Pharmacophore Fingerprinting. 2. Application to Primary Library Design

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 117-125

  McGregor, Malcolm J ^a   Muskal, Steven M ^a  

^a AFFYMAX RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY;

CHEMISTRY, PHARMACEUTICAL; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES;

EID: 0033630852     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci990313h     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Agrafiotis, D. K.; Myslik, J. C.; Salemme, F. R. Advances in Diversity Profiling and Combinatorial Series Design. Molecular Diversity 1999, 4, 1-22.
2. Eichler, U.; Ertl, P.; Gobbi, A.; Poppinger, D. Addressing the Problem of Molecular Diversity. Drugs of the Future 1999, 24, 177-190.
3. Ghose, A. K.; Vellarkad, V. N.; Wendolowski, J. J. A Knowledge-Based Approach in Designing Combinatorial or Medicinal Chemistry Libraries for drug Discovery. 1. A Qualitative and Quantitative Characterization of Known Drug Databases. J. Comb. Chem. 1999, 1, 55-68.
4. Martin, E. J.; Critchlow, R. E. Beyond Mere Diversity: Tailoring Combinatorial Libraries for Drug Discovery. J. Comb. Chem. 1999, 1, 32-45.
5. Menard, P. R.; Mason, J. S.; Morize, I.; Bauerschmidt, S. Chemistry Space Metrics in Diversity Analysis, Library Design, and Compound Selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 1204-1213.
6. Lewis, R. A.; Mason, J. S.; McLay, I. M. Similarity Measures for Rational Set Selection and Analysis of Combinatorial Libraries: The Diverse Property-Derived (DPD) Approach. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 599-614.
7. Hassan, M.; Bielawski, J. P.; Hempel, J. C.; Waldman, M. Optimization and Visualization of Molecular Diversity of Combinatorial Libraries. Molecular Diversity 1996, 2, 64-74.
8. McGregor, M. J.; Muskal, S. M. Pharmacophore Fingerprinting. 1. Application to QSAR and Focused Library Design. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 569-574.
9. Brown, R. D. Descriptors for Diversity Analysis. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 1997, 7/8, 31-49.
10. Brown, R. D.; Martin, Y. C. Use of Structure-Activity Data To Compare Structure-Based Clustering Methods and Descriptors for Use in Compound Selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 572-584.
11. Brown, R. D.; Martin, Y. C. The Information Content of 2D and 3D Structural Descriptors Relevant to Ligand-Receptor Binding. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 37, 1-9.
12. Patterson, D. E.; Cramer, R. D.; Ferguson, A. M.; Clark, R. D., Weinberger, L. E. Neighborhood Behavior: A Useful Concept for Validation of "Molecular Diversity" Descriptors. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 3049-3059.
13. Kearsley, S. K.; Sallamack, S.; Fluder, E. M.; Andose, J. D.; Mosley, R. T.; Sheridan, R. P. Chemical Similarity Using Physicochemical Property Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 118-127.
14. Lipinski, C. A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B. W.; Feeney, P. J. Experimental and Computational Approaches to Estimate Solubility and Permeability in Drug Discovery and Development Settings. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 1997, 23, 3-25.
15. Sprague, P. W. Automated Chemical Hypothesis Generation and Database Searching with Catalyst. Persp. Drug Discovery Des. 1995, 3, 1-20.
16. Barnum, D.; Greene, J.; Smellie, A.; Sprague, P. Identification of Common Functional Configurations Amoung Molecules. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 563-571.
17. Greene, J.; Kahn, S.; Savoj, H.; Sprague, P.; Teig, S. Chemical Function Queries for 3D Database Search. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 1297-1308.
18. Murray, C. M.; Cato, S. J. Design of Libraries to Explore Receptor Sites. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 46-50.
19. Mason, J. S.; Morize, I.; Menard, P. R.; Cheney, D. L.; Hulme, C.; Labaudiniere, R. F. New 4-Point Pharmacophore Method for Molecular Similarity and Diversity Applications: Overview of the Method and Applications, Including a Novel Approach to the Design of Combinatorial Libraries Containing Privileged Substructures. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 3251-3264.
20. Pickett, S. D.; Luttmann, C.; Guerin, V.; Laoui, A.; James, E. DIVSEL and COMPLIB - Strategies for the Design and Comparison of Combinatorial Libraries using Pharmacophoric Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 144-150.
21. Mason, J. S.; Pickett, S. D. Partition-Based Selection. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 1997, 7/8, 85-114.
22. Pickett, S. D.; Mason, J. S.; McLay, I. M. Diversity Profiling and Design Using 3D Pharmacophores: Pharmacophore-Derived Queries (PDQ). J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 1214-1223.
23. Good, A. C.; Kuntz, I. D. Investigating the Extension of Pairwise Distance Pharmacophore Measures to Triplet-Based Descriptors. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1995, 9, 373.
24. Nilakantan, R.; Bauman, N.; Venkataraghavan, R. New Method for Rapid Characterization of Molecular Shapes: Applications in Drug Design. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1993, 33, 79-85.
25. Gasteiger, J.; Rudolph, C.; Sadowski, J. Automatic Generation of 3D-Atomic Coordinates for Organic Molecules. Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol. 1990, 3, 537-547 (http://www2.ccc.uni-erlangen.de/software/ corina/index.html).
26. Sadowski, J.; Gasteiger, J.; Klebe, G. Comparison of Automatic Three-Dimensional Model Builders Using 639 X-ray Structures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 1000-1008.
27. MDL Information Systems, Inc., 14600 Catalina St., San Leandro, CA 94577.
28. Geladi, P.; Kowalski, B. R. Partial Least-Squares Regression: A Tutorial. Anal. Chim. Acta 1986, 185, 1-17.
29. The Tanimoto coefficient is N1&2/(N1 + N2 - N1&2), where N1 and N2 are number of bits set (=1) in bitstrings 1 and 2 respectively, and N1&2 is the number of bits in the bitstring which results from the logical AND of the two bitstrings.
30. Molecular Simulations Inc., 9685 Scranton Road, San Diego, CA 92121-3752.
31. Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Inc., 27401 Los Altos, Suite 370, Mission Viejo, CA 92691.