How are laser attacks encountered in commercial aviation? A hazard analysis based on systems theory

Safety Science

Volumn 110, Issue , 2018, Pages 178-191

  Schmid, Daniela ^a   Stanton, Neville A ^b  

^a GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aviation; Laser illumination; STAMP; STPA; Systems theory

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT ACCIDENTS; AIRCRAFT DETECTION; AVIATION; CIVIL AVIATION; HAZARDS; STAMPING; SYSTEM THEORY;

HAZARD ANALYSIS; LASER ILLUMINATION; OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES; STPA; SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS;

LASER THEORY;

AIRCRAFT; AIRPLANE PILOT; ARTICLE; AVIATION; LASER SAFETY; LAW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION HAZARD; SYSTEMS THEORY;

EID: 85051952096     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.012     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Abdulkhaleq, A., Lammering, D., Wagner, S., Röder, J., Balbierer, N., Ramsauer, L., et al. A systematic approach based on STPA for developing a dependable architecture for fully automated driving vehicles. Procedia Eng. 179 (2017), 41–51, 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.094.
2. Aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft, 18 C.F.R. § 39A, 2012.
3. Air Accident Investigation Unit Ireland, 2016. Synoptic Report. Incident. Boeing 737-8AS, EI-FIH. Porto, Portugal. AAIU Report. Dublin, Ireland.
4. Airbus innovation, 2016. Safety and Security Innovations. In: Paper presented at the 22nd Flight Safety Conference, Bangkok, Thailand. Slides retrieved from https://www.icao.int/ESAF/Documents/meetings/2016/UN-Habitat-ICAO%20Experts%20Meeting%202016/Presentations/p_Flight_Development_Update_and_Innovation__The_Role_of_Innovation%20(5).pdf.
5. Allison, C.K., Revell, K.M., Sears, R., Stanton, N.A., Systems Theoretic Accident Model and Process (STAMP) safety modelling applied to an aircraft rapid decompression event. Saf. Sci. 98 (2017), 159–166.
6. Aps, R., Fetissov, M., Goerlandt, F., Kujala, P., Piel, A., Systems-theoretic process analysis of maritime traffic safety management in the Gulf of Finland (Baltic Sea). Procedia Eng. 179 (2017), 2–12, 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.090.
7. Aven, T., Risk Analysis. second ed., 2015, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, United Kingdom.
8. Bagschik, G., Stolte, T., Maurer, M., Safety analysis based on systems theory applied to an unmanned protective vehicle. Procedia Eng. 179 (2017), 61–71, 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.096.
9. Brandt, S.L., Lachter, J., Battiste, V., Johnson, W., Pilot situation awareness and its implications for single pilot operations: analysis of a human-in-the-loop study. Procedia Manuf. 3:Supplement C (2015), 3017–3024, 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.846.
10. Čepin, M., Event tree analysis. Čepin, M., (eds.) Assessment of Power System Reliability, 2011, Springer-Verlag, London, London, United Kingdom, 89–99.
11. Civil Air Navigation Services Organisation, Shedding light on laser attacks: A CANSO survey of Members has confirmed an evolving threat from laser attacks. What can be done?. Airsp.: J. Civ. Air Navig. Serv. Organ. 27:Quarter 4 (2014), 24–25.
12. Civil Aviation Authority, 2016. The Air Navigation Order 2016 and Regulations Civil Aviation Authority, London, UK.
13. Coles, W.A., Murphy, J.R., Melser, J.F., Tu, J.K., White, G.A., Kassabian, K.H., et al. A radio system for avoiding illuminating aircraft with a laser beam. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 124:911 (2012), 42–50.
14. Derenski, P.A., Reducing the threat of laser illuminations. Aero Quart. 10:37 (2010), 10–15.
15. Dunjóa, J., Fthenakis, V., Vílcheza, J.A., Arnaldosa, J., Hazard and operability (HAZOP) analysis. A literature review. J. Hazard. Mater. 53:1–3 (2010), 19–32, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.076.
16. Elias, B., 2005. Lasers Aimed at Aircraft Cockpits: Background and Possible Options to Address the Threat to Aviation Safety and Security (CRS Report for Congress RS22033). Retrieved from Fort Belvoir, VA, US: http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA444154.
