Using Formative Assessment to Enhance Learning, Achievement, and Academic Self-Regulation

Using Formative Assessment to Enhance Learning, Achievement, and Academic Self-Regulation

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 1-128

  Andrade, Heidi L ^a   Heritage, Margaret ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85135667863     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315623856     Document Type: Book

References (149)

1. Allal, L. (2010). Assessment and the regulation of learning. In E.B.P. Peterson (Ed.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 3, pp. 348-352). Oxford: Elsevier.
2. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
3. McMillan, J. H. (2013). Why we need research on classroom assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 3-16). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4. Wiliam, D. (2010). An integrative summary of the research literature and implications for a new theory of formative assessment. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 18-40). New York, NY: Routledge.
5. Allal, L. (2010). Assessment and the regulation of learning. In E.B.P. Peterson (Ed.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 3, pp. 348-352). Oxford: Elsevier.
6. Andrade, H. L. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13-18.
7. Andrade, H. L. G. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 90-105). New York, NY: Routledge.
8. Andrade, H. (2013). Classroom assessment in the context of learning theory and research. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 17-34). New York, NY: SAGE.
9. Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. (2014). Toward a theory of assessment as the regulation of learning. Symposium presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.
10. Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2016). The role of classroom assessment in supporting self-regulated learning. In D. Laveault & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 293-309). Heidelberg: Springer.
11. Andrade, H., Hefferen, J., & Palma, M. (2014). Formative assessment in the visual arts. Art Education Journal, 67(1), 34-40.
12. Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5-25.
13. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. New York, NY: Open University Press.
14. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy and Practice, 5, 7-73.
15. Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
16. Brown, G. T., & Harris, L. R. (2013). Student self-assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 367-393). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
17. Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Butler, R. (1987). Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 474-482.
19. Butler, R., & Nisan, M. (1986). Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(3), 210-216. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.3.210
20. Cowie, B. (2005). Pupil commentary on assessment for learning. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 137-151.
21. Crooks, T. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on pupils. Review of Educational Research, 58(14), 438-481.
22. Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
23. Fong, C., Schallert, D., Williams, K., Williamson, Z., Lin, S., Chen, L.-H., & Kim, Y. (2016). Making feedback constructive: The interplay of undergraduates’ mastery goal orientation with feedback specificity and friendliness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
24. Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65-86). New York: Routledge.
25. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
26. Hattie, J., & Yates, G. (2014). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. New York, NY: Routledge.
27. Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment and next-generation assessment systems: Are we losing an opportunity? Washington, DC: The Council of Chief State School Officers.
28. Heritage, M. (2013). Formative assessment: A process of inquiry and action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
29. Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A metaanalysis and a call for research. Educational measurement: Issues and practice, 30(4), 28-37.
30. Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2008). Response to assessment feedback: The effects of grades, praise, and source of information. ETS Research Report Series, 2008(1), i-57.
31. National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Retrieved July 1, 2011 from www.nationalacademies.org/dbasse
32. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
33. Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Huertas, J. A. (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and selfefficacy in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 806-813. doi:10.1016/j.lin-dif.2012.04.007.
34. Raider-Roth, M. B. (2005). Trusting what you know: Negotiating the relational context of classroom life. Teachers College Record, 107(4), 587-628.
35. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional strategies. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
36. Schunk, D., & Zimmerman, B. (Eds.). (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
37. Shute, V. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.
38. Sizer, T. R., & Sizer, N. F. (1999). The students are watching: Schools and the moral contract. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
39. Tierney, R. (2010). Fairness in classroom assessment. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 125-144). New York: Routledge.
40. Wiliam, D. (1992). Some technical issues in assessment: A user’s guide. British Journal of Curriculum and Assessment, 2(3), 11-20.
41. Wiliam, D. (2010). An integrative summary of the research literature and implications for a new theory of formative assessment. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 18-40). New York, NY: Routledge.
42. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Achieving self-regulation: The trial and triumph of adolescence. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Academic motivation of adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
43. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of selfregulation of learning and performance. New York, NY: Routledge.
44. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
45. Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2000). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85, 536-553.
46. Ciofalo, J. F., & Wylie, E. C. (2006). Using diagnostic classroom assessment: One question at a time. TCRecord. Retrieved from www.tcrecord.org. ID Number: 12285.
