A review of non-invasive sensory feedback methods for transradial prosthetic hands

IEEE Access

Volumn 6, Issue , 2018, Pages 6878-6899

  Stephens Fripp, Benjamin ^a   Alici, Gursel ^a   Mutlu, Rahim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

Electrotactile stimulation; Mechanotactile stimulation; Non invasive; Prosthetics; Sensory feedback; Vibrotactile stimulation

Indexed keywords

AUGMENTED REALITY; DENTAL PROSTHESES; NONINVASIVE MEDICAL PROCEDURES; PROSTHETICS; SENSORS; SENSORY FEEDBACK; SKIN; SURGERY; VIBRATIONS (MECHANICAL);

ELECTROTACTILE STIMULATION; MECHANOTACTILE STIMULATION; NON-INVASIVE; PROSTHETIC HANDS; VIBRATIONS; VIBROTACTILE;

FEEDBACK;

EID: 85041204709     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21693536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2791583     Document Type: Review

References (109)

1. R. S. Johansson and J. R. Flanagan, Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks, Nature Rev. Neurosci., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 345-359, May 2009.
2. D. J. Atkins, D. C. Y. Heard, and W. H. M. Donovan, Epidemiologic overview of individuals with upper-limb loss and their reported research priorities, J. Prosthetics Orthotics, vol. 8, pp. 2-11, Jan. 1996.
3. E. A. Biddiss and T. T. Chau, Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years, Prosthetics Orthotics Int., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 236-257, 2007.
4. E. Biddiss and T. Chau, Upper-limb prosthetics: Critical factors in device abandonment, Amer. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil., vol. 86, no. 12, pp. 977-987, 2007.
5. M. D. Alonzo, F. Clemente, and C. Cipriani, Vibrotactile stimulation promotes embodiment of an alien hand in amputees with phantom sensations, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 450-457, May 2015.
6. H. H. Ehrsson, B. Rosen, A. Stockselius, C. Ragno, P. Kohler, and G. Lundborg, Upper limb amputees can be induced to experience a rubber hand as their own, Brain, vol. 131, pp. 3443-3452, Dec. 2008.
7. L. Schmalzl, A. Kalckert, C. Ragnö, and H. H. Ehrsson, Neural correlates of the rubber hand illusion in amputees: A report of two cases, Neurocase, vol. 20, pp. 407-420, May 2013.
8. J. D. Brown, T. S. Kunz, D. Gardner, M. K. Shelley, A. J. Davis, and R. B. Gillespie, An empirical evaluation of force feedback in bodypowered prostheses, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 215-226, Mar. 2017.
9. R. Mann and S. Reimers, Kinesthetic sensing for the EMG controlled Boston arm, IEEE Trans. Man-Mach. Syst., vol.11, no. 1, pp. 110-115, Mar. 1970.
10. A. Chortos, J. Liu, and Z. Bao, Pursuing prosthetic electronic skin, Nature Mater., vol. 15, pp. 937-950, Sep. 2016.
11. C. M. Oddo et al., Intraneural stimulation elicits discrimination of textural features by artificial fingertip in intact and amputee humans, Elife, vol. 5, p. e09148, Mar. 2016.
12. E. L. Graczyk, M. A. Schiefer, H. P. Saal, B. P. Delhaye, S. J. Bensmaia, and D. J. Tyler, The neural basis of perceived intensity in natural and artificial touch, Sci. Transl. Med., vol. 8, no. 362, p. 362-442, 2016.
13. G. W. Vidal, M. L. Rynes, Z. Kelliher, and S. J. Goodwin, Review of brain-machine interfaces used in neural prosthetics with new perspective on somatosensory feedback through method of signal breakdown, Sci. (Cairo), vol. 2016, p. 8956432, May 2016.
14. D. Perruchoud, I. Pisotta, S. Carda, M. M. Murray, and S. Ionta, Biomimetic rehabilitation engineering: The importance of somatosensory feedback for brain.machine interfaces, J. Neural Eng., vol. 13, p. 041001, Aug. 2016.
15. S. B. Godfrey, M. Bianchi, A. Bicchi, and M. Santello, Influence of force feedback on grasp force modulation in prosthetic applications: A preliminary study, in Proc. 38th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. (EMBC), Aug. 2016, pp. 5439-5442.
16. C. Antfolk et al., Transfer of tactile input from an artificial hand to the forearm: Experiments in amputees and able-bodied volunteers, Disabil-ity Rehabil., Assist. Technol., vol. 8, pp. 249-254, May 2013.
