Progressing Toward Airliners’ Reduced-Crew Operations: A Systematic Literature Review

International Journal of Aerospace Psychology

Volumn 30, Issue 1-2, 2020, Pages 1-24

  Schmid, Daniela ^a   Stanton, Neville A ^b  

^a GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85076887482     PISSN: 24721840     EISSN: 24721832     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/24721840.2019.1696196     Document Type: Review

References (155)

1. Abbott, K., McKenney, D., & Railsback, P., (2013). Operational use of flight path management systems final report of the Performance-based operations–Aviation Rulemaking Committee (PARC)/Commercial Aviation Safety Team Flight Deck Automation Working Group (CAST). Washington, DC: Commercial Aviation Safety Team Flight Deck Automation Working Group.
2. ACROSS Consortium. (2016a). Incapacitated crew: Emergency Aircraft Control System (EACS). Bruessels, Belgium: European Commission. Retrieved from http://www.across-fp7.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/ACROSS-WP10-03_Emergency-Aircraft-Control-System-EACS.pdf
3. ACROSS Consortium. (2016b). Mental workload monitoring with fNIR optical brain imaging technology: Turkish Aerospace Industries TAI. European Commission. Retrieved from http://www.across-fp7.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/ACROSS-WP9-01_Mental-Workload-Monitoring-with-fNIR.pdf
4. Aimar, J. L., (2010). US Patent No. US 7,792,615 B2. Google Patents: The Boeing Company.
5. Airbus. (2011a). A350-900: Flight deck and systems briefing for pilots (Vol. 2). Blagnac Cedex, France: Author.
6. Airbus. (2011b). Airbus A380 flight crew operating manual. Blagnac Cedex, France: Author.
7. Airbus. (2018). Global networks, global citizens: 2018-2037. Blagnac Cedex, France: Author.
8. Aircraft Accident Investigation Branch. (2016). Embraer EMB-505 Phenom 300, HZ-IBN (EW/C2015/07/04). Farnborough, UK: Aircraft Accident Investigation Unit.
9. Arthur, J. J., Shelton, K. J., Prinzel, L. J., & Bailey, R. E., (2016). Performance evaluation of speech recognition systems as a next-generation pilot-vehicle interface technology (NASA-TM–2016–219329). Retrieved from Hampton, VA, USA https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20160010565.pdf
10. Bailey, R. E., Kramer, L. J., Kennedy, K. D., Stephens, C. L., & Etherington, T. J., (2017). An assessment of reduced crew and single pilot operations in commercial transport aircraft operations. Paper presented at the 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), St. Petersburg, FL.
11. Barnes, R., (2008). Ensuring VLJ operational safety: learning to ask the right questions. SAE Technical Paper, 2008-01-2239. doi:10.4271/2008-01-2239
12. Battiste, V., Lachter, J., Brandt, S. L., Alvarez, A., Strybel, T., & Vu, K.-P. L., (2018). Human-Automation teaming: Lessons learned and future directions. In S., Yamamoto & H., Mori (Eds.), Human Interface and the Management of Information. HIMI 2018 (pp. 395–368). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
13. Benitez, D. M., del Corte Valiente, A., & Lanzi, P., (2018). A novel global operational concept in cockpits under peak workload situations. Safety Science, 102, 38–50. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.028
14. Berry, K. A., & Pace, J. J., (2011). Examining the actors and functions of an airline operations center. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 55(1), 1412–1416. doi:10.1177/1071181311551294
15. Bilimoria, K. D., Johnson, W. W., & Schutte, P. C., (2014). Conceptual framework for single pilot operations. Proceedings of the international conference on human-computer interaction in aerospace. New York, NY: ACM.
16. Boeing. (2018). Commercial market outlook: 2018-2037. Seattle, WA: Author.
17. Boeing Commercial Airplanes. (2018). Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents: Worldwide operations | 1959–2017. Retrieved from Seattle, WA: www.boeing.com/news/techissues/pdf/statsum.pdf
18. Bohn, R. E., (2010). How flying got smarter. Paper presented at the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), San Diego, CA.
19. Bonner, M., Taylor, R. M., Fletcher, K., & Miller, C. A., (2000). Adaptive automation and decision aiding in the military fast jet. In D. B., Kaber & M. R., Endsley (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Human Performance, Situation Awareness and Automation: User centered design for the new Millenium (pp. 154–159). Madison, WI: Omnipress.