47. Harrison, C., & Howard, S. (2009). Inside the primary black box: Assessment for learning in primary and early years classrooms. London, UK: GL Assessment.
48. Heritage, M. (2010a). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
49. Heritage, M. (2010b). Formative assessment and next-generation assessment systems: Are we losing an opportunity? Paper commissioned by The Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, DC.
50. Heritage, M. (2013a). Gathering evidence of student understanding. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 179-193). New York. SAGE.
51. Heritage, M. (2013b). Formative assessment: A process of inquiry and action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
52. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles into actions. Reston, VA: Author.
53. Pajares, F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy beliefs. Retrieved from www.education.com/reference/article/self-efficacy-theory/#A
54. Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89-101.
55. Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. (1990). Quantitative and qualitative perspectives on student motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
56. Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2009). Self-efficacy theory. In K. Wentzel, A. Wigfield, & D. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 35-53). Abingdon: Routledge.
57. Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18(4), 433-449.
58. The Teachers College Reading and Writing Project. (n.d.) Teaching Students to Examine Craft Moves and Author’s Intent in Mentor Persuasive Essay in Order to Support Revision. Retrieved from http://readingandwritingproject.org/resources/units-of-study-implementation/units-of-study-classroom-videos#.
59. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R., & Davis-Kean, P. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 933-1002). New York: Wiley.
60. Wigfield, A., Klauda, S. L., & Cambria, J. (2011). Influences on the development of academic self-regulatory processes. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 33-48). New York: Wiley.
61. Wylie, C., Mawhinney, L., & Ciofalo, J. (2007). Diagnostic questions. Paper presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
62. Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 1-37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. Andrade, H. G. (2001). The effects of instructional rubrics on learning to write. Current Issues in Education, 4(4). Retrieved from http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume4/number4.
64. Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2016). The role of classroom assessment in supporting self-regulated learning. In D. Laveault & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 293-309). Heidelberg: Springer.
65. Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Mycek, K. (2010). Rubric-referenced selfassessment and middle school students’ writing. Assessment in Education, 17(2), 199-214.
66. Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students’ writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 27(2), 3-13.
67. Andrade, H., & Warner, Z. (2012). Beyond “I give myself an A”: Meaningful, rubric-referenced student self-assessment. Educator’s Voice, V(42), 42-51.
68. Bailey, A. L., & Heritage, M. (2014). The role of language learning progressions in improved instruction and assessment of English language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 480-506.
69. Booth, J. L., Lange, K. E., Koedinger, K. R., & Newton, K. J. (2013). Example problems that improve student learning in algebra: Differentiating between correct and incorrect examples. Learning and Instruction, 25, 24-34.
70. Briggs, D. C., Alonzo, A. C., Schwab, C., & Wilson, M. (2006). Diagnostic assessment with ordered multiple choice items. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 33-63.
71. Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
72. Brookhart, S., & Chen, F. (2014). The quality and effectiveness of descriptive rubrics. Educational Review, 67(3), 343-368. doi:10.1080/00131911.2014.929565
73. Brown, G. T., & Harris, L. R. (2013). Student self-assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 367-393). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
74. Butler, D. L., & Cartier, S. (2004). Promoting students’ active and productive interpretation of academic work: A key to successful teaching and learning. Teachers College Record, 106(9), 1729-1758.
75. Ciofalo, J. F., & Wylie, E. C. (2006). Using diagnostic classroom assessment: One question at a time. TCRecord. Date published: January 10, 2006. http://www.tcrecord.org. ID Number: 12285.
76. Confrey, J., & Maloney, A. (June 2010). The construction, refinement, and early validation of the equipartitioning learning trajectory. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences-Volume 1 (pp. 968-975). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
77. Corcoran, T. B., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform. CPRE Research Reports. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/53
78. Formative Assessment Insights. (2015). Online digital learning experience. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
79. Furtak, E. M., & Heredia, S. C. (2014). Exploring the influence of learning progressions in two teacher communities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(8), 982-1020.
80. Griffin, P. (2009). Teachers’ use of assessment data. In C. Wyatt-Smith & J. Cumming (Eds.), Educational assessment in the 21st century (pp. 183-208). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Springer.
81. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
82. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
83. Heritage, M. (2008). Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment. Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, DC. Retrieved from www.ccsso.org/content/PDFs/FASTLearningProgressions.org
84. Heritage, M., Walqui, A., & Linquanti, R. (2015). English language learners and the new standards: Developing language, content knowledge, and analytical practices in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
85. National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
86. Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129-144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002.
87. Panadero, E., & Romero, M. (2014). To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and selfefficacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 133-148. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2013.877872
88. Perkins, D. (1992). Smart schools: From training memories to educating minds. New York, NY: The Free Press/Simon & Schuster.
89. Ross, J. A., & Starling, M. (2008). Self-assessment in a technologysupported environment: The case of grade 9 geography. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 15(2), 183-199.
90. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional strategies. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
91. Seidel, T., Rimmele, R., & Prenzel, M. (2005). Clarity and coherence of lesson goals as a scaffold for student learning. Learning and Instruction, 15(6), 539-556.
92. Songer, N., Kelcey, B., & Gotwals, A. (2009). How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 610-631.
93. Steedle, J. T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2009). Supporting valid interpretations of learning progression level diagnoses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 699-715.
94. Sztajn, P., Confrey, J., Wilson, P. H., & Edgington, C. (2012). Learning trajectory based instruction: Toward a theory of teaching. Educational Researcher, 41, 147-156.
95. Wylie, C., Bauer, M., Bailey, A. L., & Heritage, M. (in press). Formative assessment of mathematics and language: What applying companion learning progressions can reveal to teachers. In A. L. Bailey, C. Mayer, & L. Wilkinson (Eds.), Language, literacy and learning in the STEM disciplines: How language counts for English learners. New York: Routledge.
96. Wylie, C., Ciofalo, J., & Mavronikolas, E. (2010). Documenting, diagnosing and treating misconceptions: Impact on student learning. Paper presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
97. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, Joint Committee on Standards for Educational & Psychological Testing (US). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
98. Andrade, H. L. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 90-105). New York, NY: Routledge.
99. Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Mycek, K. (2010). Rubric-referenced selfassessment and middle school students’ writing. Assessment in Education, 17(2), 199-214.
100. Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students’ writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 27(2), 3-13.
101. Beatty, I. D., & Gerace, W. J. (2009) Technology-enhanced formative assessment: A research-based pedagogy for teaching science with classroom response technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10956-008-9140-4/fulltext.html
102. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy and Practice, 5, 7-73.
103. Black, P., Wilson, M., & Yao, S.-Y. (2011). Road maps for learning: A guide to the navigation of learning progressions. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 9(2-3), 71-122.
104. Bloom, B. S. (1971). Mastery learning. In J. H. Block (Ed.), Mastery learning: Theory and practice (pp. 47-63). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
105. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 4-17.
106. Chappuis, J. (2015). Seven strategies of assessment for learning (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
107. Cheema, S., Pead, D., VanLehn, K., Schoenfeld, A., & Burkhardt, H. (2016). Electronic posters to support formative assessment. Proceeding of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts in Computing Systems (pp. 1159-1164). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892417
108. Ciofalo, J. F., & Wylie, E. C. (2006). Using diagnostic classroom assessment: One question at a time. TCRecord. Retrieved from www.tcrecord.org. ID Number: 12285.
109. Cowie, B. (April 2016). Connoisseurship in formative assessment. Presentation at the FAST SCASS Conference, Portland, OR.
110. Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(1), 101-116.
111. Crooks, T., Kane, M., & Cohen, A. (1996). Threats to the valid use of assessments. Assessment in Education, 3, 265-285.
112. Doğan, E. (2016). The future is here: The (new) standards for educational and psychological testing. National Council of Education Statistics. Retrieved from www.niss.org/sites/default/files/news_attachments/New%20standards%20Jan%2012%202015%20final_0.pdf
113. Draper, S. (2009). What are learners actually regulating when given feedback? British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 306-315.
114. Education Week. (2014). Testing digital tools to improve formative assessments. Retrieved from www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2014/03/13/25personalized.h33.html?intc=EW-TC14-TOC
115. Erickson, F. (2007). Some thoughts on “proximal” formative assessment of student learning. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 106, 186-216.
116. Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
117. Heritage, M. (2013). Formative assessment: A process of inquiry and action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
118. Hodgen, J., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Mathematics inside the box: Assessment for learning in the mathematics classroom. West Palm Beach, FL: Learning Sciences International.
119. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.
120. Meusen-Beekman, K., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., & Boshuizen, H. (2014). The effects of formative assessment on self-regulated learning skills by sixth grade pupils. Paper presented at the Conference of EARLI SIG1: Assessment and Evaluation, Madrid, Spain.
121. Minstrell, J., Anderson, R., Kraus, P., & Minstrell, J. E. (2008). Bridging from practice to research and back: Perspectives and tools in assessing for learning. In J. Coffey, R. Douglas, & C. Stearns (Eds.), Assessing science learning (pp. 37-69). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
122. Perkins, D. (1992). Smart schools: From training memories to educating minds. New York, NY: The Free Press/Simon & Schuster.
123. Perkins, D. (2003). King Arthur’s round table: How collaborative conversations create smart organizations (pp. 39-61). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
124. Quellmalz, E. S., Timms, M., & Buckley, B. (2009). Using science simulations to support powerful formative assessments of complex science learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
125. Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & Rolheiser, C. (2002). Student selfevaluation in grade 5-6 mathematics: Effects on problem-solving achievement. Educational Assessment, 8, 43-58.
126. Russell, M. (2010). Technology-aided formative assessment of learning. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 125-138). New York: Routledge.
127. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional strategies. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
128. Sadler, P. (1998). Psychometric models of student conceptions in science: Reconciling qualitative studies and distractor-driven assessment instruments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 265-296.
129. Shavelson, R., Young, D., Ayala, C., Brandon, P., Furtak, E., & RuizPrimo, M. (2008). On the impact of curriculum-embedded formative assessment on learning: A collaboration between curriculum and assessment developers. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 295-314.
130. Shepard, L. A. (2001). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 1066-1101). Washington, DC: AERA.
131. Smith, J. (2003). Reconsidering reliability in classroom assessment and grading. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 26-33.
132. Steedle, J., & Shavelson, R. (2009). Supporting valid interpretations of learning progression level diagnoses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 699-715.
133. Stobart, G. (2006). The validity of formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and Learning (pp. 133-146). London: Sage.
134. Stobart, G. (November 2008). Validity in formative assessment. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual AEA-Europe Conference, Hisar, Bulgaria.
135. Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18(4), 433-449.
136. Topping, K. J. (2013). Peers as a source of formative and summative assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 395-412). London: Sage.
137. Wylie, C., Ciofalo, J., & Mavronikolas, E. (2010). Documenting, diagnosing and treating misconceptions: Impact on student learning. Paper presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
138. Andrade, H., Lui, A., Palma, M., & Hefferen, J. (2015). Formative assessment in dance education. Journal of Dance Education, 15(2), 47-59. doi:10.1080/15290824.2015.1004408
139. Bailey, A. L., & Heritage, M. (2017). Imperatives for teacher education: Findings from studies of effective teaching for English language learners. In M. Peters, B. Cowie, & I. Menter (Eds.), A companion to research in teacher education. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
140. Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
141. Cowie, B. (April 2016). Connoisseurship in formative assessment. Presentation at the FAST SCASS Conference, Portland, OR.
142. Dweck, C. (2007). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
143. Educational Testing Service and National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. (2013). English learner formative assessments, teacher’s versions [Guidance documents]. Retrieved from https://ets.org/research/topics/ella/elfa/teachers_versions/.
144. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
145. MARS, Shell Center. (2015). Mathematics assessment project. Retrieved from http://map.mathshell.org
146. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
147. New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2016). Deliberate acts of teaching. Retrieved from http://literacyonline.tki.org.nz/Literacy-Online/Planning-for-my-students-needs/Effective-Literacy-Practice-Years-1-4/Deliberate-acts-of-teaching
148. Valle, C., Andrade, H., Palma, M., & Hefferen, J. (2016). Applications of peer and self-assessment in music education. Music Educators’ Journal, 102(4), 41-49. doi:10.1177/0027432116644652.
149. Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3-14.