Peers as a source of formative and summative assessment

SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 395-412

  Topping, Keith J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883288285     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452218649.n22     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Atkinson, P. (2003). Assessment 5-14: What do pupils and parents think? (ERIC Reproduction Document Service No. ED480897)
2. Black, P., & Harrison, C. (2001). Self- and peer-assessment and taking responsibility: The science student's role in formative assessment. School Science Review, 83(302), 43-49.
3. Bryan, T. (2005). Science-based advances in the social domain of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 119-121.
4. Bryant, D. A., & Carless, D. R. (2010). Peer assessment in a test-dominated setting: Empowering, boring or facilitating examination preparation? Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 9(1), 3-15.
5. Chang, C. C., & Chou, P. N. (2011). Effects of reflection category and reflection quality on learning outcomes during web-based portfolio assessment process: A case study of high school students in computer application course. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 101-114.
6. Chang, C. C., & Tseng, K. H. (2009). Use and performances of web-based portfolio assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 358-370.
7. Chang, C. C., Tseng, K. H., Chou, P. N., & Chen, Y. H. (2011). Reliability and validity of web-based portfolio peer assessment: A case study for a senior high school's students taking computer course. Computers and Education, 57(1), 1306-1316.
8. Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471-533.
9. Chin, C., & Teou, L. Y. (2009). Using concept cartoons in formative assessment: Scaffolding students' argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 31(10), 1307-1332.
10. Frederickson, N. L., & Furnham, A. E. (2004). Peer-assessed behavioural characteristics and sociometric rejection: Differences between pupils who have moderate learning difficulties and their mainstream peers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(3), 391-410.
11. Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304-315.
12. Hodgson, C. (2010). Assessment for learning in science: What works? Primary Science, 115, 14-16.
13. Kane, J. S., & Lawler, E. E. (1978). Methods of peer assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 85(3), 555-586.
14. King, A. (1998). Transactive peer tutoring: Distributing cognition and metacognition. Educational Psychology Review, 10(1), 57-74.
15. Lu, J., & Law, N. (2012). Online peer assessment: Effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instructional Science, 40(2), 257-275.
16. Malecki, C. K., & Elliott, C. N. (2002). Children's social behaviors as predictors of academic achievement: A longitudinal analysis. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 1-23.
17. Mok, J. (2011). A case study of students' perceptions of peer assessment in Hong Kong. ELT Journal, 65(3), 230-239.
18. O'Donnell, A. M. & Topping, K. (1998). Peers assessing peers: Possibilities and problems. In K.Topping & S.Ehly (eds.), Peer-assisted learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. O'Keefe, P. F. (1991). Relationship between social status and peer assessment of social behavior among mentally retarded and nonretarded children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED340500)
20. Rockhill, C. M., & Asher, S. R. (1992). Peer assessment of the behavioral characteristics of poorly accepted boys and girls. Educational Resources Information Center document reproduction service ED346372.
21. Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1998). Tutoring and students with special needs. In K. J.Topping & S.Ehly (eds.), Peer-assisted learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Sebba, J., Crick, R. D., Yu, G., Lawson, H., Harlen, W., & Durant, K. (2008). Systematic review of research evidence of the impact on students in secondary schools of self and peer assessment (Technical report). In Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
23. Sluijsmans, D., & Prins, F. (2006). A conceptual framework for integrating peer assessment in teacher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32, 6-22.
24. Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., Chiou, S. K., & Hou, H. T. (2005). The design and application of a web-based self- and peer-assessment system. Computers and Education, 45 (2), 187-202.
25. Tillema, H., Leenknecht, M., & Segers, M. (2011). Assessing assessment quality: Criteria for quality assurance in design of (peer) assessment for learning-A review of research studies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 25-34.
26. Topping, K. J. (2003). Self and peer assessment in school and university: Reliability, validity and utility. In M. S. R.Segers, F. J. R. C.Dochy, & E. C.Cascallar (eds.), Optimizing new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
27. Tseng, S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers and Education, 49(4), 1161-1174.
28. Tsivitanidou, O. E., Zacharia, Z. C., & Hovardas, T. (2011). Investigating secondary school students' unmediated peer assessment skills. Learning and Instruction, 21(4), 506-519.
29. Van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M., & Tillema, H. M. (2009). Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 41-54.
30. Van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merrienboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 270-279.
31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. M.Cole, V.John-Steiner, S.Scribner, & E.Souberman (eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Weaver, M. E. (1995). Using peer response in the classroom: Students' perspectives. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 12, 31-37.
33. Yang, J. C., Ko, H. W., & Chung, I. L. (2005). Web-based interactive writing environment: Development and evaluation. Educational Technology and Society, 8(2), 214-229.
34. Yugar, J. M., & Shapiro, E. S. (2001). Elementary children's school friendship: A comparison of peer assessment methodologies. School Psychology Review, 30(4), 68-85.
35. Yurdabakan, I. (2011). The investigation of peer assessment in primary school cooperative learning groups with respect to gender. Education 3-13, 39(2), 153-169.