20. Boy, G. A., (2011). Cognitive function analysis in the design of human and machine multi-agent systems. In G. A., Boy (Ed.), The handbook of human-machine interaction (pp. 189–206). Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
21. Boy, G. A., (2015). Requirements for single pilot operations in commercial aviation: A first high-level cognitive function analysis. In F., Boulanger, D., Korb, G., Morel, & J.-C., Roussel (Eds.), Complex systems design & management (pp. 227–234). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
22. Boy, G. A., (2016). Flexibility. In G. A., Boy (Ed.), Tangible interactive systems: Grasping the real world with computers (pp. 107–129). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
23. Brandt, S. L., Lachter, J., Battiste, V., & Johnson, W., (2015). Pilot situation awareness and its implications for single pilot operations: Analysis of a human-in-the-loop study. Procedia Manufacturing, 3(Supplement C), 3017–3024. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.846
24. Brandt, S. L., Lachter, J., Russell, R., & Shively, R. J., (2017). A human-autonomy teaming approach for a flight-following task. In C., Baldwin (Ed.), Advances in neuroergonomics and cognitive engineering: Proceedings of the AHFE 2017 (pp. 12–22). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
25. Bueno,J., Herrería, J. A., & SOFIA Consortium. (2010). SOFIA (Safe automatic flight back and landing of aircraft): Final publishable activity report. EC contract.
26. Burian, B. K., (2007). Very light jets in the national airspace system. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Dayton, OH.
27. Burian, B. K., & Dismukes, K., (2007). Alone at 41,000 feet. AeroSafety World, 2(11), 30–34.
28. Çakır, M. P., Vural, M., Koç, S. Ö., & Toktaş, A., (2016). Real-Time monitoring of cognitive workload of airline pilots in a flight simulator with fNIR optical brain imaging technology. In D., Schmorrow & C. M., Fidopiastis (Eds.), Foundations of augmented cognition: Neuroergonomics and operational neuroscience (pp. 147–158). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
29. Caldwell, J. A., Mallis, M. M., Caldwell, J. L., Paul, M. A., Miller, J. C., & Neri, D. F., (2009). Fatigue countermeasures in aviation. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 80(1), 29–59. doi:10.3357/asem.2435.2009
30. Carey, B., (2018, August 1). Airline pilots unions join to oppose single-pilot research. Aviation Daily. Retrieved from https://aviationweek.com/awincommercial/airline-pilots-unions-join-oppose-single-pilot-research.
31. Comerford, D., Brandt, S. L., Lachter, J., Wu, S.-C., Mogford, R., Battiste, V., & Johnson, W. W., (2013). NASA’s single-pilot operations technical interchange meeting: Proceedings and findings. Moffett Field, CA: NASA.
32. Corbett, M. A., (2009). A drowsiness detection system for pilots: Optalert®. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 80(2), 149. doi:10.3357/ASEM.21001.2009
33. Cover, M., Reichlen, C., Matessa, M., & Schnell, T., (2018). Analysis of airline pilots subjective feedback to human autonomy teaming in a reduced crew environment. In S., Yamamoto & H., Mori (Eds.), Human Interface and the Management of Information. HIMI 2018 (pp. 359–368). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
34. Cummings, M. L., Stimpson, A., & Clamann, M., (2016). Functional requirements for onboard intelligent automation in single pilot operations. Paper presented at the AIAA Infotech @ Aerospace, San Diego, CA.
35. DeMik, R. J., Allen, J. M., & Welsh, B. W., (2008). Very light Jets: Requirements for pilot qualification and collegiate Aviation’s role. Collegiate Aviation Review, 26(2), 37.
36. Deutsch, S., & Pew, R. W., (2005). Single pilot commercial aircraft operation (BBN Report). Cambridge, MA: BBN Technologies.
37. Driscoll, K., Roy, A., & Ponchak, D. S., (2017). Cyber safety and security for reduced crew operations (RCO). Paper presented at the 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference DASC, St. Petersburg, FL.
38. Driscoll, K., Roy, A., Ponchak, D. S., & Downey, A. N., (2017). Cyber safety and security for Reduced Crew Operations (RCO). Paper presented at the Aerospace Conference, 2017 IEEE, Big Sky, MT.