17. K. Kim and J. E. Colgate, Haptic feedback enhances grip force control of sEMG-controlled prosthetic hands in targeted reinnervation amputees, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 798-805, Nov. 2012.
18. C. Antfolk et al., Artificial redirection of sensation from prosthetic fingers to the phantom hand map on transradial amputees: Vibrotactile versus mechanotactile sensory feedback, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 112-120, Jan. 2013.
19. D. Zhang, H. Xu, P. B. Shull, J. Liu, and X. Zhu, Somatotopical feedback versus non-somatotopical feedback for phantom digit sensation on amputees using electrotactile stimulation, J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol. 12, p. 44, May 2015.
20. G. H. Chai et al., Phantom finger perception evoked with transcutaneous electrical stimulation for sensory feedback of prosthetic hand, in Proc. 6th Int. IEEE/EMBS Conf. Neural Eng. (NER), 2013, pp. 271-274.
21. X. X. Liu, G. H. Chai, H. E. Qu, and N. Lan, A sensory feedback system for prosthetic hand based on evoked tactile sensation, in Proc. 37th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. (EMBC), Aug. 2015, pp. 2493-2496.
22. G. Chai, X. Sui, S. Li, L. He, and N. Lan, Characterization of evoked tactile sensation in forearm amputees with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, J. Neural Eng., vol. 12, p. 066002, Dec. 2015.
23. P. Li, G. H. Chai, K. H. Zhu, N. Lan, and X. H. Sui, Effects of electrode size and spacing on sensory modalities in the phantom thumb perception area for the forearm amputees, in Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. (EMBS), Aug. 2015, pp. 3383-3386.
24. H. L. Benz et al., Upper extremity prosthesis user perspectives on unmet needs and innovative technology, in Proc. EMBC, Aug. 2016, pp. 287-290.
25. C. Cipriani, M. Controzzi, and M. C. Carrozza, Objectives, criteria and methods for the design of the SmartHand transradial prosthesis, Robotica, vol. 28, pp. 919-927, Oct. 2010.
26. B. Peerdeman et al., Myoelectric forearm prostheses: State of the art from a user-centered perspective, J. Rehabil. Res. Develop., vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 719-738, 2011.
27. R. A. Normann and E. Fernandez, Clinical applications of penetrating neural interfaces and utah electrode array technologies, J. Neural Eng., vol. 13, p. 061003, Dec. 2016.
28. B. T. Nghiem et al., Providing a sense of touch to prosthetic hands, Plastic Reconstrution Surg., vol. 135, pp. 1652-1663, Jun. 2015.
29. M. Ortiz-Catalan, B. Hakansson, and R. Branemark, An osseointegrated human-machine gateway for long-Term sensory feedback and motor control of artificial limbs, Sci. Transl. Med., vol. 6, p. 257-306, Oct. 2014.
30. T. S. Davis et al., Restoring motor control and sensory feedback in people with upper extremity amputations using arrays of 96 microelectrodes implanted in the median and ulnar nerves, J. Neural Eng., vol. 13, p. 036001, Jun. 2016.
31. P. Svensson, U.Wijk, A. Björkman, and C. Antfolk, A review of invasive and non-invasive sensory feedback in upper limb prostheses, Expert Rev. Med. Devices, vol. 14, pp. 439-447, Jun. 2017.
32. A. Saudabayev and H. A. Varol, Sensors for robotic hands: A survey of state of the art, IEEE Access, vol. 3, pp. 1765-1782, 2015.
33. J. S. Schofield, K. R. Evans, J. P. Carey, and J. S. Hebert, Applications of sensory feedback in motorized upper extremity prosthesis: A review, Expert Rev. Med. Devices, vol. 11, pp. 499-511, Sep. 2014.
34. C. Antfolk, M. D'Alonzo, B. Rosén, G. Lundborg, F. Sebelius, and C. Cipriani, Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics, Expert Rev. Med. Devices, vol. 10, pp. 45-54, Jan. 2013.
35. J. Kawamura, N. Fukui, M. Nakagawa, T. Fujishita, T. Aoyama, and H. Furukawa, The upper-limb amputees-A survey and trends in Kinki area of Japan, Jpn. J. Rehabil. Med., vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 384-389, 1999.
