The use of operational event sequence diagrams and work domain analysis techniques for the specification of the crewing configuration of a single-pilot commercial aircraft

Cognition, Technology and Work

Volumn 19, Issue 2-3, 2017, Pages 289-302

  Huddlestone, John ^a   Sears, Rod ^a   Harris, Don ^a  

^a Faculty of Engineering and Computing   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Allocation of function; Flight deck design; Operational event sequence diagrams; Reduced crewing; Work domain analysis

Indexed keywords

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; TAXICABS;

AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURERS; EVENT SEQUENCE DIAGRAMS; FLIGHT DECK DESIGN; MONITORING ACTIVITIES; OPERATIONAL ARCHITECTURE; REDUCED CREWING; SUPPORTING TECHNOLOGY; WORK DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

FIGHTER AIRCRAFT;

EID: 85026919426     PISSN: 14355558     EISSN: 14355566     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10111-017-0423-5     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Across project http://www.across-fp7.eu/
2. Allison CK, Revell KM, Sears R, Stanton NA (Under Review) Systems theoretic accident model and process (STAMP) safety modelling applied to an aircraft rapid decompression event. Saf Sci
3. Aviation Week and Space Technology (2015) NASA advances single-pilot operations concepts: ‘Super dispatcher’ fills in for a dozen first officers in NASA studies. Aviation Week and Space Technology, Jan 12, 2015. Retrieved from http://aviationweek.com/technology/nasa-advances-single-pilot-operations-concepts. 16 Nov 2016
4. Bilimoria KD, Johnson WW, Schutte PC (2014) Conceptual framework for single pilot operations. (2014). In: Proceedings of international conference on human-computer interaction in aerospace (HCI-Aero 2014), July 30–August 1, 2014. Santa Clara, California, USA
5. Boeing Aircraft Company (2006) Boeing 757 flight crew training manual, October 31, 2006. (Author: Seattle WA)
6. Bonner M, Taylor R, Fletcher K, Miller C (2000) Adaptive automation and decision aiding in the military fast jet domain. In: Kaber DB, Endsley MR (eds) Human performance, situation awareness and automation: user-centred design for the new millenium. Omnipress, Madison, WI, pp 154–159
7. Carayon P, Kianfar S, Li Y, Xie A, Alyousef B, Wooldridge A (2015) A systematic review of mixed methods research on human factors and ergonomics in health care. Appl Ergon 51:291–321
8. Carsten O, Lai FCH, Barnard Y, Jamson AH, Merat N (2012) Control task substitution in semi-automated driving: does it matter what aspects are automated? Hum Factors 54:747–761
9. Challenger R, Clegg CW, Shepherd C (2013) Function allocation in complex systems: reframing an old problem. Ergonomics 56:1051–1069
10. Civil Aviation Authority (2013) Monitoring Matters, guidance on the development of pilot monitoring skills. CAA Paper 2013/02. London: Civil Aviation Authority
11. Civil Aviation Authority (2015) Unmanned Aircraft System Operations in UK Airspace – Guidance (6th Edition). CAP 722. London: Civil Aviation Authority
12. Comerford D, Brandt SL, Lachter J, Wu S-C., Mogford R, Battiste V, Johnson WL (2013) NASA’s single pilot operations technical interchange meeting: proceedings and findings (NASA/CP-2013-216513). (Moffett Field, CA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Center)
13. Corbridge C, Cook CA (1997) The role of function allocation in the design of future naval systems In: Fallon E, Bannon L, McCarthy J (eds) ALLFN’97 revisiting the allocation of function issue: proceedings of the 1st international conference on allocation of functions, vol 1. IEA Press, Louisville, KY, pp 73–88
14. Croft J (2015) NASA advances single-pilot operations concepts. Aviation Week & Space Technology. 12 http://aviationweek.com/technology/nasa-advances-single-pilotoperations-concepts. Accessed 20 Sept 2016
15. Dearden A, Harrison M, Wright P (2000) Allocation of function: scenarios, context and the economics of effort. Int J Hum Comput Stud 52:289–318
16. Deutch S, Pew RW (2005) Single pilot commercial aircraft operation (BBN report No. 8436). Cambridge, MA: BBN Technologies
17. EASA (2011) European action plan for the prevention of runway incursions edition 2.0 (EASA, Cologne)
18. EasyJet PLC (2013) Annual report and accounts 2013, http://corporate.easyjet.com/~/media/Files/E/Easyjet-Plc-V2/pdf/investors/result-center-investor/annual-report-2013.pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2016
19. Fuld RB (2000) The fiction of function allocation, revisited. Int J Hum Comput Stud 52:217–233
20. Harris D (2007) A human-centred design agenda for the development of a single crew operated commercial aircraft. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 79:518–526
21. Harris D, Stanton NA, Starr A (2015) Spot the difference: operational event sequence diagrams as a formal method for work allocation in the development of single pilot operations for commercial aircraft. Ergonomics 58(11):1773–1791
22. Huddlestone J (2015) Future flight deck concept of operation and operational scenarios (Deliverable D1.2), Future Flight Deck, Aerospace Growth Partnership