39. Embraer, S. A., (2015). Phenom 300. São José dos Campos, Brazil: Embraer S.A.
40. Endsley, M. R., & Kiris, E. O., (1995). The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors, 37(2), 381–394. doi:10.1518/001872095779064555
41. Eriksson, A., & Stanton, N. A., (2017). Takeover time in highly automated vehicles: Noncritical transitions to and from manual control. Human Factors, 59(4), 689–705. doi:10.1177/0018720816685832
42. Etherington, T. J., Kramer, A. F., Bailey, R. E., Kennedy, K. D., & Stephens, C. L., (2016). Quantifying pilot contribution to flight safety for normal and non-normal airline operations. Paper presented at the 35th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), Sacramento, CA.
43. Etherington, T. J., Kramer, L. J., Bailey, R. E., & Kennedy, K. D., (2017). Quantifying pilot contribution to flight safety during an in-flight airspeed failure. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (ISAP), Dayton, OH.
44. Etherington, T. J., Kramer, L. J., Kennedy, K. D., Bailey, R. E., & Last, M. C., (2017). Quantifying pilot contribution to flight safety during dual generator failure. Paper presented at the 35th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), St. Petersburg, FL.
45. FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 (H.R.302). (2018). Washington, DC: Congress.
46. FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 (H.R.4). (2018). Washington, DC: Congress.
47. Faulhaber, A., (2019). From crewed to single-pilot operations: Pilot performance and workload management Paper presented at the 20th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Dayton, OH.
48. Federal Aviation Administration. (2017). 14 C.F.R. part 135 (FSIS FAA Order 8900.1). Washington, DC.
49. Feigh, K. M., & Pritchett, A. R., (2014). Requirements for effective function allocation: A critical review. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 8(1), 23–32. doi:10.1177/1555343413490945
50. Garland, D. J., Mitchell, C. M., Caisse, S., Sandusky, L., Smith, P. J., & Mitchell, C. M., (1999). Air traffic management: The view from the ground. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 43(3), 204–208. doi:10.1177/154193129904300316
51. Gateau, T., Ayaz, H., & Dehais, F., (2018). In silico vs. Over the clouds: On-the-Fly mental state estimation of aircraft pilots, using a functional near infrared spectroscopy based passive-BCI. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12(187), 1–14. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00187
52. Gateau, T., Durantin, G., Lancelot, F., Scannella, S., & Dehais, F., (2015). Real-Time state estimation in a flight simulator using fNIRS. PLoS One, 10(3), e0121279. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121279
53. Gaultier, D., & SAFEE Consortium. (2008). SAFEE (Security of Aircraft in the Future European Environment): Final publishable report (EC contract AIP3-CT-2003-503521). Retrieved from https://cordis.europa.eu/docs/publications/1247/124772271-6_en.pdf
54. Gore, B. F., & Wolter, C. A., (2014). A task analytic process to define future concepts in aviation. In V. G., Duffy (Ed.), Digital human modeling (pp. 236–246). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
55. Graham, J., Hopkins, C., Loeber, A., & Trivedi, S., (2014). Design of a single pilot cockpit for airline operations. Paper presented at the Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS), Charlottesville, VA.
56. Grant, E., Salmon, P. M., Stevens, N., Goode, N., & Read, G. J. M., (2018). Back to the future: What do accident causation models tell us about accident prediction? Safety Science, 104, 99–109. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.018
57. Harris, D., (2007). A human‐centred design agenda for the development of single crew operated commercial aircraft. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 79(5), 518–526. doi:10.1108/00022660710780650
58. Harris, D., (2017). The future flight deck. In D., Harris (Ed.), Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics: Cognition and design (Vol. 10276, pp. 222–230). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
59. Harris, D., (2018). Network re-analysis of Boeing 737 accident at Kegworth using different potential crewing configurations for a single pilot commercial aircraft. In D., Harris (Ed.), Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics (pp. 572–582). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
60. Harris, D., Stanton, N. A., & Starr, A., (2015). Spot the difference: Operational event sequence diagrams as a formal method for work allocation in the development of single-pilot operations for commercial aircraft. Ergonomics, 58(11), 1773–1791. doi:10.1080/00140139.2015.1044574
61. Hart, S. G., (2006). Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX): 20 years later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(9), 904–908. doi:10.1177/154193120605000909
62. Ho, N., Johnson, W., Panesar, K., Wakeland, W., Sadler, G., Wilson, N., … Brandt, S. L., (2017). Application of human-autonomy teaming to an advanced ground station for reduced crew operations. Paper presented at the 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), St. Petersburg, FL.
