Recursive median partitioning for virtual screening of large databases

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 182-188

  Godden, Jeffrey W ^a,b   Furr, John R ^a   Bajorath, Jürgen ^a,b,c  

^a ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH INC   (United States)

^b ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH INC   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA STRUCTURES; DATABASE SYSTEMS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; ITERATIVE METHODS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; NEURAL NETWORKS; STATISTICAL METHODS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

DECISION TREE STRUCTURE; DIVERSE BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY; MOLECULES CLASSIFICATION; RECURSIVE MEDIAN PARTITIONING; VIRTUAL SCREENING;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DRUG SCREENING; FACTUAL DATABASE; STATISTICS;

ALGORITHMS; BIOMETRY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 0037208311     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci0203848     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Chen, X.; Rusinko, A., III; Young, S. S. Recursive partitioning analysis of a large structure-activity data set using three-dimensional descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 1054-1062.
2. Rusinko, A., III; Farmen, M. W.; Lambert, C. G.; Brown, P. L.; Young, S. S. Analysis of a large structure/biological activity data set using recursive partitioning. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 1017-1026.
3. Miller, D. A. Results of a new classification algorithm combining K nearest neighbors and recursive partitioning. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 42, 168-175.
4. Blower, P.; Fligner, M.; Verducci, J.; Bjoraker, J. On combining recursive partitioning and simulated annealing to detect groups of biologically active compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 393-404.
5. Pearlman, R. S.; Smith, K. M. Novel software tools for chemical diversity. Perspect. Drug Discov. Design 1998, 9, 339-353.
6. Pearlman, R. S.; Smith, K. M. Metric validation and the receptor-relevant subspace concept. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39 28-35.
7. Xue, L.; Bajorath, J. Molecular descriptors for effective classification of biologically active compounds based on principal component analysis identified by a genetic algorithm. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 801-809.
8. Xue, L.; Bajorath, J. Accurate partitioning of compounds belonging to diverse activity classes. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 757-764.
9. Xie, D.; Tropsha, A.; Schlick, T. An efficient projection protocol for chemical databases: single value decomposition combined with truncated Newton minimization. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 167-177.
10. Hull, R. D.; Singh, S. B.; Nachbar, R. B.; Sheridan, R. P.; Kearsley, S. K.; Fluder, E. M. Latent semantic structure indexing (LaSSI) for defining chemical similarity. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 1177-1184.
11. Agrafiotis, D. K.; Lobanov, V. S. Multidimensional scaling of combinatorial libraries without explicit enumeration. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 1712-1722.
12. Agrofiotis, D. K.; Lobanov, V. S. Nonlinear mapping networks. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 1356-1362.
13. Tamura, S. Y.; Bacha, P. A.; Gruver, H. S.; Nutt, R. F. Data analysis of high-throughput screening results: application of multidomain clustering to the NCI anti-HIV. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 45, 3082-3093.
14. Godden, J. W.; Xue, L.; Kitchen, D. B.; Stahura, F. L.; Schermerhorn, E. J.; Bajorath, J. Median partitioning: A novel method for the selection of representation subsets from large compound pools. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 885-893.
15. Meier, P. C.; Zünd, R. E. Statistical methods in analytical chemistry; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2000.
16. Snarey, M.; Terrett, N. K.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. J. Comparison of algorithms for dissimilarity-based compound selection. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 1997, 15, 372-285.
17. Willett, P. Dissimilarity-based algorithms for selecting structurally diverse sets of compounds. J. Comput. Biol. 1999, 6, 447-457.
18. ACD (Available Chemicals Directory), MDL Information Systems, Inc., 14600 Catalina Street, San Leandro, CA 94577.
19. Godden, J. W.; Xue, L.; Bajorath, J. Classification of biologically active compounds by median partitioning. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 1263-1269.
20. Godden, J. W.; Bajorath, J. Chemical descriptors with distinct levels of information content and varying sensitivity to differences between selected compound databases identified by SE-DSE analysis. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 87-93.
21. MOE (Molecular Operating Environment), version 2001.01, Chemical Computing Group Inc., 1255 University Street, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3B 3X3.
22. Labute, P. A widely applicable set of descriptors. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2000, 18, 464-477.
23. Engels, M. F. M.; Venkatarangan, P. Smart screening: approach to efficient HTS. Curr. Opin. Drug. Discov. Dev. 2001, 4, 275-283.
24. Harper, G.; Bradshaw, J.; Gittin, J. C.; Green, D. V. S.; Leach, A. R. Prediction of biological activity for high-throughput screening using binary kernel discrimination. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1295-1300.
25. Doman, T. N.; McGovern, S. L.; Witherbee, B. J.; Kasten, T. P., Kurumbail, R.; Stallings, W. C.; Connolly, D. T.; Shoichet, B. K. Molecular docking and high-throughput screening for novel inhibitors of protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2213-2221.