Gathering evidence of student understanding

SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 179-196

  Heritage, Margaret ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84953209914     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452218649.n11     Document Type: Chapter

References (91)

1. Allal, L. (2010). Assessment and the regulation of learning. In P.Peterson, E.Baker, & B.McGraw (eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 3, pp. 348-352). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
2. Alonzo, A. C., & Steedle, J. T. (2008). Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression. Science Education, 93, 389-421.
3. Anastasi, S. (1990). Ability testing in the 1980's and beyond: Some major trends. Public Personnel Management, 18, 471-485.
4. Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 685-730.
5. Bailey, A., & Heritage, M. (2008). Formative assessment for literacy, grades K-6. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
6. Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2000). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85, 536-553.
7. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
8. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy and Practice, 5, 7-73.
9. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Changing teaching through formative assessment: Research and practice. In Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 223-240). Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
10. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability, 21, 5-31.
11. Black, P., Wilson, M., & Yao, S. Y. (2011). Road maps for learning: A guide to the navigation of learning progressions. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 9 (2-3), 71-122.
12. Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 413-425.
13. Brookhart, S. M. (2003). Developing measurement theory for classroom assessment purposes and uses. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 5-12.
14. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E. T., & Franke, M. L. (1996). Cognitively Guided Instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 97, 3-20.
15. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., & Carey, D. A. (1988). Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 385-401.
16. Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
17. Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. In A.Kozulin, B.Gindis, V. S.Ageyev, & S. M.Miller (eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39-64). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 815-843.
19. Cohen, N., Hall, T. E., Vue, G., & Ganley, P. (2011). Becoming strategic readers: Three cases using formative assessment, UDL, and technology to support struggling middle school readers. In P.Noyce & D. T.Hickey (eds.), New frontiers in formative assessment (pp. 129-140). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
20. Confrey, J., & Maloney, A. (2010, October). Building formative assessments around learning trajectories as situated in the CCSS. Paper presented at fall meeting of the State Collaborative on Assessment and Student Standards: Formative Assessment for Students and Teachers, Savannah, GA.
21. Cook, K., Seeley, C., & Chaput, L. (2011). Customizing and capture:Online assessment tools for secondary mathematics. In P.Noyce & D. T.Hickey (eds.), New frontiers in formative assessment (pp. 69-85). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
22. Cronbach, L. (1988). Internal consistency of tests: Analyses old and new. Psychometrika, 53, 63-70.
23. Crooks, T. (2011). Assessment for learning in the accountability era: New Zealand. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 71-77.
24. Crooks, T., Kane, M., & Cohen, A. (1996). Threats to the valid use of assessments. Assessment in Education, 3, 265-285.
25. Dewey, J. (1928). Progressive education and the science of education. Progressive Education, V, 197-201.
26. Dierick, S., & Dochy, F. (2001). New lines in edumetrics: New forms of assessment lead to new assessment criteria. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27, 307-329.
27. Duschl, R. A. (2006). Learning progressions as babushkas. Measurement, 14 (1 & 2), 116-119.
28. Duschl, R. D., & Gitomer, D. H. (1997). Strategies and challenges to change the focus of assessment and instruction in science classrooms. Educational Assessment, 4(1), 37-73.
29. Erickson, F. (2007). Some thoughts on "proximal" formative assessment of student learning. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 106, 186-216.
30. Frederiksen, J., & Collins, A. (1989). A systems approach to educational testing. Educational Researcher, 18(9), 27-32.
31. Gibbs, G. (1999). Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn. In S.Brown & A.Glasner (eds.), Assessment matters in higher education: Choosing and using diverse approaches (pp. 41-53). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
32. Ginsburg, H. P. (2009). The challenge of formative assessment in mathematics education: Children's minds, teachers' minds. Human Development, 52(2), 109-128.
33. Griffin, P. (2007). The comfort of competence and the uncertainty of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33, 87-99.
34. Griffin, P., Murray, L., Care, E., Thomas, A., & Perri, P. (2010). Developmental assessment: Lifting literacy through professional learning teams. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17, 383-397.
35. Harlen, W. (2007). Formative classroom assessment in science and mathematics. In J. H.McMillan (ed.), Formative classroom assessment: Theory into practice (pp. 116-135). New York: Teachers College Press.
36. Harlen, W., & James, M. (1996). Creating a positive impact of assessment on learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
37. Harlen, W., & James, M. (1997). Assessment and learning: Differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 4(3), 365-379.
38. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
39. Heffernan, N., Militello, M., Heffernan, C., & Decoteu, M. (in press). Effective and meaningful use of educational technology: Three cases from the classroom. In C.Dede & J.Richards (eds.), Digital teaching platforms. New York: Teachers College Press.
40. Heritage, M. (2008). Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/content/PDFs/FASTLearningProgressions.pdf
41. Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
42. Heritage, M., & Heritage, J. (2011). Teacher questioning: the epicenter of instruction and assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
43. Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 24-31.
44. Heritage, M. & Niemi, D. (2006). Toward a framework for using student mathematical representations as formative assessments [Special issue]. Educational Assessment, 11 (3 & 4), 265-284. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45. Herman, J. L., Heritage, M., & Goldschmidt, P. (2011). Developing and selecting assessments of student growth for use in teacher evaluation systems. Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
46. Jordan, B., & Putz, P. (2004). Assessment as practice: Notes on measurement, tests, and targets. Human Organization, 63, 346-358.