63. Hobbs, A., & Lyall, B., (2016). Human factors guidelines for unmanned aircraft systems. Ergonomics in Design, 24(3), 23–28. doi:10.1177/1064804616640632
64. Huddlestone, J., Harris, D., Richards, D., Scott, S., & Sears, R., (2014). Dual pilot and single pilot operations–hierarchical task decomposition analysis of doing more with less. In D., Harris (Ed.), Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics (pp. 365–376). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
65. Huddlestone, J., Sears, R., & Harris, D., (2017). The use of operational event sequence diagrams and work domain analysis techniques for the specification of the crewing configuration of a single-pilot commercial aircraft. Cognition, Technology & Work, 19(2–3), 289–302. doi:10.1007/s10111-017-0423-5
66. International Air Transport Association. (2011). Flight crew computer errors (FMS, EFB) case studies (1 ed.). Montreal, Quebec: Author.
67. International Air Transport Association. (2015). FMS data entry error prevention best practices (1 ed.). Montreal, Quebec: Author.
68. Jacobsen, A. R., Graeber, D. A., & Wiedemann, J., (2010). Crew station design and integration. In E., Salas & D., Maurino (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (2nd ed., pp. 533–560). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
69. Jay, S. R., Brandt, S. L., Lachter, J., Matessa, M., Sadler, G., & Battiste, H., (2016). Application of Human-Autonomy Teaming (HAT) Patterns to Reduced Crew Operations (RCO). In D., Harris (Ed.), Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics (pp. 244–255). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
70. Jenkins, D. P., Salmon, P. M., & Walker, G. H., (2008). Event analysis of systematic teamwork. In N. A., Stanton, C., Baber, & D., Harris (Eds.), Modelling command and control (pp. 49–118). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
71. Johnson, W. W., Lachter, J., Feary, M., Comerford, D., Battiste, V., & Mogford, R., (2012). Task allocation for single pilot operations: A role for the ground. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aerospace, New York, NY: ACM.
72. Kaliardos, B., & Lyall, B., (2014). Human factors of unmanned aircraft system integration in the national airspace system. In K. P., Valavanis & G. J., Vachtsevanos (Eds.), Handbook of unmanned aerial vehicles (pp. 2135–2158). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
73. Koltz, M. T., Roberts, Z. S., Sweet, J., Battiste, H., Cunningham, J., Battiste, V., … Strybel, T. Z., (2015). An investigation of the harbor pilot concept for single pilot operations. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 2937–2944. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.948
74. Kramer, L. J., Etherington, T. J., Bailey, R. E., & Kennedy, K. D., (2017). Quantifying pilot contribution to flight safety during hydraulic systems failure. In N. A., Stanton (Ed.), Advances in human aspects of transportation. AHFE 2017 (pp. 15–26). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
75. Kramer, L. J., Etherington, T. J., Last, M. C., Kennedy, K. D., & Bailey, R. E., (2017). Quantifying pilot contribution to flight safety during drive shaft failure. Paper presented at the 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), St. Petersburg, FL.
76. Lachter, J., Battiste, V., Matessa, M., Dao, Q. V., Koteskey, R., & Johnson, W. W., (2014). Toward single pilot operations: The impact of the loss of non-verbal communication on the flight deck. Proceedings of the international conference on human-computer interaction in aerospace. New York, NY: ACM.
77. Lachter, J., Brandt, S. L., Battiste, V., Ligda, S. V., Matessa, M., & Johnson, W. W., (2014). Toward single pilot operations: Developing a ground station. Proceedings of the international conference on human-computer interaction in aerospace. New York, NY: ACM.
78. Lachter, J., Brandt, S. L., Battiste, V., Matessa, M., & Johnson, W. W., (2017). Enhanced ground support: Lessons from work on reduced crew operations. Cognition, Technology & Work, 19(2–3), 279–288. doi:10.1007/s10111-017-0422-6
79. Laviv, O., & Speijker, L. J. P., (2007). SAFEE - Security of Aircraft in the Future European Environment. Amsterdam, Netherlands: National Aerospace Laboratory NLR.