17. Endsley, M.R., Kiris, E.O., The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Hum. Factors 37:2 (1995), 381–394, 10.1518/001872095779064555.
18. Eriksson, A., Stanton, N.A., Takeover time in highly automated vehicles: noncritical transitions to and from manual control. Hum. Factors 59:4 (2017), 689–705, 10.1177/0018720816685832.
19. Esler, D., The risk of laser attacks on pilots is real and growing: the strikes are frequent and dangerous, temporarily blinding flight crews. Bus. Commer. Aviat., 15(1), 2016.
20. Eurocontrol, 2016. Annual Safety Report 2016 (SRC Document 56). Retrieved from Bruessels, Belgium: https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/single-sky/src/src-docs/src-doc-56-e1.0.pdf.
21. Commission, European, Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012. Off. J. Eur. Union, 55(L 296), 2015, 296).
22. Federal Aviation Administration, 2001. Instrument Flying Handbook. U.S. Department of Transportation. Flight Standards Service. Skyhorse Publishing.
23. Federal Aviation Administration (Producer), 2009. Aircraft Laser Illumination: Awareness for the Aviation Community [Podcast]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTBxUPLZrhw.
24. Fleming, C.H., Leveson, N.G., Improving hazard analysis and certification of integrated modular avionics. J. Aerosp. Inf. Syst. 11:6 (2014), 397–411, 10.2514/1.i010164.
25. Flynn, P, 2017. Portugal asked to review laser laws after pilot blinded. Irish Examinaer.
26. Geymar, J.A.B., Ebecken, N.F.F., Fault-tree analysis: a knowledge-engineering approach. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 40:1 (1995), 37–45.
27. Goode, N., Salmon, P.M., Lenne, M.G., Hilliard, A., Systems thinking applied to safety during manual handling tasks in the transport and storage industry. Accid. Anal. Prevent. 68 (2014), 181–191, 10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.025.
28. Gosling, D.B., O'Hagan, J.B., Quhill, F.M., Blue laser induced retinal injury in a commercial pilot at 1300 ft. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform. 87:1 (2016), 69–70.
29. Grant, E., Salmon, P.M., Stevens, N., Goode, N., Read, G.J.M., Back to the future: what do accident causation models tell us about accident prediction?. Saf. Sci. 104 (2018), 99–109, 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.018.
30. Harris, D., A human-centred design agenda for the development of single crew operated commercial aircraft. Aircraft Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 79:5 (2007), 518–526, 10.1108/00022660710780650.
31. Hughes, B.P., Anund, A., Falkmer, T., System theory and safety models in Swedish, UK, Dutch and Australian road safety strategies. Accid. Anal. Prev. 74 (2015), 271–278 doi:101016/j.aap.2014.07.017.
32. International Civil Aviation Organization, 2003. Manual on Laser Emitters and Flight Safety. Doc 9815. International Civil Aviation Organization. Montréal, Canada.
33. International Civil Aviation Organization, Manual of Civil Aviation Medicine. 2012, Doc. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montréal, Canada.
34. International Civil Aviation Organization, Annex 11 – Air Traffic Services. 14th ed., 2016, International Organization of Civil Aviation, Montreal, Canada.
35. International Civil Aviation Organization, Annex 14 to the Convention of Civil Aviation: Aerodromes. Volume I – Aerodrome Design Operations. seventh ed., 2016, International Organization of Civil Aviation, Montreal, Canada.
36. International Civil Aviation Organization, Annex 17 to the Convention of Civil Aviation: Security. Safeguarding International Civil Aviation Against Acts of Unlawful Interference. 10th ed., 2017, International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Canada.
37. International Civil Aviation Organization, 2017. MID-Region: LASER Attacks Safety Guidelines (RSA-12). Retrieved from Cairo, Egypt: https://www.icao.int/MID/Documents/2017/RASG-MID6/RSA%2012-%20Revised-%20Laser%20Attacks%20Safety%20Guidelines.pdf.
38. International Electrotechnical Commission, Safety of laser products - Part 1: Equipment classification and requirements (IEC 60825–1:2014). 2014, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland.