36. M. Markovic, S. Dosen, C. Cipriani, D. Popovic, and D. Farina, Stereovision and augmented reality for closed-loop control of grasping in hand prostheses, J. Neural Eng., vol. 11, no. 4, p. 046001, 2014.
37. G. Sriram, A. N. Jensen, and S. C. Chiu, Slippage control for a smart prosthetic hand prototype via modified tactile sensory feedback, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Electro/Inf. Technol., Jun. 2014, pp. 225-230.
38. W. Shaw-Cortez, D. Oetomo, C. Manzie, and P. Choong, Towards dynamic object manipulation with tactile sensing for prosthetic hands, in Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst. (IROS), Mar. 2016, pp. 1164-1169.
39. Y. Cho, K. Liang, F. Folowosele, B. Miller, and N. V. Thakor, Wireless temperature sensing cosmesis for prosthesis, in Proc. IEEE 10th Int. Conf. Rehabil. Robot., Jun. 2007, pp. 672-677.
40. Y. Ueda and C. Ishii, Development of a feedback device of temperature sensation for a myoelectric prosthetic hand by using Peltier element, in Proc. Int. Conf. Adv. Mech. Syst. (ICAMechS), 2016, pp. 488-493.
41. H. Yamada, Y. Yamanoi, K. Wakita, and R. Kato, Investigation of a cognitive strain on hand grasping induced by sensory feedback for myoelectric hand, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. (ICRA), May 2016, pp. 3549-3554.
42. A. Ninu, S. Dosen, S. Muceli, F. Rattay, H. Dietl, and D. Farina, Closedloop control of grasping with a myoelectric hand prosthesis: Which are the relevant feedback variables for force control? IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1041-1052, Sep. 2014.
43. M. Nabeel, Vibrotactile stimulation for 3D printed prosthetic hand, in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Robot. Artif. Intell. (ICRAI), 2016, pp. 202-207.
44. T. Rosenbaum-Chou, W. Daly, R. Austin, P. Chaubey, and D. A. Boone, Development and real world use of a vibratory haptic feedback system for upper-limb prosthetic users, J. Prosthetics Orthotics, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 136-144, 2016.
45. P. Chaubey, T. Rosenbaum-Chou, W. Daly, and D. Boone, Closed-loop vibratory haptic feedback in upper-limb prosthetic users, J. Prosthetics Orthotics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 120-127, 2014.
46. F. Clemente, M. D'Alonzo, M. Controzzi, B. B. Edin, and C. Cipriani, Non-invasive, temporally discrete feedback of object contact and release improves grasp control of closed-loop myoelectric transradial prostheses, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1314-1322, Dec. 2016.
47. N. Mohamad Hanif, P. Chappell, N. White, A. Cranny, and N. N. N. Hashim, Tactile to vibrotactile sensory feedback interface for prosthetic hand users, Presented at the IEEE EMBS Conf. Biomed. Eng. Sci. (IECBES), 2016.
48. T. Li, H. Huang, C. Antfolk, J. Justiz, and V. M. Koch, Tactile display on the remaining hand for unilateral hand amputees, Current Directions Biomed. Eng., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 399-403, 2016.
49. E. Raveh, J. Friedman, and S. Portnoy, Visuomotor behaviors and performance in a dual-Task paradigm with and without vibrotactile feedback when using a myoelectric controlled hand, Assist Technol, vol. 19, pp. 1-7, Jun. 2017.
50. C. J. Hasson and J. Manczurowsky, Effects of kinematic vibrotactile feedback on learning to control a virtual prosthetic arm, J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol. 12, p. 31, Mar. 2015.
51. J. M. Walker, A. A. Blank, P. A. Shewokis, and M. K. O'Malley, Tactile feedback of object slip facilitates virtual object manipulation, IEEE Trans. Haptics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 454-466, Dec. 2015.
52. M. Aziziaghdam and E. Samur, Providing contact sensory feedback for upper limb robotic prosthesis, in Proc. IEEE Haptics Symp. (HAPTICS), Feb. 2014, pp. 575-579.
53. T. Morita, T. Kikuchi, and C. Ishii, Development of sensory feedback device for myoelectric prosthetic hand to provide hardness of objects to users, J. Robot. Mechatron., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 361-370, 2016.
