Rubrics as a way of providing transparency in assessment

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 840-852

  Jonsson, Anders ^a  

^a KRISTIANSTAD UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

assessment; professional education; scoring rubrics; transparency

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905826917     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2013.875117     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Baartman, L. K. J., T. J. Bastiaens, P. A. Kirschner, and C. P. M. van der Vleuten. 2006. "The Wheel of Competency Assessment: Presenting Quality Criteria for Competency Assessment Programs." Studies in Educational Evaluation 32 (2): 153-170.10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.04.006
2. Balan, A. 2012. "Assessment for Learning. A Case Study in Mathematics Education." Doctoral dissertation, Malmö University, Malmö.
3. Biggs, J. 1999. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: Open University Press.
4. Frederiksen, J. R., and A. Collins. 1989. "A Systems Approach to Educational Testing." Educational Researcher 18 (9): 27-32.
5. Jonsson, A. 2010. "The Use of Transparency in the 'Interactive examination' for Student Teachers." Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 17 (2): 185-199.
6. Jonsson, A. 2012. Bedömning av autentiska uppgifter: utmaningar och möjligheter [Assessment of Authentic Tasks: Challenges and Possibilities]. Malmö: Malmö University.
7. Jonsson, A. 2013a. "Facilitating Productive Use of Feedback in Higher Education." Active Learning in Higher Education 14 (1): 63-76.10.1177/1469787412467125
8. Jonsson, A. 2013b. "Bedömningsmatriser - inte bättre än sina användare [Scoring Rubrics - No Better than Their User]." Grundskoletidningen 23 (2): 37-40.
9. Jonsson, A., and G. Svingby. 2007. "The Use of Scoring Rubrics: Reliability, Validity and Educational Consequences." Educational Research Review 2 (2): 130-144.10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
10. Orsmond, P., and S. Merry. 1996. "The Importance of Marking Criteria in the Use of Peer Assessment." Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 21 (3): 239-250.
11. Orsmond, P., S. Merry, and K. Reiling. 1997. "A Study in Self-Assessment: Tutor and Students' Perceptions of Performance Criteria." Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 22 (4): 357-368.
12. Panadero, E., and A. Jonsson. 2013. "The Use of Scoring Rubrics for Formative Assessment Purposes Revisited: A Review." Educational Research Review 9: 129-144.10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
13. Reddy, Y. M., and H. Andrade. 2010. "A Review of Rubric Use in Higher Education." Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (4): 435-448.
14. Schamber, J. F., and S. L. Mahoney. 2006. "Assessing and Improving the Quality of Group Critical Thinking Exhibited in the Final Projects of Collaborative Learning Groups." The Journal of General Education 55 (2): 103-137.10.1353/jge.2006.0025
15. Wiggins, G. 1998. Educative Assessment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16. Wiiand, T. 2005. Examinationen som vägvisare. Högskolestudenters upplevelse av examination i ett longitudinellt perspektiv [The Examination as a Guide. University students' Perceptions of Examinations in a Longitudinal Perspective]. Report Series from the Department for Development of Pedagogy and Inter-Active Learning. Report No. 5. Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University.
17. Wiliam, D. 2007. "Keeping Learning on Track." In Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, edited by F. Lester, 1053-1098. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.