80. Leveson, N. G., (2004). A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Safety Science, 42(4), 237–270. doi:10.1016/s0925-7535(03)00047-x
81. Leveson, N. G., (2011). Engineering a safer world: Systems thinking applied to safety. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
82. Ligda, S. V., Fischer, U., Mosier, K., Matessa, M., Battiste, V., & Johnson, W. W., (2015). Effectiveness of advanced collaboration tools on crew communication in reduced crew operations. In D., Harris (Ed.), Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics (pp. 416–427). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
83. Lim, Y., Bassien-Capsa, V., Ramasamy, S., Liu, J., & Sabatini, R., (2017). Commercial airline single-pilot operations: System design and pathways to certification. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 32(7), 4–21. doi:10.1109/maes.2017.160175
84. Lim, Y., Ramasamy, S., Gardi, A., & Sabatini, R., (2017). A virtual pilot assistant system for single pilot operations of commercial transport aircraft. In 17th Australian International Aerospace Congress: AIAC 2017 (pp. 139–145). Barton, A.C.T.: Engineers Australia, Royal Aeronautical Society.
85. Liu, H., Ma, X., Zhang, Y., Jin, Z., & Dong, D., (2017). A practice for the certification of minimum flight crew workload. In C., Stephanidis (Ed.), HCI international 2017–Posters’ extended abstracts (pp. 339–346). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
86. Liu, J., Gardi, A., Ramasamy, S., Lim, Y., & Sabatini, R., (2016). Cognitive pilot-aircraft interface for single-pilot operations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 112, 37–53. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2016.08.031
87. Lyons, J. B., Sadler, G. G., Koltai, K., Battiste, H., Ho, N. T., Hoffmann, L. C., … Shively, R., (2017). Shaping trust through transparent design: theoretical and experimental guidelines. In P., Savage-Knepshield & J., Chen (Eds.), Advances in human factors in robots and unmanned systems (pp. 127–136). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
88. Maiolo, L., Maita, F., Castiello, A., Minotti, A., & Pecora, A., (2017). Highly wearable wireless wristband for monitoring pilot cardiac activity and muscle fine movements. 2017 IEEE international workshop on metrology for aerospace (metroaerospace) (pp. 271–275). Padua, Italy: IEEE.
89. Malik, A., & Gollnick, V., (2016). Impact of reduced crew operations on airlines–Operational challenges and cost benefits. Paper presented at the 16th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Washington, DC.
90. Mallis, M. M., Maislin, G., Konowal, N., Bryne, V., Bierman, D., Davis, R., … Dinges, D. F., (2000). Biobehavioral responses to drowsy driving alarms and alerting stimuli (NHTSA Contractor Report). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
91. Mallis, M. M., Neri, D. F., Colletti, L. M., Oyung, R. L., Reduta, D. D., & Van Dongen, H. P., (2004). Feasibility of an automated drowsiness monitoring device on the flightdeck. Sleep, 27(Abstract Suppl.), A167–A168.
92. Matessa, M., Vu, K.-P. L., Strybel, T., Battiste, V., Schnell, T., & Cover, M., (2018). Using distributed simulation to investigate human-autonomy teaming. In S., Yamamoto & H., Mori (Eds.), Human Interface and the Management of Information. HIMI 2018 (pp. 541–550). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
93. Moehle, R., & Clauss, J., (2015). Wearable technologies as a path to single-pilot part 121 operations. SAE International Journal of Aerospace, 8(1), 81–88. doi:10.4271/2015-01-2440
94. Mouloua, M., Gilson, R., Daskarolis-Kring, E., Kring, J., & Hancock, P. A., (2001). Ergonomics of UAV/UCAV mission success: Considerations for data-link, control, and display issues. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 45(2), 144–148. doi:10.1177/154193120104500231
95. Munro, P., & Mogford, R., (2018). Managing variability: A cognitive ethnography of the work of airline dispatchers. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 62(1), 182–186. doi:10.1177/1541931218621043
96. National Transportation Safety Board. (2016). Aerodynamic stall and loss of control during approach: Embraer EMB-500, N100EQ, Gaithersburg, Maryland, December 8, 2014 (NTSB/AAR-16/01). Washington, DC.