23. Jenkins DP, Stanton NA, Walker GH, Salmon PM (2009) Cognitive work analysis: coping with complexity. Ashgate, Aldershot
24. Keinrath C, Vašek J, Dorneich M (2010) A cognitive adaptive man-machine Interface for future Flight Decks. In: Droog A, Heese M (eds) Performance, safety and well-being in aviation proceedings of the 29th conference of the european association for aviation psychology, European Association of Aviation Psychology, Budapest, Hungary 20–24 Sep 2010
25. Kirwan B, Ainsworth LK (1992) A guide to task analysis. Taylor and Francis, London
26. Kurke MI (1961) Operation sequence diagrams in system design. Hum Factors 3:66–73
27. Lachter J, Brandt SL, Battiste V (2014) Toward single pilot operations: developing a ground station. In: Proceedings of international conference on human-computer interaction in aerospace (HCI-Aero 2014), July 30–August 1, 2014. Santa Clara, California, USA
28. Leveson N (2004) A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Saf Sci 42:237–270
29. Leveson N (2011) Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to safety. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
30. McIlroy RC, Stanton NA (2011) Getting past first base: going all the way with cognitive work analysis. Appl Ergon 42:358–370
31. Naikar N (2006) Beyond interface design: further applications of cognitive work analysis. Int J Ind Ergon 36:423–438
32. Norman RM (2013) Economic opportunities and technical challenges for reduced crew operations. In: Comerford D, Brandt SL, Lachter J, Wu S-C, Mogford R, Battiste V, Johnson WL (eds) NASA’s single pilot operations technical interchange meeting: proceedings and findings (NASA/CP-2013-216513), (Moffett Field, CA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Center), pp 31–35
33. Onken R (1994) Human-centred cockpit design through the knowledge-based cockpit assistant system CASSY. NATO DRG panel 8 workshop on improving function allocation for integrated system design. (TNO Institute for Perception, Soesterberg, NL)
34. Onken R (1997) Functional development and field test of CASSY—a knowledge based cockpit assistant system, knowledge-based functions in aerospace systems, AGARD lecture series 200, (AGARD, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France)
35. Rasmussen J, Pejtersen A, Goodstein LP (1994) Cognitive systems engineering. Wiley, New York
36. Ryanair (2009) Full year results, 2009. http://www.ryanair.com/doc/investor/2009/q4_2009_doc.pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2017
37. Sanders MS, McCormick EJ (1993) Human factors in engineering and design. McGraw-Hill Publications, New York, NY
38. Schulte A, Meitinger C (2009) Cognitive and cooperative automation for manned-unmanned teaming missions. In: Advanced automation issues for supervisory control in manned-unmanned teaming missions. NATO Research and Technology Organization, EN-SCI-208. (NATO/OTAN: Neuilly-sur-Seine)
39. Schulte A, Meitinger C (2010) Measuring self-adaptive UAV operators’ load-shedding strategies under high workload. In: Harris D (ed) Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics. Springer, Berlin, pp 342–351
40. Schulte A, Meitinger C (2012) Introducing cognitive and co-operative automation into uav guidance work systems. In: Jentsch F, Barnes MM (eds) Human-robot interactions in future military operations. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 145–170
41. Schulte A, Stütz P (2001) Cognitive concepts in mission management for air-to-ground attack aircraft. In: Harris D (ed) Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics, vol 5. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 23–30
42. Stanton NA, Salmon P, Harris D, Marshall A, Demagalski JM, Young MS, Waldmann T, Dekker SWA (2009) Predicting pilot error: testing a new methodology and a multi-methods and analysts approach. Appl Ergon 40(3):464–471
43. Stanton NA, Sorensen LJ, Banks AP (2011) Back to SA school: contrasting three approaches to situation awareness in the cockpit. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 12:451–471
44. Stanton NA, Salmon PM, Rafferty LA, Walker GH, Baber C, Jenkins DP (2013) Human factors methods: a practical guide for engineering and design, 2nd edn. Ashgate, Aldershot
45. Stanton NA, Harris D, Starr A (2014) Modelling and analysis of single pilot operations in commercial aviation. In: Proceedings of HCI Aero 2014, 30 July–1 August, 2014, Santa Clara, CA, USA
46. Stanton NA, Harris D, Starr A (2016) The future flight deck: modelling dual, single and distributed crewing options. Appl Ergon 53:331–342
47. Stütz P, Schulte A (2001) Evaluation of the cockpit assistant military aircraft (CAMA) in flight trials. In: Harris D (ed) Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics, vol 5. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 15–22
48. Taylor RM, Howells H, Watson D (2000) The cognitive cockpit: operational requirement and technical challenge. In: McCabe PT, Hanson MA, Robertson SA (eds) Contemporary ergonomics 2000. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 55–59
49. Vicente KJ (1999) Cognitive work analysis: toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