54. S. Casini, M. Morvidoni, M. Bianchi, M. Catalano, G. Grioli, and A. Bicchi, Design and realization of the CUFF-Clenching upper-limb force feedback wearable device for distributed mechano-Tactile stimulation of normal and tangential skin forces, in Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst. (IROS), Oct. 2015, pp. 1186-1193.
55. C. Antfolk, A. Björkman, S. O. Frank, F. Sebelius, G. Lundborg, and B. Rosen, Sensory feedback from a prosthetic hand based on airmediated pressure from the hand to the forearm skin, J. Rehabil. Med., vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 702-707, 2012.
56. A. Akhtar, M. Nguyen, L. Wan, B. Boyce, P. Slade, and T. Bretl, Passive mechanical skin stretch for multiple degree-of-freedom proprioception in a hand prosthesis, in Proc. Int. Conf. Human Haptic Sens. Touch Enabled Comput. Appl., 2014, pp. 120-128.
57. J. Wheeler, K. Bark, J. Savall, and M. Cutkosky, Investigation of rotational skin stretch for proprioceptive feedback with application to myoelectric systems, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 58-66, Feb. 2010.
58. N. Jorgovanovic, S. Dosen, D. J. Djozic, G. Krajoski, and D. Farina, Virtual grasping: Closed-loop force control using electrotactile feedback, Comput. Math. Methods Med., vol. 2014, Jan. 2014, Art. no. 120357.
59. M. Isakovi et al., Electrotactile feedback improves performance and facilitates learning in the routine grasping task, Eur. J. Transl. Myol, vol. 26, no. 3, p. 6069, Jun. 2016.
60. M. A. Schweisfurth, M. Markovic, S. Dosen, F. Teich, B. Graimann, and D. Farina, Electrotactile EMG feedback improves the control of prosthesis grasping force, J. Neural Eng., vol. 13, p. 056010, Oct. 2016.
61. P. Shi and X. Shen, Sensation feedback and muscle response of electrical stimulation on the upper limb skin: A case study, in Proc. ICMTMA, 2015, pp. 969-972.
62. H. Xu, D. Zhang, J. C. Huegel, W. Xu, and X. Zhu, Effects of different tactile feedback on myoelectric closed-loop control for grasping based on electrotactile stimulation, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 827-836, Aug. 2016.
63. K. Choi, P. Kim, K.-S. Kim, and S. Kim, Two-channel electrotactile stimulation for sensory feedback of fingers of prosthesis, in Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst. (IROS), Oct. 2016, pp. 1133-1138.
64. G. K. Patel, S. Dosen, C. Castellini, and D. Farina, Multichannel electrotactile feedback for simultaneous and proportional myoelectric control, J. Neural Eng., vol. 13, p. 056015, Oct. 2016.
65. D. Pamungkas and K. Ward, Electro-Tactile feedback system for a prosthetic hand, Presented at the Int. Conf. Mach.Vis. Mechatron. Pract., Twoowoomba, Qld, Australia, 2015.
66. M. Strbac et al., Integrated and flexible multichannel interface for electrotactile stimulation, J. Neural Eng., vol. 13, no. 4, p. 046014, Aug. 2016.
67. M. Franceschi, L. Seminara, L. Pinna, S. Dosen, D. Farina, and M. Valle, Preliminary evaluation of the tactile feedback system based on artificial skin and electrotactile stimulation, in Proc. 37th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. (EMBC), Aug. 2015, pp. 4554-4557.
68. C. Hartmann et al., Towards prosthetic systems providing comprehensive tactile feedback for utility and embodiment, in Proc. IEEE Biomed. Circuits Syst. Conf. (BioCAS), Oct. 2014, pp. 620-623.
69. S. Dosen, M.-C. Schaeffer, and D. Farina, Time-division multiplexing for myoelectric closed-loop control using electrotactile feedback, J. Neuro Eng. Rehabil., vol. 11, p. 138, Sep. 2014.
70. L. Jiang, Q. Huang, J. Zhao, D. Yang, S. Fan, and H. Liu, Noise cancellation for electrotactile sensory feedback of myoelectric forearm prostheses, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Inf. Autom. (ICIA), Jul. 2014, pp. 1066-1071.
71. B. Xu et al., An epidermal stimulation and sensing platform for sensorimotor prosthetic control, management of lower back exertion, and electrical muscle activation, Adv. Mater., vol. 28, pp. 4462-4471, Jun. 2016.
