Performance of 3D-Database Molecular Docking Studies into Homology Models

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 764-767

  Oshiro, Connie ^a   Bradley, Erin K ^c   Eksterowicz, John ^c   Evensen, Erik ^c   Lamb, Michelle L ^c   Lanctot, J Kevin ^c   Putta, Santosh ^c   Stanton, Robert ^c   Grootenhuis, Peter D J ^b  

^a ROCHE BIOSCIENCE   (United States)

^b VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD CLOTTING FACTOR 7A;

ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DATA BASE; DRUG BINDING SITE; DRUG SCREENING; MOLECULAR MODEL; PERFORMANCE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

BINDING SITES; CDC2-CDC28 KINASES; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE 2; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FACTOR VII; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 1642581026     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm0300781     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Baker, D.; Sali, A. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 2001, 294, 93-96.
2. Sanchez, R.; Pieper, U.; Melo, F.; Eswar, N.; Marti-Renom, M. A.; et al. A Protein structure modeling for structural genomics. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2000, November (Suppl.), 986-990.
3. Schneider, G.; Bohm, H.-J. Virtual screening and fast automated docking methods. Drug Discovery Today 2002, 7, 64-70.
4. Shoichet, B. K.; McGovern, S. L.; Wei, B.; Irwin, J. J. Lead discovery using molecular docking. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2002, 6, 439-446.
5. Doman, T. N.; McGovern, S. L.; Witherbee, B. J.; Kasten, T. P.; Kurumbail, R.; et al. Molecular docking and high throughput screening for novel inhibitors of protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 43, 2213-2221.
6. Bernstein, F. C.; Koetzle, T. F.; Williams, G. J.; Meyer, E. E.; Brice, M. D.; et al. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 1977, 112, 535-542.
7. Chemical Computing Group, Montreal, Canada.
8. Available Chemicals Directory; Molecular Design, Ltd., San Leandro, CA.
9. Kuntz, I. D.; Blaney, J. M.; Oatley, S. J.; Langridge, R.; Ferrin, T. A geometric approach to macromolecular-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 1982, 161, 269-288.
10. Meng, E. C.; Shoichet, B. K.; Kuntz, I. D. Automated docking with grid-based energy evaluation. J. Comput. Chem. 1992, 13, 505-524.
11. Ewing, T.; Kuntz, I. D. Critical Evaluation of Search Algorithms for Automated Molecular Docking and Database Screening. J. Comput. Chem. 1997, 18, 1175-1189.
12. Smellie, A.; Henne, R.; Stanton, R.; Teig, S. Conformational Analysis by Intersection: CONAN. J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 24, 10-20.
13. Weiner, S. J.; Kollman, P. A.; Case, D. A.; Singh, U. C.; Ghio, C.; et al. A new force field for molecular mechanics simulation of nucleic acids and proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 765-784.
14. Weiner, S. J.; Kollman, P. A.; Hguyen, D. T.; Case, D. A. An all atom force field for simulations of proteins and nucleic acids. J. Comput. Chem. 1986, 7, 230-252.
15. Marsili, M.; Gasteiger, J. π charge distribution from molecular topology and p orbital electronegativity. Croat. Chem. Acta 1980, 52, 601-614.
16. Gasteiger, J.; Marsili, M. Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity: a rapid access to atomic charges. Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 3210-3228.
17. Somoza, J. R.; Skillman, A. G.; Munagala, N. R.; Oshiro, C. M.; Knegtel, R. M. A.; et al. Rational design of novel antimicrobials: blocking purine salvage in a parasitic protozoan. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 5344-5348.
18. Kick, E. K.; Roe, D. C.; Skillman, A. G.; Liu, G.; Ewing, T. J.; Sun, Y. ; Juntz, I. D.; Ellman, J. A. Structure-based design and combinatorial chemistry yield low nanomolar inhibitors of cathepsin D. Chem. Biol. 1997, 4, 297-307.
19. Charifson, P.; Corkery, J.; Murcko, M.; Walters, W. P. Consensus Scoring: A Method for Obtaining Improved Hit Rates for Docking Databases of Three-Dimensional Structures into Proteins. J. Med. Chem 1999, 42, 5100-5109.
20. Ring, C. S.; Sun, E.; McKerrow, J. H.; Lee, G. K.; Rosenthal, P. J.; et al. Structure-based inhibitor design by using protein models for the development of antiparasitic agents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90, 3583-3587.
21. Schafferhans, A.; Klebe, G. Docking ligands onto binding site representations derived from proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 307, 407-427.
22. Sternberg, M. J. E. Protein structure prediction: principles and approaches. Protein Structure Prediction; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1996; pp 1-30.
23. Sanchez, R.; Sali, A. Advances in comparative protein-structure modelling. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1997, 7, 206-214.
24. Insight II, 2000, Accelrys, San Diego, CA.
25. Bissantz, C.; Folkers, G.; Rogman, D. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4759-4767.
26. Klebe, G.; Holger, G. Approaches to the description and prediction of the binding affinity of small-molecule ligands to macromolecular receptors. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2644-2676.