47. Kane, M. T. (1992). An argument-based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 527-535.
48. Kouba, V., & Franklin, K. (1995). Multiplication and division: Sense making and meaning. Teaching Children Mathematics, 1, 574-577.
49. Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S., & Miller, S. M. (2003). Introduction: Sociocultural theory and education: Students, teachers, and knowledge. In A.Kozulin, B.Gindis, V. S.Ageyev, & S. M.Miller (eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 1-11). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Cambridge: University of Chicago Press.
51. Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A. E., & Post, T. (2003). Principles for developing thought revealing activities for students and teachers. In R.Lesh & H. M.Doerr (eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52. Linn, R. L., & Baker, E. L. (1996). Can performance-based student assessment be psychometrically sound? In J. B.Baron & D. P.Wolf (eds.), Performance-based assessment-challenges and possibilities: 95th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education part 1 (Vol. 95 (1), pp. 84-103). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
53. Masters, G., & Forster, M. (1996). Progress maps: Assessment resource kit. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: The Australian Council for Educational Research.
54. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L.Linn (ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
56. Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13-23.
57. Newman, L. S. (1990). International and unintentional memory in young children: Remembering vs. playing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 243-258.
58. Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 261-290.
59. Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. W. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. J.Jones & L.Idol (eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
60. Pellegrino, J. W., & Glaser, R. (1982). Analyzing aptitudes for learning: Inductive reasoning. In R.Glaser (ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 269-345). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61. Phelan, R. (2003). Assessment, curriculum, and instruction: Overview of the standards movement. Retrieved from http://www.sonoma.edu/users/p/phelan/423/standards.html
62. Ploegh, K., Tillema, H., & Segers, M. R. S. (2009). In search of quality criteria in peer assessment practices. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35, 102-109.
63. Poppers, A. E. (2011). Identifying craft moves: Close observation of elementary students writing. In P.Noyce & D. T.Hickey (eds.), New frontiers in formative assessment (pp. 89-107). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
64. Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28(1), 4-13.
65. Riley, J. (2009, June). Developing learning progressions. Paper presented at the Council of Chief State School Officers National Conference on Student Assessment, Detroit, MI.
66. Rowe, M. B. (1974). Wait time and rewards as instructional variables, their influence in language, logic, and fate control: Part II, rewards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11, 291-308.
67. Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2011). Informal formative assessment: The role of instructional dialogues in assessing students for science learning. Special issue in assessment for learning, Studies of Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 15-24.
68. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2004, April). Informal assessment of students' understanding of scientific inquiry. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
69. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2006). Informal formative assessment and scientific inquiry: Exploring teachers' practices and student learning. Educational Assessment, 11 (3 & 4), 237-263.
70. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers' informal formative assessment practices and students' understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Educational Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57-84.
71. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional strategies. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
72. Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on children's achievement: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 93-105.
73. Schunk, D. H. (1984). Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist, 19, 48-58.
74. Shavelson, R. J., Young, D. B., Ayala, C. C., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A. et al. (2008). On the impact of curriculum-embedded formative assessment on learning: A collaboration between curriculum and assessment developers. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(4), 295-314.
75. Shepard, L. A. (2001). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning. In V.Richardson (ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 1066-1101). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
76. Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
77. Smith, C., Wiser, M., Anderson, C., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Implications of research on children's learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and atomic-molecular theory. Measurement, 14, 1-98.
78. Smith, J. (2003). Reconsidering reliability in classroom assessment and grading. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 26-33.
79. Songer, N. B., Kelcey, B., & Gotwals, A. W. (2009). How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 46, 610-631.
80. Stobart, G. (2006). The validity of formative assessment. In J.Gardner (ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 133-146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
81. Stobart, G. (2008, November). Validity in formative assessment. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual AEA-Europe Conference, Hisar, Bulgaria.
82. Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (1998). Investigating formative assessment. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
83. Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27, 615-631.
84. Vygotsky, L. S. (1935). Umstvennoie razvitie detei v protsesse obuchenia. Moscow, Russia: Gosudarstvennoie Uchebno-pedagogicheskoie Izdatel 'stvo.
85. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (Rev. ed.) (A.Kozulin, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
86. Webb, M. E., & Jones, J. (2009). Exploring tensions in developing assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16, 165-184.
87. Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
88. Wiliam, D., & Black, P. J. (1996). Meanings and consequences: A basis for distinguishing formative and summative functions of assessment? British Educational Research Journal, 22(5), 537-548.
89. Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York: Routledge.
90. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628.
91. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284-290.