The Use and Design of Rubrics to Support Assessment for Learning

Enabling Power of Assessment

Volumn 5, Issue , 2017, Pages 99-111

  Jönsson, Anders ^a   Panadero, Ernesto ^b  

^a KRISTIANSTAD UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Constructive Feedback; Dental Student; Quality Level; Student Performance; Widespread Implementation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85134980281     PISSN: 21982643     EISSN: 21982651     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_7     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10(3), 1–11.
2. Balan, A. (2012). Assessment for learning. A case study in mathematics education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
3. Brookhart, S. M., & Chen, F. (2014). The quality and effectiveness of descriptive rubrics. Educational Review, 67(3), 343–368.
4. Case, S. (2007). Reconfiguring and realigning the assessment feedback processes for an undergraduate criminology degree. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(3), 285–299.
5. Dawson, P. (2015). Assessment rubrics: Towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294.
6. Green, R., & Bowser, M. (2006). Observations from the field: Sharing a literature review rubric. Journal of Library Administration, 45(1), 185–202.
7. Hanna, M. A., & Smith, J. (1998). Using rubrics for documentation of clinical work supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 37(4), 269–278.
8. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
9. Humphry, S. M., & Heldsinger, S. A. (2014). Common structural design features of rubrics may represent a threat to validity. Educational Researcher, 43(5), 253–263.
10. Jönsson, A. (2010). The use of transparency in the ‘interactive examination’ for student teachers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(2), 185–199.
11. Jönsson, A. (2013). Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 63–76.
12. Jönsson, A. (2014). Rubrics as a way of providing transparency in assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(7), 840–852.
13. Jönsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144.
14. Kocakülah, M. S. (2010). Development and application of a rubric for evaluating students’ performance on Newton’s laws of motion. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(2), 146–164.
15. Linn, R. L., Baker, E., & Dunbar, S. B. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20(8), 15–21.
16. Lucander, H., Knutsson, K., Salé, H., & Jönsson, A. (2012). “I’ll never forget this”: Evaluating a pilot workshop in effective communication. Journal of Dental Education, 76(10), 1311–1316.
17. Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. (1996). The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), 239–250.
18. Panadero, E. (2011). Instructional help for self-assessment and self-regulation: Evaluation of the efficacy of self-assessment scripts vs. rubrics. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
19. Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013). Self-assessment: Theoretical and practical connotations. When it happens, how is it acquired and what to do to develop it in our students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(2), 551–576.
20. Panadero, E., & Jönsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited. Educational Research Review, 9, 129–144.
21. Panadero, E., & Romero, M. (2014). To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 21(2), 133–148.
22. Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Huertas, J. A. (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts: Effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 806–813.
23. Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Huertas, J. A. (2014). Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts: Effects on first year university students’ self-regulation and performance. Infancia y Aprendizaje: Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 37(1), 149–183.
24. Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Reche, E. (2013). Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts: Effect on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy in pre-service teachers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(3), 125–132.
25. Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435–448.
26. Reitmeier, C. A., Svendsen, L. K., & Vrchota, D. A. (2004). Improving oral communication skills of students in food science courses. Journal of Food Science Education, 3(2), 15–20.
27. Reynolds-Keefer, L. (2010). Rubric-referenced assessment in teacher preparation: An opportunity to learn by using. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 15(8), 1–9.
28. Sadler, D. R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 175–194.
29. Sadler, D. R. (2009). Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 159–179.
30. Schamber, J. F., & Mahoney, S. L. (2006). Assessing and improving the quality of group critical thinking exhibited in the final projects of collaborative learning groups. The Journal of General Education, 55(2), 103–137.
31. Torrance, H. (2007). Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post-secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(3), 281–294.
32. Wilson, M. (2006). Rethinking rubrics in writing assessment. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
33. Yopp, B. D., & Rehberger, R. (2009). A curriculum focus intervention’s effects on prealgebra achievement. Journal of Developmental Education, 33(2), 28–30.
34. Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135–147.