Quantifying pilot contribution to flight safety for normal and non-normal airline operations

AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference - Proceedings

Volumn 2016-December, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Etherington, Timothy J ^a   Kramer, Lynda J ^b   Bailey, Randall E ^b   Kennedy, Kellie D ^b   Stephens, Chad L ^b  

^a Advanced Technology Center Inc   (United States)

^b NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

augmented crew; automation; automation surprise; aviation safety; crew complement; flight crew error; increasingly autonomous systems; single pilot operations

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT ACCIDENTS; AUTOMATION; AVIONICS; DIGITAL AVIONICS; FIGHTER AIRCRAFT; NASA; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

AUGMENTED CREW; AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS; AVIATION SAFETY; CREW COMPLEMENT; FLIGHT CREWS; PILOT OPERATIONS;

FLIGHT SIMULATORS;

EID: 85009433454     PISSN: 21557195     EISSN: 21557209     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/DASC.2016.7778094     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Li, G., Baker, S.P., Grabowski, J.G., and Rebok, G.W., "Factors Associated with Pilot Error in Aviation Crashes," Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 72, No. 1, January 2001.
2. Air Line Pilots Association, "Air Line Pilots Association White Paper on Unmanned Aircraft Systems," April 2011.
3. Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular: Aviation Safety Action Program, AC-120- 66B, Dated November, 2002.
4. Emergency and Abnormal Situations in Aviation Symposium, LOSA Data and Emergency and Abnormal Situations http://humanfactors.arc.nasa.gov/flightcognition/download/EAS-Symposium-Presentations/LOSA.pdf, June 10-11, 2003
5. NASA, "NASA Aeronautics Strategic Implementation Plan," [online database], URL: http://www.aeronautics.nasa.gov/pdf/armd-strategicimplementation- plan.pdf [cited June 2, 2016].
6. NASA ARMD/SASO URL: http://www.aeronautics.nasa.gov/aosp/sasop/index.ht ml
7. National Research Council (NRC). "Autonomy Research for Civil Aviation: Toward a New Era of Flight," Final Report from the "Committee on Autonomy Research for Civil Aviation," Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, 2014.
8. Roscoe, A.H., "Heart rate as a psychophysiological measure for in-flight workload assessment," Ergonomics, Volume 36, Issue 9, 1993, pp. 1055-1062
9. Hart, S.G. & Staveland, L.E., "Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research." In P.A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1988, pp. 139-183.
10. Moroney, W.F., Biers, D.W., Eggemeier, F.T., and Mitchell, J.A., "A Comparison Of Two Scoring Procedures With The NASA Task Load Index In A Simulated Flight Task" Proceedings of the IEEE 1992 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, Vol. 2, May 1992, pp. 734-740.
11. Ruggiero, F.T., and Fadden, D.M., "Pilot Subjective Evaluation: A Practical Supplement to Traditional Assessments of Workload." paper presented at the IEEE-SMC Conference, Seattle, WA, Oct 1982.
12. Kanki, B.G., Lozito, S., and Foushee, H.C., "Communication Indices of Crew Coordination" Aviation, Space and Environmental medicine, Vol. 60, Issue 1, pp. 56-60. Jan. 1989.
13. Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular: Crew Resource Management Training, AC- 120-51E, January 22, 2004.
14. Hindson, W.S., Eshow, M.M., and Schroeder, J.A., "A Pilot Rating Scale For Evaluating Failure Transients In Electronic Flight Control Systems, " paper presented at AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Portland, Oregon, AIAA Paper No. 1990-2827, Aug 1990.