97. Neis, S. M., Klingauf, U., & Schiefele, J., (2018). Classification and review of conceptual frameworks for commercial single pilot operations. Paper presented at the 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), London, UK.
98. Newman, D. G., (2014). Flying fast Jets: Human factors and performance limitations. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
99. Norman, M., (2007). Economic opportunities and technological challenges for reduced crew operations. Technical paper prepared for: Crew Vehicle Interface Element, NASA, Hampton, VA.
100. Oliveira, L. M. L., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., Mação, B. M., Nicolau, P. A., & Zhou, L., (2012). A WSN solution for light aircraft pilot health monitoring. Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) (pp. 119–124). Shanghai, China: IEEE.
101. Onken, R., & Schulte, A., (2010). System-Ergonomic design of cognitive automation (SCI, Vol. 235). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
102. Pleydell-Pearce, K., Dickinson, B., & Whitecross, S., (2000). Cognition monitor: A system for real time pilot state assessment. In P. T., McCabe, M. A., Hanson, & S. A., Robertson (Eds.), Contemporary ergonomics 2000 (pp. 65–69). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
103. Pritchett, A. R., Kim, S. Y., & Feigh, K. M., (2014a). Measuring human-automation function allocation. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 8(1), 52–77. doi:10.1177/1555343413490166
104. Pritchett, A. R., Kim, S. Y., & Feigh, K. M., (2014b). Modeling human–Automation function allocation. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 8(1), 33–51. doi:10.1177/1555343413490944
105. Ranter, H., (2019). Aviation Safety Network releases 2018 airliner accident statistics. Retrieved from https://news.aviation-safety.net/2019/01/01/aviation-safety-network-releases-2018-airliner-accident-statistics/
106. Reitsma, J., van Passen, R., & Mulder, M., (2019). Operational alerting concept for commercial single pilot operations systems Paper presented at the 20th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Dayton, OH.
107. Revell, K. M., Allison, C., Sears, R., & Stanton, N. A., (2019). Modelling distributed crewing in commercial aircraft with STAMP for a rapid decompression hazard. Ergonomics, 62(2), 156–170. doi:10.1080/00140139.2018.1514467
108. Revell, K. M., Allison, C., Stanton, N. A., & Sears, R., (2016). Modelling distributed crewing with STAMP. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aerospace. New York, NY: ACM.
109. Revell, K. M., Stanton, N. A., & Kelleher, G., (2016). Exploring changes in pilot behaviour during distributed crewing. Paper presented at the The Institute of Ergonomics and Human Factors Annual Conference, 19th–21st April, Daventry, UK.
110. Richards, T., (2012). ON-WINGS: ON Wing ice detection and monitoring system. Retrieved from http://cordis.europa.eu/docs/publications/1436/143672651-8_en.zip
111. Sadler, G., Battiste, H., Ho, N., Hoffmann, L., Lyons, J., Johnson, W., … Smith, D., (2016). Effects of transparency on pilot trust and agreement in the autonomous constrained flight planner. Paper presented at the 35th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), Piscataway, NJ.
112. Salmon, P. M., (2016). Bigger, bolder, better: Methodological issues in ergonomics science. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 17(4), 337–344. doi:10.1080/1463922x.2016.1156783
113. Salmon, P. M., Walker, G. H., Read, G. J. M., Goode, N., & Stanton, N. A., (2016). Fitting methods to paradigms: Are ergonomics methods fit for systems thinking? Ergonomics, 60(2), 194–205. doi:10.1080/00140139.2015.1103385
114. Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., Szalma, J. L., & Hancock, P. A., (2016). A meta-analysis of factors influencing the development of trust in automation. Human Factors, 58(3), 377–400. doi:10.1177/0018720816634228
115. Schmid, D., (2017). A workload-centered perspective on reduced crew operations in commercial aviation. Paper presented at the H-Workload 2017: The first international symposium on human mental workload, Dublin, Ireland.
116. Schmid, D., & Korn, B., (2017). A tripartite concept of a remote-copilot center for commercial single-pilot operations. Paper presented at the AIAA SciTech 2017 Forum, Grapevine, TX.