39. International Laser Display Association, Skyzan (Version 6.0). 2017, International Laser Display Association, Orlando, FL, USA.
40. Ishimatsu, T., Leveson, N.G., Thomas, J.P., Fleming, C.H., Katahira, M., Miyamoto, Y., et al. Hazard analysis of complex spacecraft using systems-theoretic process analysis. J. Spacecraft Rockets 51:2 (2014), 509–522, 10.2514/1.a32449.
41. Johnson, W.W., Lachter, J., Feary, M., Comerford, D., Battiste, V., Mogford, R., Task allocation for single pilot operations: a role for the ground. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aerospace, 2012, ACM, New York, NY.
42. Kazaras, K., Kirytopoulos, K., Rentizelas, A., Introducing the STAMP method in road tunnel safety assessment. Saf. Sci. 50:9 (2012), 1806–1817, 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.04.013.
43. Kentek, 2018. EASY HAZ™ LSO Edition: Laser Hazard Analysis Software. Kentek, Pittsfield, NH, USA.
44. Kim, T.-E., Nazir, S., Øvergård, K.I., A STAMP-based causal analysis of the Korean Sewol ferry accident. Saf. Sci. 83 (2016), 93–101, 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.014.
45. Kogelbauer, I., 2016. A system-theoretic model of threat and error management in flight instruction. In: The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, pp. 241–248.
46. Koltz, M.T., Roberts, Z.S., Sweet, J., Battiste, H., Cunningham, J., Battiste, V., et al. An investigation of the harbor pilot concept for single pilot operations. Procedia Manuf. 3 (2015), 2937–2944, 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.948.
47. Lachter, J., Brandt, S.L., Battiste, V., Matessa, M., Johnson, W.W., Enhanced ground support: Lessons from work on reduced crew operations. Cogn. Technol. Work 19:2–3 (2017), 279–288, 10.1007/s10111-017-0422-6.
48. Lee, W.S., Grosh, D.L., Tillman, F.A., Lie, C.H., Fault tree analysis, methods, and applications: a review. IEEE Trans. Reliab. R-34:3 (1985), 194–203.
49. Leveson, N.G., A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Saf. Sci. 42:4 (2004), 237–270, 10.1016/s0925-7535(03)00047-x.
50. Leveson, N.G., Technical and managerial factors in the NASA challenger and Columbia losses: looking forward to the future. Kleinman, D.L., Cloud-Hansen, K.A., Matta, C., Handelsman, J., (eds.) Controversies in Science and Technology Volume 2: From Climate to Chromosomes, 2007, Mary Ann Liebert, New Rochelle, NY, US, 237–261.
51. Leveson, N.G., Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety. 2011, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
52. Leveson, N.G., Rasmussen's legacy: a paradigm change in engineering for safety. Appl. Ergon. 59 (2017), 581–591, 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.01.015.
53. Luftfahrt-Bundesamt LBA, 2017. Gemeldete betriebliche Ereignisse. from Luftfahrt-Bundesamt LBA http://www.lba.de/DE/Presse/Statistiken/Statistik_Ereignismeldungen.html?nn=700678.
54. Mahajan, H.S., Bradley, T., Pasricha, S., Application of systems theoretic process analysis to a lane keeping assist system. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 167 (2017), 177–183, 10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.037.
55. Margot, J., 2012. Government crackdown on misuse of laser pointers [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-crackdown-on-misuse-of-laser-pointers.
56. Murphy, P., Lasers and Aviation Safety. Retrieved from, 2009, International Laser Display Association, Orlando, FL, USA.
57. Murphy, P., 2018. Laser hazard distance calculator. Retrieved from http://www.laserpointersafety.com/calculator.html.
58. Nakagawara, V.B., Montgomery, R.W., Laser Pointers: Their Potential Affects on Vision and Aviation Safety. (DOT/FAA/AM-01/7). 2001, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington DC, USA.
59. Nakagawara, V.B., Montgomery, R.W., Dillard, A.E., McLin, L.N., Connor, C.W., The Effects of Laser Illumination on Operational and Visual Performance of Pilots Conducting Terminal Operations. (DOT/FAA/AM-03/12). 2003, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington DC, USA.
60. Nakagawara, V.B., Montgomery, R.W., Wood, K.J., Aircraft accidents and incidents associated with visual effects from bright light exposures during low-light flight operations. Optometry – J. Am. Optom. Assoc. 78:8 (2007), 415–420, 10.1016/j.optm.2006.11.016.
