Why human-autonomy teaming?

Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

Volumn 586, Issue , 2018, Pages 3-11

  Shively, R Jay ^a   Lachter, Joel ^a   Brandt, Summer L ^b   Matessa, Michael ^c   Battiste, Vernol ^b   Johnson, Walter W ^a  

^a NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ROCKWELL COLLINS   (United States)

Author keywords

Automation; Human factors; Human autonomy teaming

Indexed keywords

HUMAN ENGINEERING; TRANSPARENCY;

AUTOMATED FUNCTIONS; BI-DIRECTIONAL COMMUNICATION; HUMAN OVERSIGHT; HUMAN-AUTONOMY TEAMING;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 85021811386     PISSN: 21945357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-60642-2_1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. The Observer. http://observer.com/2015/08/stephen-hawking-elon-musk-and-bill-gates-warn-about-artificial-intelligence
2. PBS. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/driver-killed-in-self-driving-car-accident-for-first-time
3. Lee, D.D.: Review of a pivotal human factors article: “humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse”. Hum. Factors 50, 404–410 (2008)
4. Parasuraman, R., Riley, V.: Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Hum. Factors 39, 230–253 (1997)
5. Parasuraman, R., Manzey, D.H.: Complacency and bias in human use of automation: an attentional integration. Hum. Factors 52, 381–410 (2010)
6. Billings, C.E.: Human-Centered Aviation Automation: Principles and Guidelines. NASA, Washington, DC (1996). NASA-TM-110381
7. Chen, J.Y.C., Barnes, M.J.: Human-Agent Teaming for Multi-Robot Control: A Literature Review. Army Research Lab Technical report, ARL-TR-6328 (2013)
8. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/03/the-robot-will-see-you-now/309216/
9. Christoffersen, K., Woods, D.D.: How to make automated systems team players. In: Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research, vol. 2, pp. 1–12. Emerald Group Publishing Limited (2002)
10. Wiener, E.L.: Cockpit automation. In: Wiener, E.L., Nagel, D.C. (eds.) Human Factors in Aviation, pp. 433–461. Academic Press Inc., New York (1989)
11. Onken, R.:. The cockpit assistant system CASSY as an on-board player in the ATM environment. In: Proceedings of First Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, pp. 1–26 (1997)
12. Lyons, J.B., Saddler, G.G., Koltai, K., Battiste, H., Ho, N.T., Hoffmann, L.C., Smith, D., Johnson, W., Shively, R.: Shaping trust through transparent design: theoretical and experimental guidelines. Adv. Hum. Factors Robot. Unmanned Syst. 499, 127–136 (2017)
13. Sadler, G., Battiste, H., Ho, N., Hoffmann, L., Johnson, W., Shively, R., Lyons, J., Smith, D.: Effects of transparency on pilot trust and agreement in the autonomous constrained flight planner. In: Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) IEEE/AIAA 35th, pp. 1–9. IEEE (2016)
14. Lee, D.D., See, K.A.: Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum. Factors 46, 50–80 (2004)
15. Lees, M.N., Lee, J.D.: The influence of distraction and driving context on driver response to imperfect collision warning systems. Ergonomics 50, 1264–1286 (2007)
16. Hergeth, S., Lorenz, L., Vilimek, R., Krems, J.F.: keep your scanners peeled: gace behavior as a measure of automation trust during highly automated driving. Hum. Factors 58, 5–27 (2016)
17. Endsley, M.R.: From here to autonomy: lessons learned from human-automation research. Hum. Factors 59, 5–27 (2017)
18. Christoffersen, K., Woods, D.D.: How to make automated systems team players. In: Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research, pp. 1–12. Emerald Group Publishing Limited (2002)
19. Alberts, D.S., Garstka, J.J., Hayes, R.E., Signori, D.A.: Understanding Information Age Warfare. Command Control Research Program, Washington, DC (2001)
20. Chen, J.Y.C., Barnes, M.J., Harper-Sciarini, M.: Supervisory control of multiple robots: human performance issues and user interface design. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.–Part C: Appl. Rev. 41, 435–454 (2011)
21. Lyons, J.B.: Being transparent about transparency: a model for human robot interaction. In: AIAA Spring Symposium Series (2013)
22. Miller, C.A., Parasuraman, R.: Designing for flexible interaction between humans and automation: delegation interfaces for supervisory control. Hum. Factors 49, 57–75 (2007)