Enhanced ground support: lessons from work on reduced crew operations

Cognition, Technology and Work

Volumn 19, Issue 2-3, 2017, Pages 279-288

  Lachter, Joel ^a   Brandt, Summer L ^b   Battiste, Vernol ^b   Matessa, Michael ^c   Johnson, Walter W ^a  

^a NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ROCKWELL COLLINS   (United States)

Author keywords

Dispatch station; Ground station; Reduced crew operations (RCO); Single pilot operations (SPO)

Indexed keywords

NASA;

AMES RESEARCH CENTERS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; DISPATCH STATION; GROUND STATIONS; HUMAN-IN-THE-LOOP SIMULATIONS; PILOT OPERATIONS; REDUCED CREW OPERATIONS (RCO); TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS;

FIGHTER AIRCRAFT;

EID: 85021935409     PISSN: 14355558     EISSN: 14355566     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10111-017-0422-6     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Adams C (2013) Integrating UAS in the NAS. Avionics Today. http://www.aviationtoday.com/av/military/Integrating-UAS-in-the-NAS_79730.html#.VMl1tlqBNYA. Accessed 24 May 2016
2. Brandt SL, Lachter J, Battiste V, Johnson WW (2015) Pilot situation awareness and its implications for single pilot operations: analysis of a human-in-the-loop study. Procedia Manuf 3:3017–3024
3. Chen FS, Minson JA, Schöne M, Heinrichs M (2013) In the eye of the beholder: eye contact increases resistance to persuasion. Psychol Sci 24:2254–2261
4. Comerford D, Brandt SL, Lachter J, Wu SC, Mogford R, Battiste V, Johnson WW (2012) NASA’s single pilot operations technical interchange meeting: proceedings and findings. In: NASA-CP-2013-216513. NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field
5. George F (2012) ‘Flying’ the Centaur optionally piloted aircraft. Aviation Week. http://aviationweek.com/awin/flying-centaur-optionally-piloted-aircraft. Accessed 24 May 2016
6. Granada S, Dao AQ, Wong D, Johnson WW, Battiste V (2005) Development and integration of a human-centered volumetric cockpit situation display for distributed air-ground operations. In: Proceedings of the 12th international symposium on aviation psychology, pp 229–284
7. Helmreich RL, Merritt AC, Wilhelm JA (1999) The evolution of crew resource management training in commercial aviation. Int J Aviat Psychol 9:19–32
8. Koltz MT, Roberts ZS, Sweet J, Battiste H, Cunningham J, Battiste V, Vu KPL, Strybel TZ (2015) An investigation of the harbor pilot concept for single pilot operations. Procedia Manuf 3:2937–2944
9. Lachter J, Battiste V, Matessa M, Dao QV, Koteskey R, Johnson WW (2014a) Toward single pilot operations: the impact of the loss of non-verbal communication on the flight deck. In: Proceedings of the international conference on human–computer interaction in aerospace Article No. 29, HCI-Aero ′14, Santa Clara, California — July 30 - August 01, 2014. ACM, New York, NY
10. Lachter J, Brandt SL, Battiste V, Ligda S, Matessa M, Johnson WW (2014b) Toward single pilot operations: developing a ground station. In: Proceedings of the international conference on human–computer interaction in aerospace Article No. 19, HCI-Aero '14, Santa Clara, California — July 30 - August 01, 2014, ACM, New York, NY
11. Ligda SV, Fischer U, Mosier K, Matessa M, Battiste V, Johnson WW (2015) Effectiveness of advanced collaboration tools on crew communication in reduced crew operations. In: International conference on engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics, pp 416–427
12. Lyons JB, Sadler GG, Koltai K, Battiste H, Ho NT, Hoffmann LC, Smith D, Johnson W, Shively R (2016) Shaping trust through transparent design: theoretical and experimental guidelines. In: Proceedings of the 7th annual international conference on applied human factors and ergonomics, Orlando, Florida
13. Maurino D (2005) Threat and error management (TEM) In: Canadian Aviation Safety Seminar (CASS), British Columbia. http://flightsafety.org/archives-and-resources/threat-and-error-management-tem. Accessed 24 May 2016
14. McKinney EH, Barker JR, Davis KJ, Smith D (2005) How swift starting action teams get off the ground: what United flight 232 and airline flight crews can tell us about team communication. Manag Commun Q 19:198–237
15. Meuleau N, Plaunt C, Smith D, Smith T (2009) An emergency landing planner for damaged aircraft. In: International conference on automated planning and scheduling, Australia
16. Meuleau N, Neukom C, Plaunt C, Smith D, Smith T (2011) The emergency landing planner experiment. In: 21st international conference on automated planning and scheduling, Germany
17. “Minimum operational performance standards for unmanned aircraft systems” (2015) RTCA Digest, p 10
18. Nakamura D, Royce W (2008) Operational benefits of performance-based navigation. Aero. http://www.boeing.com/commercial/aeromagazine/articles/qtr_2_08/article_03_1.html. Accessed 24 May 2016
19. Noland D (2007) 10 plane crashes that changed aviation. Popular Mechanics. http://www.popularmechanics.com/flight/g73/10-airplane-crashes-that-changed-aviation/#slide-1. Accessed 24 May 2016
20. Patterson T (2015) Remote-controlled passenger flights 5 years away, CEO says. CNN. http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/26/travel/remote-controlled-passenger-airplane/. Accessed 24 May 2016
21. Prinzel LJ, Kramer LJ (2006) Synthetic vision systems. In: Karwowski W (ed) International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors. Taylor & Francis, Pennsylvania, pp 25-1–25-10
22. Reigler P (2013) Lessons learnt from the crash of eastern 401. Frequent Business Traveler. http://www.frequentbusinesstraveler.com/2013/12/lessons-learnt-from-the-crash-of-eastern-401/. Accessed 24 May 2016
23. Russell-Smith HP (1979) A simulator study of the interaction of pilot workload with errors, vigilance, and decisions. In: NASA-TM-78482. NASA Ames Research Center, Washington, DC
24. Sadler G, Battiste H, Johnson W, Ho N, Lyons J, Hoffmann L, Smith D, Shively R (2016) Effects of transparency on pilot trust and acceptance in the autonomous constraints flight planner. In: Proceedings of the 35th annual digital avionics systems conference, Sacramento, California
25. Wichman H (1970) Effects of isolation and communication on cooperation in a two-person game. J Pers Soc Psychol 16:114–120
26. Williams E (1977) Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: a review. Psychol Bull 84:963–976