How to make the most of your human: Design considerations for single pilot operations

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 9174, Issue , 2015, Pages 480-491

  Schutte, Paul C ^a  

^a NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Autoflight; Automation; Aviation; Flight crew; Function allocation; Human error; Safety

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; AUTOMATION; AVIATION; ERGONOMICS; ERRORS; SAFETY ENGINEERING;

AUTOFLIGHT; AVIATION SAFETY; DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS; FLIGHT CREWS; FUNCTION ALLOCATIONS; HUMAN ERRORS; PILOT OPERATIONS; PILOT PERFORMANCE;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 84947222140     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20373-7_46     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accidents Worldwide Operations 1959–2013. Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Seattle, WA (2014)
2. Kanki, B., Helmreich, R., Anca, J. (eds.): Crew Resource Management. Academic Press, San Diego (2010)
3. Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accidents Worldwide Operations 1959–2004. Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Seattle, WA (2005)
4. Sarter, N.B., Woods, D.D.: How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 37(1), 5–19 (1995)
5. Parasuraman, R., Riley, V.: Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 39(2), 230–253 (1997)
6. Sarter, N.B., Woods, D.D., Billings, C.E.: Automation surprises. Handb. Hum. Factors Ergon. 2, 1926–1943 (1997)
7. Skitka, L.J., Mosier, K., Burdick, M.D.: Accountability and automation bias. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 52(4), 701–717 (2000)
8. Aviation Safety Network. http://aviation-safety.net/statistics/period/stats.php?cat=A1
9. Pope, A.: An Essay on Criticism. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1909)
10. Williard, N., et al.: Lessons learned from the 787 Dreamliner issue on lithium-ion battery reliability. Energies 6(9), 4682–4695 (2013)
11. http://www.b737.org.uk/fmc_u108.htm
12. Bhana, H.: Trust but verify. AeroSafety World 5(5), 13–14 (2010)
13. http://aviation.about.com/od/Pilot-Training/tp/7-Reasons-You-Shouldnt-Become-a-Pilot.htm
14. Jordan, N.: Allocation of functions between man and machines in automated systems. J. Appl. Psychol. 47(3), 161 (1963)
15. Yerkes, R.M., Dodson, J.D.: The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habitformation. J. Comp. Neurol. Psychol. 18(5), 459–482 (1908)
16. Broadhurst, P.L.: A confirmation of the Yerkes-Dodson law and its relationship to emotionality in the rat. Acta Psychol. 15, 603–604 (1959)
17. Anderson, K.J.: Impulsitivity, caffeine, and task difficulty: a within-subjects test of the Yerkes-Dodson law. Pers. Individ. Differ. 16(6), 813–829 (1994)
18. Casner, S.M., Geven, R.W., Williams, K.T.: The effectiveness of airline pilot training for abnormal events. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. (2012). doi:10.1177/0018720812466893
19. Funk, K., et al.: Flight deck automation issues. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 9(2), 109–123 (1999)
20. Parasuraman, R., Mouloua, M., Molloy, R., Hilburn, B.: Monitoring of automated systems. In: Parasuraman, R., Mouloua, M. (eds.) Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications Mahwah, pp. 91–116. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ (1996)
21. Dismukes, R.K., Young, G.E., Sumwalt, R.L.: Cockpit interruptions and distractions: effective management requires a careful balancing act. ASRS Directline 10, 4–9 (1998)
22. Billings, C.E.: Human-centered aviation automation: principles and guidelines (1996)
23. Reason, J.: Human error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)
24. Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses: Final report on the accident on 1st June 2009 to the Airbus A330-203 registered F-GZCP operated by Air France flight AF 447 Rio de Janeiro–Paris. Ministère de l’Écologie. du Dévéloppement durable, des Transports et du Logement, Paris (2012)
25. National Transportation Safety Board. Loss of Control on Approach, Colgan Air, Inc. Operating as Continental Connection Flight 3407 Bombardier DHC-8-400, N200WQ, Clarence Center, New York, February 12, 2009. NTSB/AAR-10/01. National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC (2010)
26. Wiener, E.L.: Human factors of advanced technology (glass cockpit) transport aircraft (1989)
27. Wiener, E.L.: Cockpit automation. In: Wiener, E.L., Nagel, D.C. (eds.) Human Factors in Aviation, pp. 433–461. Academic Press, San Diego (1988)
28. Woods, D.D.: Decomposing automation: apparent simplicity, real complexity. Autom. Hum. Perform. Theory Appl. 3–17 (1996)
29. Comerford, D., et al.: NASA’s Single-Pilot Operations Technical Interchange Meeting: Proceedings and Findings. (Report no. NASA-CP-2013-216513). NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA (2013)
30. Schutte, P.: 2015 task analysis of two crew operations in the flight deck: investigating the feasibility of using single pilot in part 121 operations (in press)
31. Lachter, J., et al.: Toward single pilot operations: the impact of the loss of non-verbal communication on the flight deck. In: Paper Presented at the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aerospace, Santa Clara, CA (2014)
32. Lachter, J., et al.: Toward single pilot operations: developing a ground station. In: Paper presented at the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aerospace, Santa Clara, CA (2014)
33. Lowy, J.: Automation in the sky dulls airline-pilot skill, Daily News Los Angeles. http://www.dailynews.com/business/ci_18792474. Accessed 31 August 2011
34. Schutte, P.: Complemation: an alternative to automation. J. Inf. Technol. Impact 1(3), 113–118 (1999)