72. S. Wilson and S. Dirven, Audio sensory substitution for human-in-Theloop force feedback of upper limb prosthetics, in Proc. 23rd Int. Conf. Mechatronics Mach. Vis. Pract. (MVIP), 2016, pp. 1-6.
73. A. Gibson and P. Artemiadis, Object discrimination using optimized multi-frequency auditory cross-modal haptic feedback, in Proc. 36th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., Aug. 2014, pp. 6505-6508.
74. J. Gonzalez, H. Suzuki, N. Natsumi, M. Sekine, and W. Yu, Auditory display as a prosthetic hand sensory feedback for reaching and grasping tasks, in Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., Sep. 2012, pp. 1789-1792.
75. M. Markovic, H. Karnal, B. Graimann, D. Farina, and S. Dosen, GLIMPSE: Google Glass interface for sensory feedback in myoelectric hand prostheses, J. Neural Eng., vol. 14, p. 036007, Jun. 2017.
76. F. Clemente, S. Dosen, L. Lonini, M. Markovic, D. Farina, and C. Cipriani, Humans can integrate augmented reality feedback in their sensorimotor control of a robotic hand, IEEE Trans. Human-Mach. Syst., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 583-589, Aug. 2017.
77. M. D'Alonzo, S. Dosen, C. Cipriani, and D. Farina, HyVE: Hybrid vibro-electrotactile stimulation for sensory feedback and substitution in rehabilitation, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 290-301, Mar. 2014.
78. M. D'Alonzo, S. Dosen, C. Cipriani, and D. Farina, Hyve-Hybrid vibro-electrotactile stimulation-Is an efficient approach to multi-channel sensory feedback, IEEE Trans. Haptics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 181-190, Apr./Jun. 2014.
79. F. Clemente and C. Cipriani, A novel device for multi-modal sensory feedback in hand prosthetics: Design and preliminary prototype, in Proc. IEEE Haptics Symp. (HAPTICS), Feb. 2014, pp. 569-573.
80. M. C. Jimenez and J. A. Fishel, Evaluation of force, vibration and thermal tactile feedback in prosthetic limbs, in Proc. IEEE Haptics Symp. (HAPTICS), Feb. 2014, pp. 437-441.
81. T. Li, H. Huang, J. Justiz, and V. M. Koch, A miniature multimodal actuator for effective tactile feedback: Design and characterization, Proc. Eng., vol. 168, pp. 1547-1550, 2016.
82. M. R. Motamedi, M. Otis, and V. Duchaine, The impact of simultaneously applying normal stress and vibrotactile stimulation for feedback of exteroceptive information, J. Biomech. Eng., vol. 139, no. 6, pp. 0610041-0610049, Jun. 2017.
83. H. J. Witteveen, H. S. Rietman, and P. H. Veltink, Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users, Prosthetics Orthotics Int., vol. 39, pp. 204-212, Jun. 2015.
84. A. Ajoudani et al., Exploring teleimpedance and tactile feedback for intuitive control of the pisa/IIT Soft Hand, IEEE Trans. Haptics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 203-215, Apr./Jun. 2014.
85. I. Saunders and S. Vijayakumar, The role of feed-forward and feedback processes for closed-loop prosthesis control, J. NeuroEng. Rehabil., vol. 8, p. 60, Oct. 2011.
86. C. Cipriani, M. D'Alonzo, and M. C. Carrozza, A miniature vibrotactile sensory substitution device for multi-fingered hand prosthetics, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 400-408, Feb. 2012.
87. J. Cohen, M. Niwa, R. W. Lindeman, H. Noma, Y. Yanagida, and K. Hosaka, A closed-loop tactor frequency control system for vibrotactile feedback, in Proc. Extended Abstracts Human Factors Comput. Syst., 2005, pp. 1296-1299.
88. C. E. Stepp, Q. An, and Y. Matsuoka, Repeated training with augmentative vibrotactile feedback increases object manipulation performance, PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 2, p. e32743, 2012.
89. C. E. Stepp and Y. Matsuoka, Vibrotactile sensory substitution for object manipulation: Amplitude versus pulse train frequency modulation, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 31-37, Jan. 2012.
90. C. Pylatiuk, A. Kargov, and S. Schulz, Design and evaluation of a low-cost force feedback system for myoelectric prosthetic hands, J. Prosthetics Orthotics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 57-61, 2006.
