The use of transparency in the 'interactive examination' for student teachers

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 183-197

  Jonsson, Anders ^a  

^a MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78349252377     PISSN: 0969594X     EISSN: 1465329X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09695941003694441     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Andrade, H.G. 1999a. The role of instructional rubrics and self-assessment in learning to write: a smorgasbord of findings. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, in Montreal, Canada.
2. Andrade, H.G. 1999b. Student self-assessment: at the intersection of metacognition and authentic assessment. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, in Montreal, Canada.
3. Arter, J., and J. McTighe. 2001. Scoring rubrics in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
4. Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, Principles, Policy & Practice 5, no. 1: 7-74.
5. Boud, D., and N. Falchikov. 1989. Quantitative studies of self-assessment in higher education: a critical analysis of findings. Higher Education 18, no. 5: 529-549.
6. Brown, G.T.L., K. Glasswell, and D. Harland. 2004. Accuracy in the scoring of writing: Studies of reliability and validity using a New Zealand writing assessment system. Assessing Writing 9, no. 2: 105-121.
7. Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
8. Denner, P.R., S.A. Salzman, and L.B. Harris. 2002. Teacher work sample assessment: an accountability method that moves beyond teacher testing to the impact of teacher performance on student learning. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, February, in New York.
9. Dochy, F., M. Segers, and D. Sluijsmans. 1999. The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education 24, no. 3: 331-350.
10. Eisner, E. 1991. Taking a second look: Educational connoisseurship revisited. In Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Evaluation and education at quarter century, ed. M.W. McLaughlin and D.C. Phillips, 169-187. Chicago, IL: The National Society for the Study of Education.
11. Falchikov, N., and D. Boud. 1989. Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 59, no. 4: 395-430.
12. Frederiksen, J.R., and A. Collins. 1989. A systems approach to educational testing. Educational Researcher 18, no. 9: 27-32.
13. Jonsson, A., L.K.J. Baartman, and S.A. Lennung. 2009. Estimating the quality of new modes of assessment: the case of an 'Interactive Examination' for teacher competency. Learning Environments Research 12, no. 3: 225-241.
14. Jonsson, A., N. Mattheos, G. Svingby, and R. Attström. 2007. Dynamic assessment and the 'Interactive examination'. Educational Technology & Society 10, no. 4: 17-27.
15. Jonsson, A., and G. Svingby. 2007. The use of scoring rubrics: reliability, validity and educational consequences, Educational Research Review 2, no. 1: 130-144.
16. Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Mattheos, N., A. Nattestad, E. Falk Nilsson, and R. Attström. 2004. The interactive examination: Assessing students' self-assessment ability. Medical Education 38, no. 4: 378-389.
18. Mullen, Y.K. 2003. Student improvement in middle school science. Master's thesis, University of Wisconsin.
19. Orsmond, P., S. Merry, and K. Reiling. 1997. A study in self-assessment: Tutor and students' perceptions of performance criteria. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 22, no. 4: 357-370.
20. Orsmond, P., S. Merry, and K. Reiling. 2002. The use of exemplars and formative feedback when using student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27, no. 4: 309-323.
21. Piscitello, M.E. 2001. Using rubrics for assessment and evaluation in art. Master's thesis, Saint Xavier University, Chicago.
22. Schamber, J.F., and S.L. Mahoney. 2006. Assessing and improving the quality of group critical thinking exhibited in the final projects of collaborative learning groups. Journal of General Education 55, no. 2: 103-137.
23. Topping, K. 2003. Self and peer assessment in school and university: reliability, validity and utility. In Optimizing new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards, ed. M. Segers, F. Dochy, and E. Cascallar, 55-87. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24. Wiggins, G. 1998. Educative assessment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.