61. Nakagawara, V.B., Montgomery, R.W., Wood, K.J., The Illumination of Aircraft at Altitude by Laser Beams: A 5-Year Study Period (2004–2008). (DOT/FAA/AM-10/21). 2010, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington DC, USA.
62. Nakagawara, V.B., Montgomery, R.W., Wood, K.J., Laser Illumination of Flight Crew Personnel by Month, Day of Week, and Time of Day for a 5-Year Study Period: 2004-2008. (DOT/FAA/AM-11/7). 2011, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington DC, USA.
63. Nakagawara, V.B., Wood, K.J., Montgomery, R.W., A Review of Recent Laser Illumination Events in the Aviation Environment. (DOT/FAA/AM-06/23). 2006, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington DC, USA.
64. Nakagawara, V.B., Wood, K.J., Montgomery, R.W., Laser exposure incidents: Pilot ocular health and aviation safety issues. Optometry – J. Am. Optom. Assoc. 79:9 (2008), 518–524, 10.1016/j.optm.2007.08.022.
65. Newnam, S., Goode, N., Do not blame the driver: a systems analysis of the causes of road freight crashes. Accid. Anal. Prev. 76 (2015), 141–151, 10.1016/j.aap.2015.01.016.
66. Ouyang, M., Hong, L., Yu, M.-H., Fei, Q., STAMP-based analysis on the railway accident and accident spreading: taking the China-Jiaoji railway accident for example. Saf. Sci. 48:5 (2010), 544–555, 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.01.002.
67. Oxford Aviation Academy, Air Law. fourth ed., 2008, Oxford Aviation Academy (UK), Shoreham, UK.
68. Palakkamanil, M.M., Fielden, M.P., Effects of malicious ocular laser exposure in commercial airline pilots. Can. J. Ophthalmol./Journal Canadien d'Ophtalmologie 50:6 (2015), 429–432, 10.1016/j.jcjo.2015.09.002.
69. Pierre, S.M., 2017. The Effects of Laser Eye Protection on Color Recognition and Discrimination. (Master Thesis), Florida Institute of Technology, Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11141/1399.
70. Plioutsias, A., Karanikas, N., Using STPA in the evaluation of fighter pilots training programs. Procedia Eng. 128 (2015), 25–34, 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.501.
71. Plioutsias, A., Karanikas, N., Chatzimichailidou, M.M., Hazard analysis and safety requirements for small drone operations: to what extent do popular drones embed safety?. Risk Anal., 1–23, 2017, 10.1111/risa.12867.
72. Rahmer, G., Lefebvre, M., Christou, J.C., Aircraft avoidance for laser propagation at the Large Binocular Telescope Observatory: life under a busy airspace. Proceedings of SPIE: Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems, vol. 9910(VI), 2016, 1–10, 10.1117/12.2231909.
73. Rash, C.E., Manning, S.D., Laser-light displays, laser pointers disrupt crewmember vision. Hum. Factors Aviat. Med. 48:6 (2001), 1–8.
74. Rasmussen, J., Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf. Sci. 27:2–3 (1997), 183–213, 10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00052-0.
75. Revell, K., Stanton, N.A., Models of models: Filtering and bias rings in depiction of knowledge structures and their implications for design. Ergonomics 55:9 (2012), 1073–1092, 10.1080/00140139.2012.692818.
76. Revell, K., Stanton, N.A., Mental Models: Design of User Interaction and Interfaces for Domestic Energy Systems. 2017, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
77. Rokseth, B., Utne, I.B., Vinnem, J.E., A systems approach to risk analysis of maritime operations. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part O: J. Risk Reliab. 231:I (2016), 53–68, 10.1177/1748006X16682606.
78. Rokseth, B., Utne, I.B., Vinnem, J.E., Deriving verification objectives and scenarios for maritime systems using the systems-theoretic process analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 169 (2018), 18–31, 10.1016/j.ress.2017.07.015.
79. SAE International, 2009. Unauthorized Laser Illuminations: Pilot Operational Procedures (SAE ARP 5598). SAE International.
80. Salmon, P.M., Read, G.J.M., Stevens, N.J., Who is in control of road safety? A STAMP control structure analysis of the road transport system in Queensland, Australia. Accid. Anal. Prev. 96 (2016), 140–151, 10.1016/j.aap.2016.05.025.
