Somatotopical feedback versus non-somatotopical feedback for phantom digit sensation on amputees using electrotactile stimulation

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Zhang, Dingguo ^a   Xu, Heng ^a   Shull, Peter B ^a   Liu, Jianrong ^a   Zhu, Xiangyang ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Amputees; Electrotactile stimulation; Non Somatotopical feedback; Phantom digit somatotopy; Somatotopical feedback

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; DISABLED PERSON; ELECTROSTIMULATION; ELECTROTACTILE STIMULATION; FEMALE; FINGER AMPUTATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDEX FINGER; MALE; MENTAL TASK; MIDDLE AGED; NON SOMATOTOPICAL FEEDBACK; ORIENTATION; PHANTOM; PHANTOM PAIN; PILOT STUDY; POWER SUPPLY; PRESSURE SENSATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE RATE; RESPONSE TIME; SELF EVALUATION; SKIN SENSATION; SOMATOTOPICAL FEEDBACK; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TACTILE FEEDBACK; TACTILE STIMULATION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; AMPUTATION STUMP; AMPUTEE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHANTOM LIMB; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SENSORY FEEDBACK; TOUCH; TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATION;

AMPUTATION STUMPS; AMPUTEES; ARM; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; HUMANS; PHANTOM LIMB; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TOUCH; TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRIC NERVE STIMULATION;