117. Schmid, D., & Korn, B., (2018). The operational issue of an airliner’s reduced-crew caused by data-link break-up to remote support. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 62, 71–75. doi:10.1177/1541931218621016
118. Schmid, D., Korn, B., & Stanton, N. A., (2019). Evaluating the reduced flight deck crew concept using cognitive work analysis and social network analysis: Comparing normal and data-link outage scenarios. Cognition, Technology & Work, 1–16. doi:10.1007/s10111-019-00548-5
119. Schmid, D., Korn, B., Wies, M., & Stanton, N. A., (2019). Managing a data-link failure of a single-piloted airliner during flight: A system-theoretic process analysis. Proceedings of the Human Factors And Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 63, 106–110. doi:10.1177/1071181319631001
120. Schmid, D., & Stanton, N. A., (2018). How are laser attacks encountered in commercial aviation? A hazard analysis based on systems theory. Safety Science, 110, 178–191. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.012
121. Schmid, D., & Stanton, N. A., (2019a). Considering single-piloted airliners for different flight durations: An issue of fatigue management. In N. A., Stanton (Ed.), Advances in human factors of transportation (pp. 683–694). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
122. Schmid, D., & Stanton, N. A., (2019b). A future airliner’s reduced-crew: Modelling pilot incapacitation and homicide-suicide with systems theory. Human-Intelligent Systems Integration, 1(1), 27–42. doi:10.1007/s42454-019-00001-y
123. Schmid, D., & Stanton, N. A., (2019c). The training of operators in single pilot operations: An initial system theoretic consideration. Paper presented at the 20th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Dayton, OH.
124. Schmid, D., Vollrath, M., & Stanton, N. A., (2018). The System Theoretic Accident Modelling and Process (STAMP) of medical pilot knock-out events: Pilot incapacitation and homicide-suicide. Safety Science, 110, 58–71. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.07.015
125. Schmitt, D.-R., Többen, H., & Philippens, H., (2010). Passivation of misused aircraft to protect passengers, airports and infrastructure. In I., Grant (Ed.), 27th congress of the international council of aeronautical sciences (pp. 1–3). Edinburgh, UK: Optimage.
126. Schutte, P. C., (2015). How to make the most of your human: Design considerations for single pilot operations. In D., Harris (Ed.), Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics (pp. 480–491). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
127. Schutte, P. C., (2017). Task analysis of two crew operations in the flight deck: Investigating the feasibility of using single pilot. Paper presented at the 19th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (ISAP), Dayton, OH.
128. Schutte, P. C., Goodrich, K. H., Cox, D. E., Jackson, E. B., Palmer, M. T., Pope, A. T., … Barry, J. S., (2007). The naturalistic flight deck system: An integrated system concept for improved single-pilot operations. Hampton, VA: NASA.
129. Serovy, R. M., & Sitter, C. J., (2017). US Grant Patent No. US9826941B1. Google Patents: Rockwell Collins Inc.
130. Shively, R. J., (2017). Human-Autonomy teaming in a flight following task. Paper presented at the NATO HFM-247, Leiden, Netherlands.
131. Shively, R. J., Lachter, J., Brandt, S. L., Matessa, M., Battiste, V., & Johnson, W. W., (2017). Why human-autonomy teaming? In C., Baldwin (Ed.), Advances in neuroergonomics and cognitive engineering. AHFE 2017 (pp. 3–11). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
132. Smith, P. J., Billings, C. E., Denning, R., McCoy, E., Gee, T., Van Horn, A., … Rodvold, M., (1996). Control by permission: A case study of cooperative problem solving in the interactions of airline dispatchers with ATCSCC. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 4(4), 229–247. doi:10.2514/atcq.4.4.229
133. Sprengart, S. M., Neis, S. M., & Schiefele, J., (2018). Role of the human operator in future commercial reduced crew operations. Paper presented at the 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), London, UK.
134. Stanton, N. A., & Baber, C., (2008). Modelling of alarm handling responses times: A case of the Ladbroke Grove rail accident in the UK. Ergonomics, 51(4), 423–440. doi:10.1080/00140130701695419
135. Stanton, N. A., Harris, D., & Starr, A., (2014). Modelling and analysis of single pilot operations in commercial aviation. Proceedings of the international conference on human-computer interaction in aerospace. New York, NY: ACM.