81. Santos-Reyes, J., Beard, A.N., A systemic analysis of the Edge Hill railway accident. Acc. Anal. Prevent. 41 (2015), 1133–1144, 10.1016/j.aap.2008.05.004.
82. Schmid, D., & Korn, B., 2017. A tripartite concept of a remote-copilot center for commercial single-pilot operations. In: Paper Presented at the AIAA SciTech 2017 Forum, Grapevine, Texas, USA.
83. Siegel, A.W., Schraagen, J.M.C., Beyond procedures: team reflection in a rail control centre to enhance resilience. Saf. Sci. 91 (2017), 181–191, 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.013.
84. Stanton, N.A., Baber, C., Error by design: methods for predicting device usability. Des. Stud. 23:4 (2002), 363–384, 10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00032-1.
85. Stanton, N.A., Harris, D., Starr, A., The future flight deck: modelling dual, single and distributed crewing options. Appl. Ergon. 53:Part B (2016), 331–342, 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.019.
86. Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P., Harris, D., Marshall, A., Demagalski, J., Young, M.S., et al. Predicting pilot error: Testing a new methodology and a multi-methods and analysts approach. Appl. Ergon. 40:3 (2009), 464–471, 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.10.005.
87. Stanton, N.A., Stevenage, S.V., Learning to predict human error: issues of acceptability, reliability and validity. Ergonomics 41:11 (1998), 1737–1756, 10.1080/001401398186162.
88. Stastny, P., Griffith, P.S., 2001. Outdoor Laser Operations in the Navigable Airspace (SRC DOC 7). Retrieved from Bruessels, Belgium: https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/article/content/documents/single-sky/src/src-docs/src-doc-7-e1.0.pdf.
89. Stewart, J., Laser Hazard Distance (Version 1.0.1). Retrieved from, 2011, LVR Limited, Shropshire, UK.
90. Stomski, P.J., Goodrich, B., Shimko, S., Strategy for laser guide star operations without human aircraft spotters. Proc. SPIE: Adapt. Opt. Syst. 7015 (2008), 1–11, 10.1117/12.790274.
91. Stomski, P.J., Murphy, T.W., Campbell, R., Recent developments in aircraft protection systems for laser guide star operations. Proc. SPIE: Adapt. Opt. Syst. 8447:III (2012), 1–12.
92. Tagesschau, 2017. Dutzende Piloten von Laserpointern geblendet. Tagesschau. Retrieved from https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/piloten-laser-101.html.
93. Talhofer, V., Baláž T., Racek, F., Hofmann, A., Hošková-Mayerová Š., Simulation of laser attacks against aircrafts. Gensel, J., Josselin, D., Vandenbroucke, D., (eds.) Bridging the Geographic Information Sciences: International AGILE’2012 Conference, Avignon (France), April, 24–27, 2012, 2012, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 215–229.
94. Underwood, P., Waterson, P., Systemic accident analysis: Examining the gap between research and practice. Accid. Anal. Prev. 55 (2013), 154–164, 10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.041.
95. Underwood, P., Waterson, P., Systems thinking, the Swiss Cheese Model and accident analysis: a comparative systemic analysis of the Grayrigg train derailment using the ATSB, AcciMap and STAMP models. Accid. Anal. Prev. 68 (2014), 75–94, 10.1016/j.aap.2013.07.027.
96. Vu, K., Lachter, J., Battiste, V., Strybel, T., Single pilot operations in domestic commercial aviation. Hum. Factors, 2018, 10.1177/0018720818791372.
97. Warwick, G., 2017. Retrofittable Cockpit Laser Protection Backed By Airbus. Aviation Daily. Retrieved from http://aviationweek.com/awincommercial/retrofittable-cockpit-laser-protection-backed-airbus.
98. Waterson, P., Jenkins, D.P., Salmon, P.M., Underwood, P., Remixing Rasmussen’: the evolution of Accimaps within systemic accident analysis. Appl. Ergonom. 59:Part B (2017), 483–503, 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.10.003.
99. Wright, P., Scott, R.A.H., Optics and Vision. Gradwell, D.P., Rainford, D.J., (eds.) Ernsting's Aviation and Space Medicine, 5 ed., 2016, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 263–280.
100. Young, K.L., Salmon, P.M., Sharing the responsibility for driver distraction across road transport systems: a systems approach to the management of distracted driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 74 (2015), 350–359, 10.1016/j.aap.2014.03.017.