EID: 84928617437     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-015-0037-1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Childress DS. Closed-loop control in prosthetic systems: historical perspective. Ann Biomed Eng. 1980; 8(4):293-303.
2. Gonzalez J, Soma H, Sekine M, Yu W, et al.Psycho-physiological assessment of a prosthetic hand sensory feedback system based on an auditory display: a preliminary study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012; 9(1):1-14.
3. Herberts P, Körner L. Ideas on sensory feedback in hand prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1979; 3(3):157-62.
4. Jiang N, Dosen S, Müller KR, Farina D. Myoelectric control of artificial limbs-is there a need to change focus. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2012; 29(5):152-0.
5. Altinsoy ME, Merchel S. Electrotactile feedback for handheld devices with touch screen and simulation of roughness. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2012; 5(1):6-13.
6. Kaczmarek KA. Electrotactile adaptation on the abdomen: Preliminary results. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2000; 8(4):499-505.
7. Kaczmarek KA, Tyler ME, Brisben AJ, Johnson KO. The afferent neural response to electrotactile stimuli: preliminary results. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2000; 8(2):268-70.
8. Antfolk C, D'Alonzo M, Rosén B, Lundborg G, Sebelius F, Cipriani C. Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics. 2013.
9. Buma DG, Buitenweg JR, Veltink PH. Intermittent stimulation delays adaptation to electrocutaneous sensory feedback. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007; 15(3):435-41.
10. Yamamoto A, Nagasawa S, Yamamoto H, Higuchi T. Electrostatic tactile display with thin film slider and its application to tactile telepresentation systems. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2006; 12(2):168-77.
11. Perović M, Stevanović M, Jevtić T, Štrbac M, Bijelić G, Vučetić Č, et al. J Automatic Control. 2013; 21(1):13-18.
12. Antfolk C, Cipriani C, Carrozza MC, Balkenius C, Björkman A, Lundborg G, et al. Transfer of tactile input from an artificial hand to the forearm: experiments in amputees and able-bodied volunteers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013; 8(3):249-54.
13. Antfolk C, Bjorkman A, Frank SO, Sebelius F, Lundborg G, Rosen B. Sensory feedback from a prosthetic hand based on air-mediated pressure from the hand to the forearm skin. J Rehabil Med. 2012; 44(8):702-7.
14. Cipriani C, Antfolk C, Balkenius C, Rosén B, Lundborg G, Carrozza MC, et al. A novel concept for a prosthetic hand with a bidirectional interface: a feasibility study. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009; 56(11):2739.
15. Chai G, Li S, Sui X, Mei Z, He L, Zhong C, et al. Phantom finger perception evoked with transcutaneous electrical stimulation for sensory feedback of prosthetic hand. In: 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER): 2013. p. 271-4.
16. Antfolk C, D'Alonzo M, Controzzi M, Lundborg G, Rosen B, Sebelius F, et al. Artificial redirection of sensation from prosthetic fingers to the phantom hand map on transradial amputees: vibrotactile versus mechanotactile sensory feedback. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013; 21(1):112-20.
17. Stepp CE, Matsuoka Y. Object manipulation improvements due to single session training outweigh the differences among stimulation sites during vibrotactile feedback. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2011; 19(6):677-85.
18. Cipriani C, D'Alonzo M, Carrozza MC. A miniature vibrotactile sensory substitution device for multifingered hand prosthetics. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012; 59(2):400-8.
19. Witteveen HJ, Droog EA, Rietman JS, Veltink PH. Vibro-and electrotactile user feedback on hand opening for myoelectric forearm prostheses. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012; 59(8):2219-226.
20. Damian DD, Arita A, Martinez H, Pfeifer R. Slip speed feedback for grip force control. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012; 59(8):2200-210.
21. Witteveen HJ, Luft F, Rietman JS, Veltink PH. Stiffness feedback for myoelectric forearm prostheses using vibrotactile stimulation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013; 22(1):53-61.
22. Rombokas E, Stepp CE, Chang C, Malhotra M, Matsuoka Y. Vibrotactile sensory substitution for electromyographic control of object manipulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013; 60(8):2226-232.
23. D'Alonzo M, Cipriani C, Carrozza MC. Vibrotactile sensory substitution in multi-fingered hand prostheses: Evaluation studies. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR): 2011. p. 1-6.
24. Antfolk C, Balkenius C, Lundborg G, Rosén B, Sebelius F. Design and technical construction of a tactile display for sensory feedback in a hand prosthesis system. Biomed Eng Online. 2010; 9(1):50.
25. Saunders I, Vijayakumar S. The role of feed-forward and feedback processes for closed-loop prosthesis control. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011; 8(60):1-12.
26. Seps M, Dermitzakis K, Hernandez-Arieta A. Study on lower back electrotactile stimulation characteristics for prosthetic sensory feedback. In: 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS): 2011. p. 3454-459.
27. Ehrsson HH, Rosén B, Stockselius A, Ragnö C, Köhler P, Lundborg G. Upper limb amputees can be induced to experience a rubber hand as their own. Brain. 2008; 131(12):3443-452.
28. Björkman A, Weibull A, Olsrud J, Henrik Ehrsson H, Rosén B, Björkman-Burtscher IM. Phantom digit somatotopy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in forearm amputees. Eur J Neurosci. 2012; 36(1):2098-106.
29. van der Riet D, Stopforth R, Bright G, Diegel O. Simultaneous vibrotactile feedback for multisensory upper limb prosthetics. In: IEEE Robotics and Mechatronics Conference (RobMech), 2013 6th: 2013. p. 64-9.
30. Nolan MF. Two-point discrimination assessment in the upper limb in young adult men and women. Phys Ther. 1982; 62(7):965-9.
31. Folgheraiter M, Gini G, Vercesi D. A multi-modal haptic interface for virtual reality and robotics. J Intell Robot Syst. 2008; 52(3-4):465-88.
32. Kajimoto H, Kawakami N, Maeda T, Tachi S. Electro-tactile display with tactile primary color approach. Graduate School of Information and Technology, The University of Tokyo. 2004.
33. Geng B, Yoshida K, Jensen W. Impacts of selected stimulation patterns on the perception threshold in electrocutaneous stimulation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011; 8(9).
34. Warren JP, Bobich LR, Santello M, Sweeney JD, Tillery SIH. Receptive field characteristics under electrotactile stimulation of the fingertip. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2008; 16(4):410-5.
35. Hart SG. Nasa-task load index (nasa-tlx); 20 years later. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting: 2006. p. 904-8.
36. Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of nasa-tlx (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv Psychol. 1988; 52:139-83.
37. Haapalainen E, Kim S, Forlizzi JF, Dey AK. Psycho-physiological measures for assessing cognitive load. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing: 2010. p. 301-10.
38. Kuiken TA, Marasco PD, Lock BA, Harden RN, Dewald JP. Redirection of cutaneous sensation from the hand to the chest skin of human amputees with targeted reinnervation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007; 104(50):20061-0066.