136. Stanton, N. A., Harris, D., & Starr, A., (2016). The future flight deck: Modelling dual, single and distributed crewing options. Applied Ergonomics, 53(Part B), 331–342. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.019
137. Stanton, N. A., Plant, K. L., Revell, K. M. A., Griffin, T. G. C., Moffat, S., & Stanton, M. J., (2017). Macrocognition in flight operations: Representing distributed teamworking in sociotechnical systems. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making, Bath, UK.
138. Stanton, N. A., Plant, K. L., Revell, K. M. A., Griffin, T. G. C., Moffat, S., & Stanton, M. J., (2019). Distributed cognition in aviation operations: A gate-to-gate study with implications for distributed crewing. Ergonomics, 62(2), 138–155. doi:10.1080/00140139.2018.1520917
139. Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., & Walker, G., (2018). Systems thinking in practice: Applications of the event analysis of systemic teamwork method. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
140. Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., Walker, G. H., & Jenkins, D. P., (Eds.). (2017). Cognitive work analysis: Applications, extensions and future directions. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
141. Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., Walker, G. H., Salas, E., & Hancock, P. A., (2017). State-of-science: Situation awareness in individuals, teams and systems. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 60(4), 449–466. doi:10.1080/00140139.2017.1278796
142. Stanton, N. A., & Young, M. S., (1999). What price ergonomics? Nature, 399, 197–198. doi:10.1038/20298
143. Stimpson, A. J., Ryan, J. C., & Cummings, M. L., (2016). Assessing pilot workload in single-pilot operations with advanced autonomy. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 60(1), 675–679. doi:10.1177/1541931213601155
144. Strybel, T., Keeler, J., Barakezyan, V., Alvarez, A., Mattoon, N., Vu, K.-P. L., & Battiste, V., (2018). Effectiveness of human autonomy teaming in cockpit applications. In S., Yamamoto & H., Mori (Eds.), Human Interface and the Management of Information. HIMI 2018 (pp. 465–476). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
145. Strybel, T., Keeler, J., Mattoon, N., Alvarez, A., Barakezyan, V., Barraza, E., … Battiste, V., (2017). Measuring the effectiveness of human autonomy teaming. In C., Baldwin (Ed.), Advances in neuroergonomics and cognitive engineering. AHFE 2017 (pp. 23–33). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
146. Taylor, R. M., (1990). Situational Awareness Rating Technique (SART): The development of a tool for aircrew design. Proceedings of the AGARD AMP symposium: situational awareness in aerospace operations (Vol. 478). Neuilly Sur Seine, France: NATO.
147. Taylor, R. M., Abdi, S., Dru-Drury, R., & Bonner, M., (2001). Cognitive cockpit systems: Information requirements analysis for pilot control of cockpit automation. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Edinburgh, Scotland: Aerospace and Transportation Systems.
148. Tran, T. H., Behrend, F., Fünning, N., & Arango, A., (2018). Single pilot operations with AR-Glasses using Microsoft HoloLens. Paper presented at the 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), London, UK.
149. Vu, K.-P. L., Lachter, J., Battiste, V., & Strybel, T., (2018). Single pilot operations in domestic commercial aviation. Human Factors, 60(6), 755–762. doi:10.1177/0018720818791372
150. Warm, J. S., Matthews, G., & Finomore, V. S., (2008). Vigilance, workload, and stress. In J. L., Szalma & P. A., Hancock (Eds.), Performance under stress (pp. 114–115). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
151. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K., (1994). Social network analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
152. Wilson, J., Harron, G., Lyall, B., Hoffa, B., & Jones, E., (2013). Understanding Single Pilot Operations (SPO) certification requirements. Moffet Field, CA: Research Integrations Incorporated prepared for NASA Langely Research Center.
153. Wolter, C. A., & Gore, B. F., (2015). A validated task analysis of the single pilot operations concept (NASA/TM—2015–218480). Moffett Field, CA: NASA.
154. Yong, Z., Zhang, R., & Joon Lim, T., (2016). Wireless communications with unmanned aerial vehicles: Opportunities and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 54(5), 36–42. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2016.7470933
155. Young, M. S., Brookhuis, K. A., Wickens, C. D., & Hancock, P. A., (2015). State of science: Mental workload in ergonomics. Ergonomics, 58(1), 1–17. doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.956151