.S.; Beno, B.R. Library Design Using BCUT Chemistry-Space Descriptors and Multiple Four-Point Pharmacophore Finger-prints: Simultaneous Optimization and Structure-Based Diversity. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2000, 18, 438-451.
48. Schnur, D. Design and Diversity Analysis of Large Combinatorial Libraries Using Cell-Based Methods. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 36-45.
49. Menard, P.R.; Mason, J.S.; Morize, I.; Bauerschmidt, S. Chemistry Space Metrics in Diversity Analysis, Library Design and Compound Selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 1204-1213.
50. Pirard, B.; Pickett, S.D. Classification of Kinase Inhibitors Using BCUT Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 1431-1440.
51. Schneider, G.; Neidhart, W.; Giller, T.; Schmid, G. "Scaffold-Hopping" by Topological Pharmacophore Search: A Contribution to Virtual Screening. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 2894-2896.
52. MDDR and ACD databases are available from MDL Information Systems Inc., San Leandro, CA 94577, U.S.A.
53. Horn, F.; Weare, J.; Beukers, M.W.; Horsch, S.; Bairoch, A.; Chen, W.; Edvardsen, O.; Campagne, F.; Vriend, G. GPCRDB: an Information System for G Protein-Coupled Receptors. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26, 275-279 (see also http://www.cmbi.kun.nl/7tm/phylo/phylo.html).
54. Myers, M.R.; He, W.; Hulme, C. Inhibitors of Tyrosine Kinases Involved in Inflammation and Autoimmune Disease. Curr. Pharm. Des. 1997, 3, 473-502.
55. Boschelli, D.H. Small Molecule Inhibitors of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases. Drugs Fut. 1999, 24, 515-537.
56. Trivedi, B.K.; Low, J.E.; Carson, K.; LaRosa G.J. In Annual Reports in Medicinal Chemistry; Doherty A.M., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, 2000; Vol. 35, Chapter 17, p 191.
57. Whitley, D.C.; Ford, M.G.; Livingstone, D.J. Unsupervised Forward Selection: a Method for Eliminating Redundant Variables. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 1160-1168.
58. Bishop, C.M. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition; Oxford University Press: 1995.
59. MATLAB is available from The MathWorks, Inc., Natick MA.
60. Nabney, I.T. NETLAB: Algorithms for Pattern Recognition; Springer, 2002.
61. UNITY - Tripos, Inc.: 1669 S. Hanley Rd., Suite 303, St. Louis, MO 63144, U.S.A.
62. NCI database searchable from the following url: http://131.188.127.153/services/ncidb2/.