A review of rubric use in higher education

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 435-448

  Reddy, Y Malini ^a   Andrade, Heidi ^b  

^a IFHE UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Effects on performance; Formative assessment; Higher education; Programme assessment; Reliability and validity; Review of empirical research; Rubric; User perceptions

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650537955     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930902862859     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Andrade, H. 2000. Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership 57, no. 5: 13-18.
2. Andrade, H.G. 2001. The effects of instructional rubrics on learning to write. Current Issues in Education 4, no. 4. http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume4/number4 (accessed January 4, 2007).
3. Andrade, H.G. 2005. Teaching with rubrics: The good, the bad, and the ugly. College Teaching 53, no. 1: 27-30.
4. Andrade, H., and Y. Du. 2005. Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 10, no. 5: 1-11.
5. Andrade, H., Y. Du, and X. Wang. 2008. Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students' writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices 27, no. 2: 3-13.
6. Arter, J., and J. Chappuis. 2007. Creating and recognizing quality rubrics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
7. Arter, J., and J. McTighe. 2001. Scoring rubrics in the classroom: Using performance criteria for assessing and improving student performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin/Sage.
8. Bolton, C.F. 2006. Rubrics and adult learners: Andragogy and assessment. Assessment Update 18, no. 3: 5-6.
9. Boulet, J.R, T.A. Rebbecchi, E.C. Denton, D. Mckinley, and G.P. Whelan. 2004. Assessing the written communication skills of medical school graduates. Advances in Health Sciences Education 9: 47-60.
10. Campbell, A. 2005. Application of ICT and rubrics to the assessment process where professional judgment is involved: the features of an e-marking tool. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30, no. 5: 529-37.
11. Cohen, E.G., R.A. Lotan, P.L. Abram, B.A. Scarloss, and S.E. Schultz. 2002. Can groups learn? Teachers College Record 104, no. 6: 1045-68.
12. Dunbar, N.E., C.F. Brooks, and T. Kubicka-Miller. 2006. Oral communication skills in higher education: Using a performance-based evaluation rubric to assess communication skills. Innovative Higher Education 31, no. 2: 115-28.
13. Fleenor, J.W., J.B. Fleenor, and W.F. Grossnickle. 1996. Interrater reliability and agreement of performance ratings: A methodological comparison. Journal of Business and Psychology 10: 367-80.
14. Green, R., and M. Bowser. 2006. Observations from the field: Sharing a literature review rubric. Journal of Library Administration 45, nos. 1-2: 185-202.
15. Hafner, J.C., and P.M. Hafner. 2003. Quantitative analysis of the rubric as an assessment tool: An empirical study of student peer-group rating. International Journal of Science Education 25, no. 12: 1509-28.
16. Jonsson, A., and G. Svingby. 2007. The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review 2: 130-44.
17. Knight, L.A. 2006. Using rubrics to assess information literacy. Reference Services Review 34, no. 1: 43-55.
18. Lapsley, R., and R. Moody. 2007. Teaching tip: Structuring a rubric for online course discussions to assess both traditional and non-traditional students. Journal of American Aacademy of Business 12, no. 1: 167-72.
19. Marzano, R.J., R.S. Brandt, C.S. Hughese, B.F. Jones, B.Z. Presseisen, C. Stuart, and C. Shhor. 1998. Dimensions of thinking. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
20. Moni, R.W., E. Beswick, and K.B. Moni. 2005. Using student feedback to construct an assessment rubric for a concept map in physiology. Advances in Physiology Education 29: 197-203.
21. Moskal, B.M., and J.A. Leydens. 2000. Scoring rubric development: Validity and reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 7, no. 10: 71-81. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=10 (accessed July 9, 2007).
22. Oakleaf, M.J. 2006. Assessing information literacy skills: A rubric approach. PhD diss., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. UMI No. 3207346.
23. Osana, H.P., and J.R. Seymour. 2004. Critical thinking in preservice teachers: A rubric for evaluating argumentation and statistical reasoning. Educational Research and Evaluation 10, nos. 4-6: 473-98.
24. Parke, C.S. 2001. An approach that examines sources of misfit to improve performance assessment items and rubrics. Educational Assessment 7, no. 3: 201-25.
25. Parkes, K.A. 2006. The effect of performance rubrics on college level applied studio grading. PhD diss., University of Maimi. UMI No. 3215237.
26. Payne, D.A. 2003. Applied educational assessment. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
27. Petkov, D., and O. Petkova. 2006. Development of Scoring Rubrics for IS Projects as an Assessment Tool. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology 3: 499-510.
28. Popham, W.J. 1997. What's wrong - and what's right - with rubrics. Educational Leadership 55, no. 2: 72-5.
29. Powell, T.A. 2001. Improving assessment and evaluation methods in film and television production courses. PhD diss., Capella University. UMI No. 3034481.
30. Quinlan, A.M. 2006. A complete guide to rubrics, assessments made easy for teachers, K-College. USA: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
31. Reitmeier, C.A., L.K. Svendsen, and D.A. Vrchota. 2004. Improving oral communication skills of students in food science courses. Journal of Food Science Education 3: 15-20.
32. Schneider, J.F. 2006. Rubrics for teacher education in community college. The Community College Enterprise 12, no. 1: 39-55.
33. Simon, M., and R. Forgette-Giroux. 2001. A rubric for scoring postsecondary academic skills. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 7, no. 18. Available http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=18 (accessed December 7, 2006).
34. Song, K.H. 2006. A conceptual model of assessing teaching performance and intellectual development of teacher candidates: A pilot study in the US. Teaching in Higher Education 11, no. 2: 175-90.
35. Stiggins, R.J. 2001. Student-involved classroom assessment. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
36. Tierney, R., and M. Simon. 2004. What's still wrong with rubrics: focusing on the consistency of performance criteria across scale levels'. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 9, no. 2.
37. Tunon, J., and B. Brydges. 2006. A study on using rubrics and citation analysis to measure the quality of doctoral dissertation reference lists from traditional and nontraditional institutions. Journal of Library Administration 45, nos. 3-4: 459-81.