91. A. Chatterjee, P. Chaubey, J. Martin, and N. Thakor, Testing a prosthetic haptic feedback simulator with an interactive force matching task, J. Prosthetics Orthotics, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 27-34, 2008.
92. H. J. B. Witteveen, E. A. Droog, J. S. Rietman, and P. H. Veltink, Vibroand electrotactile user feedback on hand opening for myoelectric forearm prostheses, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 2219-2226, Aug. 2012.
93. M. A. F. Ismail and S. Shimada, Robot hand illusion under delayed visual feedback: Relationship between the senses of ownership and agency, PLoS ONE, vol. 11, p. e0159619, Jul. 2016.
94. S. Shimada, K. Fukuda, and K. Hiraki, Rubber hand illusion under delayed visual feedback, PLoS ONE, vol. 4, p. e6185, Jul. 2009.
95. A. Y. J. Szeto and F. A. Saunders, Electrocutaneous stimulation for sensory communication in rehabilitation engineering, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 300-308, Apr. 1982.
96. K. A. Kaczmarek, J. G. Webster, P. B. Rita, and W. J. Tompkins, Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1-16, Jan. 1991.
97. A.Y. Szeto and R. R. Riso, Sensory feedback using electrical stimulation of the tactile sense, in Rehabilitation Engineering, J. H. Leslie and R. V. Smith, Eds. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 1990, pp. 29-78.
98. D. W. Tan, M. A. Schiefer, M. W. Keith, J. R. Anderson, J. Tyler, and D. J. Tyler, A neural interface provides long-Term stable natural touch perception, Sci. Transl. Med., vol. 6, no. 257, p. 257-338, 2014.
99. E. Battaglia, J. P. Clark, M. Bianchi, M. G. Catalano, A. Bicchi, and M. K. O'Malley, The rice haptic rocker: Skin stretch haptic feedback with the pisa/IIT SoftHand, in Proc. World Haptics Conf. (WHC), Jun. 2017, pp. 7-12.
100. K. Bark, J. Wheeler, P. Shull, J. Savall, and M. Cutkosky, Rotational skin stretch feedback: A wearable haptic display for motion, IEEE Trans. Haptics, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 166-176, Jul./Sep. 2010.
101. A. Bjoörkman, U. Wijk, C. Antfolk, I. Bjorkman-Burtscher, and B. Rosen, Sensory Qualities of the Phantom Hand Map in the Residual Forearm of Amputees, J. Rehabil. Med., vol. 48, pp. 365-370, Apr. 2016.
102. H. Wang et al., Towards determining the afferent sites of perception feedback on residual arms of amputees with transcutaneous electrical stimulation, in Proc. 37th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. (EMBC), Aug. 2015, pp. 3367-3370.
103. J. T. Belter et al., Mechanical design and performance specifications of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: A review, J. Rehabil. Res. Develop., vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 599-618, 2013.
104. A. Blank, A. M. Okamura, and K. J. Kuchenbecker, Identifying the role of proprioception in upper-limb prosthesis control, ACM Trans. Appl. Perception, vol. 7, no. 3, 2010, Art. no. 15.
105. T. Pistohl, D. Joshi, G. Ganesh, A. Jackson, and K. Nazarpour, Artificial proprioceptive feedback for myoelectric control, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 498-507, May 2015.
106. F. Cordella et al., Literature review on needs of upper limb prosthesis users, Frontiers Neurosci., vol. 10, p. 209, May 2016.
107. M. Strbac et al., Short-And long-Term learning of feedforward control of a myoelectric prosthesis with sensory feedback by amputees, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 2133-2145, Nov. 2017.
108. G. Chai, D. Zhang, and X. Zhu, Developing non-somatotopic phantom finger sensation to comparable levels of somatotopic sensation through user training with electrotactile stimulation, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 469-480, May 2017.
109. R. Bekrater-Bodmann et al., The importance of synchrony and temporal order of visual and tactile input for illusory limb ownership experiences-An fMRI study applying virtual reality, PLoS ONE, vol. 9, p. e87013, Jan. 2014.